Clinical outcomes of frozen embryo versus fresh embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Purpose To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET). Methods Meta-analysis. Results We conducted an electronic literature search o...
Saved in:
Published in | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics Vol. 298; no. 2; pp. 259 - 272 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.08.2018
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose
To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET).
Methods
Meta-analysis.
Results
We conducted an electronic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases and manually supplemented another 2 articles from relevant citations. Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis,including 1141 women who underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1079 who underwent frozen embryo transfer. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that the live birth rate [RR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.08–1.30),
P
= 0.0003] and clinical pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.02–1.19),
P
= 0.02] were significantly higher in FET group. Miscarriage rate [RR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.48–0.80),
P
= 0.0002], and moderate to severe OHSS occurrence rate [RR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.12 to 0.39),
P
< 0.00001] were significantly lower in FET group. Differences of biochemical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate between the two groups did not reach the statistical significance.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that the IVF/ICSI with FET is more efficient and less risky for OHSS compared with ET. However, we should comprehensively inform patients with advantages, disadvantages and potential risks related to embryo cryopreservation, and carefully assess their fertility conditions to make the most beneficial clinical decision. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET).PURPOSETo examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET).Meta-analysis.METHODSMeta-analysis.We conducted an electronic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases and manually supplemented another 2 articles from relevant citations. Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis,including 1141 women who underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1079 who underwent frozen embryo transfer. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that the live birth rate [RR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.08-1.30), P = 0.0003] and clinical pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.02-1.19), P = 0.02] were significantly higher in FET group. Miscarriage rate [RR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.48-0.80), P = 0.0002], and moderate to severe OHSS occurrence rate [RR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.12 to 0.39), P < 0.00001] were significantly lower in FET group. Differences of biochemical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate between the two groups did not reach the statistical significance.RESULTSWe conducted an electronic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases and manually supplemented another 2 articles from relevant citations. Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis,including 1141 women who underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1079 who underwent frozen embryo transfer. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that the live birth rate [RR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.08-1.30), P = 0.0003] and clinical pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.02-1.19), P = 0.02] were significantly higher in FET group. Miscarriage rate [RR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.48-0.80), P = 0.0002], and moderate to severe OHSS occurrence rate [RR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.12 to 0.39), P < 0.00001] were significantly lower in FET group. Differences of biochemical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate between the two groups did not reach the statistical significance.Our results suggest that the IVF/ICSI with FET is more efficient and less risky for OHSS compared with ET. However, we should comprehensively inform patients with advantages, disadvantages and potential risks related to embryo cryopreservation, and carefully assess their fertility conditions to make the most beneficial clinical decision.CONCLUSIONSOur results suggest that the IVF/ICSI with FET is more efficient and less risky for OHSS compared with ET. However, we should comprehensively inform patients with advantages, disadvantages and potential risks related to embryo cryopreservation, and carefully assess their fertility conditions to make the most beneficial clinical decision. Purpose To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET). Methods Meta-analysis. Results We conducted an electronic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases and manually supplemented another 2 articles from relevant citations. Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis,including 1141 women who underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1079 who underwent frozen embryo transfer. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that the live birth rate [RR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.08–1.30), P = 0.0003] and clinical pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.02–1.19), P = 0.02] were significantly higher in FET group. Miscarriage rate [RR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.48–0.80), P = 0.0002], and moderate to severe OHSS occurrence rate [RR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.12 to 0.39), P < 0.00001] were significantly lower in FET group. Differences of biochemical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate between the two groups did not reach the statistical significance. Conclusions Our results suggest that the IVF/ICSI with FET is more efficient and less risky for OHSS compared with ET. However, we should comprehensively inform patients with advantages, disadvantages and potential risks related to embryo cryopreservation, and carefully assess their fertility conditions to make the most beneficial clinical decision. PurposeTo examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET).MethodsMeta-analysis.ResultsWe conducted an electronic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases and manually supplemented another 2 articles from relevant citations. Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis,including 1141 women who underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1079 who underwent frozen embryo transfer. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that the live birth rate [RR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.08–1.30), P = 0.0003] and clinical pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.02–1.19), P = 0.02] were significantly higher in FET group. Miscarriage rate [RR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.48–0.80), P = 0.0002], and moderate to severe OHSS occurrence rate [RR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.12 to 0.39), P < 0.00001] were significantly lower in FET group. Differences of biochemical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate between the two groups did not reach the statistical significance.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the IVF/ICSI with FET is more efficient and less risky for OHSS compared with ET. However, we should comprehensively inform patients with advantages, disadvantages and potential risks related to embryo cryopreservation, and carefully assess their fertility conditions to make the most beneficial clinical decision. To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET). Meta-analysis. We conducted an electronic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases and manually supplemented another 2 articles from relevant citations. Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis,including 1141 women who underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1079 who underwent frozen embryo transfer. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that the live birth rate [RR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.08-1.30), P = 0.0003] and clinical pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.02-1.19), P = 0.02] were significantly higher in FET group. Miscarriage rate [RR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.48-0.80), P = 0.0002], and moderate to severe OHSS occurrence rate [RR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.12 to 0.39), P < 0.00001] were significantly lower in FET group. Differences of biochemical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate between the two groups did not reach the statistical significance. Our results suggest that the IVF/ICSI with FET is more efficient and less risky for OHSS compared with ET. However, we should comprehensively inform patients with advantages, disadvantages and potential risks related to embryo cryopreservation, and carefully assess their fertility conditions to make the most beneficial clinical decision. |
Author | Wu, Jing Wang, Xiaohong Zhang, Junyan Xiao, Xifeng Zhang, Wanlin Peng, Ling Wang, Wenjun |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Wanlin surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Wanlin organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medical Center, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University – sequence: 2 givenname: Xifeng surname: Xiao fullname: Xiao, Xifeng organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medical Center, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University – sequence: 3 givenname: Junyan surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Junyan organization: Bothwin Clinical Study Consultant – sequence: 4 givenname: Wenjun surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Wenjun