Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist improves the efficiency of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/intrauterine insemination

Leuprolide acetate (LA) has improved the efficiency of human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) in in vitro fertilization cycles. We hypothesized that the combination of LA/hMG/intrauterine insemination (IUI) would be more efficacious than hMG/IUI cycles. During an 18-month period, all patients completi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFertility and sterility Vol. 55; no. 5; pp. 939 - 944
Main Authors Gagliardi, Carol L., Emmi, Adelina M., Weiss, Gerson, Schmidt, Cecilia L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.05.1991
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Leuprolide acetate (LA) has improved the efficiency of human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) in in vitro fertilization cycles. We hypothesized that the combination of LA/hMG/intrauterine insemination (IUI) would be more efficacious than hMG/IUI cycles. During an 18-month period, all patients completing either a hMG/IUI cycle (group I) or a LA/hMG/IUI cycle (group II) had the characteristics and outcomes of their stimulation cycles assessed. The groups were not prospectively randomized. Referral center at a tertiary care hospital. One hundred twenty three patients in group I completed 219 cycles, and 64 patients in group II completed 102 cycles. Twenty-eight of the patients who failed to conceive with hMG/IUI were advanced to group II. Pregnancy/IUI is compared between the two groups. Group II demonstrated significantly greater clinical pregnancy/IUI than group I (26.5% and 16.0%, respectively, P<0.05), as well as a higher live birth/IUI (21.6% and 12.8%, respectively, P<0.05). No difference was present in the rate of fetal wastage or multiple births. In our patients with recalcitrant infertility, the addition of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to hMG/IUI improved the pregnancy rate, without increasing the rate of multiple births or fetal wastage.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54303-9