Use of electronic health record data to evaluate overuse of cervical cancer screening

National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA Vol. 19; no. e1; pp. e96 - e101
Main Authors Mathias, Jason S, Gossett, Dana, Baker, David W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Group 01.06.2012
SeriesFOCUS on clinical research informatics
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests. Electronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3 years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified. Manual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing. Secondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system.
AbstractList National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests.BACKGROUNDNational organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests.Electronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3 years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified.METHODSElectronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3 years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified.Manual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing.RESULTSManual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing.Secondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system.CONCLUSIONSecondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system.
BackgroundNational organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests.MethodsElectronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified.ResultsManual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing.ConclusionSecondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system.
National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services. Electronic health records (EHRs) could be used to measure use of low-value services, but few studies have examined this. The aim of the study was to: (1) determine if EHR data can be used to identify women eligible for an extended Pap testing interval; (2) determine the proportion of these women who received a Pap test sooner than recommended; and (3) assess the consequences of these low-value Pap tests. Electronic query of EHR data identified women aged 30-65 years old who were at low-risk of cervical cancer and therefore eligible for an extended Pap testing interval of 3 years (as per professional society guidelines). Manual chart review assessed query accuracy. The use of low-value Pap tests (ie, those performed sooner than recommended) was measured, and adverse consequences of low-value Pap tests (ie, colposcopies performed as a result of low-value Pap tests) were identified. Manual chart review confirmed query accuracy. Two-thirds (1120/1705) of low-risk women received a Pap test sooner than recommended, and 21 colposcopies were performed as a result of this low-value Pap testing. Secondary analysis of EHR data can accurately measure the use of low-value services such as Pap testing performed sooner than recommended in women at low risk of cervical cancer. Similar application of our methodology could facilitate efforts to simultaneously improve quality and decrease costs, maximizing value in the US healthcare system.
Author Mathias, Jason S
Gossett, Dana
Baker, David W
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
– name: 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jason S
  surname: Mathias
  fullname: Mathias, Jason S
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Dana
  surname: Gossett
  fullname: Gossett, Dana
– sequence: 3
  givenname: David W
  surname: Baker
  fullname: Baker, David W
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22268215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkUtrHDEQhEWwiV_5BYGgYy6T6DGSZi6BYPICQy5e8E30aHq9MlrJkTQL_vfRshuT5JCc1EhfFdWqC3ISU0RCXnP2jnOp38PWw0MMnWCcd4wxJfULcs6VMN1o-ruTNjNtOsWEOSMXpTwwxrWQ6iU5E0LoQXB1TlargjStKQZ0NafoHd0ghLqhGV3KM52hAq2J4g7CArXBO8zLQeQw77yDQB3ENtPiMmL08f6KnK4hFHx1PC_J6vOn2-uv3c33L9-uP950rpdD7WbpuOZuZsZpZ2an9MQlwDhDDz1qYQZ060lMvRQap0kCG9pNr3BUZhjMJC_Jh4Pv4zJtcXYYa4ZgH7PfQn6yCbz98yX6jb1POyvlKAalm8Hbo0FOPxYs1W59cRgCRExLsVypllD3TP4fFdIwo0clGvrm91jPeX59ewPkAXA5lZJx_YxwZvfl2mO5dl-uPZTbVONfKucrVJ_2u_nwT-1PqO6tvg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191912200
crossref_primary_10_7326_M14_2426
crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2013_002428
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12265_017_9752_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthpol_2018_02_001
crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2012_000968
crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2013_001935
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_32585_5
crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2013_4475
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24087158
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2023_115670
crossref_primary_10_5888_pcd10_130034
crossref_primary_10_1097_MLR_0000000000000319
crossref_primary_10_3390_informatics8010012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10552_016_0732_7
crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocx160
crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2013_001681
Cites_doi 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00006
10.1097/01.AOG.0000196500.50044.ce
10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.047
10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00007
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182210034
10.1001/jama.296.19.2336
10.1006/pmed.1995.1096
10.1016/0022-3999(92)90051-3
10.7326/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00005
10.1056/NEJMoa035419
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c6f8a4
10.1001/archinternmed.2010.134
10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00410-0
10.3322/canjclin.52.6.342
10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.09.010
10.1001/jama.293.10.1223
10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125
10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca4015
10.1001/jama.1988.03720080028023
10.1002/cncr.22487
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. 2012
Copyright_xml – notice: 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. 2012
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7QO
8FD
FR3
P64
5PM
DOI 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000536
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
Engineering Research Database
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1527-974X
EndPage e101
ExternalDocumentID PMC3392856
22268215
10_1136_amiajnl_2011_000536
Genre Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: AHRQ HHS
  grantid: T32 HS000078
– fundername: NCATS NIH HHS
  grantid: UL1 TR000150
– fundername: AHRQ HHS
  grantid: 5T32HS000078-13
– fundername: NCRR NIH HHS
  grantid: UL1 RR025741
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.DC
.GJ
0R~
18M
1B1
1TH
29L
2WC
4.4
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5WD
6PF
7RV
7X7
7~T
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FI
8FJ
8FW
AABZA
AACZT
AAEDT
AAJQQ
AALRI
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPGJ
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AARHZ
AAUAY
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWDT
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYXX
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABEUO
ABGNP
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABNHQ
ABOCM
ABPQP
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABQNK
ABSMQ
ABUWG
ABVGC
ABWST
ABWVN
ABXVV
ACFRR
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACHQT
ACRPL
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ACVCV
ACYHN
ACZBC
ADBBV
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADJOM
ADMTO
ADMUD
ADNBA
ADNMO
ADQBN
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYVW
AEGPL
AEJOX
AEKSI
AEMDU
AEMQT
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFFQV
AFFZL
AFIYH
AFKRA
AFOFC
AFXAL
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKRT
AGMDO
AGORE
AGQXC
AGSYK
AGUTN
AHGBF
AHMBA
AHMMS
AJBYB
AJDVS
AJEEA
AJNCP
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
ALXQX
APIBT
APJGH
AQDSO
AQKUS
AQUVI
ARAPS
ATGXG
AVNTJ
AVWKF
AXUDD
AYCSE
AZQEC
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BENPR
BEYMZ
BGLVJ
BHONS
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BTRTY
BVRKM
BVXVI
BZKNY
C1A
C45
CCPQU
CDBKE
CITATION
CS3
DAKXR
DIK
DILTD
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EIHJH
EJD
EMOBN
ENERS
EO8
EX3
F5P
FDB
FECEO
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
FYUFA
G-Q
GAUVT
GJXCC
GNUQQ
GX1
H13
HAR
HCIFZ
HMCUK
IH2
IHE
J21
JXSIZ
K6V
K7-
KBUDW
KOP
KSI
KSN
LSO
M0T
M1P
M2P
M2Q
M41
MBLQV
MHKGH
NAPCQ
NOMLY
NOYVH
NQ-
NU-
NVLIB
O9-
OAUYM
OAWHX
OBFPC
OCZFY
ODMLO
OJQWA
OJZSN
OK1
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
P2P
P62
PAFKI
PCD
PEELM
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q5Y
R53
RIG
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RPM
RPZ
RUSNO
RWL
RXO
S0X
SSZ
SV3
TAE
TEORI
TJX
TMA
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
YAYTL
YHZ
YKOAZ
YXANX
ZGI
~S-
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
7X8
7QO
8FD
FR3
P64
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d3c161cd07c6c7dc56b13aa9da4a4e6278ecfb2b4326ebb3a088ec45e957887b3
ISSN 1067-5027
1527-974X
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:21:47 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:58:28 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 16:43:30 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:00:19 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:01:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:01 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue e1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c438t-d3c161cd07c6c7dc56b13aa9da4a4e6278ecfb2b4326ebb3a088ec45e957887b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
An earlier version of the manuscript was presented as a poster at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting in Minneapolis, MN in 2010 and as an oral presentation at the Academy Health Annual Research Meeting in Seattle, WA in 2011.