organization: Department of Infectious Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 5 givenname: Jing surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Jing organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medical Center, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University – sequence: 6 givenname: Ling surname: Peng fullname: Peng, Ling organization: Department of Thoracic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University – sequence: 7 givenname: Xiaohong orcidid: 0000-0001-8925-5736 surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Xiaohong email: WXHIVF8888@163.com organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medical Center, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881888$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kc9u1DAQxi1URLeFB-CCLHHhEhg7TuxwQyv-SZW4wDlynHFx5djFdop234I3xtttQaoEF8_o0-8b2_OdkZMQAxLynMFrBiDfZAABogGmGiFV33SPyIaJljcgGTshGxgOPfTylJzlfAXAuFL9E3LKB6WYUmpDfm29C85oT-NaTFww02ipTXGPgeIypV2kN5jymquI-fu9VpIO2WKiNnoff7pwSV2gN66kSKtcnHd7XVwMb6mmCxbd6KD9Lrvb-dU8x8XtcaYmhurxvrYlOe3zU_LY1oLP7uo5-fbh_dftp-biy8fP23cXjRGtKo1WINTE51YKy4yFVkswKPgwwWQmlGJuZ90rUAMIK-aJc2YMaitn0fU46_acvDrOvU7xx4q5jIvLBr3XAeOaRw4dVzAwARV9-QC9imuq_6kU71nX1rOr1Is7ap0WnMfr5BadduP9sivAjoBJMeeE9g_CYDwEOh4DHWug4yHQ8TBUPvAYV24XWxNw_r9OfnTmeku4xPT30f82_QYwEbe1 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dey331 crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2021_745039 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_020_01857_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_020_01934_z crossref_primary_10_1080_14647273_2020_1778199 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_023_05369_z crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2021_738005 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0967199422000466 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jri_2023_103819 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2020_491892 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bj_2021_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dead184 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_022_05088_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbmo_2021_11_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbmo_2021_10_015 crossref_primary_10_1080_09513590_2021_1998438 crossref_primary_10_1080_15592294_2019_1646572 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00431_021_03975_7 crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2019_00325 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2018_06_033 crossref_primary_10_1093_biolre_ioy176 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000001537 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cryobiol_2019_11_041 crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dey388 crossref_primary_10_31083_j_ceog5008171 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_021_02206_0 crossref_primary_10_2152_jmi_69_224 crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_13863 crossref_primary_10_2174_1573404817666210223163145 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_058468 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2021_05_044 crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_606X_21_04722_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2020_11_011 crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deae106 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrd_23715 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_021_02348_1 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0967199425000048 crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deab059 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43032_021_00538_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2022_12_012 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/bdra.23116 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.059 10.5935/1518-0557.20170012 10.1371/journal.pone.0067614 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.011 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.049 10.1177/0300060513489480 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027 10.1007/s10815-016-0647-y 10.1093/humrep/det272 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80080-5 10.1007/BF02066172 10.3109/09513590.2014.995620 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03323-X 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.027 10.13005/bbra/1165 10.1071/RD9950237 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60981-9 10.1002/mrd.22340 10.1093/humrep/14.6.1457 10.1093/humrep/den501 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.06.002 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60042-9 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.09.001 10.1056/NEJMoa1513873 10.1093/humrep/deu239 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.025 10.1186/1477-7827-11-84 10.1093/molehr/gah150 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58275-2 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.023 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 – notice: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00404-018-4786-5 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central ProQuest One Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X7 name: Health & Medical Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1432-0711 |
