A comparison of open versus arthroscopic harvesting of osteochondral autografts

Abstract Osteochondral autograft transfer is a technique for treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage lesions. A graft in which the cartilage cap is oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the graft is ideal because it can both restore the cartilage tidemark and minimize articular step-o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe knee Vol. 16; no. 6; pp. 458 - 462
Main Authors Keeling, John J, Gwinn, David E, McGuigan, Francis X
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.12.2009
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Abstract Osteochondral autograft transfer is a technique for treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage lesions. A graft in which the cartilage cap is oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the graft is ideal because it can both restore the cartilage tidemark and minimize articular step-off at the recipient site. This study determines if osteochondral harvest technique (arthroscopic versus mini-open) or donor site location affects suitable graft harvest. One hundred and twenty eight osteochondral grafts were harvested in 16 cadaver knees utilizing a 7 mm OATS chisel from four donor sites: lateral supracondylar ridge, lateral femoral condyle, lateral intercondylar notch and medial femoral condyle. Mini-open and arthroscopic harvesting techniques were equally employed. Radiographic methods were used to analyze graft perpendicularity. Statistical analysis comparing graft suitability based on technique and donor site location was performed. There were no statistically significant differences ( p > 0.05) in graft suitability regardless of the technique used or donor site location. 69% of arthroscopic and 56% of mini-open graft harvest were considered suitable, possessing a cartilage cap and graft axis angle that would create less than 1 mm of articular incongruity. Incongruity results when the angle between the subchondral bone plug long axis and cartilage interface is greater than 74°. There is no difference in the quality of osteochondral grafts harvested from the knee regardless of technique or donor site used. Osteochondral graft diameter should be kept at or less than 7 mm because of the high percentage of unacceptable grafts with increasing chisel sizes.
AbstractList Osteochondral autograft transfer is a technique for treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage lesions. A graft in which the cartilage cap is oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the graft is ideal because it can both restore the cartilage tidemark and minimize articular step-off at the recipient site. This study determines if osteochondral harvest technique (arthroscopic versus mini-open) or donor site location affects suitable graft harvest. One hundred and twenty eight osteochondral grafts were harvested in 16 cadaver knees utilizing a 7 mm OATS chisel from four donor sites: lateral supracondylar ridge, lateral femoral condyle, lateral intercondylar notch and medial femoral condyle. Mini-open and arthroscopic harvesting techniques were equally employed. Radiographic methods were used to analyze graft perpendicularity. Statistical analysis comparing graft suitability based on technique and donor site location was performed. There were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) in graft suitability regardless of the technique used or donor site location. 69% of arthroscopic and 56% of mini-open graft harvest were considered suitable, possessing a cartilage cap and graft axis angle that would create less than 1 mm of articular incongruity. Incongruity results when the angle between the subchondral bone plug long axis and cartilage interface is greater than 74 degrees . There is no difference in the quality of osteochondral grafts harvested from the knee regardless of technique or donor site used. Osteochondral graft diameter should be kept at or less than 7 mm because of the high percentage of unacceptable grafts with increasing chisel sizes.
Osteochondral autograft transfer is a technique for treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage lesions. A graft in which the cartilage cap is oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the graft is ideal because it can both restore the cartilage tidemark and minimize articular step-off at the recipient site. This study determines if osteochondral harvest technique (arthroscopic versus mini-open) or donor site location affects suitable graft harvest. One hundred and twenty eight osteochondral grafts were harvested in 16 cadaver knees utilizing a 7 mm OATS chisel from four donor sites: lateral supracondylar ridge, lateral femoral condyle, lateral intercondylar notch and medial femoral condyle. Mini-open and arthroscopic harvesting techniques were equally employed. Radiographic methods were used to analyze graft perpendicularity. Statistical analysis comparing graft suitability based on technique and donor site location was performed. There were no statistically significant differences ( p > 0.05) in graft suitability regardless of the technique used or donor site location. 69% of arthroscopic and 56% of mini-open graft harvest were considered suitable, possessing a cartilage cap and graft axis angle that would create less than 1 mm of articular incongruity. Incongruity results when the angle between the subchondral bone plug long axis and cartilage interface is greater than 74°. There is no difference in the quality of osteochondral grafts harvested from the knee regardless of technique or donor site used. Osteochondral graft diameter should be kept at or less than 7 mm because of the high percentage of unacceptable grafts with increasing chisel sizes.
