Abdominal Adhesion Prevention: Still a Sticky Subject
Background: Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to evaluate current understanding of adhesion formation and products aimed at prevention. Failure to keep up to date...
Saved in:
| Published in | Digestive surgery Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 347 - 358 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Basel, Switzerland
S. Karger AG
01.11.2010
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0253-4886 1421-9883 1421-9883 |
| DOI | 10.1159/000314805 |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Background: Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to evaluate current understanding of adhesion formation and products aimed at prevention. Failure to keep up to date with adhesion treatment may subject clinicians to a greater medico-legal risk. Design: Review of published studies exploring the problem of peritoneal adhesion formation. This encompasses the underlying processes of adhesion formation combined with general approaches to reduce formation. An overview of products trialled to prevent formation in both the animal model and clinical setting describes products of scientific interest and commercial success. Results: Advances in surgical technique, such as laparoscopic surgery, can help minimize the probability of adhesion formation. Currently barrier products, whilst reducing adhesion formation, have not been shown to reduce the risk of readmission with complications related to adhesions. Hybrid products may improve upon this situation. Conclusions: No single approach has been wholly satisfactory in reducing adhesions. Research into the processes driving adhesion formation is providing exciting new targets for therapeutic agents. It would seem plausible that with many promising avenues of research a revolutionary agent to reduce the incidence of adhesional small bowel obstruction may result. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to evaluate current understanding of adhesion formation and products aimed at prevention. Failure to keep up to date with adhesion treatment may subject clinicians to a greater medico-legal risk.BACKGROUNDAdhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to evaluate current understanding of adhesion formation and products aimed at prevention. Failure to keep up to date with adhesion treatment may subject clinicians to a greater medico-legal risk.Review of published studies exploring the problem of peritoneal adhesion formation. This encompasses the underlying processes of adhesion formation combined with general approaches to reduce formation. An overview of products trialled to prevent formation in both the animal model and clinical setting describes products of scientific interest and commercial success.DESIGNReview of published studies exploring the problem of peritoneal adhesion formation. This encompasses the underlying processes of adhesion formation combined with general approaches to reduce formation. An overview of products trialled to prevent formation in both the animal model and clinical setting describes products of scientific interest and commercial success.Advances in surgical technique, such as laparoscopic surgery, can help minimize the probability of adhesion formation. Currently barrier products, whilst reducing adhesion formation, have not been shown to reduce the risk of readmission with complications related to adhesions. Hybrid products may improve upon this situation.RESULTSAdvances in surgical technique, such as laparoscopic surgery, can help minimize the probability of adhesion formation. Currently barrier products, whilst reducing adhesion formation, have not been shown to reduce the risk of readmission with complications related to adhesions. Hybrid products may improve upon this situation.No single approach has been wholly satisfactory in reducing adhesions. Research into the processes driving adhesion formation is providing exciting new targets for therapeutic agents. It would seem plausible that with many promising avenues of research a revolutionary agent to reduce the incidence of adhesional small bowel obstruction may result.CONCLUSIONSNo single approach has been wholly satisfactory in reducing adhesions. Research into the processes driving adhesion formation is providing exciting new targets for therapeutic agents. It would seem plausible that with many promising avenues of research a revolutionary agent to reduce the incidence of adhesional small bowel obstruction may result. Background: Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to evaluate current understanding of adhesion formation and products aimed at prevention. Failure to keep up to date with adhesion treatment may subject clinicians to a greater medico-legal risk. Design: Review of published studies exploring the problem of peritoneal adhesion formation. This encompasses the underlying processes of adhesion formation combined with general approaches to reduce formation. An overview of products trialled to prevent formation in both the animal model and clinical setting describes products of scientific interest and commercial success. Results: Advances in surgical technique, such as laparoscopic surgery, can help minimize the probability of adhesion formation. Currently barrier products, whilst reducing adhesion formation, have not been shown to reduce the risk of readmission with complications related to adhesions. Hybrid products may improve upon this situation. Conclusions: No single approach has been wholly satisfactory in reducing adhesions. Research into the processes driving adhesion formation is providing exciting new targets for therapeutic agents. It would seem plausible that with many promising avenues of research a revolutionary agent to reduce the incidence of adhesional small bowel obstruction may result. Background: Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to evaluate current understanding of adhesion formation and products aimed at prevention. Failure to keep up to date with adhesion treatment may subject clinicians to a greater medico-legal risk. Design: Review of published studies exploring the problem of peritoneal adhesion formation. This encompasses the underlying processes of adhesion formation combined with general approaches to reduce formation. An overview of products trialled to prevent formation in both the animal model and clinical setting describes products of scientific interest and commercial success. Results: Advances in surgical technique, such as laparoscopic surgery, can help minimize the probability of adhesion formation. Currently barrier products, whilst reducing adhesion formation, have not been shown to reduce the risk of readmission with complications related to adhesions. Hybrid products may improve upon this situation. Conclusions: No single approach has been wholly satisfactory in reducing adhesions. Research into the processes driving adhesion formation is providing exciting new targets for therapeutic agents. It would seem plausible that with many promising avenues of research a revolutionary agent to reduce the incidence of adhesional small bowel obstruction may result. