Net‐benefit regression with censored cost‐effectiveness data from randomized or observational studies

Cost‐effectiveness analysis is an essential part of the evaluation of new medical interventions. While in many studies both costs and effectiveness (eg, survival time) are censored, standard survival analysis techniques are often invalid due to the induced dependent censoring problem. We propose met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 41; no. 20; pp. 3958 - 3974
Main Authors Chen, Shuai, Hoch, Jeffrey S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 10.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0277-6715
1097-0258
1097-0258
DOI10.1002/sim.9486

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cost‐effectiveness analysis is an essential part of the evaluation of new medical interventions. While in many studies both costs and effectiveness (eg, survival time) are censored, standard survival analysis techniques are often invalid due to the induced dependent censoring problem. We propose methods for censored cost‐effectiveness data using the net‐benefit regression framework, which allow covariate‐adjustment and subgroup identification when comparing two intervention groups. The methods provide a straightforward way to construct cost‐effectiveness acceptability curves with censored data. We also propose a more efficient doubly robust estimator of average causal incremental net benefit, which increases the likelihood that the results will represent a valid inference in observational studies. Lastly, we conduct extensive numerical studies to examine the finite‐sample performance of the proposed methods, and illustrate the proposed methods with a real data example using both survival time and quality‐adjusted survival time as the measures of effectiveness.
Bibliography:Funding information
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant/Award Number: UL1 TR001860; National Institute of Mental Health, Grant/Award Number: P50 MH106438‐7776
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/sim.9486