Evaluation of Different Cryoprotectant Combinations in Vitrification and Slow Freezing for Ovarian Tissue Preservation in Domestic Cats
ABSTRACT Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertil...
Saved in:
Published in | Reproduction in domestic animals Vol. 60; no. 4; pp. e70064 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2025
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0936-6768 1439-0531 1439-0531 |
DOI | 10.1111/rda.70064 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | ABSTRACT
Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm3 each. These fragments were randomly allocated to three different treatment groups for V (V1, V2 and V3) or SF (SF1, SF2 and SF3). Each group employed solutions with varying concentrations of DMSO, EG and either trehalose or sucrose. The assessment included histological evaluation, follicle counting, immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity, and ultrastructural examination. The results demonstrated that the V1 protocol—composed of an equilibration solution with 10% DMSO, 10% EG and 0.1 M trehalose, followed by a V solution with 20% DMSO, 20% EG and 0.1 M trehalose—proved most effective. This combination best preserved follicular morphology, reduced degeneration, supported follicle proliferation and maintained favourable ultrastructural integrity compared to other treatments. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving fertility preservation in domestic cats, with potential applications for endangered felid conservation programs. |
---|---|
AbstractList | ABSTRACT
Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm3 each. These fragments were randomly allocated to three different treatment groups for V (V1, V2 and V3) or SF (SF1, SF2 and SF3). Each group employed solutions with varying concentrations of DMSO, EG and either trehalose or sucrose. The assessment included histological evaluation, follicle counting, immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity, and ultrastructural examination. The results demonstrated that the V1 protocol—composed of an equilibration solution with 10% DMSO, 10% EG and 0.1 M trehalose, followed by a V solution with 20% DMSO, 20% EG and 0.1 M trehalose—proved most effective. This combination best preserved follicular morphology, reduced degeneration, supported follicle proliferation and maintained favourable ultrastructural integrity compared to other treatments. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving fertility preservation in domestic cats, with potential applications for endangered felid conservation programs. Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm3 each. These fragments were randomly allocated to three different treatment groups for V (V1, V2 and V3) or SF (SF1, SF2 and SF3). Each group employed solutions with varying concentrations of DMSO, EG and either trehalose or sucrose. The assessment included histological evaluation, follicle counting, immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity, and ultrastructural examination. The results demonstrated that the V1 protocol—composed of an equilibration solution with 10% DMSO, 10% EG and 0.1 M trehalose, followed by a V solution with 20% DMSO, 20% EG and 0.1 M trehalose—proved most effective. This combination best preserved follicular morphology, reduced degeneration, supported follicle proliferation and maintained favourable ultrastructural integrity compared to other treatments. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving fertility preservation in domestic cats, with potential applications for endangered felid conservation programs. Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm 3 each. These fragments were randomly allocated to three different treatment groups for V (V1, V2 and V3) or SF (SF1, SF2 and SF3). Each group employed solutions with varying concentrations of DMSO, EG and either trehalose or sucrose. The assessment included histological evaluation, follicle counting, immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity, and ultrastructural examination. The results demonstrated that the V1 protocol—composed of an equilibration solution with 10% DMSO, 10% EG and 0.1 M trehalose, followed by a V solution with 20% DMSO, 20% EG and 0.1 M trehalose—proved most effective. This combination best preserved follicular morphology, reduced degeneration, supported follicle proliferation and maintained favourable ultrastructural integrity compared to other treatments. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving fertility preservation in domestic cats, with potential applications for endangered felid conservation programs. Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm 3 each. These fragments were randomly allocated to three different treatment groups for V (V1, V2 and V3) or SF (SF1, SF2 and SF3). Each group employed solutions with varying concentrations of DMSO, EG and either trehalose or sucrose. The assessment included histological evaluation, follicle counting, immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity, and ultrastructural examination. The results demonstrated that the V1 protocol—composed of an equilibration solution with 10% DMSO, 10% EG and 0.1 M trehalose, followed by a V solution with 20% DMSO, 20% EG and 0.1 M trehalose—proved most effective. This combination best preserved follicular morphology, reduced degeneration, supported follicle proliferation and maintained favourable ultrastructural integrity compared to other treatments. