Methodological problems in a study of fetal visual perception

Reid et al.[1] analysed data from 39 third-trimester fetuses, concluding that they showed a preferential head-orienting reaction towards lights projected through the uterine wall in a face-like arrangement, as opposed to an inverted triangle of dots. These results imply not only that assessment of v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent biology Vol. 28; no. 10; pp. R594 - R596
Main Authors Scheel, Anne M., Ritchie, Stuart J., Brown, Nicholas J.L., Jacques, Steven L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 21.05.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Reid et al.[1] analysed data from 39 third-trimester fetuses, concluding that they showed a preferential head-orienting reaction towards lights projected through the uterine wall in a face-like arrangement, as opposed to an inverted triangle of dots. These results imply not only that assessment of visual-perceptive responses is possible in prenatal subjects, but also that a measurable preference for faces exists before birth. However, we have identified three substantial problems with Reid et al.’s [1] method and analyses, which we outline here. A recent study on visual perception in human fetuses suggested that a preference for face-like shapes may be present before birth. Scheel et al. comment on this study, describing three methodological and analytical problems that call its conclusions into question.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ObjectType-Commentary-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0960-9822
1879-0445
1879-0445
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.047