OpenAccessLink https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-pdf/19/e1/e96/17375148/19-e1-e96.pdf
PMID 22268215
PQID 1237076952
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3392856
proquest_miscellaneous_1551616403
proquest_miscellaneous_1237076952
pubmed_primary_22268215
crossref_primary_10_1136_amiajnl_2011_000536
crossref_citationtrail_10_1136_amiajnl_2011_000536
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR
PublicationSeriesTitle FOCUS on clinical research informatics
PublicationTitle Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
PublicationTitleAlternate J Am Med Inform Assoc
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher BMJ Group
Publisher_xml – name: BMJ Group
References Saslow ( key 20170522100104_b14) 2002; 52
Chung ( key 20170522100104_b5) 2008
Saraiya ( key 20170522100104_b26) 2010; 170
Saraiya ( key 20170522100104_b22) 2010; 16
Wardle ( key 20170522100104_b20) 1992; 36
Bell ( key 20170522100104_b21) 1995; 24
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( key 20170522100104_b15) 2003
Kulasingam ( key 20170522100104_b18) 2006; 107
Holland-Barkis ( key 20170522100104_b27) 2006; 42
American Medical Association ( key 20170522100104_b4) 2011
Eltoum ( key 20170522100104_b23) 2007; 111
Tierney ( key 20170522100104_b11) 1988; 259
Chaudhry ( key 20170522100104_b8) 2006; 144
Walter ( key 20170522100104_b9) 2006; 296
Owens ( key 20170522100104_b6) 2011; 154
Sawaya ( key 20170522100104_b17) 2003; 349
Garg ( key 20170522100104_b7) 2005; 293
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology ( key 20170522100104_b13) 2009; 114
Yabroff ( key 20170522100104_b25) 2009; 151
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins ( key 20170522100104_b16) 2003; 102
National Quality Forum ( key 20170522100104_b3) 2011
Wright ( key 20170522100104_b19) 2007; 197
( key 20170522100104_b29) 2008
Bates ( key 20170522100104_b12) 1999; 106
Kaiser Family Foundation ( key 20170522100104_b1) 2011
Walter ( key 20170522100104_b10) 2009; 150
Meissner ( key 20170522100104_b24) 2010; 48
Lee ( key 20170522100104_b28) 2011; 118
American College of Physicians ( key 20170522100104_b2) 2011
12469763 - CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Nov-Dec;52(6):342-62
14561792 - N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 16;349(16):1501-9
16449119 - Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):321-8
19884621 - Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 3;151(9):602-11
12907124 - Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2):417-27
20134296 - Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1409-20
17105796 - JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2336-42
20182268 - Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):249-59
21282697 - Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):174-80
20536271 - Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jun;16(6):e137-44
21691157 - Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):4-13
19349631 - Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):465-73
17262799 - Cancer. 2007 Feb 25;111(1):34-40
17904957 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):346-55
1403996 - J Psychosom Res. 1992 Oct;36(7):609-24
15755945 - JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38
10230742 - Am J Med. 1999 Feb;106(2):144-50
16290022 - Prev Med. 2006 Feb;42(2):140-5
8610085 - Prev Med. 1995 Nov;24(6):610-6
3339821 - JAMA. 1988 Feb 26;259(8):1194-8
16702590 - Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52
20548011 - Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):977-85
References_xml – volume: 150
  start-page: 465
  year: 2009
  ident: key 20170522100104_b10
  article-title: Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00006
– volume-title: PCPI and PCPI Approved Quality Measures
  year: 2011
  ident: key 20170522100104_b4
– volume: 107
  start-page: 321
  year: 2006
  ident: key 20170522100104_b18
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000196500.50044.ce
– volume: 197
  start-page: 346
  year: 2007
  ident: key 20170522100104_b19
  article-title: 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.047
– volume: 154
  start-page: 174
  year: 2011
  ident: key 20170522100104_b6
  article-title: High-value, cost-conscious health care: concepts for clinicians to evaluate the benefits, harms, and costs of medical interventions
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00007
– volume-title: Screening for Cervical Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale
  year: 2003
  ident: key 20170522100104_b15
– volume-title: ACP's High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care Initiative
  year: 2011