Osteochondral autograft transfer is a technique for treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage lesions. A graft in which the cartilage cap is oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the graft is ideal because it can both restore the cartilage tidemark and minimize articular step-off at the recipient site. This study determines if osteochondral harvest technique (arthroscopic versus mini-open) or donor site location affects suitable graft harvest. One hundred and twenty eight osteochondral grafts were harvested in 16 cadaver knees utilizing a 7 mm OATS chisel from four donor sites: lateral supracondylar ridge, lateral femoral condyle, lateral intercondylar notch and medial femoral condyle. Mini-open and arthroscopic harvesting techniques were equally employed. Radiographic methods were used to analyze graft perpendicularity. Statistical analysis comparing graft suitability based on technique and donor site location was performed. There were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) in graft suitability regardless of the technique used or donor site location. 69% of arthroscopic and 56% of mini-open graft harvest were considered suitable, possessing a cartilage cap and graft axis angle that would create less than 1 mm of articular incongruity. Incongruity results when the angle between the subchondral bone plug long axis and cartilage interface is greater than 74 degrees . There is no difference in the quality of osteochondral grafts harvested from the knee regardless of technique or donor site used. Osteochondral graft diameter should be kept at or less than 7 mm because of the high percentage of unacceptable grafts with increasing chisel sizes.
Abstract Osteochondral autograft transfer is a technique for treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage lesions. A graft in which the cartilage cap is oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the graft is ideal because it can both restore the cartilage tidemark and minimize articular step-off at the recipient site. This study determines if osteochondral harvest technique (arthroscopic versus mini-open) or donor site location affects suitable graft harvest. One hundred and twenty eight osteochondral grafts were harvested in 16 cadaver knees utilizing a 7 mm OATS chisel from four donor sites: lateral supracondylar ridge, lateral femoral condyle, lateral intercondylar notch and medial femoral condyle. Mini-open and arthroscopic harvesting techniques were equally employed. Radiographic methods were used to analyze graft perpendicularity. Statistical analysis comparing graft suitability based on technique and donor site location was performed. There were no statistically significant differences ( p > 0.05) in graft suitability regardless of the technique used or donor site location. 69% of arthroscopic and 56% of mini-open graft harvest were considered suitable, possessing a cartilage cap and graft axis angle that would create less than 1 mm of articular incongruity. Incongruity results when the angle between the subchondral bone plug long axis and cartilage interface is greater than 74°. There is no difference in the quality of osteochondral grafts harvested from the knee regardless of technique or donor site used. Osteochondral graft diameter should be kept at or less than 7 mm because of the high percentage of unacceptable grafts with increasing chisel sizes.
Osteochondral autograft transfer is a technique for treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage lesions. A graft in which the cartilage cap is oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the graft is ideal because it can both restore the cartilage tidemark and minimize articular step-off at the recipient site. This study determines if osteochondral harvest technique (arthroscopic versus mini-open) or donor site location affects suitable graft harvest. One hundred and twenty eight osteochondral grafts were harvested in 16 cadaver knees utilizing a 7 mm OATS chisel from four donor sites: lateral supracondylar ridge, lateral femoral condyle, lateral intercondylar notch and medial femoral condyle. Mini-open and arthroscopic harvesting techniques were equally employed. Radiographic methods were used to analyze graft perpendicularity. Statistical analysis comparing graft suitability based on technique and donor site location was performed. There were no statistically significant differences (p >0.05) in graft suitability regardless of the technique used or donor site location. 69% of arthroscopic and 56% of mini-open graft harvest were considered suitable, possessing a cartilage cap and graft axis angle that would create less than 1 mm of articular incongruity. Incongruity results when the angle between the subchondral bone plug long axis and cartilage interface is greater than 74°. There is no difference in the quality of osteochondral grafts harvested from the knee regardless of technique or donor site used. Osteochondral graft diameter should be kept at or less than 7 mm because of the high percentage of unacceptable grafts with increasing chisel sizes.