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving fertility preservation in domestic cats, with potential applications for endangered felid conservation programs. Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm3 each. These fragments were randomly allocated to three different treatment groups for V (V1, V2 and V3) or SF (SF1, SF2 and SF3). Each group employed solutions with varying concentrations of DMSO, EG and either trehalose or sucrose. The assessment included histological evaluation, follicle counting, immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity, and ultrastructural examination. The results demonstrated that the V1 protocol-composed of an equilibration solution with 10% DMSO, 10% EG and 0.1 M trehalose, followed by a V solution with 20% DMSO, 20% EG and 0.1 M trehalose-proved most effective. This combination best preserved follicular morphology, reduced degeneration, supported follicle proliferation and maintained favourable ultrastructural integrity compared to other treatments. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving fertility preservation in domestic cats, with potential applications for endangered felid conservation programs.Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm3 each. These fragments were randomly allocated to three different treatment groups for V (V1, V2 and V3) or SF (SF1, SF2 and SF3). Each group employed solutions with varying concentrations of DMSO, EG and either trehalose or sucrose. The assessment included histological evaluation, follicle counting, immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity, and ultrastructural examination. The results demonstrated that the V1 protocol-composed of an equilibration solution with 10% DMSO, 10% EG and 0.1 M trehalose, followed by a V solution with 20% DMSO, 20% EG and 0.1 M trehalose-proved most effective. This combination best preserved follicular morphology, reduced degeneration, supported follicle proliferation and maintained favourable ultrastructural integrity compared to other treatments. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving fertility preservation in domestic cats, with potential applications for endangered felid conservation programs. Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm each. These fragments were randomly allocated to three different treatment groups for V (V1, V2 and V3) or SF (SF1, SF2 and SF3). Each group employed solutions with varying concentrations of DMSO, EG and either trehalose or sucrose. The assessment included histological evaluation, follicle counting, immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity, and ultrastructural examination. The results demonstrated that the V1 protocol-composed of an equilibration solution with 10% DMSO, 10% EG and 0.1 M trehalose, followed by a V solution with 20% DMSO, 20% EG and 0.1 M trehalose-proved most effective. This combination best preserved follicular morphology, reduced degeneration, supported follicle proliferation and maintained favourable ultrastructural integrity compared to other treatments. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving fertility preservation in domestic cats, with potential applications for endangered felid conservation programs. Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising this, it becomes imperative to implement strategies aimed at mitigating this concerning conservation scenario. For this, female fertility preservation is crucial in this context, and studies concerning this field are still scarce. In the realm of cryopreservation, prevalent methods involve slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V). This study aimed to evaluate various cryoprotective combinations for V or SF processes applied to domestic cat ovarian tissue. Twenty ovaries from 10 healthy cats were dissected, and cortical regions were sectioned into eight fragments measuring 3 mm³ each. These fragments were randomly allocated to three different treatment groups for V (V1, V2 and V3) or SF (SF1, SF2 and SF3). Each group employed solutions with varying concentrations of DMSO, EG and either trehalose or sucrose. The assessment included histological evaluation, follicle counting, immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity, and ultrastructural examination. The results demonstrated that the V1 protocol—composed of an equilibration solution with 10% DMSO, 10% EG and 0.1 M trehalose, followed by a V solution with 20% DMSO, 20% EG and 0.1 M trehalose—proved most effective. This combination best preserved follicular morphology, reduced degeneration, supported follicle proliferation and maintained favourable ultrastructural integrity compared to other treatments. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving fertility preservation in domestic cats, with potential applications for endangered felid conservation programs. |
