Combined Orthokeratology with Atropine for Children with Myopia: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Myopia has become a worldwide public health issue, which is occurring at a younger age, leading to an increased risk of high myopia. Ocular complications associated with high myopia can lead to irreversible vision loss. It is urgent and critical to explore effective treatment to slow dow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmic research Vol. 64; no. 5; pp. 723 - 731
Main Authors Wang, Suzhen, Wang, Jie, Wang, Ningli
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel, Switzerland S. Karger AG 01.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background: Myopia has become a worldwide public health issue, which is occurring at a younger age, leading to an increased risk of high myopia. Ocular complications associated with high myopia can lead to irreversible vision loss. It is urgent and critical to explore effective treatment to slow down or even stop the progression of myopia in young children. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the additive effects of orthokeratology (OK) and 0.01% atropine ophthalmic solution for myopia in children. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of science, Ovid, EBSCO host, CNKI, and CBM to collect eligible studies. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in terms of the axial length (AL), uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (CECD), and intraocular pressure (IOP). We calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all outcomes and plotted on forest plots. Results: Four studies were ultimately included, involving a total of 267 subjects. This meta-analysis revealed that the mean AL of the subjects in the experimental group was 0.09 mm less than that of subjects in the control group (WMD = −0.09, 95% CI [−0.15, −0.03], p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in UCVA, CECD, and IOP between the 2 groups (WMD was −0.01 [95% CI: −0.03, 0.01], 11.75 [95% CI: −4.09, 27.58], 0.12 [95% CI: −0.40, 0.63], respectively). None of the studies reported severe adverse events. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the combination of OK and 0.01% atropine is more effective in slowing axial elongation than OK monotherapy in children with myopia in a relatively short duration of treatment. In addition, the combination therapy has no negative influence on UCVA, CECD, and IOP.
AbstractList Background: Myopia has become a worldwide public health issue, which is occurring at a younger age, leading to an increased risk of high myopia. Ocular complications associated with high myopia can lead to irreversible vision loss. It is urgent and critical to explore effective treatment to slow down or even stop the progression of myopia in young children. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the additive effects of orthokeratology (OK) and 0.01% atropine ophthalmic solution for myopia in children. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of science, Ovid, EBSCO host, CNKI, and CBM to collect eligible studies. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in terms of the axial length (AL), uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (CECD), and intraocular pressure (IOP). We calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all outcomes and plotted on forest plots. Results: Four studies were ultimately included, involving a total of 267 subjects. This meta-analysis revealed that the mean AL of the subjects in the experimental group was 0.09 mm less than that of subjects in the control group (WMD = −0.09, 95% CI [−0.15, −0.03], p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in UCVA, CECD, and IOP between the 2 groups (WMD was −0.01 [95% CI: −0.03, 0.01], 11.75 [95% CI: −4.09, 27.58], 0.12 [95% CI: −0.40, 0.63], respectively). None of the studies reported severe adverse events. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the combination of OK and 0.01% atropine is more effective in slowing axial elongation than OK monotherapy in children with myopia in a relatively short duration of treatment. In addition, the combination therapy has no negative influence on UCVA, CECD, and IOP.
Myopia has become a worldwide public health issue, which is occurring at a younger age, leading to an increased risk of high myopia. Ocular complications associated with high myopia can lead to irreversible vision loss. It is urgent and critical to explore effective treatment to slow down or even stop the progression of myopia in young children. The aim of the study was to evaluate the additive effects of orthokeratology (OK) and 0.01% atropine ophthalmic solution for myopia in children. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of science, Ovid, EBSCO host, CNKI, and CBM to collect eligible studies. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in terms of the axial length (AL), uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (CECD), and intraocular pressure (IOP). We calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all outcomes and plotted on forest plots. Four studies were ultimately included, involving a total of 267 subjects. This meta-analysis revealed that the mean AL of the subjects in the experimental group was 0.09 mm less than that of subjects in the control group (WMD = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.15, -0.03], p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in UCVA, CECD, and IOP between the 2 groups (WMD was -0.01 [95% CI: -0.03, 0.01], 11.75 [95% CI: -4.09, 27.58], 0.12 [95% CI: -0.40, 0.63], respectively). None of the studies reported severe adverse events. Our study suggests that the combination of OK and 0.01% atropine is more effective in slowing axial elongation than OK monotherapy in children with myopia in a relatively short duration of treatment. In addition, the combination therapy has no negative influence on UCVA, CECD, and IOP.