Author McGuigan, Francis X
Keeling, John J
Gwinn, David E
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Keeling, John J
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Gwinn, David E
– sequence: 3
  fullname: McGuigan, Francis X
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19362004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVJaDYff6CHYughJzsjS7ItKIUlpEkgkEPas9DK46w2XsmV7IX8-8jdhUAOOQnB8w4zz3tKjpx3SMg3CgUFWl1tiheHWJQAsoCyAApfyII2NctFA3BEFiCrJk8knJDTGDcAUEkuvpITKlmVYnxBHpeZ8dtBBxu9y3yX-QFdtsMQp5jpMK6Dj8YP1mRrHXYYR-ue_2NxRG_W3rVB95meRv8cdDfGc3Lc6T7ixeE9I39_3_y5vssfHm_vr5cPueGsGXPsVoighdBlrZGnb8WgA1EZUQEX3IgajeCtRCpKIXmzQtPKVUkp16xmlJ2Ry_3cIfh_U9pLbW002PfaoZ-iqhkH2TSMJ_LHB3Ljp-DScooC47IRlRSJKveUSQfHgJ0agt3q8JogNdtWGzXbVrNtBaVKtlPo-2H0tNpi-x456E3Azz2AScXOYlDRWHQGWxvQjKr19vP5vz7ETW-dNbp_wVeM73eomALqae57rhtkqppzyt4A3U-nOA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsm_2020_150781
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2021_103102
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_013_1711_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcot_2021_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2011_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00590_023_03731_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2012_06_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biomaterials_2010_07_110
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcot_2011_04_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_orthtr_2009_07_007
crossref_primary_10_15825_1995_1191_2016_4_102_122
Cites_doi 10.1177/107110079701801005
10.1177/03635465000280011601
10.1007/s00264-005-0068-5
10.1053/jars.2001.19966
10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70310-0
10.1177/0363546505278299
10.1097/00003086-199405000-00040
10.2106/JBJS.D.02086
10.2106/00004623-200300002-00004
10.2106/00004623-200300002-00003
10.1053/jars.2001.24705
10.1097/00003086-200208000-00020
10.1016/j.arthro.2004.12.003
10.1016/S1067-2516(02)80030-8
10.1177/03635465980260040201
10.1016/S0749-8063(04)00607-3
10.1002/jor.1100090412
10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80428-1
10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.012
10.2106/00004623-199501000-00009
10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70129-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2009
Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 2009
Copyright_xml – notice: 2009
– notice: Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 2009
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QP
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1873-5800
EndPage 462
ExternalDocumentID 2744597201
10_1016_j_knee_2009_02_010
19362004
S0968016009000441
1_s2_0_S0968016009000441
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID -
0R
1
1-
123
1B1
1P
1RT
1~.
1~5
29L
3V.
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
7RV
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8P
9JM
AACTN
AAEDT
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALMO
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABLVK
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABPIF
ABPTK
ABUWG
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACPRK
ACRLP
ADALY
ADBBV
ADEZE
AEBSH
AEKER
AENEX
AEVXI
AFKRA
AFKWA
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJRQY
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
AZQEC
BBAFP
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CS3
DU5
DWQXO
EBS
EFJIC
EJD
EMOBN
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FO
FYUFA
G-
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HEE
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ
IHE
J1W
K
KOM
LCYCR
LK8
M
M1P
M29
M2O
M31
M41
M7P
MO0
N9A
NAPCQ
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OF0
OR.
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PADUT
PC.
