Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g
Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g). We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or hea...
Saved in:
Published in | Yonsei medical journal Vol. 61; no. 12; pp. 1054 - 1059 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
Yonsei University College of Medicine
01.12.2020
연세대학교의과대학 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0513-5796 1976-2437 1976-2437 |
DOI | 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054 |
Cover
Abstract | Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g).
We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavy myomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni's test, and multiple linear regression were used.
No differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myoma diameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm,
=0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in the AM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively,
=0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosal myomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALM group also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different between the two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89,
<0.0001) affecting the EBL.
RALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose: Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy(RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g).
Materials and Methods: We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavymyomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni’s test, and multiple linearregression were used.
Results: No differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myomadiameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, p=0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in theAM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, p=0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosalmyomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALMgroup also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different betweenthe two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, p<0.0001) affecting the EBL.
Conclusion: RALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorterhospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time. KCI Citation Count: 0 Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g). We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavy myomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni's test, and multiple linear regression were used. No differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myoma diameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, =0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in the AM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, =0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosal myomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALM group also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different between the two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, <0.0001) affecting the EBL. RALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time. Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g).PURPOSEHere, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g).We included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavy myomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni's test, and multiple linear regression were used.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe included 278 patients who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) or AM (n=151) for large or heavy myomas in a tertiary care hospital between April 2019 and June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni's test, and multiple linear regression were used.No differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myoma diameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, p=0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in the AM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, p=0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosal myomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALM group also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different between the two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, p<0.0001) affecting the EBL.RESULTSNo differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, or history of pelvic surgery between the two groups. Myoma diameters were not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, p=0.233), but myomas were lighter in the RALM group than in the AM group (444.6±283.14 g vs. 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, p=0.001). The RALM group had a higher proportion of subserosal myomas, fewer myomas, fewer large myomas over >3 cm, lighter myomas, and longer total operating time. However, the RALM group also had shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was not different between the two groups. The number of removed myomas was the most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, p<0.0001) affecting the EBL.RALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time.CONCLUSIONRALM is a feasible myomectomy technique even for large or heavy myomas. RALM patients tend to have shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative fevers within 48 hours. However, RALM has longer total operating time. |
Author | Kim, Yong-Man Lee, Young-Jae Kim, Young-Tak Lee, Shin-Wha Park, Jeong Yeol Kim, Dae-Yeon Lee, Eun Sil Lee, Sa Ra Suh, Dae-Shik Kim, Sung Hoon |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – name: 2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sa Ra orcidid: 0000-0002-7890-8348 surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Sa Ra organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Eun Sil orcidid: 0000-0003-4132-5533 surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Eun Sil organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Young-Jae orcidid: 0000-0001-6557-2454 surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Young-Jae organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Shin-Wha orcidid: 0000-0002-5088-1905 surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Shin-Wha organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Jeong Yeol orcidid: 0000-0003-2475-7123 surname: Park fullname: Park, Jeong Yeol organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 6 givenname: Dae-Yeon orcidid: 0000-0002-8068-3475 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Dae-Yeon organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 7 givenname: Sung Hoon orcidid: 0000-0003-2567-2092 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Sung Hoon organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 8 givenname: Yong-Man orcidid: 0000-0003-3225-5748 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Yong-Man organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 9 givenname: Dae-Shik orcidid: 0000-0003-1861-3203 surname: Suh fullname: Suh, Dae-Shik organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 10 givenname: Young-Tak orcidid: 