Myopia has become a worldwide public health issue, which is occurring at a younger age, leading to an increased risk of high myopia. Ocular complications associated with high myopia can lead to irreversible vision loss. It is urgent and critical to explore effective treatment to slow down or even stop the progression of myopia in young children.BACKGROUNDMyopia has become a worldwide public health issue, which is occurring at a younger age, leading to an increased risk of high myopia. Ocular complications associated with high myopia can lead to irreversible vision loss. It is urgent and critical to explore effective treatment to slow down or even stop the progression of myopia in young children.The aim of the study was to evaluate the additive effects of orthokeratology (OK) and 0.01% atropine ophthalmic solution for myopia in children.OBJECTIVEThe aim of the study was to evaluate the additive effects of orthokeratology (OK) and 0.01% atropine ophthalmic solution for myopia in children.We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of science, Ovid, EBSCO host, CNKI, and CBM to collect eligible studies. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in terms of the axial length (AL), uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (CECD), and intraocular pressure (IOP). We calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all outcomes and plotted on forest plots.METHODSWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of science, Ovid, EBSCO host, CNKI, and CBM to collect eligible studies. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in terms of the axial length (AL), uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (CECD), and intraocular pressure (IOP). We calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all outcomes and plotted on forest plots.Four studies were ultimately included, involving a total of 267 subjects. This meta-analysis revealed that the mean AL of the subjects in the experimental group was 0.09 mm less than that of subjects in the control group (WMD = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.15, -0.03], p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in UCVA, CECD, and IOP between the 2 groups (WMD was -0.01 [95% CI: -0.03, 0.01], 11.75 [95% CI: -4.09, 27.58], 0.12 [95% CI: -0.40, 0.63], respectively). None of the studies reported severe adverse events.RESULTSFour studies were ultimately included, involving a total of 267 subjects. This meta-analysis revealed that the mean AL of the subjects in the experimental group was 0.09 mm less than that of subjects in the control group (WMD = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.15, -0.03], p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in UCVA, CECD, and IOP between the 2 groups (WMD was -0.01 [95% CI: -0.03, 0.01], 11.75 [95% CI: -4.09, 27.58], 0.12 [95% CI: -0.40, 0.63], respectively). None of the studies reported severe adverse events.Our study suggests that the combination of OK and 0.01% atropine is more effective in slowing axial elongation than OK monotherapy in children with myopia in a relatively short duration of treatment. In addition, the combination therapy has no negative influence on UCVA, CECD, and IOP.CONCLUSIONOur study suggests that the combination of OK and 0.01% atropine is more effective in slowing axial elongation than OK monotherapy in children with myopia in a relatively short duration of treatment. In addition, the combination therapy has no negative influence on UCVA, CECD, and IOP.