  ident: key 20170522100104_b2
– volume: 118
  start-page: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: key 20170522100104_b28
  article-title: Low-risk human papillomavirus testing and other nonrecommended human papillomavirus testing practices among u.s. Health care providers
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182210034
– volume: 296
  start-page: 2336
  year: 2006
  ident: key 20170522100104_b9
  article-title: PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.296.19.2336
– volume: 24
  start-page: 610
  year: 1995
  ident: key 20170522100104_b21
  article-title: Psychological response to cervical screening
  publication-title: Prev Med
  doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1096
– volume-title: Empirical Applications for Assessing the Efficiency and Value of Healthcare Using the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement Physician Performance Measures
  year: 2008
  ident: key 20170522100104_b5
– volume-title: Percent Annual Increase in National Health Expenditures (NHE) per Capita vs. Increase in Consumer Price Index (CPI), 1980–2009
  year: 2011
  ident: key 20170522100104_b1
– volume: 36
  start-page: 609
  year: 1992
  ident: key 20170522100104_b20
  article-title: The psychological costs of screening for cancer
  publication-title: J Psychosom Res
  doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90051-3
– volume: 151
  start-page: 602
  year: 2009
  ident: key 20170522100104_b25
  article-title: Specialty differences in primary care physician reports of papanicolaou test screening practices: a national survey, 2006 to 2007
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00005
– volume: 349
  start-page: 1501
  year: 2003
  ident: key 20170522100104_b17
  article-title: Risk of cervical cancer associated with extending the interval between cervical-cancer screenings
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035419
– volume-title: Health Care Efficiency Measures: Identification, Categorization, and Evaluation
  year: 2008
  ident: key 20170522100104_b29
– volume: 114
  start-page: 1409
  year: 2009
  ident: key 20170522100104_b13
  article-title: ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c6f8a4
– volume: 170
  start-page: 977
  year: 2010
  ident: key 20170522100104_b26
  article-title: Cervical cancer screening with both human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou testing vs Papanicolaou testing alone: what screening intervals are physicians recommending?
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.134
– volume: 106
  start-page: 144
  year: 1999
  ident: key 20170522100104_b12
  article-title: A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests
  publication-title: Am J Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00410-0
– volume: 52
  start-page: 342
  year: 2002
  ident: key 20170522100104_b14
  article-title: American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/canjclin.52.6.342
– volume: 42
  start-page: 140
  year: 2006
  ident: key 20170522100104_b27
  article-title: Primary care physicians' awareness and adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines in Texas
  publication-title: Prev Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.09.010
– volume: 293
  start-page: 1223
  year: 2005
  ident: key 20170522100104_b7
  article-title: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223
– volume: 102
  start-page: 417
  year: 2003
  ident: key 20170522100104_b16
  article-title: ACOG Practice Bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 45, August 2003. Cervical cytology screening (replaces committee opinion 152, March 1995)
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 144
  start-page: 742
  year: 2006
  ident: key 20170522100104_b8
  article-title: Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125
– volume: 16
  start-page: e137
  year: 2010
  ident: key 20170522100104_b22
  article-title: Ambulatory care visits for Pap tests, abnormal Pap test results, and cervical cancer procedures in the United States
  publication-title: Am J Manag Care
– volume: 48
  start-page: 249
  year: 2010
  ident: key 20170522100104_b24
  article-title: Too much of a good thing? Physician practices and patient willingness for less frequent pap test screening intervals
  publication-title: Med Care
  doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca4015
– volume-title: Overuse
  year: 2011
  ident: key 20170522100104_b3
– volume: 259
  start-page: 1194
  year: 1988
  ident: key 20170522100104_b11
  article-title: Computer predictions of abnormal test results. Effects on outpatient testing
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.1988.03720080028023