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
PSQYO
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
SV3
T5K
UHS
UPT
WOW
WUQ
YQT
Z5R
---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1P~
8P~
AAEDW
ABJNI
AXJTR
EFLBG
FYGXN
HZ~
~G-
AAXKI
AFCTW
AFJKZ
AKRWK
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QP
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-efbee0a55a27ae4efb630f056c560454c57ec54d9e1525948becd9b2114a37313
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0968-0160
IngestDate Sat Aug 17 03:46:16 EDT 2024
Fri Sep 13 03:24:42 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 19:19:21 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:45:10 EDT 2024
Fri Feb 23 02:16:53 EST 2024
Thu Aug 18 17:12:41 EDT 2022
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords OATS
Osteochondral autograft transfer
Mosaicplasty
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c438t-efbee0a55a27ae4efb630f056c560454c57ec54d9e1525948becd9b2114a37313
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 19362004
PQID 1034985695
PQPubID 1216385
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_734098834
proquest_journals_1034985695
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_knee_2009_02_010
pubmed_primary_19362004
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_knee_2009_02_010
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0968016009000441
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2009
  text: 2009-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
– name: Amsterdam
PublicationTitle The knee
PublicationTitleAlternate Knee
PublicationYear 2009
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Kish, Modis, Hangody (bib19) 1999; 18
Hangody, Kish, Karpati, Szerb, Eberhardt (bib26) 1997; 18
Buckwalter, Mankin (bib1) 1998; 47
Matsusue, Yamamuro, Hama (bib20) 1993; 9
Simonian, Sussmann, Wickiewicz, Paletta, Warren (bib16) 1998; 26
Hangody, Fules (bib7) 2003; 85A
Duchow, Hess, Kohn (bib24) 2000; 28
Choung, Christensen (bib25) 2002; 41
Evans, Miniaci, Hurtig (bib11) 2004; 20
Ritsila, Santavirta, Alhopuro, Poussa, Jaroma, Rubak (bib6) 1994; 302
Brown, Pope, Hale, Buckwalter, Brand (bib14) 1991; 9
Jakob, Franz, Gautier, Mainil-Varlet (bib15) 2002; 401
Marcacci, Kon, Zaffagnini, Iacono, Neri, Vascellari (bib9) 2005; 21
Diduch, Chhabra, Blessey, Miller (bib17) 2003; 16
Makino, Fujioka, Yoshiya, Kokubu, Fujita, Makino (bib21) 2002; 48
Makino, Fujioka, Kurosaka, Matsui, Yoshihara, Tsunoda (bib22) 2001; 17
Magnuson (bib3) 1974; 101
Outerbridge, Outerbridge, Outerbridge (bib4) 1995; 77A
Oztark, Ozdemir, Ozkan (bib10) 2006; 30
Hangody, Kish, Karpati (bib18) 1998; 5
Huntley, Bush, McBirnie, Simpson, Hall (bib12) 2005; 87A
Laprade, Botker (bib13) 2004; 20
Pearce, Hurtig, Clarnette, Kaira, Cowan, Miniaci (bib23) 2001; 17
Alleyne, Galloway (bib2) 2001; 20
Peterson, Minas, Brittberg, Lindahl (bib5) 2003; 85A
Kreuz, Steniwachs, Erggelet, Lahm, Henle, Niemeyer (bib8) 2006; 34
Diduch (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib17) 2003; 16
Matsusue (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib20) 1993; 9
Hangody (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib18) 1998; 5
Hangody (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib26) 1997; 18
Laprade (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib13) 2004; 20
Oztark (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib10) 2006; 30
Pearce (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib23) 2001; 17
Ritsila (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib6) 1994; 302
Hangody (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib7) 2003; 85A
Magnuson (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib3) 1974; 101
Brown (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib14) 1991; 9
Jakob (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib15) 2002; 401
Kish (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib19) 1999; 18
Choung (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib25) 2002; 41
Simonian (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib16) 1998; 26
Alleyne (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib2) 2001; 20
Buckwalter (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib1) 1998; 47
Outerbridge (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib4) 1995; 77A
Makino (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib22) 2001; 17
Marcacci (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib9) 2005; 21
Duchow (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib24) 2000; 28
Kreuz (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib8) 2006; 34
Peterson (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib5) 2003; 85A
Huntley (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib12) 2005; 87A
Makino (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib21) 2002; 48
Evans (10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib11) 2004; 20
References_xml – volume: 20
  start-page: 343
  year: 2001
  end-page: 364
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Management of osteochondral injuries of the knee