Background: Myopia has become a worldwide public health issue, which is occurring at a younger age, leading to an increased risk of high myopia. Ocular complications associated with high myopia can lead to irreversible vision loss. It is urgent and critical to explore effective treatment to slow down or even stop the progression of myopia in young children. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the additive effects of orthokeratology (OK) and 0.01% atropine ophthalmic solution for myopia in children. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of science, Ovid, EBSCO host, CNKI, and CBM to collect eligible studies. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in terms of the axial length (AL), uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (CECD), and intraocular pressure (IOP). We calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all outcomes and plotted on forest plots. Results: Four studies were ultimately included, involving a total of 267 subjects. This meta-analysis revealed that the mean AL of the subjects in the experimental group was 0.09 mm less than that of subjects in the control group (WMD = 0.09, 95% CI [0.15, 0.03], p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in UCVA, CECD, and IOP between the 2 groups (WMD was 0.01 [95% CI: 0.03, 0.01], 11.75 [95% CI: 4.09, 27.58], 0.12 [95% CI: 0.40, 0.63], respectively). None of the studies reported severe adverse events. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the combination of OK and 0.01% atropine is more effective in slowing axial elongation than OK monotherapy in children with myopia in a relatively short duration of treatment. In addition, the combination therapy has no negative influence on UCVA, CECD, and IOP. Keywords: Atropine, Axial length, Combination therapy, Myopia, Orthokeratology
Audience Academic
Author Wang, Suzhen
Wang, Ningli
Wang, Jie
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Suzhen
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Suzhen
  email: *Ningli Wang, wningli@vip.163.com
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jie
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Jie
  email: *Ningli Wang, wningli@vip.163.com
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ningli
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Ningli
  email: *Ningli Wang, wningli@vip.163.com
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkc9r2zAcxcXoWNNuh93HMOyyHtx-9cOWvZsJXTdoyRi9C9n-KtFqW5mkMPLfT8FpYSPoIND7vCfpfS_I2eQmJOQ9hWtKi_oGAAoKUtavyIIKxnNgRX1GFgAcci6FPCcXIfwCSHANb8g5Z7KiooAF-bF0Y2sn7LOVjxv3hF5HN7j1Pvtj4yZronfbJGfG-Wy5sUPvcZqlh31S9JesyR4w6ryZ9LAPNrwlr40eAr477pfk8evt4_Jbfr-6-75s7vNO8DLmrBB9yRlvwWjZAmc1q-sKSs45FlUrGe152RneIkcpioqyssCSmYpKCcLwS_J5jt1693uHIarRhg6HQU_odkExwTkTULI6oZ9mdK0HVHYyLnrdHXDVSCbT1ZLyRF2foNLqcbRd6tvYdP6P4ePxBbt2xF5tvR2136vnbhNwMwOddyF4NKqzUUfrppRsB0VBHaanXqaXHFf_OZ5DT7HHXz1pv0b_Qq5-3s6E2vaHmj6cpI4hfwGkYKmc
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s40662_025_00426_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clae_2024_102317
crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_13347
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_022_02635_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40123_024_00951_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clae_2024_102131
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_821106
crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_63_6_27
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_025_03974_4
crossref_primary_10_4103_tjo_TJO_D_24_00026
crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_62_5_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftal_2023_06_007
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0000000000001884
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_024_08210_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59101859
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamaophthalmol_2024_2295
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000038384
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfma_2022_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_13417
crossref_primary_10_3389_fopht_2024_1447558
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_023_02831_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftale_2023_08_001
crossref_primary_10_12677_HJO_2023_122012
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000029191
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_023_02835_7
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000029409
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e33341
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_2450197
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_50958
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00940.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.019
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00841.x
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00298.x
10.3109/09286586.2010.508347
10.3390/jcm7090259
10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00044.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.031
10.1167/iovs.14-15737
10.1167/iovs.11-8453
10.1097/ICL.0000000000000189
10.1007/s10384-018-0608-3
10.3109/02713683.2015.1050743
10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.020
10.1167/iovs.13-12527
10.1089/jop.2011.0017
10.1186/1471-2415-14-141
10.1167/iovs.11-9091
10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4
10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.028
10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.004
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1091
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000894
10.1136/bjo.2005.071118
10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.024
10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.010
10.1371/journal.pone.0161535
10.1371/journal.pone.0124535
10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
10.1016/j.exer.2012.08.002
10.1167/iovs.12-10565
10.1167/iovs.10-5485
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000505
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.
COPYRIGHT 2021 S. Karger AG
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
– notice: 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 S. Karger AG
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1159/000510779
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1423-0259
EndPage 731
ExternalDocumentID A727329713
32781450
10_1159_000510779
510779
Genre Meta-Analysis
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID ---
0~B
123
29N
3O.
4.4
5RE
8UI
AAYIC
ABJNI
ABPAZ
ACGFS
ACNCT
ACPRK
ACPSR
ADBBV
AENEX
AEYAO
AFJJK
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALDHI
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AZPMC
CS3
CYUIP
DU5
E0A
EBS
EMOBN
F5P
FB.
