Use of electronic health record data to evaluate overuse of cervical cancer screening
National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study w...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA Vol. 19; no. e1; pp. e96 - e101 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Group
01.06.2012
|
Series | FOCUS on clinical research informatics |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests.
Electronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3 years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified.
Manual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing.
Secondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system. |
---|---|
AbstractList | National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests.BACKGROUNDNational organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests.Electronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3 years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified.METHODSElectronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3 years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified.Manual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing.RESULTSManual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing.Secondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system.CONCLUSIONSecondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system. BackgroundNational organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests.MethodsElectronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified.ResultsManual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing.ConclusionSecondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system. National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests. Electronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3 years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified. Manual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing. Secondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system. |
Author | Mathias, Jason S Gossett, Dana Baker, David W |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA – name: 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jason S surname: Mathias fullname: Mathias, Jason S – sequence: 2 givenname: Dana surname: Gossett fullname: Gossett, Dana – sequence: 3 givenname: David W surname: Baker fullname: Baker, David W |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22268215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkUtrHDEQhEWwiV_5BYGgYy6T6DGSZi6BYPICQy5e8E30aHq9MlrJkTQL_vfRshuT5JCc1EhfFdWqC3ISU0RCXnP2jnOp38PWw0MMnWCcd4wxJfULcs6VMN1o-ruTNjNtOsWEOSMXpTwwxrWQ6iU5E0LoQXB1TlargjStKQZ0NafoHd0ghLqhGV3KM52hAq2J4g7CArXBO8zLQeQw77yDQB3ENtPiMmL08f6KnK4hFHx1PC_J6vOn2-uv3c33L9-uP950rpdD7WbpuOZuZsZpZ2an9MQlwDhDDz1qYQZ060lMvRQap0kCG9pNr3BUZhjMJC_Jh4Pv4zJtcXYYa4ZgH7PfQn6yCbz98yX6jb1POyvlKAalm8Hbo0FOPxYs1W59cRgCRExLsVypllD3TP4fFdIwo0clGvrm91jPeX59ewPkAXA5lZJx_YxwZvfl2mO5dl-uPZTbVONfKucrVJ_2u_nwT-1PqO6tvg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191912200 crossref_primary_10_7326_M14_2426 crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2013_002428 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12265_017_9752_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthpol_2018_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2012_000968 crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2013_001935 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_32585_5 crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2013_4475 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24087158 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2023_115670 crossref_primary_10_5888_pcd10_130034 crossref_primary_10_1097_MLR_0000000000000319 crossref_primary_10_3390_informatics8010012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10552_016_0732_7 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocx160 crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2013_001681 |
Cites_doi | 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00006 10.1097/01.AOG.0000196500.50044.ce 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.047 10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00007 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182210034 10.1001/jama.296.19.2336 10.1006/pmed.1995.1096 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90051-3 10.7326/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00005 10.1056/NEJMoa035419 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c6f8a4 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.134 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00410-0 10.3322/canjclin.52.6.342 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.09.010 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca4015 10.1001/jama.1988.03720080028023 10.1002/cncr.22487 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. 2012 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. 2012 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7QO 8FD FR3 P64 5PM |
DOI | 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000536 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Engineering Research Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1527-974X |
EndPage | e101 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC3392856 22268215 10_1136_amiajnl_2011_000536 |
