Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g

Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g). We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or hea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inYonsei medical journal Vol. 61; no. 12; pp. 1054 - 1059
Main Authors Lee, Sa Ra, Lee, Eun Sil, Lee, Young-Jae, Lee, Shin-Wha, Park, Jeong Yeol, Kim, Dae-Yeon, Kim, Sung Hoon, Kim, Yong-Man, Suh, Dae-Shik, Kim, Young-Tak
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Yonsei University College of Medicine 01.12.2020
연세대학교의과대학
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0513-5796
1976-2437
1976-2437
DOI10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054

Cover

Abstract Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g). We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavy myomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni's test, and multiple linear regression were used. No differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myoma diameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, =0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in the AM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, =0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosal myomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALM group also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different between the two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, <0.0001) affecting the EBL. RALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time.
AbstractList Purpose: Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy(RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g). Materials and Methods: We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavymyomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni’s test, and multiple linearregression were used. Results: No differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myomadiameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, p=0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in theAM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, p=0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosalmyomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALMgroup also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different betweenthe two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, p<0.0001) affecting the EBL. Conclusion: RALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorterhospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time. KCI Citation Count: 0
Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g). We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavy myomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni's test, and multiple linear regression were used. No differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myoma diameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, =0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in the AM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, =0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosal myomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALM group also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different between the two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, <0.0001) affecting the EBL. RALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time.
Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g).PURPOSEHere, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g).We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavy myomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni's test, and multiple linear regression were used.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavy myomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni's test, and multiple linear regression were used.No differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myoma diameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, p=0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in the AM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, p=0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosal myomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALM group also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different between the two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, p<0.0001) affecting the EBL.RESULTSNo differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myoma diameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, p=0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in the AM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, p=0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosal myomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALM group also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different between the two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, p<0.0001) affecting the EBL.RALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time.CONCLUSIONRALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time.
Author Kim, Yong-Man
Lee, Young-Jae
Kim, Young-Tak
Lee, Shin-Wha
Park, Jeong Yeol
Kim, Dae-Yeon
Lee, Eun Sil
Lee, Sa Ra
Suh, Dae-Shik
Kim, Sung Hoon
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– name: 2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sa Ra
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7890-8348
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Sa Ra
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Eun Sil
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4132-5533
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Eun Sil
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Young-Jae
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6557-2454
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Young-Jae
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Shin-Wha
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5088-1905
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Shin-Wha
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jeong Yeol
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2475-7123
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Jeong Yeol
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Dae-Yeon
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8068-3475
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Dae-Yeon
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Sung Hoon
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2567-2092
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Sung Hoon
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Yong-Man
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3225-5748
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Yong-Man
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Dae-Shik
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1861-3203
  surname: Suh
  fullname: Suh, Dae-Shik
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Young-Tak
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2126-8503
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Young-Tak
  organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002648304$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp9kkFv1DAQhS1URLeFX4CEfIRDwoydxPEFaVUVqLQIqRRxtBzHSd0m8WJnV1p-Pd7dFhUOyIeRPO997zDvjJxMfrKEvEbIOS_k-914lzNgkFeYI8sRyuIZWaAUVcYKLk7IAkrkWSlkdUrOYrwDYAKBvSCnnLMSRQ0Lsr32jZ-zZYwuzralK73WwUfj187QLzs_WjP7cUe3NsRNpMum9aOb9PB01_mQfKG3h08d6Tf3K6F88lAEakaaBD-s62_d1FNWAu1fkuedHqJ99TDPyfePlzcXn7PV109XF8tVZgou50yi1ljLCrDuCik1A4t1C9C2xjZgZVmZiqG2tWgYB1HIokWBvDSywa4wgp-Td0fuFDp1b5zy2h1m79V9UMvrmyuV8ILVMmk_HLXrTTPalDDNQQ9qHdyow-7g_HszudvE2SohAGpRJ8DbB0DwPzc2zmp00dhh0JP1m6hYUZUivZIl6ZunWX9CHg-TBPIoMOkaMdhOGTfr2fl9tBsUgtqXQKUSqH0JVIUKmdqXIHn5P95H_P9cvwF-d7Xs
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10132930
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2024_03_015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_024_01953_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13224_023_01852_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_15485
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12124134
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60010064
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10040654
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.011
10.1080/13645706.2018.1442349
10.1097/GRF.0000000000000489
10.4293/108680812X13462882736736
10.1016/j.jmig.2011.09.007
10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.010
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11918.x
10.1016/j.tjog.2014.11.004
10.1111/1471-0528.14640
10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.010
10.1002/rcs.2061
10.1089/lap.2019.0313
10.1016/j.tjog.2018.10.004
10.1097/AOG.0b013e318207854f
10.1056/NEJMcp1411029
10.1155/2016/2789201
10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.754
10.1097/AOG.0000000000002035
10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.008
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.01.012
10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.014
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.006
10.1007/s00404-017-4490-x
10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020.
Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020 2020 Yonsei University College of Medicine
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020.
– notice: Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020 2020 Yonsei University College of Medicine
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1976-2437
EndPage 1059
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9607289
PMC7700878
33251780
10_3349_ymj_2020_61_12_1054
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National IT Industry Promotion Agency
  grantid: A0602-19-1032
– fundername: Soonchunhyang University
– fundername: ;
– fundername: ;
  grantid: A0602-19-1032
GroupedDBID ---
.55
.GJ
123
29R
2WC
36B
5-W
53G
5RE
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ACYCR
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AEGXH
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EF.
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
KQ8
L7B
M48
MK0
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
RNS
RPM
SV3
TR2
X7M
XSB
ZGI
ZXP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
M~E
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-91aa1896018f499a20e18d00ddceb0e956c621ae87b2307494d17135c9b1f4c73
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 0513-5796
1976-2437
IngestDate Sun Mar 09 07:51:56 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:06:34 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 04:12:01 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:57:28 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:03:21 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:23 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Keywords robotic surgical procedures
open abdomen techniques
uterine myomectomy
Fertility
Language English
License Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c439t-91aa1896018f499a20e18d00ddceb0e956c621ae87b2307494d17135c9b1f4c73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Sa Ra Lee and Eun Sil Lee contributed equally to this work.
https://www.eymj.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054
ORCID 0000-0003-4132-5533
0000-0003-1861-3203
0000-0002-8068-3475
0000-0002-7890-8348
0000-0003-3225-5748
0000-0002-2126-8503
0000-0003-2567-2092
0000-0001-6557-2454
0000-0002-5088-1905
0000-0003-2475-7123
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054
PMID 33251780
PQID 2465757552
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9607289
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7700878
proquest_miscellaneous_2465757552
pubmed_primary_33251780
crossref_citationtrail_10_3349_ymj_2020_61_12_1054
crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2020_61_12_1054
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Yonsei medical journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Yonsei Med J
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
연세대학교의과대학
Publisher_xml – name: Yonsei University College of Medicine
– name: 연세대학교의과대학
References Cheng (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref26) 2015; 54
Cezar (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref3) 2017; 296
Stewart (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref2) 2017; 124
Wright (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref9) 2012; 16
Stewart (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref1) 2015; 372
Srivastava (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref21) 2018; 228
Wang (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref23) 2018; 27
Lim (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref8) 2016; 133
Yuk (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref16) 2019; 29
Chang (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref15) 2015; 22
Advincula (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref12) 2007; 14
Judd (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref10) 2010; 17
Stanhiser (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref5) 2015; 22
Frederick (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref20) 1994; 101
Barakat (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref22) 2011; 117
Flyckt (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref24) 2016; 2016
Bedient (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref13) 2009; 201
Vargas (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref25) 2017; 24
Mukhopadhaya (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref4) 2008; 22
Behera (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref11) 2012; 19
Lethaby (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref19) 2017; 11
Lee (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref14) 2018; 57
10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref18
Won (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref17) 2020; 16
Varghese (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref7) 2019; 62
Stentz (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref6) 2017; 129
References_xml – volume: 17
  start-page: 493
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref10
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.011
– volume: 27
  start-page: 249
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref23
  publication-title: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol
  doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1442349
– volume: 62
  start-page: 733
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref7
  publication-title: Clin Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000489
– volume: 16
  start-page: 519
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref9
  publication-title: JSLS
  doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736
– volume: 19
  start-page: 52
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref11