HZ~
IY7
KUZGX
M--
N9A
O1H
O9-
RKO
UJ6
WH7
.GJ
0~5
30W
329
34G
39C
3O-
53G
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FW
AALGM
AAYXX
ABBTS
ABUWG
ABWCG
ACQXL
ADAGL
AFKRA
AFSIO
AHFRZ
BENPR
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
CITATION
COF
EJD
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
ITC
M1P
OK1
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RIG
RXVBD
UKHRP
ZGI
ZXP
3V.
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-254d6323b0fa7b0329299806333e58b721d36cf3be3e74581265e62f817704f3
IEDL.DBID M--
ISSN 0030-3747
1423-0259
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 23:55:09 EDT 2025
Wed Mar 19 01:55:37 EDT 2025
Sat Mar 08 18:39:45 EST 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:27:10 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:28 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:45:08 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 29 12:04:40 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 05 17:58:02 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Atropine
Axial length
Orthokeratology
Combination therapy
Myopia
Language English
License Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses
2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c436t-254d6323b0fa7b0329299806333e58b721d36cf3be3e74581265e62f817704f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/510779
PMID 32781450
PQID 2433240629
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_32781450
karger_primary_510779
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A727329713
crossref_citationtrail_10_1159_000510779
proquest_miscellaneous_2433240629
gale_infotracmisc_A727329713
crossref_primary_10_1159_000510779
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Basel, Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Basel, Switzerland
– name: Switzerland
PublicationTitle Ophthalmic research
PublicationTitleAlternate Ophthalmic Res
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher S. Karger AG
Publisher_xml – name: S. Karger AG
References McBrien NA, Arumugam B, Gentle A, Chow A, Sahebjada S. The M4 muscarinic antagonist MT-3 inhibits myopia in chick: evidence for site of action. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 May;31:529–39.
Gallego P, Martínez-García C, Pérez-Merino P, Ibares-Frías L, Mayo-Iscar A, Merayo-Lloves J. Scleral changes induced by atropine in chicks as an experimental model of myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 Sep;32:478–84.
Swarbrick HA, Alharbi A, Watt K, Lum E, Kang P. Myopia control during orthokeratology lens wear in children using a novel study design. Ophthalmology. 2015 Nov;122:620–30.
Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of Myopia in Orthokeratology (ROMIO) Study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Sep;53:7077–85.
Li SM, Kang MT, Wu SS, Liu LR, Li H, Chen Z, . Efficacy, safety and acceptability of orthokeratology on slowing axial elongation in myopic children by meta-analysis. Curr Eye Res. 2016 Aug;41:600–8.
Tetsuhiko K, Takahiro H, Tetsuro O. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Apr;52:2170–4.
Wan L, Wei CC, Chen CS, Chang CY, Lin CJ, Chen JJ, . The synergistic effects of orthokeratology and atropine in slowing the progression of myopia. J Clin Med. 2018 Sep;7:259.
Kinoshita N, Konno Y, Hamada N, Kanda Y, Shimmura-Tomita M, Kakehashi A. Additive effects of orthokeratology and atropine 0.01% ophthalmic solution in slowing axial elongation in children with myopia: first year results. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;62:544–53.
Chia A, Chua WH, Cheung YB, Wong WL, Lingham A, Fong A, . Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% doses (atropine for the treatment of myopia 2). Ophthalmology. 2012 Feb;119:347–54.
Shi MH. The synergistic effects of orthokeratology combined with 0.01% atropine in slowing the progression of juvenile myopia. HeNan China: Zhengzhou Univ Ppl Hosp; 2018. p. 1–41.
Verzhanskaya TY, Tarutta EP. Stabilizing effectiveness of orthokeratology and long-term minute-concentration atropine therapy in myopia (draft report). Vestn oftalmol. 2017 Jan;133:43–8.
Tan Q, Ng AL, Cheng GP, Woo VC, Cho P. Combined atropine with orthokeratology (AOK) for myopia control: study design and preliminary results. Curr Eye Res. 2019 Jan;44:671–8.
Wang D, Chun RK, Liu M, Lee RP, Sun Y, Zhang T, . Optical defocus rapidly changes choroidal thickness in schoolchildren. PLoS One. 2016 Aug;11:e0161535.