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to evaluate current understanding of adhesion formation and products aimed at prevention. Failure to keep up to date with adhesion treatment may subject clinicians to a greater medico-legal risk. Review of published studies exploring the problem of peritoneal adhesion formation. This encompasses the underlying processes of adhesion formation combined with general approaches to reduce formation. An overview of products trialled to prevent formation in both the animal model and clinical setting describes products of scientific interest and commercial success. Advances in surgical technique, such as laparoscopic surgery, can help minimize the probability of adhesion formation. Currently barrier products, whilst reducing adhesion formation, have not been shown to reduce the risk of readmission with complications related to adhesions. Hybrid products may improve upon this situation. No single approach has been wholly satisfactory in reducing adhesions. Research into the processes driving adhesion formation is providing exciting new targets for therapeutic agents. It would seem plausible that with many promising avenues of research a revolutionary agent to reduce the incidence of adhesional small bowel obstruction may result. |
| Author | Lauder, Chris I.W. Strickland, Andrew Garcea, Giuseppe Maddern, Guy J. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Chris I.W. surname: Lauder fullname: Lauder, Chris I.W. – sequence: 2 givenname: Giuseppe surname: Garcea fullname: Garcea, Giuseppe – sequence: 3 givenname: Andrew surname: Strickland fullname: Strickland, Andrew – sequence: 4 givenname: Guy J. surname: Maddern fullname: Maddern, Guy J. email: guy.maddern@adelaide.edu.au |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20847564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpt0ElLw0AUB_BBKnbRg3eR4EU8xM6aTLyV4gYFhep5mFXTpkmdSYR-exO6HIqn_4P5vce8NwS9siotAJcI3iPEsjGEkCDKITsBA0QxijPOSQ8MIGYkppwnfTAMYdGxJENnoI8hpylL6ACwiTLVKi9lEU3Mtw15VUbv3v7asm7Lh2he50URyS71chPNG7Wwuj4Hp04WwV7scgQ-nx4_pi_x7O35dTqZxZoSUsfOGUKM4o6jtE3lkDOJZixhUKZEGogzqDiGhGpEs1Sl0DjFre2WcjrjZARut3PXvvppbKjFKg_aFoUsbdUEwRFGhGSYtvLmSC6qxrdrdSihGKYkbdH1DjVqZY1Y-3wl_Ubsz9GC8RZoX4XgrRM6r2V3idrLvBAIiu5v4nDwtuPuqGM_9D97tbVL6b-sP8jd8x_-bIWU |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_term_3249 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsomega_4c04577 crossref_primary_10_3390_biom11071027 crossref_primary_10_52054_FVVO_15_4_108 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bioactmat_2023_02_026 crossref_primary_10_1590_s0102_865020180090000011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10432_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_011_1709_1 crossref_primary_10_1177_08839115231218732 crossref_primary_10_1155_2012_194723 crossref_primary_10_1155_2011_606718 crossref_primary_10_23902_trkjnat_1309119 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13233_013_1163_x crossref_primary_10_1039_C6TB01376G crossref_primary_10_1002_btm2_10565 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40005_024_00704_8 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v24_i19_2108 crossref_primary_10_1002_adtp_202000242 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_279730 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_chemrev_0c01177 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_8b00387 crossref_primary_10_1097_TA_0000000000004195 crossref_primary_10_1177_0883911516637374 crossref_primary_10_1177_1934578X19850713 crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines9080867 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_021_22536_y crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms131012224 crossref_primary_10_1089_ten_teb_2019_0245 crossref_primary_10_1111_jocs_16062 crossref_primary_10_1067_j_cpsurg_2012_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1124_jpet_114_212795 crossref_primary_10_18499_2070_478X_2024_17_3_120_126 crossref_primary_10_1002_term_3263 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00580_018_2667_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41551_019_0442_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s44174_024_00236_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_gels9020098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2015_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijso_2020_05_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_progpolymsci_2014_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_13_62002_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_1744_1633_12120 crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_14879 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10570_019_02857_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijbiomac_2018_07_180 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_52753_0 crossref_primary_10_5604_01_3001_0016_2730 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0049673 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10856_012_4689_0 crossref_primary_10_1002_adfm_202414419 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2014_03_077 crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_7610387 crossref_primary_10_2174_1570180820666230417100810 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111%2Fj.1445-2197.2009.04880.x 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900057-0 10.1016%2Fj.jss.2005.09.032 10.1007%2Fs00464-006-9157-9 10.1016%2FS0002-9378%2898%2970016-X 10.1111%2Fj.1524-475X.2008.00378.x 10.1007%2Fs10350-007-9181-4 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F13.5.1194 10.1097%2FSLE.0b013e3181886ff4 10.1097%2F00000658-196604000-00011 10.1016%2FS1074-3804%2805%2960257-5 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900270-2 10.1097%2F01.sla.0000251519.49405.55 10.1021%2Fbm034130m 10.1159%2F000292042 10.1006%2Fjsre.1998.5317 10.1111%2Fj.1538-7836.2006.02067.x 10.1006%2Fjsre.1995.1236 