Abnormal eye movement features in patients with depression: Preliminary findings based on eye tracking technology

• Published in: General hospital psychiatry Vol. 84; pp. 25 - 30
• Main Authors: Gao, Mingzhou, Xin, Rongrong, Wang, Qingxiang, Gao, Dongmei, Wang, Jieqiong, Yu, Yanhong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2023
• Subjects: Auxiliary diagnosis; Biomarkers; Depression; Eye movement deficits; Eye-tracking; Biomarkers; Depression; Auxiliary diagnosis; Eye-tracking; Eye movement deficits
• DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2023.04.010
• ISSN: 0163-8343; 1873-7714

Saccadic eye movement (SEM) has been considered a non-invasive potential biomarker for the diagnosis of depression in recent years, but its application is not yet mature. In this study, we used eye-tracking technology to identify the eye movements of patients with depression to develop a new method for objectively identifying depression. Thirty-six patients with depression as the depression group, while thirty-six matched healthy individuals as the control group were recruited and completed eye movement tests, including two tasks: the prosaccade task and the antisaccade task. iViewX RED 500 eye-tracking instruments from SMI were used to collect eye movement data for both groups. In the prosaccade task, there was no difference between the depression and control groups(t = 0.019， P > 0.05). In general, with increasing angle, both groups showed significantly higher peak velocity (F = 81.72， P < 0.0001), higher mean velocity (F = 32.83, P = 0.000), and greater SEM amplitude (F = 24.23, P < 0.0001). In the antisaccade task, there were significant differences in correct rate (t = 3.219, P = 0.002) and mean velocity (F = 3.253， P < 0.05) between the depression group and the control group. In the anti-effect analysis, there were significant differences in correct rate (F = 67.44, P < 0.0001) and accuracy (F = 79.02, P < 0.0001) between the depression group and the control group. Both groups showed longer latency and worse correct rate and precision in the antisaccade task compared with the prosaccade task. Patients with depression showed different eye movement features, which could be potential biomarkers for clinical identification. Further studies must validate these results with larger sample sizes and more clinical populations.