Kakita T, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Apr;52(5):2170–4.
Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, . Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 to 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–42.
Shih KC, Chan TC, Ng AL, Lai JS, Li WW, Cheng AC, . Use of atropine for prevention of childhood myopia progression in clinical practice. Eye Contact Lens. 2016 Feb;42:16–23.
Sankaridurg P, Tran HDM. The lowdown on low-concentration atropine for myopia progression. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jan;126(1):125–6.
Jeffrey C, Tkatchenko AV. A review of current concepts of the etiology and treatment of myopia. Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Jun;44:231–47.
Shi YH, Li YG, Zhang JZ, Zhou HM, Liu T, Zhang LL. Effect of orthokeratology les combined with 0.01% atropine on juvenile myopia. J Pract Diagn Ther. 2017 Nov;31:1102–3.
Sun Y, Xu F, Zhang T, Liu M, Wang D, Chen Y, . Orthokeratology to control myopia progression: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Apr;10(4):e0124535.
Ho CL, Wu WF, Liou YM. Dose-response relationship of outdoor exposure and myopia indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of various research methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul;16:2595.
Chia A, Chua WH, Wen L, Fong A, Goon YY, Tan D. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: changes after stopping atropine 0.01%, 0.1% and 0.5%. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;157:451–e1.
Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, Takahashi H, Oshika T. Long-term effect of overnight orthokeratology on axial length elongation in childhood myopia: a 5-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May;53:3913–9.
Zhu MJ, Feng HY, He XG, Zou HD, Zhu JF. The control effect of orthokeratology on axial length elongation in Chinese children with myopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;14(1):141.
Swarbrick HA. Orthokeratology review and update. Clin Exp Optom. 2006 Jun;89:124–43.
Charm J, Cho P. High myopia-partial reduction orthokeratology: a 2-year randomized study. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 May;90:530–9.
Chakraborty R, Read SA, Collins MJ. Monocular myopic defocus and daily changes in axial length and choroidal thickness of human eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2012 Aug;103:47–54.
Guggenheim JA, Northstone K, Mcmahon G, Ness AR, Deere K, Mattocks C, . Time outdoors and physical activity as predictors of incident myopia in childhood: a prospective cohort study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Apr;53:2856–65.
Song YY, Wang H, Wang BS, Qi H, Rong ZX, Chen HZ. Atropine in ameliorating the progression of myopia in children with mild to moderate myopia: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;27:361–8.
Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC, Chua WH. Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 Oct;25:381–91.
Wu PC, Tsai CL, Hu CH, Yang YH. Effects of outdoor activities on myopia among rural school children in Taiwan. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;17:338–42.
Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, Kifley A, Huynh S, Smith W, . Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115:1279–85.
Si JK, Tang K, Bi HS, Guo DD, Guo JG, Wang XR. Orthokeratology for myopia control: a meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jan;92:252–7.
Chia A, Lu QS, Tan D. Five-year clinical trial on atropine for the treatment of myopia 2: myopia control with atropine 0.01% eyedrops. Ophthalmology. 2016 Aug;123(2):391–9.
Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012 May;379:1739–48.
Saw SM, Chua WH, Gazzard G, Koh D, Tan DT, Stone RA. Eye growth changes in myopic children in Singapore. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;89:1489–94.
Yam JC, Jiang Y, Tang SM, Law AKP, Chan JJ, Wong E, . Low-concentration atropine for myopia progression (lamp) study – a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops in myopia control. Ophthalmology. 2019 May;126:113–24.
Chen Z, Xue F, Zhou J, Qu X, Zhou X. Effects of orthokeratology on choroidal thickness and axial length. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Sep;93(9):1064–71.
Guo K, Yang DY, Wang Y, Yang XR, Jing XX, Guo YY, . Prevalence of myopia in school children in Ejina: the gobi desert children eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan;56:1769–74.
Gong Q, Janowski M, Luo M, Wei H, Chen B, Yang G, . Efficacy and adverse effects of atropine in childhood myopia: a meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 May;135:624–30.