Author | Aguiar, Beatriz Alves Lucci, Carolina Madeira Carvalho da Costa, Marcus Vinicius Rocha Silva, Ingrid Gracielle Martins Báo, Sônia Nair Rodrigues, Aline Queiroz Ribeiro, Rayane Brandão Piau, Tathyana Benetis Santos Bezerra, Julliene Larissa Silva, Jessyca Karoline Oliveira Goulart, Jair Trapé Paulini, Fernanda Ferreira, Yasmin Barboza Bellozi, Paula Maria Quaglio |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 Faculty of Health Sciences, Molecular Pharmacology Laboratory University of Brasilia Brasilia‐DF Brazil 2 Department of Cellular Biology University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences Brasilia‐DF Brazil 1 Department of Physiological Sciences University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences Brasilia‐DF Brazil |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Department of Cellular Biology University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences Brasilia‐DF Brazil – name: 1 Department of Physiological Sciences University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences Brasilia‐DF Brazil – name: 3 Faculty of Health Sciences, Molecular Pharmacology Laboratory University of Brasilia Brasilia‐DF Brazil |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rayane Brandão surname: Ribeiro fullname: Ribeiro, Rayane Brandão organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 2 givenname: Aline Queiroz surname: Rodrigues fullname: Rodrigues, Aline Queiroz organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 3 givenname: Beatriz Alves surname: Aguiar fullname: Aguiar, Beatriz Alves organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 4 givenname: Jessyca Karoline Oliveira surname: Silva fullname: Silva, Jessyca Karoline Oliveira organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 5 givenname: Marcus Vinicius Rocha surname: Carvalho da Costa fullname: Carvalho da Costa, Marcus Vinicius Rocha organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 6 givenname: Julliene Larissa surname: Santos Bezerra fullname: Santos Bezerra, Julliene Larissa organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 7 givenname: Yasmin Barboza surname: Ferreira fullname: Ferreira, Yasmin Barboza organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 8 givenname: Ingrid Gracielle Martins surname: Silva fullname: Silva, Ingrid Gracielle Martins organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 9 givenname: Tathyana Benetis surname: Piau fullname: Piau, Tathyana Benetis organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 10 givenname: Carolina Madeira surname: Lucci fullname: Lucci, Carolina Madeira organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 11 givenname: Sônia Nair surname: Báo fullname: Báo, Sônia Nair organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 12 givenname: Jair Trapé surname: Goulart fullname: Goulart, Jair Trapé organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences – sequence: 13 givenname: Paula Maria Quaglio surname: Bellozi fullname: Bellozi, Paula Maria Quaglio organization: University of Brasilia – sequence: 14 givenname: Fernanda orcidid: 0000-0003-4490-9614 surname: Paulini fullname: Paulini, Fernanda email: fepaulini@unb.br organization: University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40265625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFktFuFCEYhYmpsdvqhS9gSLzRi2n5B4Zhrkyz26pJkxqt3hKGgUozAyvMbLO-QF-7bKc2amLkhhC-c3IO_AdozwdvEHoJ5AjyOo6dOqoJ4ewJWgCjTUEqCntoQRrKC15zsY8OUromBCpR18_QPiMlr3hZLdDt6Ub1kxpd8DhYvHLWmmj8iJdxG9YxjEaPancMQ-v8PZew8_ibG6OzTs9K5Tv8pQ83-Cwa89P5K2xDxBcbFZ3y-NKlNBn8KZpk4mZWZItVGEwancZLNabn6KlVfTIvHvZD9PXs9HL5oTi_eP9xeXJe6NyLFa0wjHRQQ2UbqxvQqmG2KkEAU4rXLWihNAFRd11tjeFUUVG1nBJOm5q3JT1E72bf9dQOptO5alS9XEc3qLiVQTn554133-VV2EgoCXDGITu8eXCI4ceUG8jBJW36XnkTpiRpSTgI2nDxfxQaWoMoKc3o67_Q6zBFn59iRzFWCaC79K9-T_8Y-9d_ZuDtDOgYUorGPiJA5G5WZJ4VeT8rmT2e2RvXm-2_Qfl5dTIr7gDvN8E3 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s10815‐022‐02692‐w 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.431 10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.10.016 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.05.011 10.1007/s10344‐007‐0089‐z 10.1111/mam.12145 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2024.104861 10.1186/s13048‐015‐0137‐3 10.1002/(SICI)1098‐2795(199702)46:2<190::AID‐MRD9>3.0.CO;2‐L 10.1186/s13048‐014‐0102‐6 10.1016/S0093‐691X(03)00244‐9 10.1095/biolreprod.101.002204 10.1038/s41598‐019‐56585‐7 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.04.007 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.010 10.1016/S0093‐691X(99)00240‐X 10.3390/ani13010036 10.1111/rda.13357 10.1093/humrep/det449 10.3390/ani9121065 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.01.015 10.1016/j.xfss.2023.10.004 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.12.002 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.02.014 10.1186/1746‐6148‐9‐37 10.1007/978‐1‐4939‐0820‐2_14 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.07.013 10.1002/zoo.21416 10.1111/rda.12081 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.07.003 10.1016/S0093‐691X(01)00478‐2 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.02.015 