Genre | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: AHRQ HHS grantid: T32 HS000078 – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: UL1 TR000150 – fundername: AHRQ HHS grantid: 5T32HS000078-13 – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS grantid: UL1 RR025741 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .DC .GJ 0R~ 18M 1B1 1TH 29L 2WC 4.4 48X 53G 5GY 5RE 5WD 6PF 7RV 7X7 7~T 88E 88I 8AF 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FI 8FJ 8FW AABZA AACZT AAEDT AAJQQ AALRI AAMVS AAOGV AAPGJ AAPQZ AAPXW AARHZ AAUAY AAUQX AAVAP AAWDT AAWTL AAXUO AAYXX ABDFA ABEJV ABEUO ABGNP ABIXL ABJNI ABNHQ ABOCM ABPQP ABPTD ABQLI ABQNK ABSMQ ABUWG ABVGC ABWST ABWVN ABXVV ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACHQT ACRPL ACUFI ACUTJ ACVCV ACYHN ACZBC ADBBV ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIPN ADJOM ADMTO ADMUD ADNBA ADNMO ADQBN ADRTK ADVEK ADYVW AEGPL AEJOX AEKSI AEMDU AEMQT AENEX AENZO AEPUE AETBJ AEWNT AFFQV AFFZL AFIYH AFKRA AFOFC AFXAL AFYAG AGINJ AGKRT AGMDO AGORE AGQXC AGSYK AGUTN AHGBF AHMBA AHMMS AJBYB AJDVS AJEEA AJNCP ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC ALXQX APIBT APJGH AQDSO AQKUS AQUVI ARAPS ATGXG AVNTJ AVWKF AXUDD AYCSE AZQEC BAWUL BAYMD BCRHZ BENPR BEYMZ BGLVJ BHONS BKEYQ BPHCQ BTRTY BVRKM BVXVI BZKNY C1A C45 CCPQU CDBKE CITATION CS3 DAKXR DIK DILTD DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBD EBS EIHJH EJD EMOBN ENERS EO8 EX3 F5P FDB FECEO FLUFQ FOEOM FOTVD FQBLK FYUFA G-Q GAUVT GJXCC GNUQQ GX1 H13 HAR HCIFZ HMCUK IH2 IHE J21 JXSIZ K6V K7- KBUDW KOP KSI KSN LSO M0T M1P M2P M2Q M41 MBLQV MHKGH NAPCQ NOMLY NOYVH NQ- NU- NVLIB O9- OAUYM OAWHX OBFPC OCZFY ODMLO OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OPAEJ OVD OWPYF P2P P62 PAFKI PCD PEELM PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q5Y R53 RIG ROL ROX ROZ RPM RPZ RUSNO RWL RXO S0X SSZ SV3 TAE TEORI TJX TMA UKHRP WOQ WOW YAYTL YHZ YKOAZ YXANX ZGI ~S- CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB 7X8 7QO 8FD FR3 P64 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d3c161cd07c6c7dc56b13aa9da4a4e6278ecfb2b4326ebb3a088ec45e957887b3 |
ISSN | 1067-5027 1527-974X |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:21:47 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 18:58:28 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 16:43:30 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:00:19 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:01:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:01 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | e1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c438t-d3c161cd07c6c7dc56b13aa9da4a4e6278ecfb2b4326ebb3a088ec45e957887b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 An earlier version of the manuscript was presented as a poster at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting in Minneapolis, MN in 2010 and as an oral presentation at the Academy Health Annual Research Meeting in Seattle, WA in 2011. |
OpenAccessLink | https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-pdf/19/e1/e96/17375148/19-e1-e96.pdf |
PMID | 22268215 |
PQID | 1237076952 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3392856 proquest_miscellaneous_1551616403 proquest_miscellaneous_1237076952 pubmed_primary_22268215 crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2011_000536 crossref_citationtrail_10_1136_amiajnl_2011_000536 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2012 text: 2012-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR |
PublicationSeriesTitle | FOCUS on clinical research informatics |
PublicationTitle | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Am Med Inform Assoc |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
Publisher | BMJ Group |
Publisher_xml | – name: BMJ Group |
References | Saslow ( key 20170522100104_b14) 2002; 52 Chung ( key 20170522100104_b5) 2008 Saraiya ( key 20170522100104_b26) 2010; 170 Saraiya ( key 20170522100104_b22) 2010; 16 Wardle ( key 20170522100104_b20) 1992; 36 Bell ( key 20170522100104_b21) 1995; 24 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( key 20170522100104_b15) 2003 Kulasingam ( key 20170522100104_b18) 2006; 107 Holland-Barkis ( key 20170522100104_b27) 2006; 42 American Medical Association ( key 20170522100104_b4) 2011 Eltoum ( key 20170522100104_b23) 2007; 111 Tierney ( key 20170522100104_b11) 1988; 259 Chaudhry ( key 20170522100104_b8) 2006; 144 Walter ( key 20170522100104_b9) 2006; 296 Owens ( key 20170522100104_b6) 2011; 154 Sawaya ( key 20170522100104_b17) 2003; 349 Garg ( key 20170522100104_b7) 2005; 293 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology ( key 20170522100104_b13) 2009; 114 Yabroff ( key 20170522100104_b25) 2009; 151 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins ( key 20170522100104_b16) 2003; 102 National Quality Forum ( key 20170522100104_b3) 2011 Wright ( key 20170522100104_b19) 2007; 197 ( key 20170522100104_b29) 2008 Bates ( key 20170522100104_b12) 1999; 106 Kaiser Family Foundation ( key 20170522100104_b1) 2011 Walter ( key 20170522100104_b10) 2009; 150 Meissner ( key 20170522100104_b24) 2010; 48 Lee ( key 20170522100104_b28) 2011; 118 American College of Physicians ( key 20170522100104_b2) 2011 12469763 - CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Nov-Dec;52(6):342-62 14561792 - N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 16;349(16):1501-9 16449119 - Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):321-8 19884621 - Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 3;151(9):602-11 12907124 - Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2):417-27 20134296 - Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1409-20 17105796 - JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2336-42 20182268 - Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):249-59 21282697 - Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):174-80 20536271 - Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jun;16(6):e137-44 21691157 - Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):4-13 19349631 - Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):465-73 17262799 - Cancer. 