10.1159%2F000018609 10.1002%2Fbjs.6446 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-0748-z 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2897%2900574-8 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F16.8.1732 10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2007.05.009 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-0954-8 10.1016%2Fj.surg.2003.07.005 10.1002%2Flsm.1900030103 10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2007.01360.x 10.1097%2FSLA.0b013e3181656ce9 10.1001%2Farchsurg.139.7.739 10.1006%2Fjsre.1996.0355 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-6716-9 10.1111%2Fj.1445-1433.2004.03261.x 10.1016%2F0167-5699%2891%2990107-5 10.1007%2Fs004649900887 10.1046%2Fj.1524-475X.1994.20306.x 10.1016%2Fj.ijsu.2008.08.004 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F15.8.1758 10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2897%2900127-0 10.1006%2Fjsre.1994.1011 10.1046%2Fj.1365-2168.1998.00718.x 10.1016%2FS0002-9378%2898%2970428-4 10.1097%2F01.sla.0000239619.93579.ca 10.1016%2Fj.surg.2006.01.020 10.1093%2Fhumupd%2F7.6.556 10.1016%2Fj.amjsurg.2003.11.014 10.1080%2F10903120701205893 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdeg481 10.1016%2Fj.jamcollsurg.2005.02.034 10.1006%2Fjsre.1996.0081 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2897%2900573-6 10.1016%2Fj.biomaterials.2008.07.034 10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2008.01.052 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2803%2900759-3 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-6739-2 10.1007%2Fs00384-003-0489-9 10.1007%2FBF02237441 10.1097%2F00000658-200202000-00006 10.1097%2F00006254-199306000-00001 10.1016%2F0022-4804%2884%2990076-3 10.1046%2Fj.1365-2168.2000.01394.x 10.1007%2FBF02237135 10.1097%2F01.sla.0000207837.71831.a2 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-0741-6 10.1006%2Fjsre.2000.6059 10.1381%2F0960892052993530 10.1016%2FS1071-5576%2899%2900007-6 10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2004.09.038 10.1097%2F00000658-200108000-00016 10.3109%2F00016348509155163 10.1016%2FS0003-3944%2802%2900863-5 10.1615%2FJLongTermEffMedImplants.v13.i5.50 10.1016%2Fj.jvs.2008.01.034 10.1006%2Fjsre.1993.1038 10.1016%2FS0039-6109%2805%2970574-0 10.1007%2Fs00595-005-3061-0 10.1016%2FS1078-5884%2805%2980203-5 10.1007%2FBF02236862 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2902875-8 10.1016%2FS0002-9610%2801%2900617-1 10.1007%2Fs10350-005-0268-5 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdei182 10.1159%2F000050149 10.1089%2Flap.2008.0366 10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2005.00857.x 10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2000.tb11083.x 10.1016%2FS0039-6060%2896%2980096-1 10.1185%2F030079908X273426 10.1089%2Fend.1995.9.277 10.1007%2Fs00464-004-0056-7 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2901954-9 10.1152%2Fajprenal.00313.2004 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900116-2 10.1089%2Flap.2006.0028 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2901964-1 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F10.1.161 10.1308%2F003588406X114730 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F17.4.1031 10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2007.01358.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel. Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel – notice: Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel. – notice: Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QO 7QP 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FD 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FR3 FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P P64 PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1159/000314805 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef Technology Research Database MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1421-9883 |
| EndPage | 358 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 2207043521 20847564 10_1159_000314805 314805 |
| Genre | Journal Article Review |
| GroupedDBID | --- .GJ 0R~ 0~5 0~B 29G 30W 327 36B 3O. 3V. 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8UI AAYIC ABJNI ABPAZ ABUWG ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACPSR ADAGL ADBBV AENEX AEYAO AFJJK AFKRA AFRAH AHMBA ALDHI ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS APPQY AZPMC BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI C45 CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CYUIP DU5 E0A EBS EJD EMB EMOBN F5P FB. FYUFA HMCUK HZ~ IY7 KUZGX M1P N9A O1H O9- OVD P2P PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RIG RKO RXVBD SV3 TEORI UJ6 UKHRP ZGI AAYXX ABBTS ABWCG ACQXL AFSIO AHFRZ CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 7QP 7XB 8FD 8FK FR3 K9. P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS PUEGO 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-ffd33db8f8173dbbf1fd6c55650a73ad0290b82034c1497b70dfb8ee1159fc983 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
| ISSN | 0253-4886 1421-9883 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 05:30:31 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 13:27:34 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:02:19 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 12:08:18 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:58 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 29 12:04:40 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Keywords | Abdominal surgery Adhesion barrier Adhesions Adhesion prevention Peritoneum |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c433t-ffd33db8f8173dbbf1fd6c55650a73ad0290b82034c1497b70dfb8ee1159fc983 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://karger.com/dsu/article-pdf/27/5/347/2675256/000314805.pdf |
| PMID | 20847564 |
| PQID | 816420737 |
| PQPubID | 34180 |
| PageCount | 12 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_812133924 crossref_citationtrail_10_1159_000314805 proquest_journals_816420737 crossref_primary_10_1159_000314805 karger_primary_314805 pubmed_primary_20847564 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2010-11-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-11-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2010 text: 2010-11-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Basel, Switzerland |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Basel, Switzerland – name: Switzerland – name: Basel |
| PublicationTitle | Digestive surgery |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Dig Surg |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | S. Karger AG |