10.1093/humrep/dep079 10.1093/humrep/deq131 10.12996/gmj.2023.55 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.05.003 10.1016/S0303‐7207(00)00294‐X 10.1111/conl.12285 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.07.003 10.1017/S0967199412000573 10.1111/j.1748‐1090.2010.00124.x 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01071 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.01.035 10.1093/humrep/dew144 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2004.01.002 10.1159/000225935 10.3389/fvets.2023.1134726 10.1126/science.1200674 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.12.016 10.1002/mrd.10196 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.06.011 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025 The Author(s). published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH. 2025 The Author(s). Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH. 2025. This work is published under Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License~http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 The Author(s). published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH. – notice: 2025 The Author(s). Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH. – notice: 2025. This work is published under Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License~http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 8FD FR3 P64 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM |
DOI | 10.1111/rda.70064 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Engineering Research Database CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE AGRICOLA |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Veterinary Medicine Agriculture |
EISSN | 1439-0531 |
EndPage | n/a |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC12016461 40265625 10_1111_rda_70064 RDA70064 |
Genre | researchArticle Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – fundername: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil – fundername: Universidade de Brasília – fundername: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1OB 1OC 24P 29P 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHQN AAHTB AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPEJ ABPVW ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHEFC AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBS ECGQY EJD EYRJQ F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HVLQZ HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2W P2X P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WIK WOHZO WOIKV WPGGZ WQJ WXSBR XG1 ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AAYXX CITATION AAHHS ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AIWBW AJBDE CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 8FD FR3 P64 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4394-b8e40d1715f9fc91ca94f521814aa67b1c8ac0187dd7fee63a385b63063976b23 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0936-6768 1439-0531 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:26:50 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 17:33:20 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 18:33:19 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 12 02:34:20 EDT 2025 Sat May 10 01:40:37 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 06 05:08:28 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 20 07:25:18 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | felines ovarian follicles animal reproduction cryopreservation |
Language | English |
License | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2025 The Author(s). Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4394-b8e40d1715f9fc91ca94f521814aa67b1c8ac0187dd7fee63a385b63063976b23 |
Notes | This study was financed by the Funding Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 and the University of Brasília. Rayane B. Ribeiro, Aline Q. Rodrigues and Tathyana B. Piau were supported by a National Counciil for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) fellowship. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Funding: This study was financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 and the University of Brasília. Rayane B. Ribeiro, Aline Q. Rodrigues and Tathyana B. Piau were supported by a National Counciil for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) fellowship. |
ORCID | 0000-0003-4490-9614 |
OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Frda.70064 |
PMID | 40265625 |
PQID | 3194458132 |
PQPubID | 26873 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12016461 proquest_miscellaneous_3206183968 proquest_miscellaneous_3193718233 proquest_journals_3194458132 pubmed_primary_40265625 crossref_primary_10_1111_rda_70064 wiley_primary_10_1111_rda_70064_RDA70064 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | April 2025 2025-04-00 2025-Apr 20250401 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2025 text: April 2025 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Germany |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Germany – name: Oxford – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Reproduction in domestic animals |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Reprod Domest Anim |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc |
References | 2004; 61 2023; 34 2023; 5 2013; 21 1997; 46 2016; 31 2020; 16 2016; 73 2018; 83 2014; 29 2024; 224 2021; 70 2013; 9 2016; 33 2006; 63 2010; 25 2024; 115 2006; 66 2020; 94 2015; 83 2000; 53 2000; 166 2001; 55 2010; 191 2014; 7 2009; 59 2023; 10 2009; 24 2019; 9 2015; 58 2004; 48 2010; 122 2008; 56 2018; 61 2007; 53 2015; 8 2014; 753 2011; 331 2023; 40 2018; 111 2023 2002; 63 2017; 10 2023; 198 2003; 68 2019; 49 2022; 13 2011; 45 2012; 47 2018; 53 2018; 15 e_1_2_11_32_1 e_1_2_11_30_1 e_1_2_11_36_1 e_1_2_11_51_1 e_1_2_11_13_1 e_1_2_11_34_1 e_1_2_11_53_1 e_1_2_11_11_1 e_1_2_11_29_1 e_1_2_11_6_1 e_1_2_11_27_1 e_1_2_11_4_1 e_1_2_11_48_1 e_1_2_11_2_1 e_1_2_11_20_1 e_1_2_11_45_1 e_1_2_11_47_1 e_1_2_11_24_1 e_1_2_11_41_1 e_1_2_11_8_1 e_1_2_11_22_1 e_1_2_11_43_1 e_1_2_11_17_1 e_1_2_11_15_1 e_1_2_11_38_1 e_1_2_11_19_1 e_1_2_11_50_1 e_1_2_11_10_1 e_1_2_11_31_1 e_1_2_11_14_1 e_1_2_11_35_1 e_1_2_11_52_1 e_1_2_11_12_1 e_1_2_11_33_1 e_1_2_11_7_1 e_1_2_11_28_1 e_1_2_11_5_1 e_1_2_11_26_1 e_1_2_11_3_1 e_1_2_11_49_1 e_1_2_11_21_1 e_1_2_11_44_1 e_1_2_11_46_1 e_1_2_11_25_1 e_1_2_11_40_1 e_1_2_11_9_1 e_1_2_11_23_1 e_1_2_11_42_1 e_1_2_11_18_1 e_1_2_11_16_1 e_1_2_11_37_1 e_1_2_11_39_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 111 start-page: 69 year: 2018 end-page: 77 article-title: Cryopreservation of Domestic Cat ( ) Ovarian Tissue: Comparison of Two Vitrification Methods publication-title: Theriogenology – volume: 45 start-page: 124 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 132 article-title: Cryopreservation of Mammalian Ovaries and Oocytes publication-title: International Zoo Yearbook – volume: 58 start-page: 238 year: 2015 end-page: 245 article-title: Bisphenol‐A Promotes Antiproliferative Effects During Neonatal Prostate Development in Male and Female Gerbils publication-title: Reproductive Toxicology – volume: 21 start-page: 394 issue: 4 year: 2013 end-page: 405 article-title: Restoring Fertility After Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: A Half Century of Research publication-title: Zygote – volume: 9 issue: 1 year: 2019 article-title: Stepped Vitrification Technique for Human Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation publication-title: Scientific Reports – volume: 198 start-page: 12 year: 2023 end-page: 18 article-title: Feline Ovarian Tissue Vitrification: The Effect of Fragment Size and Base Medium on Follicular Viability and Morphology publication-title: Theriogenology – volume: 122 start-page: 151 issue: 3–4 year: 2010 end-page: 163 article-title: Cryopreservation of Ovarian Tissue: An Emerging Technology for Female Germline Preservation of Endangered Species and Breeds publication-title: Animal Reproduction Science – volume: 10 year: 2023 article-title: Cryopreservation of African Painted Dog ( ) Ovarian Tissue publication-title: Frontiers in Veterinary Science – volume: 63 start-page: 215 issue: 3 year: 2006 end-page: 225 article-title: A Review on Goat Sperm Cryopreservation publication-title: Small Ruminant Research – volume: 83 start-page: 1553 issue: 9 year: 2015 end-page: 1561 article-title: Positive Impact of Sucrose Supplementation During Slow Freezing of Cat Ovarian Tissues on Cellular Viability, Follicle Morphology, and DNA Integrity publication-title: Theriogenology – volume: 66 start-page: 1664 issue: 6–7 year: 2006 end-page: 1666 article-title: Cryopreservation of Preantral Ovarian Follicles In Situ From Domestic Cats ( ) Using Different Cryoprotective Agents publication-title: Theriogenology – volume: 115 year: 2024 article-title: Erythropoietin Effects on Cryopreserved/Transplanted Cat Ovarian Tissue: A Comparison of Two Incubation Methods publication-title: Cryobiology – volume: 7 start-page: 102 issue: 1 year: 2014 article-title: Ultrastructural Changes in Oocytes During Folliculogenesis in Domestic Mammals publication-title: Journal of Ovarian Research – volume: 46 start-page: 190 issue: 2 year: 1997 end-page: 200 article-title: Follicle‐Oocyte Atresia and Temporal Taphonomy in Cold‐Stored Domestic Cat Ovaries publication-title: Molecular Reproduction and Development – volume: 191 start-page: 152 issue: 2 year: 2010 end-page: 160 article-title: Morphometry, Estimation and Ultrastructure of Ovarian Preantral Follicle Population in Queens publication-title: Cells, Tissues, Organs – volume: 753 start-page: 331 year: 2014 end-page: 356 article-title: Recent Advances and Prospects in Germplasm Preservation of Rare and Endangered Species publication-title: Reproductive Sciences in Animal Conservation: Progress and Prospects – volume: 25 start-page: 1734 issue: 7 year: 2010 end-page: 1743 article-title: Xenotransplantation of Human Ovarian Tissue to Nude Mice: Comparison Between Four Grafting Sites publication-title: Human Reproduction – volume: 70 start-page: 63 year: 2021 end-page: 80 article-title: Fertility Preservation in Women for Medical and Social Reasons: Oocytes vs Ovarian Tissue publication-title: Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology – volume: 224 start-page: 58 year: 2024 end-page: 67 article-title: Melatonin Reduces Oxidative Stress and Improves Follicular Morphology in Feline ( ) Vitrified Ovarian Tissue publication-title: Theriogenology – volume: 16 start-page: 1249 issue: 2 year: 2020 end-page: 1262 article-title: Properties of Aqueous Trehalose Mixtures: Glass Transition and Hydrogen Bonding publication-title: Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation – volume: 59 start-page: 195 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 200 article-title: Cryopreservation of Swine Ovarian Tissue: Effect of Different Cryoprotectants on the Structural Preservation of Preantral Follicle Oocytes publication-title: Cryobiology – volume: 61 issue: 4 year: 2018 article-title: Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Transplantation in Patients With Cancer publication-title: Obstetrics & Gynecology Science – volume: 94 start-page: 66 year: 2020 end-page: 72 article-title: Impacts of Different Synthetic Polymers on Vitrification of Ovarian Tissue publication-title: Cryobiology – volume: 55 start-page: 1193 issue: 6 year: 2001 end-page: 1210 article-title: Activation of Follicle Development: The Primordial Follicle publication-title: Theriogenology – volume: 13 issue: 1 year: 2022 article-title: The Use of Commercial Microvolume Techniques for Feline Oocyte Vitrification publication-title: Animals – volume: 31 start-page: 1827 issue: 8 year: 2016 end-page: 1837 article-title: Ovarian Injury During Cryopreservation and Transplantation in Mice: A Comparative Study Between Cryoinjury and Ischemic Injury publication-title: Human Reproduction – volume: 9 issue: 12 year: 2019 article-title: Function of Cryopreserved Cat Ovarian Tissue After Autotransplantation publication-title: Animals – volume: 56 start-page: 120 issue: 2 year: 2008 end-page: 130 article-title: An Improved Cryopreservation Method for a Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Line publication-title: Cryobiology – volume: 331 start-page: 1390 issue: 6023 year: 2011 end-page: 1391 article-title: An Emerging Role of Zoos to Conserve Biodiversity publication-title: Science – volume: 47 start-page: 300 issue: s6 year: 2012 end-page: 304 article-title: Preservation of Primordial Follicles From Lions by Slow Freezing and Xenotransplantation of Ovarian Cortex Into an Immunodeficient Mouse publication-title: Reproduction in Domestic Animals – volume: 33 start-page: 425 issue: 3 year: 2016 end-page: 432 article-title: Survival and Growth of Human Preantral Follicles After Cryopreservation of Ovarian Tissue, Follicle Isolation and Short‐Term Xenografting publication-title: Reproductive Biomedicine Online – volume: 48 start-page: 179 issue: 2 year: 2004 end-page: 189 article-title: Vitrification of Large Tissues With Dielectric Warming: Biological Problems and Some Approaches to Their Solution publication-title: Cryobiology – volume: 53 start-page: 59 issue: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 72 article-title: Fundamental Cryobiology of Mammalian Oocytes and Ovarian Tissue publication-title: Theriogenology – volume: 34 start-page: 263 issue: 3 year: 2023 end-page: 267 article-title: Vitrification of Feline Ovarian Tissue on Copper Grid Versus Acupuncture Needle Using Different Rates of Vitrification Solution publication-title: Gazi Medical Journal – volume: 83 start-page: 9 year: 2018 end-page: 14 article-title: Cat Ovarian Follicle Ultrastructure After Cryopreservation With Ethylene Glycol and Dimethyl Sulfoxide publication-title: Cryobiology – volume: 9 issue: 1 year: 2013 article-title: Short‐Term Culture of Ovarian Cortex Pieces to Assess the Cryopreservation Outcome in Wild Felids for Genome Conservation publication-title: BMC Veterinary Research – volume: 49 start-page: 16 issue: 1 year: 2019 end-page: 30 article-title: Reproductive Biology of the 38 Extant Felid Species: A Review publication-title: Mammal Review – volume: 40 start-page: 455 issue: 3 year: 2023 end-page: 464 article-title: Vitrification Versus Slow Freezing of Human Ovarian Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Histological Outcomes publication-title: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics – volume: 53 start-page: 81 issue: 2 year: 2007 end-page: 89 article-title: Semen Cryopreservation and the Conservation of Endangered Species publication-title: European Journal of Wildlife Research – volume: 24 start-page: 1670 issue: 7 year: 2009 end-page: 1683 article-title: Vitrification Versus Controlled‐Rate Freezing in Cryopreservation of Human Ovarian Tissue publication-title: Human Reproduction – volume: 8 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2015 article-title: Preservation of Mouse Ovarian Tissue Follicle Morphology and Ultra‐Structure After Vitrifying in Biotechnological Protocols publication-title: Journal of Ovarian Research – volume: 63 start-page: 464 issue: 4 year: 2002 end-page: 470 article-title: Microtubulin Configuration and Mitochondrial Distribution After Ultra‐Rapid Cooling of Bovine Oocytes publication-title: Molecular Reproduction and Development – volume: 68 start-page: 105 issue: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 113 article-title: Efficacy of Porcine Gonadotropins for