0000-0002-2126-8503 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Young-Tak organization: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002648304$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp9kkFv1DAQhS1URLeFX4CEfIRDwoydxPEFaVUVqLQIqRRxtBzHSd0m8WJnV1p-Pd7dFhUOyIeRPO997zDvjJxMfrKEvEbIOS_k-914lzNgkFeYI8sRyuIZWaAUVcYKLk7IAkrkWSlkdUrOYrwDYAKBvSCnnLMSRQ0Lsr32jZ-zZYwuzralK73WwUfj187QLzs_WjP7cUe3NsRNpMum9aOb9PB01_mQfKG3h08d6Tf3K6F88lAEakaaBD-s62_d1FNWAu1fkuedHqJ99TDPyfePlzcXn7PV109XF8tVZgou50yi1ljLCrDuCik1A4t1C9C2xjZgZVmZiqG2tWgYB1HIokWBvDSywa4wgp-Td0fuFDp1b5zy2h1m79V9UMvrmyuV8ILVMmk_HLXrTTPalDDNQQ9qHdyow-7g_HszudvE2SohAGpRJ8DbB0DwPzc2zmp00dhh0JP1m6hYUZUivZIl6ZunWX9CHg-TBPIoMOkaMdhOGTfr2fl9tBsUgtqXQKUSqH0JVIUKmdqXIHn5P95H_P9cvwF-d7Xs |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10132930 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2024_03_015 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_024_01953_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13224_023_01852_x crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_15485 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12124134 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60010064 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10040654 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.011 10.1080/13645706.2018.1442349 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000489 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.09.007 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.010 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11918.x 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.11.004 10.1111/1471-0528.14640 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.010 10.1002/rcs.2061 10.1089/lap.2019.0313 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.10.004 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318207854f 10.1056/NEJMcp1411029 10.1155/2016/2789201 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.754 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002035 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.008 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.01.012 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.014 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.006 10.1007/s00404-017-4490-x 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020. Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020 2020 Yonsei University College of Medicine |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020. – notice: Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020 2020 Yonsei University College of Medicine |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1976-2437 |
EndPage | 1059 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9607289 PMC7700878 33251780 10_3349_ymj_2020_61_12_1054 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National IT Industry Promotion Agency grantid: A0602-19-1032 – fundername: Soonchunhyang University – fundername: ; – fundername: ; grantid: A0602-19-1032 |
GroupedDBID | --- .55 .GJ 123 29R 2WC 36B 5-W 53G 5RE 8JR 8XY 9ZL AAYXX ACYCR ADBBV ADRAZ AEGXH AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EF. EMB EMOBN F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE KQ8 L7B M48 MK0 O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT RNS RPM SV3 TR2 X7M XSB ZGI ZXP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF M~E NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-91aa1896018f499a20e18d00ddceb0e956c621ae87b2307494d17135c9b1f4c73 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 0513-5796 1976-2437 |
IngestDate | Sun Mar 09 07:51:56 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:06:34 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 04:12:01 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:57:28 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:03:21 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:23 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Keywords | robotic surgical procedures open abdomen techniques uterine myomectomy Fertility |
Language | English |
License | Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c439t-91aa1896018f499a20e18d00ddceb0e956c621ae87b2307494d17135c9b1f4c73 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Sa Ra Lee and Eun Sil Lee contributed equally to this work. https://www.eymj.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-4132-5533 0000-0003-1861-3203 0000-0002-8068-3475 0000-0002-7890-8348 0000-0003-3225-5748 0000-0002-2126-8503 0000-0003-2567-2092 0000-0001-6557-2454 0000-0002-5088-1905 0000-0003-2475-7123 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054 |
PMID | 33251780 |
PQID | 2465757552 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9607289 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7700878 proquest_miscellaneous_2465757552 pubmed_primary_33251780 crossref_citationtrail_10_3349_ymj_2020_61_12_1054 crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2020_61_12_1054 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-12-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2020 text: 2020-12-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Yonsei medical journal |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Yonsei Med J |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Yonsei University College of Medicine 연세대학교의과대학 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Yonsei University College of Medicine – name: 연세대학교의과대학 |
References | Cheng (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref26) 2015; 54 Cezar (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref3) 2017; 296 Stewart (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref2) 2017; 124 Wright (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref9) 2012; 16 Stewart (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref1) 2015; 372 Srivastava (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref21) 2018; 228 Wang (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref23) 2018; 27 Lim (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref8) 2016; 133 Yuk (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref16) 2019; 29 Chang (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref15) 2015; 22 Advincula (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref12) 2007; 14 Judd (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref10) 2010; 17 Stanhiser (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref5) 2015; 22 Frederick (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref20) 1994; 101 Barakat (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref22) 2011; 117 Flyckt (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref24) 2016; 2016 Bedient (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref13) 2009; 201 Vargas (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref25) 2017; 24 Mukhopadhaya (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref4) 2008; 22 Behera (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref11) 2012; 19 Lethaby (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref19) 2017; 11 Lee (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref14) 2018; 57 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref18 Won (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref17) 2020; 16 Varghese (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref7) 2019; 62 Stentz (10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref6) 2017; 129 |