| Publisher_xml | – name: S. Karger AG |
| References | Flessner MF: The transport barrier in intraperitoneal therapy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2005;288:F433–F442.1569205510.1152%2Fajprenal.00313.2004 Diamond MP: Reduction of de novo postsurgical adhesions by intraoperative precoating with Sepracoat (HAL-C) solution: a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter study. The Sepracoat Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steril 1998;69:1067–1074.962729410.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900057-0 Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, et al: Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by seprafilm ahesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1–11.1632000510.1007%2Fs10350-005-0268-5 Howard FM: The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: promise and pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993;48:357–387.832723510.1097%2F00006254-199306000-00001 Garrard CL, Clements RH, Nanney L, et al: Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1999;13:10–13.986967910.1007%2Fs004649900887 Chowdhury SM, Hubbell JA: Adhesion prevention with ancrod released via a tissue-adherent hydrogel. J Surg Res 1996;61:58–64.876994310.1006%2Fjsre.1996.0081 Cubukcu A, Alponat A, Gonullu N: An experimental study evaluating the effect of Mitomycin C on the prevention of postoperative intraabdominal adhesions. J Surg Res 2001;96:163–166.1126626810.1006%2Fjsre.2000.6059 Steinleitner A, Lambert H, Kazensky C, et al: Poloxamer 407 as an intraperitoneal barrier material for the prevention of postsurgical adhesion formation and reformation in rodent models for reproductive surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:48–52.1984226 Savel RH, Balasubramanya S, Lasheen S, et al: Beneficial effects of humidified, warmed carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg 2005;15:64–69.1576050010.1381%2F0960892052993530 Guvenal T, Cetin A, Ozdemir H, et al: Prevention of postoperative adhesion formation in rat uterine horn model by nimesulide: a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1732–1735.1147397410.1093%2Fhumrep%2F16.8.1732 Zhou J, Elson C, Lee TD: Reduction in postoperative adhesion formation and re-formation after an abdominal operation with the use of N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan. Surgery 2004;135:307–312.1497648110.1016%2Fj.surg.2003.07.005 Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, et al: Peritoneal Adhesions: Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Significance. Dig Surg 2001;18:260–273.1152813310.1159%2F000050149 Montgomery TC, Sharp JB, Bellina JH, et al: Comparative gross and histological study of the effects of scalpel, electric knife, and carbon dioxide laser on skin and uterine incisions in dogs. Lasers Surg Med 1983;3:9–22.663313710.1002%2Flsm.1900030103 Dunn RC, Mohler M: Effect of varying days of tissue plasminogen activator therapy on the prevention of post-surgical adhesions in a rabbit model. J Surg Res 1993;54:242–245.847424010.1006%2Fjsre.1993.1038 Haney AF, Doty E: A barrier composed of chemically cross-linked hyaluronic acid (Incert) reduces postoperative adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 1998;70:145–151.966043710.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900116-2 Nordic Adhesion Prevention Study Group. The efficacy of Interceed (TC7)* for prevention of reformation of postoperative adhesions on ovaries, fallopian tubes, and fimbriae in microsurgical operations for fertility: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril 1995;63:709–714.7890052 Replogle RL, Johnson R, Gross RE: Prevention of postoperative intestinal adhesions with combined promethazine and dexamethasone therapy: experimental and clinical studies. Ann Surg 1966;163:580–588.593501110.1097%2F00000658-196604000-00011 Farley DR, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, et al: Double-blind, prospective, randomized study of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2004;139:739–743; discussion 743–744.1524940610.1001%2Farchsurg.139.7.739 Kovacs EJ, DiPietro LA: Fibrogenic cytokines and connective tissue production. FASEB J 1994;8:854–861.7520879 Diamond MP: Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study. Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steril 1996;66:904–910.8941053 Hellebrekers BW, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Boesten L, et al: Preoperative predictors of postsurgical adhesion formation and the Prevention of Adhesions with Plasminogen Activator (PAPA-study): results of a clinical pilot study. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1204–1214.1835331410.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2008.01.052 Höckel M, Ott S, Siemann U, et al: Prevention of peritoneal adhesions in the rat with sustained intraperitoneal dexamethasone delivered by a novel therapeutic system. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1987;76:306–313.3448986 Schäfer M, Krähenb L, Büchler MW: Comparison of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic surgery. Dig Surg 1998;15:148–152.984557810.1159%2F000018609 Ellis H: Medicolegal consequences of adhesions. Hosp Med 2004;65:348–350.15222210 Filmar S, Jetha N, McComb P, et al: A comparative histologic study on the healing process after tissue transection. II. Carbon dioxide laser and surgical microscissors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:1068–1072.2658599 De Leon F, Toledo A, Sanfilippo J, et al: The prevention of adhesion formation by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an animal study comparing ibuprofen and indomethacin. Fertil Steril 1984;41:639–642.6705941 Avital S, Bollinger TJ, Wilkinson JD, et al: Preventing intra-abdominal adhesions with polylactic acid film: an animal study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:153–157.1569067310.1007%2Fs10350-004-0748-z Wiseman DM, Trout JR, Diamond MP: The rates of adhesion development and the effects of crystalloid solutions on adhesion development in pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 1998;70:702–711.979710210.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900270-2 Van Der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, et al: Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Br J Surg 2000;87:467–471.1075974410.1046%2Fj.1365-2168.2000.01394.x Lucas P, Warejcka D, Young H, et al: Formation of abdominal adhesions is inhibited by antibodies to transforming growth factor-beta1. J Surg Res 1996;65:135–138.890345910.1006%2Fjsre.1996.0355 Beck DE, Ferguson MA, Opelka FG, et al: Effect of previous surgery on abdominal opening time. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1749–1753.1115646210.1007%2FBF02236862 Holtz G: Failure of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (ibuprofen) to inhibit peritoneal adhesion reformation after lysis. Fertil Steril 1982;37:582–583.7067855 Hill-West JL, Chowdhury SM, Sawhney AS, et al: Prevention of postoperative adhesions in the rat by in situ photopolymerization of bioresorbable hydrogel barriers. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:59–64.8272310 Diamond MP, Luciano A, Johns DA, et al: Reduction of postoperative adhesions by N,O-carboxymethylchitosan: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 2003;80:631–636.1296971110.1016%2FS0015-0282%2803%2900759-3 Schreinemacher MH, Emans PJ, Gijbels MJ, et al: Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 2009;96:305–313.1922452110.1002%2Fbjs.6446 American Fertility Society. The AFS classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49:944–955.3371491 Johns DA, Ferland R, Dunn R: Initial feasibility study of a sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:334–338.1456780710.1016%2FS1074-3804%2805%2960257-5 Bellina JH, Hemmings R, Voros JI, et al: Carbon dioxide laser and electrosurgical wound study with an animal model: a comparison of tissue damage and healing patterns in peritoneal tissue. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:327–334.6421162 Okuyama N, Rodgers KE, Wang CY, et al: Prevention of retrosternal adhesion formation in a rabbit model using bioresorbable films of polyethylene glycol and polylactic acid. J Surg Res 1998;78:118–122.973362810.1006%2Fjsre.1998.5317 Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Ellis H, et al: The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8,849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study. BJOG 2000;107:855–862.1090155610.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2000.tb11083.x Oncel M, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, et al: Application of Adcon-P or Seprafilm in consecutive laparotomies using a murine model. Am J Surg 2004;187:304–308.1476932610.1016%2Fj.amjsurg.2003.11.014 Coleman MG, McLain AD, Moran BJ: Impact of previous surgery on time taken for incision and division of adhesions during laparotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1297–1299.1100550110.1007%2FBF02237441 Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, et al: Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:1–9.944959410.1016%2FS1072-7515%2897%2900127-0 Tang CL, Seow-Choen F, Fook-Chong S, et al: Bioresorbable adhesion barrier facilitates early closure of the defunctioning ileostomy after rectal excision: a prospective, randomised trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1200–1207.1297296410.1007%2Fs10350-004-6716-9 Rodgers K, Cohn D, Hotovely A, et al: Evaluation of polyethylene glycol/polylactic acid films in the prevention of adhesions in the rabbit adhesion formation and reformation sidewall models. Fertil Steril 1998;69:403–408.953186610.1016%2FS0015-0282%2897%2900574-8 Adhesion Barrier Study Group. Prevention of postsurgical adhesions by INTERCEED (TC7), an absorbable adhesion barrier: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Fertil Steril 1989;51:933–938.2524407 Hill-West JL, Dunn RC, Hubbell JA: Local release of fibrinolytic agents for adhesion prevention. J Surg Res 1995;59:759–763.853817810.1006%2Fjsre.1995.1236 Maddern GJ: NOTES: progress or marketing? ANZ J Surg 2009;79:318–319.1956650710.1111%2Fj.1445-2197.2009.04880.x Nishimura K, Nakamura R, diZerega G: Ibuprofen inhibition of postsurgical a ref57 ref56 ref59 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref55 ref54 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref100 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 ref39 ref38 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref97 ref96 ref11 ref99 ref10 ref98 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref93 ref92 ref95 ref94 ref91 ref90 ref89 ref86 ref85 ref88 ref87 ref82 ref81 ref84 ref83 ref80 ref79 ref78 ref75 ref74 ref77 ref76 ref2 ref1 ref71 ref70 ref73 ref72 ref68 ref67 ref69 ref64 ref63 ref66 ref65 ref60 ref62 ref61 |
| References_xml | – reference: Sulaiman H, Gabella G, Davis C, et al: Presence and distribution of sensory nerve fibers in human peritoneal adhesions. Ann Surg 2001;234:256–261.1150507210.1097%2F00000658-200108000-00016 – reference: Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Ellis H, et al: The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8,849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study. BJOG 2000;107:855–862.1090155610.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2000.tb11083.x – reference: Flessner MF: The transport barrier in intraperitoneal therapy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2005;288:F433–F442.1569205510.1152%2Fajprenal.00313.2004 – reference: Lucas P, Warejcka D, Young H, et al: Formation of abdominal adhesions is inhibited by antibodies to transforming growth factor-beta1. J Surg Res 1996;65:135–138.890345910.1006%2Fjsre.1996.0355 – reference: Gauwerky JF, Heinrich D, Kubli F: Complications of intraperitoneal dextran application for prevention of adhesions. Biol Res Pregnancy Perinatol 1986;7:93–97.2430629 – reference: Cheong YC, Laird SM, Li TC, et al: Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:556–566.1172786410.1093%2Fhumupd%2F7.6.556 – reference: Hoshino A, Kawamura YI, Yasuhara M, et al: Inhibition of CCL1-CCR8 interaction prevents aggregation of macrophages and development of peritoneal adhesions. J Immunol 2007;178:5296–5304.17404314 – reference: Ellis H: Medicolegal consequences of adhesions. Hosp Med 2004;65:348–350.15222210 – reference: Stovall TG, Elder RF, Ling FW: Predictors of pelvic adhesions. J Reprod Med 1989;34:345–348.2525188 – reference: Diamond MP, Luciano A, Johns DA, et al: Reduction of postoperative adhesions by N,O-carboxymethylchitosan: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 2003;80:631–636.1296971110.1016%2FS0015-0282%2803%2900759-3 – reference: Dunn RC, Mohler M: Effect of varying days of tissue plasminogen activator therapy on the prevention of postsurgical adhesions in a rabbit model. J Surg Res 1993;54:242–245.847424010.1006%2Fjsre.1993.1038 – reference: Kovacs EJ, DiPietro LA: Fibrogenic cytokines and connective tissue production. FASEB J 1994;8:854–861.7520879 – reference: Savel RH, Balasubramanya S, Lasheen S, et al: Beneficial effects of humidified, warmed carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg 2005;15:64–69.1576050010.1381%2F0960892052993530 – reference: Okuyama N, Rodgers KE, Wang CY, et al: Prevention of retrosternal adhesion formation in a rabbit model using bioresorbable films of polyethylene glycol and polylactic acid. J Surg Res 1998;78:118–122.973362810.1006%2Fjsre.1998.5317 – reference: Molinas CR, Mynbaev O, Pauwels A, et al: Peritoneal mesothelial hypoxia during pneumoperitoneum is a cofactor in adhesion formation in a laparoscopic mouse model. Fertil Steril 2001;76:560–567.1153248210.