Repeated Stimulation of Ovarian Activity for Oocyte Retrieval and In Vitro Embryo Production and Cryopreservation in Siberian Tigers ( ) publication-title: Biology of Reproduction – year: 2023 – volume: 73 start-page: 187 issue: 2 year: 2016 end-page: 195 article-title: The Preservation of Vital Functions in Cat Ovarian Tissues During Vitrification Depends More on the Temperature of the Cryoprotectant Exposure Than on the Sucrose Supplementation publication-title: Cryobiology – volume: 15 start-page: 1181 issue: 4 year: 2018 article-title: Use of Somatic Cell Banks in the Conservation of Wild Felids publication-title: Animal Reproduction – volume: 61 start-page: 581 issue: 2–3 year: 2004 end-page: 594 article-title: Development of Antral Follicles in Cryopreserved Cat Ovarian Tissue Transplanted to Immunodeficient Mice publication-title: Theriogenology – volume: 53 start-page: 125 issue: S3 year: 2018 end-page: 132 article-title: Vitrification of Cat Ovarian Tissue: Does Fragment Size Matters? publication-title: Reproduction in Domestic Animals – volume: 29 start-page: 720 issue: 4 year: 2014 end-page: 730 article-title: Optimal Vitrification Protocol for Mouse Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: Effect of Cryoprotective Agents and In Vitro Culture on Vitrified‐Warmed Ovarian Tissue Survival publication-title: Human Reproduction – volume: 10 start-page: 361 issue: 3 year: 2017 end-page: 366 article-title: IUCN Guidelines for Determining When and How Ex Situ Management Should Be Used in Species Conservation publication-title: Conservation Letters – volume: 166 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 35 article-title: In Vitro Growth of Human Primordial Follicles From Frozen‐Banked Ovarian Tissue publication-title: Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology – volume: 5 start-page: 15 issue: 2 year: 2023 end-page: 162 article-title: Assessment of Ovarian Tissue and Follicular Integrity After Cryopreservation via Slow Freezing or Vitrification Followed by In Vitro Culture publication-title: F&S Science – ident: e_1_2_11_4_1 doi: 10.1007/s10815‐022‐02692‐w – ident: e_1_2_11_24_1 doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.431 – ident: e_1_2_11_29_1 doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.10.016 – ident: e_1_2_11_2_1 doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.05.011 – ident: e_1_2_11_17_1 doi: 10.1007/s10344‐007‐0089‐z – ident: e_1_2_11_3_1 doi: 10.1111/mam.12145 – ident: e_1_2_11_46_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2024.104861 – ident: e_1_2_11_33_1 doi: 10.1186/s13048‐015‐0137‐3 – ident: e_1_2_11_51_1 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098‐2795(199702)46:2<190::AID‐MRD9>3.0.CO;2‐L – ident: e_1_2_11_36_1 doi: 10.1186/s13048‐014‐0102‐6 – ident: e_1_2_11_7_1 doi: 10.1016/S0093‐691X(03)00244‐9 – ident: e_1_2_11_14_1 doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.101.002204 – ident: e_1_2_11_26_1 doi: 10.1038/s41598‐019‐56585‐7 – ident: e_1_2_11_44_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.04.007 – ident: e_1_2_11_43_1 doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.010 – ident: e_1_2_11_45_1 doi: 10.1016/S0093‐691X(99)00240‐X – ident: e_1_2_11_34_1 doi: 10.3390/ani13010036 – ident: e_1_2_11_18_1 doi: 10.1111/rda.13357 – ident: e_1_2_11_53_1 doi: 10.1093/humrep/det449 – ident: e_1_2_11_48_1 doi: 10.3390/ani9121065 – ident: e_1_2_11_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.01.015 – ident: e_1_2_11_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.xfss.2023.10.004 – ident: e_1_2_11_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.12.002 – ident: e_1_2_11_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.02.014 – ident: e_1_2_11_50_1 doi: 10.1186/1746‐6148‐9‐37 – ident: e_1_2_11_12_1 doi: 10.1007/978‐1‐4939‐0820‐2_14 – ident: e_1_2_11_32_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.07.013 – ident: e_1_2_11_40_1 doi: 10.1002/zoo.21416 – ident: e_1_2_11_49_1 doi: 10.1111/rda.12081 – ident: e_1_2_11_27_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.07.003 – ident: e_1_2_11_38_1 doi: 10.1016/S0093‐691X(01)00478‐2 – ident: e_1_2_11_41_1 doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.02.015 – ident: e_1_2_11_21_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_23_1 doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep079 – ident: e_1_2_11_15_1 doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq131 – ident: e_1_2_11_11_1 doi: 10.12996/gmj.2023.55 – ident: e_1_2_11_37_1 doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.05.003 – ident: e_1_2_11_39_1 doi: 10.1016/S0303‐7207(00)00294‐X – ident: e_1_2_11_31_1 doi: 10.1111/conl.12285 – ident: e_1_2_11_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.07.003 – ident: e_1_2_11_30_1 doi: 10.1017/S0967199412000573 – ident: e_1_2_11_22_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1748‐1090.2010.00124.x – ident: e_1_2_11_35_1 doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01071 – ident: e_1_2_11_47_1 doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.01.035 – ident: e_1_2_11_25_1 doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew144 – ident: e_1_2_11_52_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2004.01.002 – ident: e_1_2_11_10_1 doi: 10.1159/000225935 – ident: e_1_2_11_19_1 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1134726 – ident: e_1_2_11_13_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1200674 – ident: e_1_2_11_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.12.016 – ident: e_1_2_11_42_1 doi: 10.1002/mrd.10196 – ident: e_1_2_11_16_1 doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.06.011 |