  publication-title: Clin Sports Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Galloway
– volume: 17
  start-page: 747
  year: 2001
  end-page: 751
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Histologic analysis of the implanted cartilage in an exact-fit osteochondral transplantation model
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  contributor:
    fullname: Tsunoda
– volume: 85A
  start-page: 17
  year: 2003
  end-page: 24
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation: results at two to ten years
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg [Am]
  contributor:
    fullname: Lindahl
– volume: 30
  start-page: 200
  year: 2006
  end-page: 204
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Osteochondral autografting (mosaicplasty) in grade IV cartilage defects in the knee joint: 2- to 7-year results
  publication-title: Int Orthop
  contributor:
    fullname: Ozkan
– volume: 17
  start-page: 50
  year: 2001
  end-page: 55
  ident: bib23
  article-title: An investigation of 2 techniques for optimizing joint surface congruency using multiple cylindrical osteochondral autografts
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  contributor:
    fullname: Miniaci
– volume: 9
  start-page: 318
  year: 1993
  end-page: 321
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Arthroscopic multiple osteochondral transplantation to the chondral defect in the knee associated with anterior cruciate ligament disruption
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  contributor:
    fullname: Hama
– volume: 20
  start-page: 69
  year: 2004
  end-page: 73
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autograft transfer procedures
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  contributor:
    fullname: Botker
– volume: 87A
  start-page: 351
  year: 2005
  end-page: 360
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Chondrocyte death associated with human femoral osteochondral harvest as performed for mosaicplasty
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg [Am]
  contributor:
    fullname: Hall
– volume: 21
  start-page: 462
  year: 2005
  end-page: 470
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Multiple osteochondral arthroscopic grafting (mosaicplasty) for cartilage defects of the knee: prospective study results at 2-year follow-up
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  contributor:
    fullname: Vascellari
– volume: 48
  start-page: 97
  year: 2002
  end-page: 104
  ident: bib21
  article-title: The effect of the small and unstable autologous osteochondral graft on repairing the full-thickness large articular cartilage defect in a rabbit model
  publication-title: Kobe J Med Sci
  contributor:
    fullname: Makino
– volume: 77A
  start-page: 65
  year: 1995
  end-page: 72
  ident: bib4
  article-title: The use of a lateral patellar autologous graft for the repair of a large osteochondral defect in the knee
  publication-title: J. Bone Jt Surg [Am]
  contributor:
    fullname: Outerbridge
– volume: 302
  start-page: 259
  year: 1994
  end-page: 265
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Periosteal and perichondral grafting in reconstructive surgery
  publication-title: Clin Orthop
  contributor:
    fullname: Rubak
– volume: 20
  start-page: 306
  year: 2004
  end-page: 310
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Manual punch versus power harvesting of osteochondral graft
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  contributor:
    fullname: Hurtig
– volume: 41
  start-page: 65
  year: 2002
  end-page: 75
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Mosaicplasty of the talus: a joint contact analysis in a cadaver model
  publication-title: J Foot Ankle Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Christensen
– volume: 28
  start-page: 24
  year: 2000
  end-page: 30
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Primary stability of press-fit-implanted osteochondral grafts. Influence of graft size, repeated insertion, and harvesting technique
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Kohn
– volume: 85A
  start-page: 25
  year: 2003
  end-page: 32
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg [Am]
  contributor:
    fullname: Fules
– volume: 101
  start-page: 4
  year: 1974
  end-page: 12
  ident: bib3
  article-title: The classic: joint debridement: surgical treatment of degenerative arthritis
  publication-title: Clin Orthop
  contributor:
    fullname: Magnuson
– volume: 18
  start-page: 45
  year: 1999
  end-page: 66
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee and talus in the athlete. Rationale, indications, techniques, and results
  publication-title: Clin Sports Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Hangody
– volume: 26
  start-page: 491
  year: 1998
  end-page: 494
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Contact pressures at osteochondral donor sites in the knee
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Warren
– volume: 34