EndPage | 272 |
ExternalDocumentID | 29881888 10_1007_s00404_018_4786_5 |
Genre | Journal Article Review |
GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .GJ .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 2.D 203 23N 28- 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3O- 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5QI 5RE 5VS 67Z 6NX 7X7 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AAJSJ AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACUDM ACULB ACZOJ ADBBV ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AOCGG ARMRJ AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI C6C CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GXS H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH LAS LLZTM M4Y MA- N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PT4 PT5 QOK QOR QOS R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7X Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8V Z8W Z91 ZMTXR ZOVNA ZXP ~EX AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABEEZ ABFSG ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFGXO AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a8048b2d374f1cf03a70ce429b0bcbe74d3da6808904f4db221cceaf7d456eda3 |
IEDL.DBID | U2A |
ISSN | 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 06:22:53 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 15:11:25 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:10:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:35:22 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:47 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:36:43 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | IVF Frozen embryo transfer Fresh embryo transfer Meta-analysis |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c438t-a8048b2d374f1cf03a70ce429b0bcbe74d3da6808904f4db221cceaf7d456eda3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-8925-5736 |
PMID | 29881888 |
PQID | 2261532265 |
PQPubID | 4408561 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2052809140 proquest_journals_2261532265 pubmed_primary_29881888 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_018_4786_5 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00404_018_4786_5 springer_journals_10_1007_s00404_018_4786_5 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2018-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2018 text: 2018-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Berlin/Heidelberg |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Germany – name: Heidelberg |
PublicationTitle | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Arch Gynecol Obstet |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Arch Gynecol Obstet |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | Papanikolaou, Camus, Fatemi, Tournaye, Verheyen, Van Steirteghem (CR26) 2006; 12 Roque, Valle, Kostolias, Sampaio, Geber (CR31) 2017; 21 Ferraretti, Gianaroli, Magli, Fortini, Selman, Feliciani (CR5) 1999; 14 Nouri, Ott, Stoegbauer, Pietrowski, Frantal, Walch (CR21) 2013; 11 Legro, Wu, Barnhart, Farquhar, Fauser, Mol (CR15) 2014; 29 Shaker, Zosmer, Dean, Bekir, Jacobs, Tan (CR7) 1996; 65 Elgindy, Abou-Setta, Mostafa (CR22) 2011; 23 CR14 Shapiro, Daneshmand, Restrepo, Garner, Aguirre, Hudson (CR17) 2013; 99 CR12 Ubaldi, Bourgain, Tournaye, Smitz, Van, Devroey (CR28) 1997; 67 CR32 Shapiro, Daneshmand, Garner, Aguirre, Hudson, Thomas (CR8) 2011; 96 Kolibianakis, Bourgain, Albano, Osmanagaoglu, Smitz, Steirteghem (CR27) 2002; 78 Rodriguez-Purata, Lee, Whitehouse, Duke, Grunfeld, Sandler (CR16) 2016; 33 Saenz-De-Juano, Peñaranda, Marco-Jiménez, Vicente (CR39) 2014; 69 Yin, Hang, Gu, Xu, Ma, Zhu (CR35) 2013; 97 Nakashima, Araki, Tani, Ishihara, Kuwahara, Irahara (CR33) 2013; 99 Awonuga, Pittrof, Zaidi, Dean, Jacobs, Tan (CR18) 1996; 13 Shapiro, Daneshmand, Bedient, Garner (CR36) 2016; 106 Riesco, Robles (CR40) 2013; 8 Chen, Shi, Sun, Zhang, Liang, Cao (CR3) 2016; 375 Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, Altman (CR10) 2009; 18 Wang, Feng, Zhang, Zhou, Shu, Gan (CR20) 2014; 20 Horcajadas, Riesewijk, Polman, Os, Pellicer, Mosselman (CR29) 2005; 11 Ishihara, Araki, Kuwahara, Itakura, Saito, Adamson (CR34) 2014; 101 Golan, Weissman (CR11) 2009; 19 CR23 Wong, Mastenbroek, Repping (CR2) 2014; 102 Wennerholm, Henningsen, Romundstad, Bergh, Pinborg, Skjaerven (CR37) 2013; 28 Tarín, Garcíapérez, Cano (CR41) 2014; 81 Direkvand-Moghadam, Delpisheh, Khosravi (CR1) 2013; 10 Yang, Pang, Li, Yang, Zhen, Chen (CR6) 2015; 31 Shapiro, Daneshmand, Garner, Aguirre, Hudson, Thomas (CR9) 2011; 96 Glujovsky, Farquhar, Quinteiro Retamar, Alvarer Sedo, Blake (CR24) 2012; 7 