– volume: 111
  start-page: 34
  year: 2007
  ident: key 20170522100104_b23
  article-title: Impact of HPV testing, HPV vaccine development, and changing screening frequency on national Pap test volume: projections from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.22487
– reference: 21282697 - Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):174-80
– reference: 12469763 - CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Nov-Dec;52(6):342-62
– reference: 14561792 - N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 16;349(16):1501-9
– reference: 8610085 - Prev Med. 1995 Nov;24(6):610-6
– reference: 20536271 - Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jun;16(6):e137-44
– reference: 17262799 - Cancer. 2007 Feb 25;111(1):34-40
– reference: 20134296 - Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1409-20
– reference: 19884621 - Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 3;151(9):602-11
– reference: 12907124 - Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2):417-27
– reference: 21691157 - Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):4-13
– reference: 3339821 - JAMA. 1988 Feb 26;259(8):1194-8
– reference: 20182268 - Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):249-59
– reference: 10230742 - Am J Med. 1999 Feb;106(2):144-50
– reference: 17105796 - JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2336-42
– reference: 17904957 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):346-55
– reference: 15755945 - JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38
– reference: 16449119 - Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):321-8
– reference: 20548011 - Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):977-85
– reference: 16290022 - Prev Med. 2006 Feb;42(2):140-5
– reference: 16702590 - Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52
– reference: 1403996 - J Psychosom Res. 1992 Oct;36(7):609-24
– reference: 19349631 - Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):465-73
SSID ssj0016235
Score 2.1575947
Snippet National organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value services....
BackgroundNational organizations historically focused on increasing use of effective services are now attempting to identify and discourage use of low-value...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage e96
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Early Detection of Cancer - utilization
Electronic Health Records
Female
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Middle Aged
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Research and Applications
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
Vaginal Smears - economics
Vaginal Smears - utilization
Title Use of electronic health record data to evaluate overuse of cervical cancer screening
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22268215
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1237076952
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1551616403
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3392856
Volume 19
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZgSIgXxJ1uAxmJtxJI4kviRzRtDLSOl0bqW-RbxdBI0Uhf9ut3fMmltJoGL1GV2nHr8-X4s_2dY4Te54XRpc6LRFmRJnRJTKLSzACRK4woGAe37AKFZ-f8tKLfFmwxaFV9dEmrPurrnXEl_2NVuAd2dVGy_2DZ_qFwAz6DfeEKFobrnWxchYX40VE2IaxxGpZepk7-6chlTOkNheEvrkMl7Z2Eyw7i7H41BfcBU9puINumq6MQlGF7JwYz-VTPI0P7dQZw5197eMycyDHGjkl36GHPQb_AKB21woDAYXlARrmHF90HGWC3OuFkHp2KKjpUGA0Tlob4_97jihGybDbyn1bw0VBss_CobTfvz6GRvy7kz-YyCcu8zp3sSKp9_r0-qc7O6vnxYn4fPchhNuFjwhe9EigDBsj8pnj8qTE5FTTyaUcTmwRma1byt7h2xFbmT9DjaDf8OWDmKbpnm2fo4SwKKZ6jCqCDV0s8QAcH6OAAHeygg9sV7qCDI3RcpQ46OEAH99B5gaqT4_nRaRJP2Eg0JWWbGKKB8WuTFppreGsZVxmRUhhJJbU8L0qrlypXFEi-VYpIGJOspswK5lSoirxEe82qsa8RVtoAmeciW0pNrSbKqJIJZajMc_AAaoLyrttqHdPPu1NQLms_DSW8jn1du76uQ19P0Ie-0u-QfeX24u86e9TgJd3Wl2zsav2nBn5WpAUXLL-ljNszzjhNyQS9CjbsGwUWzUtgxxNUbFi3L-CytG9-01z88NnaCcxASsb379DuAXo0vEOHaK-9Wts3wHlb9dYj9gaka7Kk
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use+of+electronic+health+record+data+to+evaluate+overuse+of+cervical+cancer+screening&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Medical+Informatics+Association+%3A+JAMIA&rft.au=Mathias%2C+Jason+S&rft.au=Gossett%2C+Dana&rft.au=Baker%2C+David+W&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.issn=1067-5027&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=e1&rft.spage=e96&rft.epage=e101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Famiajnl-2011-000536&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1067-5027&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1067-5027&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1067-5027&client=summon