  start-page: 55
  year: 2006
  end-page: 63
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Mosaicplasty with autogenous talar autograft for osteochondral lesions of the talus after failed primary arthroscopic management: a prospective study with a 4-year follow up
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Niemeyer
– volume: 16
  start-page: 17
  year: 2003
  end-page: 20
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Osteochondral autograft plug transfer: achieving perpendicurality
  publication-title: J Knee Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Miller
– volume: 401
  start-page: 170
  year: 2002
  end-page: 184
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Autologous osteochondral grafting in the knee: indication, results, and reflections
  publication-title: Clin Orthop
  contributor:
    fullname: Mainil-Varlet
– volume: 47
  start-page: 487
  year: 1998
  end-page: 504
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation
  publication-title: Instr Course Lect
  contributor:
    fullname: Mankin
– volume: 9
  start-page: 559
  year: 1991
  end-page: 567
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Effects of osteochondral defect size on cartilage contact stress
  publication-title: J Orthop Res
  contributor:
    fullname: Brand
– volume: 5
  start-page: 3
  year: 1998
  end-page: 9
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty—a multicentric, comparative, prospective study
  publication-title: Index Traumat Sport
  contributor:
    fullname: Karpati
– volume: 18
  start-page: 628
  year: 1997
  end-page: 634
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: use of the mosaicplasty technique—a preliminary report
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Eberhardt
– volume: 18
  start-page: 628
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib26
  article-title: Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: use of the mosaicplasty technique—a preliminary report
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Int
  doi: 10.1177/107110079701801005
  contributor:
    fullname: Hangody
– volume: 28
  start-page: 24
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib24
  article-title: Primary stability of press-fit-implanted osteochondral grafts. Influence of graft size, repeated insertion, and harvesting technique
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/03635465000280011601
  contributor:
    fullname: Duchow
– volume: 30
  start-page: 200
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib10
  article-title: Osteochondral autografting (mosaicplasty) in grade IV cartilage defects in the knee joint: 2- to 7-year results
  publication-title: Int Orthop
  doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0068-5
  contributor:
    fullname: Oztark
– volume: 17
  start-page: 50
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib23
  article-title: An investigation of 2 techniques for optimizing joint surface congruency using multiple cylindrical osteochondral autografts
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.19966
  contributor:
    fullname: Pearce
– volume: 20
  start-page: 343
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib2
  article-title: Management of osteochondral injuries of the knee
  publication-title: Clin Sports Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70310-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Alleyne
– volume: 34
  start-page: 55
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib8
  article-title: Mosaicplasty with autogenous talar autograft for osteochondral lesions of the talus after failed primary arthroscopic management: a prospective study with a 4-year follow up
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/0363546505278299
  contributor:
    fullname: Kreuz
– volume: 302
  start-page: 259
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib6
  article-title: Periosteal and perichondral grafting in reconstructive surgery
  publication-title: Clin Orthop
  doi: 10.1097/00003086-199405000-00040
  contributor:
    fullname: Ritsila
– volume: 87A
  start-page: 351
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib12
  article-title: Chondrocyte death associated with human femoral osteochondral harvest as performed for mosaicplasty
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg [Am]
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02086
  contributor:
    fullname: Huntley
– volume: 5
  start-page: 3
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib18
  article-title: Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty—a multicentric, comparative, prospective study
  publication-title: Index Traumat Sport
  contributor:
    fullname: Hangody
– volume: 85A
  start-page: 25
  issue: Suppl 2
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib7
  article-title: Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg [Am]
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-200300002-00004
  contributor:
    fullname: Hangody
– volume: 85A
  start-page: 17
  issue: Suppl 2