2007 Feb 25;111(1):34-40 17904957 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):346-55 1403996 - J Psychosom Res. 1992 Oct;36(7):609-24 15755945 - JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38 10230742 - Am J Med. 1999 Feb;106(2):144-50 16290022 - Prev Med. 2006 Feb;42(2):140-5 8610085 - Prev Med. 1995 Nov;24(6):610-6 3339821 - JAMA. 1988 Feb 26;259(8):1194-8 16702590 - Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52 20548011 - Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):977-85 |
References_xml | – volume: 150 start-page: 465 year: 2009 ident: key 20170522100104_b10 article-title: Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00006 – volume-title: PCPI and PCPI Approved Quality Measures year: 2011 ident: key 20170522100104_b4 – volume: 107 start-page: 321 year: 2006 ident: key 20170522100104_b18 article-title: Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000196500.50044.ce – volume: 197 start-page: 346 year: 2007 ident: key 20170522100104_b19 article-title: 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.047 – volume: 154 start-page: 174 year: 2011 ident: key 20170522100104_b6 article-title: High-value, cost-conscious health care: concepts for clinicians to evaluate the benefits, harms, and costs of medical interventions publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00007 – volume-title: Screening for Cervical Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale year: 2003 ident: key 20170522100104_b15 – volume-title: ACP's High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care Initiative year: 2011 ident: key 20170522100104_b2 – volume: 118 start-page: 4 year: 2011 ident: key 20170522100104_b28 article-title: Low-risk human papillomavirus testing and other nonrecommended human papillomavirus testing practices among u.s. Health care providers publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182210034 – volume: 296 start-page: 2336 year: 2006 ident: key 20170522100104_b9 article-title: PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.296.19.2336 – volume: 24 start-page: 610 year: 1995 ident: key 20170522100104_b21 article-title: Psychological response to cervical screening publication-title: Prev Med doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1096 – volume-title: Empirical Applications for Assessing the Efficiency and Value of Healthcare Using the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement Physician Performance Measures year: 2008 ident: key 20170522100104_b5 – volume-title: Percent Annual Increase in National Health Expenditures (NHE) per Capita vs. Increase in Consumer Price Index (CPI), 1980–2009 year: 2011 ident: key 20170522100104_b1 – volume: 36 start-page: 609 year: 1992 ident: key 20170522100104_b20 article-title: The psychological costs of screening for cancer publication-title: J Psychosom Res doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90051-3 – volume: 151 start-page: 602 year: 2009 ident: key 20170522100104_b25 article-title: Specialty differences in primary care physician reports of papanicolaou test screening practices: a national survey, 2006 to 2007 publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00005 – volume: 349 start-page: 1501 year: 2003 ident: key 20170522100104_b17 article-title: Risk of cervical cancer associated with extending the interval between cervical-cancer screenings publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035419 – volume-title: Health Care Efficiency Measures: Identification, Categorization, and Evaluation year: 2008 ident: key 20170522100104_b29 – volume: 114 start-page: 1409 year: 2009 ident: key 20170522100104_b13 article-title: ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c6f8a4 – volume: 170 start-page: 977 year: 2010 ident: key 20170522100104_b26 article-title: Cervical cancer screening with both human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou testing vs Papanicolaou testing alone: what screening intervals are physicians recommending? publication-title: Arch Intern Med doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.134 – volume: 106 start-page: 144 year: 1999 ident: key 20170522100104_b12 article-title: A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests publication-title: Am J Med doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00410-0 – volume: 52 start-page: 342 year: 2002 ident: key 20170522100104_b14 article-title: American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/canjclin.52.6.342 – volume: 42 start-page: 140 year: 2006 ident: key 20170522100104_b27 article-title: Primary care physicians' awareness and adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines in Texas publication-title: Prev Med doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.09.010 – volume: 293 start-page: 1223 year: 2005 ident: key 20170522100104_b7 article-title: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 – volume: 102 start-page: 417 year: 2003 ident: key 20170522100104_b16 article-title: ACOG Practice Bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 45, August 