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.09.007
– volume: 22
  start-page: S1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref5
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.010
– volume: 101
  start-page: 435
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref20
  publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11918.x
– volume: 54
  start-page: 39
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref26
  publication-title: Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.11.004
– volume: 124
  start-page: 1501
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref2
  publication-title: BJOG
  doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640
– volume: 133
  start-page: 359
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref8
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.010
– volume: 16
  start-page: e2061
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref17
  publication-title: Int J Med Robot
  doi: 10.1002/rcs.2061
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1475
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref16
  publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
  doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0313
– volume: 57
  start-page: 796
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref14
  publication-title: Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.10.004
– volume: 117
  start-page: 256
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref22
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318207854f
– volume: 372
  start-page: 1646
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref1
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1411029
– volume: 2016
  start-page: 2789201
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref24
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Int
  doi: 10.1155/2016/2789201
– volume: 22
  start-page: S211
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref15
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.754
– volume: 129
  start-page: 1007
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref6
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002035
– volume: 14
  start-page: 698
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref12
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.008
– volume: 22
  start-page: 677
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref4
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.01.012
– volume: 24
  start-page: 315
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref25
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.014
– volume: 228
  start-page: 279
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref21
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.006
– volume: 296
  start-page: 709
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref3
  publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4490-x
– volume: 201
  start-page: 566.e1
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref13
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049
– ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref18
– volume: 11
  start-page: CD000547
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref19
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
SSID ssj0027102
Score 2.2998881
Snippet Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with...
Purpose: Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy(RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1054
SubjectTerms Adult
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy - methods
Leiomyoma - pathology
Leiomyoma - surgery
Length of Stay
Middle Aged
Open Abdomen Techniques - methods
Operative Time
Original
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Robotics
Treatment Outcome
Uterine Myomectomy - methods
Uterine Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Neoplasms - surgery
의학일반
Title Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251780
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2465757552
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7700878
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002648304
Volume 61
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Yonsei Medical Journal, 2020, 61(12), , pp.1054-1059
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb9MwED6tQ5r2gsbvMFYZxCMZsePE7gOaJsQ0EOUBqLY3K3acrmxNtrRFdH_97tK0dGjsKVL8I7I_O_d99ukO4G1P2UJ5kqkuyUPp8yjUGvejFTqyseXKN9ka-t_S44H8cpqcbsAyK2o7gZM7pR3lkxrUF_t_ruYHuOE_kOKMZe_9fPwLhZ6I9lNOR3vIGGQHHqBpSkmN9aX-q8A4ufPs3tNwG7bimMJ4UZzINUvVKeviLhL6ry_lmnE62oGHLatkh4tl8Ag2fPkYtvrtvfkT-P29stU0RCwI1Zx9RRNJYSyry5Fj_Xk1prP78ZyRj8Zswg5tXjXJvtbLkN1iu3rom5fZhP0YXWNX5ALKeMTcmGGFEzppRWvIkPOw4VMYHH36-fE4bDMuhA6JyRT_fFnGNYoarguUQpmIPNd5FOU4PBt51FIuFTzzWllyIJc9mXPK8ed6lhfSqfgZbJZV6V8AK3gRW2R_VthMchfbzHPpElKUMpe2CEAsZ9e4Nhw5ZcW4MChLCB2D6BhCx6TccGEInQDerRpdLqJx3F_9DcJmzt3IUBRteg4rc14b1AqfDQ5TodwM4PUSVYNbi-5LstJXs4kRkm6lVJKIAJ4vUF59dblIAlC38F9VoA_eLilHZ034bqUoDqB--d8-d2GbBrJwmnkFm9N65veQ-kxtFzpJeNJtDg66zdK-Ab1LAJo
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robot-Assisted+Laparoscopic+Myomectomy+versus+Abdominal+Myomectomy+for+Large+Myomas+Sized+over+10+cm+or+Weighing+250+g&rft.jtitle=Yonsei+medical+journal&rft.au=Lee%2C+Sa+Ra&rft.au=Lee%2C+Eun+Sil&rft.au=Lee%2C+Young+Jae&rft.au=Lee%2C+Shin+Wha&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.eissn=1976-2437&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1054&rft_id=info:doi/10.3349%2Fymj.2020.61.12.1054&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33251780&rft.externalDocID=33251780
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0513-5796&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0513-5796&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0513-5796&client=summon