Comparison of external dose estimates using different retrospective dosimetry methods in the settlements located near Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site, Republic of Kazakhstan

• Published in: Journal of radiation research Vol. 65; no. 1; pp. 36 - 46
• Main Authors: Stepanenko, Valeriy, Shinkarev, Sergey, Kaprin, Andrey, Apsalikov, Kazbek, Ivanov, Sergey, Shegay, Peter, Ostroumova, Evgenia, Kesminiene, Ausrele, Lipikhina, Alexandra, Bogacheva, Viktoria, Zhumadilov, Kassym, Yamamoto, Masayoshi, Sakaguchi, Aya, Endo, Satoru, Fujimoto, Nariaki, Grosche, Bernd, Iatsenko, Vladimir, Androsova, Alla, Apsalikova, Zukhra, Kawano, Noriyuki, Hoshi, Masaharu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 19.01.2024
• Subjects: Atomic bomb; Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis; Comparative analysis; Health aspects; Humans; Kazakhstan; Methods; Nuclear Warfare; Nuclear weapons; Radiation; Radiation Dosage; Radiation Monitoring - methods; Radioactive fallout; Radioactive Fallout - analysis; Regular Paper; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Soil pollution; Testing; Kazakhstan; Japan; Russia; radioactive fallout; external dose; population exposure; nuclear weapon tests; retrospective dosimetry
• DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad082
• ISSN: 0449-3060; 1349-9157

Abstract For correct assessment of health risks after low-dose irradiation, calculation of radiation exposure estimates is crucial. To verify the calculated absorbed doses, instrumental methods of retrospective dosimetry are used. We compared calculated and instrumental-based estimates of external absorbed doses in the residents of Dolon, Mostik and Cheremushki villages, Kazakhstan, affected by the first nuclear weapon test performed at the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site (SNTS) on August 29, 1949. The ‘instrumental’ doses were retrospectively estimated using the Luminescence Retrospective Dosimetry (LRD) and Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) methods. Correlation between the calculated individual cumulative external absorbed whole-body doses based on typical input data and ESR-based individual doses in the same people was strong (r = 0.782). It was even stronger between the calculated doses based on individual questionnaires’ input data and the ESR-based doses (r = 0.940). Application of the LRD method is useful for validation of the calculated settlement-average cumulated external absorbed dose to air. Reconstruction of external exposure can be supplemented with the data from later measurements of soil contamination with long-lived radionuclides, such as, 137Cs. Our results show the reliability of the calculational method used for the retrospective assessment of individual external doses.