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2901964-1 – reference: Reid RL, Lie K, Spence JE, et al: Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of heparin-saturated interceed for prevention of adhesion reformation in the pelvic sidewall of the human; in Diamond MP, diZerega GS, Linsky CB, et al (eds): Gynecologic Surgery and Adhesion Prevention. New York, Wiley, 1993, pp 261–264. – reference: Corson SL, Batzer FR, Gocial B, et al: Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in scoring laparoscopic diagnosis of pelvic adhesions. Hum Reprod 1995;10:161–164.774504810.1093%2Fhumrep%2F10.1.161 – reference: Perlitz Y, Oettinger M, Karam K, et al: Anaphylactic shock during hysteroscopy using Hyskon solution: case report and review of adverse reactions and their treatment. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996;41:67–69.882188910.1159%2F000292042 – reference: Weaver FA, Lew W, Granke K, et al: A comparison of recombinant thrombin to bovine thrombin as a hemostatic ancillary in patients undergoing peripheral arterial bypass and arteriovenous graft procedures. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1266–1273.1844075410.1016%2Fj.jvs.2008.01.034 – reference: Bellina JH, Hemmings R, Voros JI, et al: Carbon dioxide laser and electrosurgical wound study with an animal model: a comparison of tissue damage and healing patterns in peritoneal tissue. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:327–334.6421162 – reference: Haney AF, Doty E: A barrier composed of chemically cross-linked hyaluronic acid (Incert) reduces postoperative adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 1998;70:145–151.966043710.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900116-2 – reference: Avsar F, Sahin M, Aksoy F, et al: Effects of diphenhydramine HCl and methylprednisolone in the prevention of abdominal adhesions. Am J Surg 2001;181:512–515.1151377510.1016%2FS0002-9610%2801%2900617-1 – reference: Filmar S, Jetha N, McComb P, et al: A comparative histologic study on the healing process after tissue transection. II. Carbon dioxide laser and surgical microscissors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:1068–1072.2658599 – reference: Hill-West JL, Dunn RC, Hubbell JA: Local release of fibrinolytic agents for adhesion prevention. J Surg Res 1995;59:759–763.853817810.1006%2Fjsre.1995.1236 – reference: Schäfer M, Krähenb L, Büchler MW: Comparison of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic surgery. Dig Surg 1998;15:148–152.984557810.1159%2F000018609 – reference: Guvenal T, Cetin A, Ozdemir H, et al: Prevention of postoperative adhesion formation in rat uterine horn model by nimesulide: a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1732–1735.1147397410.1093%2Fhumrep%2F16.8.1732 – reference: de la Portilla F, Ynfante I, Bejarano D, et al: Prevention of peritoneal adhesions by intraperitoneal administration of vitamin E: an experimental study in rats. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;47:2157–2161.10.1007%2Fs10350-004-0741-6 – reference: Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, et al: The SCAR-3 study: 5-year adhesion-related readmission risk following lower abdominal surgical procedures. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:551–558.1623223410.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2005.00857.x – reference: Rodgers K, Cohn D, Hotovely A, et al: Evaluation of polyethylene glycol/polylactic acid films in the prevention of adhesions in the rabbit adhesion formation and reformation sidewall models. Fertil Steril 1998;69:403–408.953186610.1016%2FS0015-0282%2897%2900574-8 – reference: Coleman MG, McLain AD, Moran BJ: Impact of previous surgery on time taken for incision and division of adhesions during laparotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1297–1299.1100550110.1007%2FBF02237441 – reference: Vrijland WW, Tseng LNL, Eijkman HJM, et al: Fewer intraperitoneal adhesions with use of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose membrane: a randomised clinical trial. Ann Surg 2002;235:193–199.1180735810.1097%2F00000658-200202000-00006 – reference: Chowdhury SM, Hubbell JA: Adhesion prevention with ancrod released via a tissue-adherent hydrogel. J Surg Res 1996;61:58–64.876994310.1006%2Fjsre.1996.0081 – reference: Montgomery TC, Sharp JB, Bellina JH, et al: Comparative gross and histological study of the effects of scalpel, electric knife, and carbon dioxide laser on skin and uterine incisions in dogs. Lasers Surg Med 1983;3:9–22.663313710.1002%2Flsm.1900030103 – reference: Nishimura K, Nakamura R, diZerega G: Ibuprofen inhibition of postsurgical adhesion formation: a time and dose response biochemical evaluation in rabbits. J Surg Res 1984;36:115–124.669437710.1016%2F0022-4804%2884%2990076-3 – reference: Holtz G: Failure of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (ibuprofen) to inhibit peritoneal adhesion reformation after lysis. Fertil Steril 1982;37:582–583.7067855 – reference: Chen MD, Teigen GA, Reynolds HT, et al: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: an evaluation of adhesion formation after pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in a porcine model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:499–503.953951610.1016%2FS0002-9378%2898%2970428-4 – reference: Hellebrekers BW, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Boesten L, et al: Preoperative predictors of postsurgical adhesion formation and the Prevention of Adhesions with Plasminogen Activator (PAPA-study): results of a clinical pilot study. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1204–1214.1835331410.