Chen C, Cheung SW, Cho P. Myopia control using toric orthokeratology (to-see study). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Sep;54(10):6510–7.
Ahmed A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Jun;44(6):2518–23.
Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, Chen H, . Efficacy comparison of 16 interventions for myopia control in children: a network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):697–708.
ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref31
ref30
ref11
ref33
ref10
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
References_xml – reference: Chen Z, Xue F, Zhou J, Qu X, Zhou X. Effects of orthokeratology on choroidal thickness and axial length. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Sep;93(9):1064–71.
– reference: Sun Y, Xu F, Zhang T, Liu M, Wang D, Chen Y, . Orthokeratology to control myopia progression: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Apr;10(4):e0124535.
– reference: Chia A, Chua WH, Cheung YB, Wong WL, Lingham A, Fong A, . Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% doses (atropine for the treatment of myopia 2). Ophthalmology. 2012 Feb;119:347–54.
– reference: Swarbrick HA, Alharbi A, Watt K, Lum E, Kang P. Myopia control during orthokeratology lens wear in children using a novel study design. Ophthalmology. 2015 Nov;122:620–30.
– reference: Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012 May;379:1739–48.
– reference: Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, Takahashi H, Oshika T. Long-term effect of overnight orthokeratology on axial length elongation in childhood myopia: a 5-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May;53:3913–9.
– reference: Kakita T, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Apr;52(5):2170–4.
– reference: Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, . Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 to 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–42.
– reference: Verzhanskaya TY, Tarutta EP. Stabilizing effectiveness of orthokeratology and long-term minute-concentration atropine therapy in myopia (draft report). Vestn oftalmol. 2017 Jan;133:43–8.
– reference: Shi YH, Li YG, Zhang JZ, Zhou HM, Liu T, Zhang LL. Effect of orthokeratology les combined with 0.01% atropine on juvenile myopia. J Pract Diagn Ther. 2017 Nov;31:1102–3.
– reference: Ahmed A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Jun;44(6):2518–23.
– reference: Wan L, Wei CC, Chen CS, Chang CY, Lin CJ, Chen JJ, . The synergistic effects of orthokeratology and atropine in slowing the progression of myopia. J Clin Med. 2018 Sep;7:259.
– reference: Shi MH. The synergistic effects of orthokeratology combined with 0.01% atropine in slowing the progression of juvenile myopia. HeNan China: Zhengzhou Univ Ppl Hosp; 2018. p. 1–41.
– reference: Yam JC, Jiang Y, Tang SM, Law AKP, Chan JJ, Wong E, . Low-concentration atropine for myopia progression (lamp) study – a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops in myopia control. Ophthalmology. 2019 May;126:113–24.
– reference: Li SM, Kang MT, Wu SS, Liu LR, Li H, Chen Z, . Efficacy, safety and acceptability of orthokeratology on slowing axial elongation in myopic children by meta-analysis. Curr Eye Res. 2016 Aug;41:600–8.
– reference: Jeffrey C, Tkatchenko AV. A review of current concepts of the etiology and treatment of myopia. Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Jun;44:231–47.
– reference: Chakraborty R, Read SA, Collins MJ. Monocular myopic defocus and daily changes in axial length and choroidal thickness of human eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2012 Aug;103:47–54.
– reference: Saw SM, Chua WH, Gazzard G, Koh D, Tan DT, Stone RA. Eye growth changes in myopic children in Singapore. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;89:1489–94.
– reference: Chen C, Cheung SW, Cho P. Myopia control using toric orthokeratology (to-see study). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Sep;54(10):6510–7.
– reference: Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of Myopia in Orthokeratology (ROMIO) Study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Sep;53:7077–85.
– reference: Tan Q, Ng AL, Cheng GP, Woo VC, Cho P. Combined atropine with orthokeratology (AOK) for myopia control: study design and preliminary results. Curr Eye Res. 2019 Jan;44:671–8.
– reference: Zhu MJ, Feng HY, He XG, Zou HD, Zhu JF. The control effect of orthokeratology on axial length elongation in Chinese children with myopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;14(1):141.
