Coupling strategies for biomedical fluid-structure interaction problems

The coupling of lightweight and often thin‐walled structures to fluids in an incompressible regime is a recurring theme in biomechanics. There are many fluid–structure interaction (FSI) solution schemes to address these kinds of problem, each one with its costs and benefits. Here, we attempt a compa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering Vol. 26; no. 3-4; pp. 305 - 321
Main Authors Küttler, U., Gee, M., Förster, Ch, Comerford, A., Wall, W. A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.03.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The coupling of lightweight and often thin‐walled structures to fluids in an incompressible regime is a recurring theme in biomechanics. There are many fluid–structure interaction (FSI) solution schemes to address these kinds of problem, each one with its costs and benefits. Here, we attempt a comparison of the most important FSI schemes in the context of biomechanical problems, that is a comparison of different fixed‐point schemes and a block preconditioned monolithic scheme. The emphasis of this study is on the numerical behavior of these FSI schemes to gain an understanding of their effectiveness in comparison with each other. To this end a simplified benchmark problem is studied to show its applicability for more involved biomechanical problems. Two such examples with patient‐specific geometries are also discussed. The monolithic scheme proved to be much more efficient than the partitioned schemes in biomechanical problems. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:6C31CF53A10A0491F36AA3B3E3B2571388EB4F21
ark:/67375/WNG-1FQ9GSHK-N
International Graduade School of Science and Engineering (IGSSE) of Technische Universität München (TUM)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - No. WA-1521/8
ArticleID:CNM1281
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:2040-7939
2040-7947
2040-7947
DOI:10.1002/cnm.1281