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2008.01.052 – reference: Forestier D, Slim K, Joubert-Zakeyh J, et al: Do bipolar scissors increase postoperative adhesions? An experimental double-blind randomized trial. Ann Chir 2002;127:680–684.1265882610.1016%2FS0003-3944%2802%2900863-5 – reference: Marana R, Rizzi M, Muzii L, et al: Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery. Fertil Steril 1995;64:924–929.7589635 – reference: Binda MM, Molinas CR, Koninckx PR: Reactive oxygen species and adhesion formation: clinical implications in adhesion prevention. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2503–2507.1464516310.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdeg481 – reference: Korell M: Reduction of adhesion by INTERCEED Barrier and Gortex Surgical Membrane after laparoscopic myomectomy; presented at ‘Möglichkeiten der Adhäsionsprophylaxe’, Munich, April 1994. – reference: Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al: Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomised, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:297–306.8843257 – reference: Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, et al: Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 2004;18:898–906.1510810510.1007%2Fs00464-004-0056-7 – reference: Wilson MS: Practicalities and costs of adhesions. Colorectal Dis 2007;9(suppl 2):60–65.1782497210.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2007.01360.x – reference: Ansaloni L, Catena F, Coccolini F, et al: Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials: An experimental comparative study of treated and untreated polypropylene meshes placed in the abdominal cavity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:369–374.1940579910.1089%2Flap.2008.0366 – reference: Haney A, Hesla J, Hurst B, et al: Expanded polytetrafluororethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) is superior to oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed TC7+) in preventing adhesions. Fertil Steril 1995;63:1021–1026.7720911 – reference: Howard FM: The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: promise and pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993;48:357–387.832723510.1097%2F00006254-199306000-00001 – reference: Avital S, Bollinger TJ, Wilkinson JD, et al: Preventing intra-abdominal adhesions with polylactic acid film: an animal study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:153–157.1569067310.1007%2Fs10350-004-0748-z – reference: Van Der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, et al: Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Br J Surg 2000;87:467–471.1075974410.1046%2Fj.1365-2168.2000.01394.x – reference: Mercorio F, Mercorio A, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al: Evaluation of ovarian adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian drilling by second-look minilaparoscopy. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1229–1233.1768133910.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2007.05.009 – reference: Jacob BP, Hogle NJ, Durak E, et al: Tissue ingrowth and bowel adhesion formation in an animal comparative study: polypropylene versus Proceed versus Parietex Composite. Surg Endosc 2007;21:629–633.1728536910.1007%2Fs00464-006-9157-9 – reference: Chalela JA, Katzan I, Liebeskind DS, et al: Safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis in the postoperative period. Stroke 2001;32:1365–1369.11387500 – reference: Kumar S, Wong PF, Leaper DJ: Intra-peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non-gynaecological abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD005080. – reference: Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, O’Rourke NA, Maddern GJ: A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg 2008;247:583–602.1836262110.1097%2FSLA.0b013e3181656ce9 – reference: Cohen Z, Senagore A, Dayton M, et al: Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a novel, glycerol/sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomised, evaluator-blinded multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1130–1139.1586823010.1007%2Fs10350-004-0954-8 – reference: Dunn RC, Mohler M: Effect of varying days of tissue plasminogen activator therapy on the prevention of post-surgical adhesions in a rabbit model. J Surg Res 1993;54:242–245.847424010.1006%2Fjsre.1993.1038 – reference: Kennedy R, Costain DJ, McAlister VC, et al: Prevention of experimental postoperative peritoneal adhesions by N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan. Surgery 1996;120:866–870.890952310.1016%2FS0039-6060%2896%2980096-1 – reference: Thompson JS, DiBaise JK, Iyer KR, et al: Postoperative short bowel syndrome. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:85–89.1597844810.1016%2Fj.jamcollsurg.2005.02.034 – reference: LeGrand EK, Rodgers KE, Girgis W, et al: Efficacy of tolmetin sodium for adhesion prevention in rabbit and rat models. J Surg Res 1994;56:67–71.827777110.1006%2Fjsre.1994.1011 – reference: Milne AA, Murphy WG, Reading SJ, et al: Fibrin sealant reduces suture line bleeding during carotid endarterectomy: a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;10:91–94.763397610.1016%2FS1078-5884%2805%2980203-5 – reference: Molinas CR, Koninckx PR: Hypoxaemia induced by CO2 or helium pneumoperitoneum is a co-factor in adhesion formation in rabbits. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1758–1763.1092009910.1093%2Fhumrep%2F15.8.1758 – reference: Mahdy T, Mohamed G, Elhawary A: Effect of methylene blue on intra-abdominal adhesion formation in rats. Int J Surg 2008;6:452–455.1881813110.1016%2Fj.ijsu.2008.08.004 – reference: Wiseman DM: Possible intergel reaction syndrome (pIRS). Ann Surg 2006;244:630–632.1699837410.1097%2F01.sla.0000239619.93579.ca – reference: American Fertility Society. The AFS classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49:944–955.3371491 – reference: Garrard CL, Clements RH, Nanney L, et al: Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1999;13:10–13.986967910.1007%2Fs004649900887 – reference: Liu Y, Li H, Shu XZ, SD, et al: Crosslinked hyaluronan hydrogels containing mitomycin C reduce postoperative abdominal adhesions. Fertil Steril 2005;83(suppl 1):1275–1283.1583130210.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2004.09.038 – reference: Filmar S, Jetha N, McComb P, et al: A comparative histologic study on the healing process after tissue transection. I. Carbon dioxide laser and electromicrosurgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:1062–1067.2658598 – reference: Yu SL, Singh S, Chen HW, et al: Intra-abdominal adhesion formation induces anti-oxidative injury, enhances cell proliferation, and prevents complement-mediated lysis. Wound Repair Regen 2008;16:388–398.1847125710.1111%2Fj.1524-475X.2008.00378.x – reference: Cubukcu A, Alponat A, Gonullu N: An experimental study evaluating the effect of Mitomycin C on the prevention of postoperative intraabdominal adhesions. J Surg Res 2001;96:163–166.1126626810.1006%2Fjsre.2000.6059 – reference: Johns DB, Keyport GM, Hoehler F, et al: Reduction of postsurgical adhesions with Intergel adhesion prevention solution: a multicenter study of safety and efficacy after conservative gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril 2001;76:595–604.1153248710.