Analysis of Spatial Relationship Based on Ecosystem Services and Ecological Risk Index in the Counties of Chongqing

• Published in: Land (Basel) Vol. 12; no. 10; p. 1830
• Main Authors: Li, Zihui, Zhu, Kangwen, Song, Dan, Guan, Dongjie, Cao, Jiameng, Su, Xiangyuan, Zhang, Yanjun, Zhang, Ya, Ba, Yong, Wang, Haoyu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.10.2023
• Subjects: Computer centers; Distribution; driving factors; Ecological effects; Economic development; Ecosystem services; Ecosystems; Environmental aspects; Environmental economics; Environmental impact; Environmental security; ES-DPSIR model; GDP; Gross Domestic Product; Identification and classification; land; risk; Risk assessment; River ecology; Security; Spatial analysis; Spatial distribution; spatial relationships; Sustainable development; Urban areas; China; Yangtze River
• DOI: 10.3390/land12101830
• ISSN: 2073-445X

Due to the insufficient research on the spatial relationship and driving mechanism of ecosystem services and ecological risks and the current background of rising ecological risks and dysfunctional ecosystem services in local areas, analyzing the relationship and driving mechanism is an urgent task in order to safeguard regional ecological security and improve ecosystem services at present. Taking Chongqing as an example, the study scientifically identifies the spatial relationship between ecosystem services and ecological risks and their driving factors at district and county scales based on the constructed Ecosystem Service—Driver–Pressures–Status–Impacts–Responses (ES-DPSIR) model. The main findings include (1) significant variation in the spatial distribution of the comprehensive ecosystem service index, where the lowest ecosystem service index (0.013) was found in the main urban area of Chongqing and the scores gradually increased outward from this center, reaching 0.689 in the outermost areas; (2) an increase in the comprehensive ecological risk index from east to west, ranging from −0.134 to 0.333; (3) a prominent spatial relationship between ecosystem services and ecological risks, with 52.63% of the districts and counties being imbalanced or mildly imbalanced; and (4) significant differences between development trends of ecosystem services-–ecological risks, including 60.53% imbalanced and 30.47% mildly balanced districts. This study identified and analyzed the spatial change characteristics of ecosystem services and ecological risks based on the ES-DPSIR model, explored the driving factors, and provided new ideas for the relationship and driving research. The results of the study could provide effective ways and references for improving regional ecological security and enhancing the capacity of ecosystem services.