Comparing stimulation-induced pain during percutaneous (intramuscular) and transcutaneous neuromuscular electric stimulation for treating shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia

• Published in: Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 82; no. 6; pp. 756 - 760
• Main Authors: Yu, David T., Chae, John, Walker, Maria E., Hart, Ronald L., Petroski, Gregory F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.06.2001; Elsevier
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Biological and medical sciences; Cross-Over Studies; Diseases of the nervous system; Double-Blind Method; Electric stimulation; Female; Hemiplegia; Hemiplegia - complications; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Pain; Pain - etiology; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects); Rehabilitation; Shoulder Dislocation - etiology; Shoulder Dislocation - rehabilitation; Shoulder pain; Statistics, Nonparametric; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - adverse effects; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods; Hemiplegia; Pain; Rehabilitation; Shoulder pain; Electric stimulation; Human; Nervous system diseases; Motor system disorder; Electrical stimulus; Crossover study; Intramuscular administration; Percutaneous route; Randomization; Treatment; Electrotherapy; Shoulder; Double blind study; Upper limb; Neurological disorder; Comparative study

Yu DT, Chae J, Walker ME, Hart RL, Petroski GF. Comparing stimulation-induced pain during percutaneous (intramuscular) and transcutaneous neuromuscular electric stimulation for treating shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:756-60. Objective: To determine whether percutan...