SSID | ssj0015877 |
Score | 2.386975 |
Snippet | ABSTRACT
Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family.... Over the past decade, increased hunting and habitat disturbance have significantly impacted the endangered population within the Felidae family. Recognising... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | e70064 |
SubjectTerms | animal reproduction Animals Cats Conservation Cryopreservation Cryopreservation - methods Cryopreservation - veterinary cryoprotectants Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology Cryoprotectors Degeneration Dimethyl Sulfoxide - pharmacology domain Domestic animals Endangered populations Evaluation family Felidae felines Female female fertility Fertility Fertility Preservation - methods Fertility Preservation - veterinary Fragments Freezing habitat destruction immunohistochemistry Original Ovarian Follicle ovarian follicles Ovaries Ovary - drug effects Sucrose Trehalose Trehalose - pharmacology Vitrification |
Title | Evaluation of Different Cryoprotectant Combinations in Vitrification and Slow Freezing for Ovarian Tissue Preservation in Domestic Cats |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Frda.70064 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40265625 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3194458132 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3193718233 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3206183968 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12016461 |
Volume | 60 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VnuAA7fIKLZVBHLhkVSe2k4jTarerCqmASlv1gBQ5jlNW0ARlsyD6B_jbzDgPdVuBELdEnkR2MuP5xh5_A_BKWm6JEdA3eOULZYVPc6BvoyKRRiodZLQOefROHZ6Kt-fyfAPe9GdhWn6IYcGNLMPN12TgOlteM_I61-OIPCrOv5SrRYDoeKCO4jJ2VRcxYFe-QkzdsQpRFs_w5LovugUwb-dJXsevzgHNH8Cnvutt3smX8arJxubqBqvjf45tC-53wJRNWk3ahg1bjuDe5KLuyDnsCEZnlDvjDvCyo25P_iH8OhgIw1lVsFlXcaVh0_pn1dFAaLqtLjEKbxcI2aJkZ4umpjyl9kld5uzj1-oHm9fWXqE_ZYim2fvvGMrrkp049WCUL9IvItMrZtUlkYQYNtXN8hGczg9Opod-V97BN3Qc189iK_ZzHnFZJIVJuNGJKCRBDqG1ijJuYm2oZmCeR4W1KtRhLDMVur1IlQXhY9gsq9I-BRbZSOhEI5bLcxEXUZJHKMEDk8da7wfGg5f9j06_tSweaR_94LdO3bf2YLdXgbQz5GWKM5QQMkZt9uDF0IwmSPsqurTVysmE6OKDMPyLTIDACcGoij140mrV0BMM4RXFoR7Ea_o2CBAF-HpLufjsqMB54AjiuAevnT79eXTp8WziLp79u-gO3A2o3LFLVNqFzaZe2eeIwZpsD-4E4sOeM7nfGNgxEw |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VcoAeeCwUAgUM4sAlqyZxbEfistrtaoFukcq26gVFju3QFTRBaRZE_wB_G4_zUJcKhLglyiSKkxnPN-PxNwAvYxMYZAT0lT3yKTPUxznQNzxPYhUzGWaYh5wfsNkRfXsSn2zA624vTMMP0Sfc0DLcfI0GjgnpS1ZeaTnk6FKvwXXs6O0CqsOePCqIheu7aEN25jOLqlteIazj6W9d90ZXIObVSsnLCNa5oOlt-Ni9fFN58nm4qrOhuviN1_F_R3cHbrXYlIwaZboLG6YYwNboU9Xyc5gBDI6xfMbt4SXzdln-Hvzc6znDSZmTSdt0pSbj6kfZMkFIPC3PbCDe5AjJsiDHy7rCUqXmTllo8uFL-Z1MK2MurEslFlCT999sNC8LsnAaQrBkpMsj4yMm5RnyhCgylvX5fTia7i3GM7_t8OAr3JHrZ8LQXR3wIM6TXCWBkgnNY0QdVErGs0AJqbBtoNY8N4ZFMhJxxiK3HMmyMNqGzaIszEMg3HAqE2nhnNZU5DzR3EoEodJCyt1QefCi-9Pp14bII-0CIPutU_etPdjpdCBtbfk8tZMUpbGwCu3B8_6ytUJcWpGFKVdOJrJePoyiv8iEFjtZPMqEBw8aterfxEbxDENRD8SawvUCyAK-fqVYnjo28CB0HHGBB6-cQv15dOnhZOQOHv276DO4MVvM99P9NwfvHsPNELsfu7qlHdisq5V5YiFZnT11lvcLyh40Vw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VIiE48FhegQIGceCS1TpxHEecVpuuyqMFlbbqASlybKddQZMqzYLoH-Bv43Ee6lKBELdEnkR2MuP5xh5_A_AyMtQgI6Cv7JXPuGE-zoG-iYskUhGXQY7rkNs7fGufvT2MDtfgdX8WpuWHGBbc0DLcfI0GfqqLC0ZeazmO0aNegauMTwSqdLo7cEfRSLiyizZi5z63oLqjFcI0nuHRVWd0CWFeTpS8CGCdB5rfgs9939vEky_jZZOP1flvtI7_ObjbcLNDpmTaqtIdWDPlCG5Mj-qOncOMYHSAyTPuBC_Z7jbl78LPzYExnFQFSbuSKw2Z1T-qjgdC4m11YsPwdoWQLEpysGhqTFRqn5SlJp--Vt_JvDbm3DpUYuE0-fDNxvKyJHtOPwgmjPSryPiKtDpBlhBFZrI5uwf788292Zbf1XfwFZ7H9XNh2ETTmEZFUqiEKpmwIkLMwaTkcU6VkAqLBmodF8bwUIYiynnoNiN5HoT3Yb2sSvMQSGxiJhNpwZzWTBRxomMrQQOlhZSTQHnwov_R2WlL45H14Y_91pn71h5s9CqQdZZ8ltkpirFIWHX24PnQbG0QN1Zkaaqlkwmtjw_C8C8ygUVOFo1y4cGDVquGntgYnmMg6oFY0bdBADnAV1vKxbHjAqeBY4ijHrxy-vTn0WW76dRdPPp30Wdw7WM6z96_2Xn3GK4HWPrYJS1twHpTL80Ti8ea_Kmzu18xYzMP |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation+of+Different+Cryoprotectant+Combinations+in+Vitrification+and+Slow+Freezing+for+Ovarian+Tissue+Preservation+in+Domestic+Cats&rft.jtitle=Reproduction+in+domestic+animals&rft.au=Ribeiro%2C+Rayane+Brand%C3%A3o&rft.au=Rodrigues%2C+Aline+Queiroz&rft.au=Aguiar%2C+Beatriz+Alves&rft.au=Silva%2C+Jessyca+Karoline+Oliveira&rft.date=2025-04-01&rft.issn=0936-6768&rft.eissn=1439-0531&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.epage=n%2Fa&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Frda.70064&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Frda.70064&rft.externalDocID=RDA70064 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0936-6768&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0936-6768&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0936-6768&client=summon |