2003. Cervical cytology screening (replaces committee opinion 152, March 1995) publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 144 start-page: 742 year: 2006 ident: key 20170522100104_b8 article-title: Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125 – volume: 16 start-page: e137 year: 2010 ident: key 20170522100104_b22 article-title: Ambulatory care visits for Pap tests, abnormal Pap test results, and cervical cancer procedures in the United States publication-title: Am J Manag Care – volume: 48 start-page: 249 year: 2010 ident: key 20170522100104_b24 article-title: Too much of a good thing? Physician practices and patient willingness for less frequent pap test screening intervals publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca4015 – volume-title: Overuse year: 2011 ident: key 20170522100104_b3 – volume: 259 start-page: 1194 year: 1988 ident: key 20170522100104_b11 article-title: Computer predictions of abnormal test results. Effects on outpatient testing publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.1988.03720080028023 – volume: 111 start-page: 34 year: 2007 ident: key 20170522100104_b23 article-title: Impact of HPV testing, HPV vaccine development, and changing screening frequency on national Pap test volume: projections from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.22487 – reference: 21282697 - Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):174-80 – reference: 12469763 - CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Nov-Dec;52(6):342-62 – reference: 14561792 - N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 16;349(16):1501-9 – reference: 8610085 - Prev Med. 1995 Nov;24(6):610-6 – reference: 20536271 - Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jun;16(6):e137-44 – reference: 17262799 - Cancer. 2007 Feb 25;111(1):34-40 – reference: 20134296 - Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1409-20 – reference: 19884621 - Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 3;151(9):602-11 – reference: 12907124 - Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2):417-27 – reference: 21691157 - Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):4-13 – reference: 3339821 - JAMA. 1988 Feb 26;259(8):1194-8 – reference: 20182268 - Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):249-59 – reference: 10230742 - Am J Med. 1999 Feb;106(2):144-50 – reference: 17105796 - JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2336-42 – reference: 17904957 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):346-55 – reference: 15755945 - JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38 – reference: 16449119 - Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):321-8 – reference: 20548011 - Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):977-85 – reference: 16290022 - Prev Med. 2006 Feb;42(2):140-5 – reference: 16702590 - Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52 – reference: 1403996 - J Psychosom Res. 1992 Oct;36(7):609-24 – reference: 19349631 - Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):465-73 |
SSID | ssj0016235 |
Score | 2.1575947 |
Snippet | National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services.... BackgroundNational organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | e96 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Early Detection of Cancer - utilization Electronic Health Records Female Guideline Adherence Humans Middle Aged Practice Guidelines as Topic Research and Applications Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis Vaginal Smears - economics Vaginal Smears - utilization |
Title | Use of electronic health record data to evaluate overuse of cervical cancer screening |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22268215 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1237076952 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1551616403 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3392856 |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZgSIgXxJ1uAxmJtxJI4kviRzRtDLSOl0bqW-RbxdBI0Uhf9ut3fMmltJoGL1GV2nHr8-X4s_2dY4Te54XRpc6LRFmRJnRJTKLSzACRK4woGAe37AKFZ-f8tKLfFmwxaFV9dEmrPurrnXEl_2NVuAd2dVGy_2DZ_qFwAz6DfeEKFobrnWxchYX40VE2IaxxGpZepk7-6chlTOkNheEvrkMl7Z2Eyw7i7H41BfcBU9puINumq6MQlGF7JwYz-VTPI0P7dQZw5197eMycyDHGjkl36GHPQb_AKB21woDAYXlARrmHF90HGWC3OuFkHp2KKjpUGA0Tlob4_97jihGybDbyn1bw0VBss_CobTfvz6GRvy7kz-YyCcu8zp3sSKp9_r0-qc7O6vnxYn4fPchhNuFjwhe9EigDBsj8pnj8qTE5FTTyaUcTmwRma1byt7h2xFbmT9DjaDf8OWDmKbpnm2fo4SwKKZ6jCqCDV0s8QAcH6OAAHeygg9sV7qCDI3RcpQ46OEAH99B5gaqT4_nRaRJP2Eg0JWWbGKKB8WuTFppreGsZVxmRUhhJJbU8L0qrlypXFEi-VYpIGJOspswK5lSoirxEe82qsa8RVtoAmeciW0pNrSbKqJIJZajMc_AAaoLyrttqHdPPu1NQLms_DSW8jn1du76uQ19P0Ie-0u-QfeX24u86e9TgJd3Wl2zsav2nBn5WpAUXLL-ljNszzjhNyQS9CjbsGwUWzUtgxxNUbFi3L-CytG9-01z88NnaCcxASsb379DuAXo0vEOHaK-9Wts3wHlb9dYj9gaka7Kk |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use+of+electronic+health+record+data+to+evaluate+overuse+of+cervical+cancer+screening&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Medical+Informatics+Association+%3A+JAMIA&rft.au=Mathias%2C+Jason+S&rft.au=Gossett%2C+Dana&rft.au=Baker%2C+David+W&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.issn=1067-5027&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=e1&rft.spage=e96&rft.epage=e101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Famiajnl-2011-000536&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1067-5027&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1067-5027&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1067-5027&client=summon |