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib5
  article-title: Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation: results at two to ten years
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg [Am]
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-200300002-00003
  contributor:
    fullname: Peterson
– volume: 17
  start-page: 747
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib22
  article-title: Histologic analysis of the implanted cartilage in an exact-fit osteochondral transplantation model
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.24705
  contributor:
    fullname: Makino
– volume: 401
  start-page: 170
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib15
  article-title: Autologous osteochondral grafting in the knee: indication, results, and reflections
  publication-title: Clin Orthop
  doi: 10.1097/00003086-200208000-00020
  contributor:
    fullname: Jakob
– volume: 21
  start-page: 462
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib9
  article-title: Multiple osteochondral arthroscopic grafting (mosaicplasty) for cartilage defects of the knee: prospective study results at 2-year follow-up
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.12.003
  contributor:
    fullname: Marcacci
– volume: 41
  start-page: 65
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib25
  article-title: Mosaicplasty of the talus: a joint contact analysis in a cadaver model
  publication-title: J Foot Ankle Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(02)80030-8
  contributor:
    fullname: Choung
– volume: 26
  start-page: 491
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib16
  article-title: Contact pressures at osteochondral donor sites in the knee
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/03635465980260040201
  contributor:
    fullname: Simonian
– volume: 20
  start-page: 69
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib13
  article-title: Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autograft transfer procedures
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1016/S0749-8063(04)00607-3
  contributor:
    fullname: Laprade
– volume: 9
  start-page: 559
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib14
  article-title: Effects of osteochondral defect size on cartilage contact stress
  publication-title: J Orthop Res
  doi: 10.1002/jor.1100090412
  contributor:
    fullname: Brown
– volume: 48
  start-page: 97
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib21
  article-title: The effect of the small and unstable autologous osteochondral graft on repairing the full-thickness large articular cartilage defect in a rabbit model
  publication-title: Kobe J Med Sci
  contributor:
    fullname: Makino
– volume: 101
  start-page: 4
  year: 1974
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib3
  article-title: The classic: joint debridement: surgical treatment of degenerative arthritis
  publication-title: Clin Orthop
  contributor:
    fullname: Magnuson
– volume: 9
  start-page: 318
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib20
  article-title: Arthroscopic multiple osteochondral transplantation to the chondral defect in the knee associated with anterior cruciate ligament disruption
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80428-1
  contributor:
    fullname: Matsusue
– volume: 20
  start-page: 306
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib11
  article-title: Manual punch versus power harvesting of osteochondral graft
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.012
  contributor:
    fullname: Evans
– volume: 77A
  start-page: 65
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib4
  article-title: The use of a lateral patellar autologous graft for the repair of a large osteochondral defect in the knee
  publication-title: J. Bone Jt Surg [Am]
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-199501000-00009
  contributor:
    fullname: Outerbridge
– volume: 47
  start-page: 487
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib1
  article-title: Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation
  publication-title: Instr Course Lect
  contributor:
    fullname: Buckwalter
– volume: 16
  start-page: 17
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib17
  article-title: Osteochondral autograft plug transfer: achieving perpendicurality
  publication-title: J Knee Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Diduch
– volume: 18
  start-page: 45
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010_bib19
  article-title: Osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee and talus in the athlete. Rationale, indications, techniques, and results
  publication-title: Clin Sports Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70129-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Kish
SSID ssj0006945
Score 1.9585322
Snippet Abstract Osteochondral autograft transfer is a technique for treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage lesions. A graft in which the cartilage cap is...