References_xml | – volume: 17 start-page: 493 year: 2010 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref10 publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.011 – volume: 27 start-page: 249 year: 2018 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref23 publication-title: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1442349 – volume: 62 start-page: 733 year: 2019 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref7 publication-title: Clin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000489 – volume: 16 start-page: 519 year: 2012 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref9 publication-title: JSLS doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736 – volume: 19 start-page: 52 year: 2012 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref11 publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.09.007 – volume: 22 start-page: S1 year: 2015 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref5 publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.010 – volume: 101 start-page: 435 year: 1994 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref20 publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11918.x – volume: 54 start-page: 39 year: 2015 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref26 publication-title: Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.11.004 – volume: 124 start-page: 1501 year: 2017 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref2 publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640 – volume: 133 start-page: 359 year: 2016 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref8 publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.010 – volume: 16 start-page: e2061 year: 2020 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref17 publication-title: Int J Med Robot doi: 10.1002/rcs.2061 – volume: 29 start-page: 1475 year: 2019 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref16 publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0313 – volume: 57 start-page: 796 year: 2018 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref14 publication-title: Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.10.004 – volume: 117 start-page: 256 year: 2011 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref22 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318207854f – volume: 372 start-page: 1646 year: 2015 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref1 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1411029 – volume: 2016 start-page: 2789201 year: 2016 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref24 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Int doi: 10.1155/2016/2789201 – volume: 22 start-page: S211 year: 2015 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref15 publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.754 – volume: 129 start-page: 1007 year: 2017 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref6 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002035 – volume: 14 start-page: 698 year: 2007 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref12 publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.008 – volume: 22 start-page: 677 year: 2008 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref4 publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.01.012 – volume: 24 start-page: 315 year: 2017 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref25 publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.014 – volume: 228 start-page: 279 year: 2018 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref21 publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.006 – volume: 296 start-page: 709 year: 2017 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref3 publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4490-x – volume: 201 start-page: 566.e1 year: 2009 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref13 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049 – ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref18 – volume: 11 start-page: CD000547 year: 2017 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.12.1054_ref19 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev |
SSID | ssj0027102 |
Score | 2.2998881 |
Snippet | Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in patients with... Purpose: Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy(RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) in... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1054 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Female Humans Laparoscopy - methods Leiomyoma - pathology Leiomyoma - surgery Length of Stay Middle Aged Open Abdomen Techniques - methods Operative Time Original Pregnancy Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Robotics Treatment Outcome Uterine Myomectomy - methods Uterine Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Neoplasms - surgery 의학일반 |
Title | Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251780 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2465757552 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7700878 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002648304 |
Volume | 61 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Yonsei Medical Journal, 2020, 61(12), , pp.1054-1059 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb9MwED6tQ5r2gsbvMFYZxCMZsePE7gOaJsQ0EOUBqLY3K3acrmxNtrRFdH_97tK0dGjsKVL8I7I_O_d99ukO4G1P2UJ5kqkuyUPp8yjUGvejFTqyseXKN9ka-t_S44H8cpqcbsAyK2o7gZM7pR3lkxrUF_t_ruYHuOE_kOKMZe_9fPwLhZ6I9lNOR3vIGGQHHqBpSkmN9aX-q8A4ufPs3tNwG7bimMJ4UZzINUvVKeviLhL6ry_lmnE62oGHLatkh4tl8Ag2fPkYtvrtvfkT-P29stU0RCwI1Zx9RRNJYSyry5Fj_Xk1prP78ZyRj8Zswg5tXjXJvtbLkN1iu3rom5fZhP0YXWNX5ALKeMTcmGGFEzppRWvIkPOw4VMYHH36-fE4bDMuhA6JyRT_fFnGNYoarguUQpmIPNd5FOU4PBt51FIuFTzzWllyIJc9mXPK8ed6lhfSqfgZbJZV6V8AK3gRW2R_VthMchfbzHPpElKUMpe2CEAsZ9e4Nhw5ZcW4MChLCB2D6BhCx6TccGEInQDerRpdLqJx3F_9DcJmzt3IUBRteg4rc14b1AqfDQ5TodwM4PUSVYNbi-5LstJXs4kRkm6lVJKIAJ4vUF59dblIAlC38F9VoA_eLilHZ034bqUoDqB--d8-d2GbBrJwmnkFm9N65veQ-kxtFzpJeNJtDg66zdK-Ab1LAJo |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robot-Assisted+Laparoscopic+Myomectomy+versus+Abdominal+Myomectomy+for+Large+Myomas+Sized+over+10+cm+or+Weighing+250+g&rft.jtitle=Yonsei+medical+journal&rft.au=Lee%2C+Sa+Ra&rft.au=Lee%2C+Eun+Sil&rft.au=Lee%2C+Young+Jae&rft.au=Lee%2C+Shin+Wha&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.eissn=1976-2437&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1054&rft_id=info:doi/10.3349%2Fymj.2020.61.12.1054&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33251780&rft.externalDocID=33251780 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0513-5796&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0513-5796&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0513-5796&client=summon |