– reference: Guggenheim JA, Northstone K, Mcmahon G, Ness AR, Deere K, Mattocks C, . Time outdoors and physical activity as predictors of incident myopia in childhood: a prospective cohort study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Apr;53:2856–65.
– reference: Shih KC, Chan TC, Ng AL, Lai JS, Li WW, Cheng AC, . Use of atropine for prevention of childhood myopia progression in clinical practice. Eye Contact Lens. 2016 Feb;42:16–23.
– reference: Ho CL, Wu WF, Liou YM. Dose-response relationship of outdoor exposure and myopia indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of various research methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul;16:2595.
– reference: Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, Chen H, . Efficacy comparison of 16 interventions for myopia control in children: a network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):697–708.
– reference: Charm J, Cho P. High myopia-partial reduction orthokeratology: a 2-year randomized study. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 May;90:530–9.
– reference: Wu PC, Tsai CL, Hu CH, Yang YH. Effects of outdoor activities on myopia among rural school children in Taiwan. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;17:338–42.
– reference: Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, Kifley A, Huynh S, Smith W, . Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115:1279–85.
– reference: Sankaridurg P, Tran HDM. The lowdown on low-concentration atropine for myopia progression. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jan;126(1):125–6.
– reference: Guo K, Yang DY, Wang Y, Yang XR, Jing XX, Guo YY, . Prevalence of myopia in school children in Ejina: the gobi desert children eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan;56:1769–74.
– reference: Si JK, Tang K, Bi HS, Guo DD, Guo JG, Wang XR. Orthokeratology for myopia control: a meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jan;92:252–7.
– reference: Swarbrick HA. Orthokeratology review and update. Clin Exp Optom. 2006 Jun;89:124–43.
– reference: Gong Q, Janowski M, Luo M, Wei H, Chen B, Yang G, . Efficacy and adverse effects of atropine in childhood myopia: a meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 May;135:624–30.
– reference: Chia A, Chua WH, Wen L, Fong A, Goon YY, Tan D. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: changes after stopping atropine 0.01%, 0.1% and 0.5%. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;157:451–e1.
– reference: Gallego P, Martínez-García C, Pérez-Merino P, Ibares-Frías L, Mayo-Iscar A, Merayo-Lloves J. Scleral changes induced by atropine in chicks as an experimental model of myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 Sep;32:478–84.
– reference: Wang D, Chun RK, Liu M, Lee RP, Sun Y, Zhang T, . Optical defocus rapidly changes choroidal thickness in schoolchildren. PLoS One. 2016 Aug;11:e0161535.
– reference: Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC, Chua WH. Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 Oct;25:381–91.
– reference: Chia A, Lu QS, Tan D. Five-year clinical trial on atropine for the treatment of myopia 2: myopia control with atropine 0.01% eyedrops. Ophthalmology. 2016 Aug;123(2):391–9.
– reference: Song YY, Wang H, Wang BS, Qi H, Rong ZX, Chen HZ. Atropine in ameliorating the progression of myopia in children with mild to moderate myopia: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;27:361–8.
– reference: Tetsuhiko K, Takahiro H, Tetsuro O. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Apr;52:2170–4.
– reference: McBrien NA, Arumugam B, Gentle A, Chow A, Sahebjada S. The M4 muscarinic antagonist MT-3 inhibits myopia in chick: evidence for site of action. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 May;31:529–39.
– reference: Kinoshita N, Konno Y, Hamada N, Kanda Y, Shimmura-Tomita M, Kakehashi A. Additive effects of orthokeratology and atropine 0.01% ophthalmic solution in slowing axial elongation in children with myopia: first year results. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;62:544–53.
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00940.x
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.019
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00841.x
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00298.x
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.3109/09286586.2010.508347
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.3390/jcm7090259
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00044.x
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.031
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15737
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8453
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000189
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0608-3
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1050743
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.020
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12527
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1089/jop.2011.0017
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-141
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9091
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.028
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.004
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1091
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000894
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.071118
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.024
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.010
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161535
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124535
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2012.08.002
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10565
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5485
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000505
SSID ssj0015990
Score 2.417879
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Background: Myopia has become a worldwide public health issue, which is occurring at a younger age, leading to an increased risk of high myopia. Ocular...
