Methodological problems in a study of fetal visual perception
Reid et al.[1] analysed data from 39 third-trimester fetuses, concluding that they showed a preferential head-orienting reaction towards lights projected through the uterine wall in a face-like arrangement, as opposed to an inverted triangle of dots. These results imply not only that assessment of v...
Saved in:
Published in | Current biology Vol. 28; no. 10; pp. R594 - R596 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
21.05.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Reid et al.[1] analysed data from 39 third-trimester fetuses, concluding that they showed a preferential head-orienting reaction towards lights projected through the uterine wall in a face-like arrangement, as opposed to an inverted triangle of dots. These results imply not only that assessment of visual-perceptive responses is possible in prenatal subjects, but also that a measurable preference for faces exists before birth. However, we have identified three substantial problems with Reid et al.’s [1] method and analyses, which we outline here.
A recent study on visual perception in human fetuses suggested that a preference for face-like shapes may be present before birth. Scheel et al. comment on this study, describing three methodological and analytical problems that call its conclusions into question. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Correspondence-1 ObjectType-Commentary-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0960-9822 1879-0445 1879-0445 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.047 |