Low-Latency Polling Schemes for Long-Reach Passive Optical Networks

The increased propagation delay of future long-reach passive optical networks (LR-PONs) may lead to a significantly increased idle time and delay if optical network units (ONUs) use conventional report-grant mechanisms. Sophisticated and efficient bandwidth allocation mechanisms are required to cope...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on communications Vol. 61; no. 7; pp. 2936 - 2945
Main Authors Kiaei, M., Fouli, K., Scheutzow, M., Maier, M., Reisslein, M., Assi, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY IEEE 01.07.2013
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The increased propagation delay of future long-reach passive optical networks (LR-PONs) may lead to a significantly increased idle time and delay if optical network units (ONUs) use conventional report-grant mechanisms. Sophisticated and efficient bandwidth allocation mechanisms are required to cope with the imposed propagation delay in LR-PONs. In this study, we evaluate three dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) frameworks in terms of frame (packet) delay; namely, we consider conventional (interleaved) polling for traditional PON and two recently introduced scheduling paradigms for next generation LR-PON, i.e., multi-thread polling (MT-P) and real-time polling (RT-P). We enhance MT-P and RT-P by applying the just-in-time framework. Next, we provide an analytical framework for evaluating the end-to-end frame delay in our enhanced MT-P and RT-P frameworks. We compare their performance with conventional polling and double-phase polling and investigate their shortcomings and advantages in an LR-PON setting. The simulation results closely match the analysis for this framework. Also, our results indicate that RT-P significantly reduces frame delay in LR-PONs compared to MT-P and conventional polling frameworks.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-6778
1558-0857
DOI:10.1109/TCOMM.2013.061013.120097