Myopia has become a worldwide public health issue, which is occurring at a younger age, leading to an increased risk of high myopia. Ocular complications...
SourceID proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
karger
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 723
SubjectTerms Analysis
Atropine
Axial Length, Eye
Child, Preschool
Health aspects
Humans
Meta-Analysis
Myopia
Myopia - drug therapy
Ophthalmic drugs
Orthokeratologic Procedures
Refraction, Ocular
Vision disorders in children
Title Combined Orthokeratology with Atropine for Children with Myopia: A Meta-Analysis
URI https://karger.com/doi/10.1159/000510779
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781450
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2433240629
Volume 64
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwdV3dS8MwEA86RfYifkydToki6EthS9q08W2MjSHUiUzYW-hHgjDpxuwe_O-9a9PixL30oUnv2lzS_O6S-4WQ-7jLpfAwOSYWGLqJUww09ZyIJyY1bmBMkbcWvojxu_s882Y23oG5MHPc_1xQo9bcAjDhFkfPgaPiy12yB34UR5b80HHq9QJPSkvACH8VQMiWQ2jj0SY54AwZnjDH_tckZH_F-6Xq7UizmHFGR-TQQkXaL217THZ0dkIOQrsYfkpeYSyDX6tTOlnlH4s50iMXQXKKwVXaz1eYDKUpwFI6sDnbZVH4DSXRE-3TUOeRUxGTtMh0NJwOxo49IMFJXC5yB5y7VHDG466JfGh1BlhHBgA6ONdeEINzl3KRGB5rrn3Xg7lceFowE_R8v-safkYa2SLTF4S62hhfpr6AqwsoIZIiAOPGPR4xrblpk8eqwVRiycPxDItPVTgRnlR1M7fJXV11WTJm_FfpAVtd4SgCOUlkkwHgbZCPSvURVjEJHnSbdDZqQu9PNopbpd1qXZWCzp_7k7dhWaSWKXzPbWVlhRJxp1mmF-svxZDQDVAOAxHnpflrEVX3udyi9Io0GW55KbagdUgjX631NWCWPL4puusPPo_fVw
linkProvider Karger AG
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwdV1LS8QwEB58oV7Et6urRhH0UthN2rTxtoiyPqoiK3gLfSQIK7uy1oP_3pk2La7opYcmTdqZpPlmMvMF4CTtCCUDSo5JJblu0pwcTV0vEZnNrR9ZW-atxfey_-zfvAQvzt9BuTBDin8uqVEbbgFccMuj59BQCdUszIdKKhrRsec1-wWBUo6AEf8qiJAdh9DUo8uwKDgxPFGO_Y9FyP2KF6qu_0ea5YpztQorDiqyXqXbNZgxo3VYjN1m-AY84lxGu9bk7GFSvI6HRI9cOskZOVdZr5hQMpRhCEvZhcvZroriLyxJzlmPxaZIvJqYZBMGV5eDi77nDkjwMl_IwkPjLpeCi7RjkxClzhHrqAhBhxAmiFI07nIhMytSI0zoB7iWy8BIbqNuGHZ8K7ZgbjQemR1gvrE2VHko8eojSkiUjFC5aVck3BhhW3BWC0xnjjyczrB406URESjdiLkFx03V94ox469KpyR1TbMI28kSlwyAb0N8VLpHsIortKBb0J6qiaM_myrerPTW9FV30P51_-HpsirS7zl-z1GtZU0tUqTZyIw_PzQnQjdEORyb2K7U3zRRD5_dfzo9hKX-IL7Td9f3t3uwzCn8pQxHa8NcMfk0-4hfivSgHLrfAWLiTw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined+Orthokeratology+with+Atropine+for+Children+with+Myopia%3A+A+Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmic+research&rft.au=Wang%2C+Suzhen&rft.au=Wang%2C+Jie&rft.au=Wang%2C+Ningli&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.issn=0030-3747&rft.eissn=1423-0259&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159%2F000510779&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32781450&rft.externalDocID=510779
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0030-3747&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0030-3747&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0030-3747&client=summon