Osteochondral autograft transfer is a technique for treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage lesions. A graft in which the cartilage cap is oriented...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 458
SubjectTerms Arthroplasty, Subchondral - methods
Arthroscopy - methods
Cadaver
Cartilage
Cartilage - transplantation
Cartilage, Articular - surgery
Humans
Knee
Methods
Mosaicplasty
OATS
Orthopedics
Osteochondral autograft transfer
Skin & tissue grafts
Success
Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods
Title A comparison of open versus arthroscopic harvesting of osteochondral autografts
URI https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0968016009000441
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.010
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19362004
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034985695/abstract/
https://search.proquest.com/docview/734098834
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR3LbtQwcFSVCxdEKYVtS-VDxQWlm8R2HB9XK6rtE9SH1JvlOA5dUJPVJnvgwrczdpxdIR4HTlGSiWzPjOcRzwPgWFOXdJAUkSiSKmI5K6OCmjRC1ZwZVE8i8RVvrq6z2T07f-APWzAdcmFcWGWQ_b1M99I6PBkHbI4X8_n4Fo3v3NVHi6U_lvQZ7KiMkKdPfmzCPDLpGxU74MhBh8SZPsbrW21tqFmZnsQui_bPyulvxqdXQqcv4UWwHsmkn-AObNn6FexOavScn76T98THc_of5bvwaULMuskgaSriGmURF4Wxagku8dHVsWwWc0Me9dIX26i_eDCke4NCsS6XOJRedS6Aq-ra13B_-vFuOotC-4TIMJp3ka0Ka2PNuU6FtgxvMxpXaPAYtHIYZ4YLazgrpXU9kCTLkZylLNAjZJoKmtA92K6b2r4FopNM2hR9G4RnTEjNpKksmiaCF4aVbAQfBrypRV8lQw3hY1-Vw7JrdylVnCrE8gjEgFo15H-ixLJt2D6tSlSLkOo3Eo-Ar7_8hUsUKoB_jng4UFBtBnGleXKeST4Csn6Nu8sdmejaNqtWCYr-b55TXOGbnvCb9Ulkc5zV_n_O6QCep6EXRZwcwna3XNl3aOB0xZHn4CN4NpneXH5217OL2fVPDIP6BA
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,4521,24144,27957,27958,45620,45714
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR3LTtwwcISWQ3tBbWnLFtr6UHFB6SaxHcfHFSpaCiwHQOJmOY5TFkSy2mQP_H3HjrOo6uPQY5Kx7Jmx5xHPA-CLpi7pICkiUSRVxHJWRgU1aYSqOTOonkTiK95czLPZDft-y2-34HjIhXFhlUH29zLdS-vwZhKoOVkuFpMrNL5zVx8tlv5aEl2gbcZFwkawPT09m803AjmTvlexg4_cgJA704d5PdTWhrKV6dfYJdL-WT_9zf70eujkFewEA5JM-zW-hi1bv4HdaY3O8-MTOSQ-pNP_K9-Fyykxmz6DpKmI65VFXCDGuiWI5Z0rZdksF4bc6ZWvt1H_8GDI-gblYl2ucCq97lwMV9W1b-Hm5Nv18SwKHRQiw2jeRbYqrI015zoV2jJ8zGhcoc1j0NBhnBkurOGslNa1QZIsR46WskCnkGkqaELfwahuarsHRCeZtCm6NwjPmJCaSVNZtE4ELwwr2RiOBrqpZV8oQw0RZPfKUdl1vJQqThVSeQxiIK0aUkBRaNk2nKBWJapFSPUbl8fANyN_2SgKdcA_ZzwYOKieJ3HVeXKeST4GsvmMB8zdmujaNutWCYoucJ5TxPB9z_hn_CTudFzVh_9c02d4Mbu-OFfnp_OzfXiZhtYUcXIAo261th_R3umKT2E__wTVG_sl
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparison+of+open+versus+arthroscopic+harvesting+of+osteochondral+autografts&rft.jtitle=The+knee&rft.au=Keeling%2C+John+J&rft.au=Gwinn%2C+David+E&rft.au=McGuigan%2C+Francis+X&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=458&rft.epage=462&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.knee.2009.02.010&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F09680160%2FS0968016009X00062%2Fcov150h.gif