Escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: clinical efficacy, tolerability and cost-effectiveness vs. venlafaxine extended-release formulation

• Published in: International journal of clinical practice (Esher) Vol. 61; no. 4; pp. 702 - 710
• Main Authors: Llorca, P. M., Fernandez, J.-L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2007; Blackwell
• Subjects: Adult and adolescent clinical studies; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation - economics; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation - therapeutic use; Biological and medical sciences; Citalopram - economics; Citalopram - therapeutic use; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclohexanols - economics; Cyclohexanols - therapeutic use; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major - drug therapy; Depressive Disorder, Major - economics; General aspects; Humans; Medical sciences; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Models, Econometric; Mood disorders; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors - economics; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors - therapeutic use; Treatment Outcome; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Mood disorder; Serotonin; Escitalopram; Controlled release form; Psychotropic; Depression; Catecholamine; Reuptake inhibitor; Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; Medicine; Treatment; Health economy; Formulation; Neurotransmitter; Dosage form; Antidepressant agent; Venlafaxine; Norepinephrine; Comparative study; Cost efficiency analysis
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01335.x
• ISSN: 1368-5031

Summary Major depressive disorder (MDD), a prevalent and serious mental illness, is associated with a substantial disease and economic burden. Long‐term pharmacotherapy is often necessary; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or the serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine are the most frequently prescribed medications in patients with moderate‐to‐severe depressive symptoms. This article reviews head‐to‐head clinical studies and health economic models comparing the efficacy, tolerability and cost‐effectiveness of escitalopram, a dual‐action selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake, and the extended‐release (XR) formulation of venlafaxine. While there has been some evidence that conventional SSRIs are inferior to venlafaxine in terms of efficacy, escitalopram was at least as effective as venlafaxine XR in reducing Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores from baseline in two short‐term (8‐week) comparative studies. Furthermore, escitalopram had potentially important advantages over venlafaxine XR in terms of time to remission, tolerability and discontinuation (withdrawal) symptoms. The results of economic evaluations, including a ‘gold standard’ prospective study conducted alongside one of the studies are consistent in suggesting that escitalopram offers a more cost‐effective alternative to venlafaxine XR for the treatment of MDD, both from a healthcare and societal perspective. Based on this evidence, it is concluded that escitalopram is at least as effective as venlafaxine XR in the treatment of MDD, but is better tolerated and may also have cost advantages.