Coates, Kung, Mounts, Hesla, Bankowski, Barbieri (CR4) 2017; 107 Maldonado, Penteado, Faccio, Lopes, Arnold (CR38) 2015; 71 Wong, van Wey, Mol, Repping, Mastenbroek (CR13) 2017; 3 Li, Dong, Guo, Sun, Su, Chen (CR25) 2013; 41 Van, Van, Ghislain, In’T, Schuit, Fatemi (CR30) 2009; 24 Bourne, Richings, Harari, Watkins, Speirs, Johnston (CR19) 1995; 7 S Yang (4786_CR6) 2015; 31 MF Riesco (4786_CR40) 2013; 8 MB Maldonado (4786_CR38) 2015; 71 A Direkvand-Moghadam (4786_CR1) 2013; 10 D Moher (4786_CR10) 2009; 18 O Ishihara (4786_CR34) 2014; 101 UB Wennerholm (4786_CR37) 2013; 28 EG Papanikolaou (4786_CR26) 2006; 12 4786_CR23 ZJ Chen (4786_CR3) 2016; 375 A Coates (4786_CR4) 2017; 107 D Glujovsky (4786_CR24) 2012; 7 BS Shapiro (4786_CR36) 2016; 106 KM Wong (4786_CR2) 2014; 102 BS Shapiro (4786_CR8) 2011; 96 RR Li (4786_CR25) 2013; 41 JA Horcajadas (4786_CR29) 2005; 11 RS Legro (4786_CR15) 2014; 29 JJ Tarín (4786_CR41) 2014; 81 CZ Wang (4786_CR20) 2014; 20 AP Ferraretti (4786_CR5) 1999; 14 AG Shaker (4786_CR7) 1996; 65 4786_CR32 A Nakashima (4786_CR33) 2013; 99 A Golan (4786_CR11) 2009; 19 4786_CR12 L Yin (4786_CR35) 2013; 97 BS Shapiro (4786_CR17) 2013; 99 VI Van (4786_CR30) 2009; 24 J Rodriguez-Purata (4786_CR16) 2016; 33 BS Shapiro (4786_CR9) 2011; 96 4786_CR14 K Nouri (4786_CR21) 2013; 11 M Roque (4786_CR31) 2017; 21 KM Wong (4786_CR13) 2017; 3 MD Saenz-De-Juano (4786_CR39) 2014; 69 H Bourne (4786_CR19) 1995; 7 AO Awonuga (4786_CR18) 1996; 13 F Ubaldi (4786_CR28) 1997; 67 E Kolibianakis (4786_CR27) 2002; 78 EA Elgindy (4786_CR22) 2011; 23 |
References_xml | – volume: 97 start-page: 744 year: 2013 end-page: 749 ident: CR35 article-title: Analysis of birth defects among children 3 years after conception through assisted reproductive technology in China publication-title: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol doi: 10.1002/bdra.23116 – volume: 96 start-page: 516 year: 2011 end-page: 518 ident: CR9 article-title: Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.059 – volume: 21 start-page: 49 year: 2017 end-page: 53 ident: CR31 article-title: Freeze-all cycle in reproductive medicine: current perspectives publication-title: JBRA Assist Reprod doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170012 – volume: 8 start-page: e67614 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: CR40 article-title: Cryopreservation causes genetic and epigenetic changes in zebrafish genital ridges publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067614 – volume: 23 start-page: 789 issue: 6 year: 2011 end-page: 798 ident: CR22 article-title: Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in women with high oestradiol concentrations: randomized controlled trial publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.011 – volume: 106 start-page: 317 year: 2016 end-page: 321 ident: CR36 article-title: Comparison of birth weights in patients randomly assigned to fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.049 – volume: 41 start-page: 1318 issue: 4 year: 2013 end-page: 1325 ident: CR25 article-title: Comparative study of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 embryo transfer and day 5 blastocyst transfer in patients with progesterone elevation publication-title: J Int Med Res doi: 10.1177/0300060513489480 – volume: 20 start-page: 697 issue: 8 year: 2014 end-page: 701 ident: CR20 article-title: Chen HH. [Effects of IVF versus ICSI on the outcomes of elective blastocyst culture publication-title: Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue – ident: CR14 – volume: 99 start-page: 389 year: 2013 end-page: 392 ident: CR17 article-title: Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044 – ident: CR12 – volume: 7 start-page: Cd002118 year: 2012 ident: CR24 article-title: Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 102 start-page: 19 issue: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 26 ident: CR2 article-title: Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027 – volume: 33 start-page: 401 year: 2016 end-page: 412 ident: CR16 article-title: Reproductive outcome is optimized by genomic embryo screening, vitrification, and subsequent transfer into a prepared synchronous endometrium publication-title: J Assist Reprod Gen doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0647-y – volume: 28 start-page: 2545 year: 2013 end-page: 2553 ident: CR37 article-title: Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group publication-title: Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) doi: 10.1093/humrep/det272 – volume: 67 start-page: 521 year: 1997 end-page: 526 ident: CR28 article-title: Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80080-5 – volume: 13 start-page: 401 year: 1996 end-page: 406 ident: CR18 article-title: Elective cryopreservation of all embryos in women at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome may not prevent the condition but reduces the live birth rate publication-title: J Assist Reprod Gen doi: 10.1007/BF02066172 – volume: 31 start-page: 355 year: 2015 end-page: 358 ident: CR6 article-title: The individualized choice of embryo transfer timing for patients with elevated serum progesterone level on the HCG day in IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized clinical study publication-title: Gynecol Endocrinol doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.995620 – volume: 78 start-page: 1025 year: 2002 end-page: 1029 ident: CR27 article-title: Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03323-X – volume: 99 start-page: 450 year: 2013 end-page: 455 ident: CR33 article-title: Implications of assisted reproductive technologies on term singleton birth weight: an analysis of 25,777 children in the national assisted reproduction registry of Japan publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.027 – ident: CR23 – volume: 18 start-page: 889 year: 2009 end-page: 896 ident: CR10 article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement publication-title: Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet – volume: 10 start-page: 559 issue: 2 year: 2013 end-page: 567 ident: CR1 article-title: Epidemiology of female infertility; a review of literature publication-title: Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia doi: 10.13005/bbra/1165 – volume: 7 start-page: 237 year: 1995 end-page: 245 ident: CR19 article-title: The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of severe and extreme male infertility publication-title: Reprod Fertil Dev doi: 10.1071/RD9950237 – volume: 96 start-page: 344 year: 2011 end-page: 348 ident: CR8 article-title: Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050 – volume: 12 start-page: 60 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 65 ident: CR26 article-title: Early pregnancy loss is significantly higher after day 3 single embryo transfer than after day 5 single blastocyst transfer in GnRH antagonist stimulated IVF cycles publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60981-9 – volume: 81 start-page: 568 year: 2014 end-page: 583 ident: CR41 article-title: Assisted reproductive technology results: why are live-birth percentages so low? publication-title: Mol Reprod Dev doi: 10.1002/mrd.22340 – volume: 14 start-page: 1457 year: 1999 end-page: 1460 ident: CR5 article-title: Elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: efficiency and safety publication-title: Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.6.1457 – volume: 24 start-page: 1085 year: 2009 end-page: 1091 ident: CR30 article-title: In GnRH antagonist/rec-FSH stimulated cycles, advanced endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte retrieval correlates with altered gene expression publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/den501 – volume: 69 start-page: 178 year: 2014 end-page: 180 ident: CR39 article-title: Does vitrification alter the methylation pattern of OCT4 promoter in rabbit late blastocyst? publication-title: Cryobiology doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.06.002 – volume: 19 start-page: 28 year: 2009 end-page: 32 ident: CR11 article-title: A modern classification of OHSS publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60042-9 – volume: 71 start-page: 481 year: 2015 end-page: 485 ident: CR38 article-title: Changes in tri-methylation profile of lysines 4 and 27 of histone H3 in bovine blastocysts after cryopreservation publication-title: Cryobiology doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.09.001 – volume: 375 start-page: 523 issue: 6 year: 2016 end-page: 533 ident: CR3 article-title: Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513873 – volume: 29 start-page: 2075 year: 2014 end-page: 2082 ident: CR15 article-title: Improving the reporting of clinical trials of infertility treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statementdaggerdouble dagger publication-title: Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu239 – ident: CR32 – volume: 101 start-page: 128 year: 2014 end-page: 133 ident: CR34 article-title: Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.025 – volume: 107 start-page: e3 issue: 723–30 year: 2017 ident: CR4 article-title: Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Fertil Steril – volume: 11 start-page: 84 year: 2013 ident: CR21 article-title: Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in IVF versus ICSI-conceived pregnancies at a tertiary care center–a pilot study publication-title: Reprod Biol Endocrinol doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-84 – volume: 11 start-page: 195 year: 2005 end-page: 205 ident: CR29 article-title: Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF on endometrial gene expression profiles publication-title: Mol Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah150 – volume: 65 start-page: 992 year: 1996 end-page: 996 ident: CR7 article-title: Comparison of intravenous albumin and transfer of fresh embryos with cryopreservation of all embryos for subsequent transfer in prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58275-2 – volume: 3 start-page: Cd011184 year: 2017 ident: CR13 article-title: Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 12 start-page: 60 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 4786_CR26 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60981-9 – volume: 18 start-page: 889 year: 2009 ident: 4786_CR10 publication-title: Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet – volume: 20 start-page: 697 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: 4786_CR20 publication-title: Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue – volume: 11 start-page: 84 year: 2013 ident: 4786_CR21 publication-title: Reprod Biol Endocrinol doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-84 – volume: 67 start-page: 521 year: 1997 ident: 4786_CR28 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80080-5 – volume: 41 start-page: 1318 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 4786_CR25 publication-title: J Int Med Res doi: 10.1177/0300060513489480 – volume: 10 start-page: 559 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 4786_CR1 publication-title: Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia doi: 10.13005/bbra/1165 – volume: 99 start-page: 389 year: 2013 ident: 4786_CR17 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044 – volume: 7 start-page: 237 year: 1995 ident: 4786_CR19 publication-title: Reprod Fertil Dev doi: 10.1071/RD9950237 – volume: 96 start-page: 516 year: 2011 ident: 4786_CR9 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.059 – volume: 97 start-page: 744 year: 2013 ident: 4786_CR35 publication-title: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol doi: 10.1002/bdra.23116 – volume: 21 start-page: 49 year: 2017 ident: 4786_CR31 publication-title: JBRA Assist Reprod doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170012 – volume: 65 start-page: 992 year: 1996 ident: 4786_CR7 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58275-2 – volume: 23 start-page: 789 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 4786_CR22 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.011 – volume: 99 start-page: 450 year: 2013 ident: 4786_CR33 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.027 – volume: 29 start-page: 2075 year: 2014 ident: 4786_CR15 publication-title: Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu239 – volume: 101 start-page: 128 year: 2014 ident: 4786_CR34 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.025 – volume: 28 start-page: 2545 year: 2013 ident: 4786_CR37 publication-title: Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) doi: 10.1093/humrep/det272 – ident: 4786_CR12 – ident: 4786_CR14 – volume: 24 start-page: 1085 year: 2009 ident: 4786_CR30 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/den501 – volume: 8 start-page: e67614 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 4786_CR40 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067614 – volume: 14 start-page: 1457 year: 1999 ident: 4786_CR5 publication-title: Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.6.1457 – volume: 106 start-page: 317 year: 2016 ident: 4786_CR36 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.049 – volume: 107 start-page: e3 issue: 723–30 year: 2017 ident: 4786_CR4 publication-title: Fertil Steril – volume: 81 start-page: 568 year: 2014 ident: 4786_CR41 publication-title: Mol Reprod Dev doi: 10.1002/mrd.22340 – volume: 33 start-page: 401 year: 2016 ident: 4786_CR16 publication-title: J Assist Reprod Gen doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0647-y – volume: 71 start-page: 481 year: 2015 ident: 4786_CR38 publication-title: Cryobiology doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.09.001 – volume: 375 start-page: 523 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 4786_CR3 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513873 – ident: 4786_CR32 doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019 – volume: 69 start-page: 178 year: 2014 ident: 4786_CR39 publication-title: Cryobiology doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.06.002 – volume: 102 start-page: 19 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 4786_CR2 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027 – volume: 19 start-page: 28 year: 2009 ident: 4786_CR11 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60042-9 – volume: 78 start-page: 1025 year: 2002 ident: 4786_CR27 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03323-X – volume: 13 start-page: 401 year: 1996 ident: 4786_CR18 publication-title: J Assist Reprod Gen doi: 10.1007/BF02066172 – ident: 4786_CR23 doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.023 – volume: 96 start-page: 344 year: 2011 ident: 4786_CR8 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050 – volume: 11 start-page: 195 year: 2005 ident: 4786_CR29 publication-title: Mol Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah150 – volume: 31 start-page: 355 year: 2015 ident: 4786_CR6 publication-title: Gynecol Endocrinol doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.995620 – volume: 7 start-page: Cd002118 year: 2012 ident: 4786_CR24 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 3 start-page: Cd011184 year: 2017 ident: 4786_CR13 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev |
SSID | ssj0012886 |
Score | 2.3902566 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Purpose
To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET)... To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in... PurposeTo examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET)... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 259 |
SubjectTerms | Clinical outcomes Clinical trials Cryopreservation Endocrinology Gynecology Human Genetics Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery Pregnancy Review |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La9wwEBZtCqWX0PTpNAkq9NQiqpWllbeXEEJCCKSnBvZm9KQLu1ZqexOSf5F_3JFWdiihuRgj62XPjPSNZjyD0BdlVHSc1IQLYwmfUpvsu0RoKUvhvRE6KooXP6dnl_x8Lub5wK3LbpXDmpgWahtMPCP_DjABhBOu4vDqD4lZo6J1NafQeI5exNBlkavlfFS4YOlNmR5BaWckLsuDVZNugogm_4t4tlRNifh3X3oENh8ZStP-c_oabWfgiI82lN5Bz1zzBr28yKbxt-g-R_hc4rDu4ZVch4PHvg13rsFupdvbgKMLxrqDQtf9Hsr6hFxdiz1wRLiBsfGiwdeLvg3YR6frZf5T8wdWeOV6RVSOYxL7h8Y2rBZ3zuLs9L6E25QKpHuHLk9Pfh2fkZxvgRheVj1RFYizZraU3E-Mp6WS1DjYsDTVRjvJbWlVTNUxo9xzqxmbGOOUlxZQmLOqfI-2mtC4jwgrTw3TDLoBdUxoPqukZxM_dRNppLauQHT42rXJwchjToxlPYZRTgSqgUB1JFAtCvR1bHK1icTxVOW9gYR1FsqufmChAn0eH4M4RRuJalxYQx0qWAUYitMCfdiQfhyNzSqAN1VVoG8DLzx0_t-p7D49lU_oFYtcmHwK99BW367dPuCcXh8kZv4LrBf7ug priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Clinical outcomes of frozen embryo versus fresh embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-018-4786-5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881888 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2261532265 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2052809140 |
Volume | 298 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9QwEA_eHYgv4rd7nksEn5RCN02arG_rsueh3CHiwvpU8skt7DbSdj28_8L_2Ek2rcip4EtbknTSdibJbzqTGYReSi2D46TKKNMmo2Vuon03Y4rzgjmnmQqK4vlFebak71dslfZxt723e2-SjDP1sNktyFvwmAh_g0SZsQN0xEB1D35cSzIbTAdExPSOoKmTLMzFvSnzTyR-X4xuIMwb1tG46JzeQ3cTWsSzPXvvo1u2foBunyd7-EP0I4X13GC_6-A1bIu9w67x17bGdqua7x4Hv4tdC4W2vezLughXbYMdiIG_gr7xusbf1l3jsQue1pu0PfMNlnhrO5nJFLwk0Iebjd-ur63BydN9A5cx_0f7CC1PF5_nZ1lKspBpWogukwLGsCKm4NRNtMsLyXNtYZVSudLKcmoKI0N-jmlOHTWKkInWVjpuAHpZI4vH6LD2tX2KsHS5JooAGdDBmKJTwR2ZuNJOuObK2BHK-69d6RSBPCTC2FRD7OTIoAoYVAUGVWyEXg23fN2H3_hX45OehVUaiW0F8BImdThC9YuhGsZQMIzI2vodtMkZEQCcaD5CT_asH3ojUwGYRogRet3Lwi_if32U4_9q_QzdIUEoo1_hCTrsmp19DlinU2N0wFd8jI5m7758WMD57eLi4yconZfzcZT7n9r-_UU |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkYAL4k2ggJHgAorwOvY6WwkhBFRb2u2plfYW_BQr7cYlyVK1_4I_wm_s2HlUqKK3XqIo8Uue8fgbz3gGoTdSy-A4qVLGtUnZmJho3025EiLjzmmugqI4OxhPj9j3OZ9voL_9XZjgVtnLxCiojdfhjPwDwARYnPDkn45_pSFrVLCu9ik0WrbYs6cnoLLVH3e_An3fUrrz7fDLNO2yCqSaZXmTyhyYVlGTCeZG2pFMCqItiGVFlFZWMJMZGRJSTAhzzChKR1pb6YQBrGGNzKDdG-gmbLwkKHtiPih4IOpjZkkCmCgN20BvRSVt0NLo7xHOsvJxyv_dBy-B20uG2bjf7dxDdzugij-3nHUfbdjyAbo160zxD9GfLqLoEvt1A1Noa-wddpU_syW2K1WdehxcPtY1fLT1z_5bE5GyrbADDvQn0DdelPj3oqk8dsHJe9ndDN3GEq9sI1PZxU0J7UNl41eLM2tw52S_hNeYeqR-hI6uhRKP0WbpS_sUYemIpopCM6D-ccUmuXB05MZ2JLRQxiaI9LNd6C74ecjBsSyGsM2RQAUQqAgEKniC3g1VjtvIH1cV3upJWHRCoC4uWDZBr4ffsHyDTUaW1q-hDOE0B8zGSIKetKQfeqOTHOBUnifofc8LF43_dyjPrh7KK3R7ejjbL_Z3D_aeozs0cGT0Z9xCm021ti8AYzXqZWRsjH5c90o6B9etOiQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Jb9QwFLagSBWXqmWdtoCROIGsehx77OFWUUZlacWBkXqLvIqRZuIqyYDaf9F_zHPGCUIFJC5R5OU5yXu2P-dtCL3SVifDSUO4sI7wCXWdfpcII2UhQrDCpIPi2fnkdM4_XoiLnOe06a3de5XkxqchRWmq2qNLF44Gx7cke8l6Iv0ZUhMi7qJ7PDkDg0DP2fGgRmCqS_UIp3ZG0rrcqzX_ROL3jekW2rylKe02oNku2snIER9vWL2H7vjqAdo-y7rxh-gmh_hc4rhu4ZV8g2PAoY7XvsJ-ZeqriJMNxrqBQt9868vaDrr6GgcQifgDxsaLCn9ftHXEIVldL7Or5lus8cq3mugcyCTRh84urhbX3uFs9b6E2y4XSPMIzWfvv747JTnhArG8UC3RCuazYa6QPIxtoIWW1HrYsQw11njJXeF0ytUxpTxwZxgbW-t1kA5gmHe6eIy2qlj5pwjrQC0zDMjAeUwYPlUysHGY-LG00jg_QrT_2qXN0chTUoxlOcRR7hhUAoPKxKBSjNDrocvlJhTHvxof9iws86xsSoCasMDDFapfDtUwn5KSRFc-rqENFUwBiOJ0hJ5sWD-MxqYK8I1SI_Sml4VfxP_6KPv_1foF2v5yMis_fzj_dIDusySfnbnhIdpq67V_BhCoNc87Mf8JZob_eQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+outcomes+of+frozen+embryo+versus+fresh+embryo+transfer+following+in+vitro+fertilization%3A+a+meta-analysis+of+randomized+controlled+trials&rft.jtitle=Archives+of+gynecology+and+obstetrics&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Wanlin&rft.au=Xiao%2C+Xifeng&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Junyan&rft.au=Wang%2C+Wenjun&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.pub=Springer+Berlin+Heidelberg&rft.issn=0932-0067&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft.volume=298&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=272&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00404-018-4786-5&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00404_018_4786_5 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0932-0067&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0932-0067&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0932-0067&client=summon |