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2901954-9 – reference: Sites CK, Jensen BA, Glock JL, et al: Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of Hyskon or lactated Ringer’s solution instillation after laparoscopy: randomized, controlled study. J Ultrasound Med 1997;16:195–199.9166816 – reference: diZerega GS, Verco SJ, Young P, et al: A randomized, controlled pilot study of the safety and efficacy of 4% icodextrin solution in the reduction of adhesions following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1031–1038.1192540110.1093%2Fhumrep%2F17.4.1031 – reference: Gustafson SB, Fulkerson P, Bildfell R, et al: Chitosan dressing provides hemostasis in swine femoral arterial injury model. Prehosp Emerg Care 2007;11:172–178.1745480310.1080%2F10903120701205893 – reference: Höckel M, Ott S, Siemann U, et al: Prevention of peritoneal adhesions in the rat with sustained intraperitoneal dexamethasone delivered by a novel therapeutic system. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1987;76:306–313.3448986 – reference: Yeo Y, Ito T, Bellas E, et al: In situ cross-linkable hyaluronan hydrogels containing polymeric nanoparticles for preventing postsurgical adhesions. Ann Surg 2007;245:819–824.1745717710.1097%2F01.sla.0000251519.49405.55 – reference: Steinleitner A, Lambert H, Kazensky C, et al: Poloxamer 407 as an intraperitoneal barrier material for the prevention of postsurgical adhesion formation and reformation in rodent models for reproductive surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:48–52.1984226 – reference: Krähenbühl L, Schäfer M, Kuzinkovas V, et al: Experimental study of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 1998;85:826–830.966771710.1046%2Fj.1365-2168.1998.00718.x – reference: Ellis H: The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;577:5–9.9076446 – reference: Doria C, Fischer CP, Wood CG, et al: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of plasma-derived human thrombin versus bovine thrombin in achieving hemostasis in patients undergoing surgery. Curr Med Res Opin 2008;24:785–794.1824152510.1185%2F030079908X273426 – reference: Nordic Adhesion Prevention Study Group. The efficacy of Interceed (TC7)* for prevention of reformation of postoperative adhesions on ovaries, fallopian tubes, and fimbriae in microsurgical operations for fertility: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril 1995;63:709–714.7890052 – reference: Zhou J, Elson C, Lee TD: Reduction in postoperative adhesion formation and re-formation after an abdominal operation with the use of N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan. Surgery 2004;135:307–312.1497648110.1016%2Fj.surg.2003.07.005 – reference: Farley DR, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, et al: Double-blind, prospective, randomized study of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2004;139:739–743; discussion 743–744.1524940610.1001%2Farchsurg.139.7.739 – reference: van Goor H: Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis 2007;9(suppl 2):25–34.1782496710.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2007.01358.x – reference: Ong SY, Wu J, Moochhala SM, et al: Development of a chitosan-based wound dressing with improved hemostatic and antimicrobial properties. Biomaterials 2008;29:4323–4332.1870825110.1016%2Fj.biomaterials.2008.07.034 – reference: Replogle RL, Johnson R, Gross RE: Prevention of postoperative intestinal adhesions with combined promethazine and dexamethasone therapy: experimental and clinical studies. Ann Surg 1966;163:580–588.593501110.1097%2F00000658-196604000-00011 – reference: Zeyneloglu HB, Senturk LM, Seli E, et al: The role of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in intraperitoneal adhesion formation. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1194–1199.964754610.1093%2Fhumrep%2F13.5.1194 – reference: Leach RE, Henry RL: Reduction of postoperative adhesions in the rat uterine horn model with poloxamer 407. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1317–1319.2339733 – reference: Sajid MS, Mallick AS, Rimpel J, et al: Effect of heated and humidified carbon dioxide on patients after laparoscopic procedures: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008;18:539–546.1909865610.1097%2FSLE.0b013e3181886ff4 – reference: Tang CL, Jayne DG, Seow-Choen F, et al: A randomised controlled trial of 0.5% ferric hyaluronate gel (Intergel) in the prevention of adhesions following abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 2006;243:449–455.1655219410.1097%2F01.sla.0000207837.71831.a2 – reference: Wiseman DM, Trout JR, Diamond MP: The rates of adhesion development and the effects of crystalloid solutions on adhesion development in pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 1998;70:702–711.979710210.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900270-2 – reference: Wang GJ, Goldthwaite CA Jr, Burks S, et al: Fibrin sealant reduces perioperative blood loss in total hip replacement. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2003;13:399–411.1464957810.1615%2FJLongTermEffMedImplants.v13.i5.50 – reference: Adhesion Barrier Study Group. Prevention of postsurgical adhesions by INTERCEED (TC7), an absorbable adhesion barrier: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Fertil Steril 1989;51:933–938.2524407 – reference: Hill-West JL, Chowdhury SM, Sawhney AS, et al: Prevention of postoperative adhesions in the rat by in situ photopolymerization of bioresorbable hydrogel barriers. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:59–64.8272310 – reference: Kusunoki M, Ikeuchi H, Yanagi H, et al: Bioresorbable hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose membrane (Seprafilm) in surgery for rectal carcinoma: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Surg Today 2005;35:940–945.1624984810.1007%2Fs00595-005-3061-0 – reference: Adhesion Scoring Group. Improvement of interobserver reproducibility of adhesion scoring system. Fertil Steril 1994;62:984–988.7926146 – reference: Portz D, Elkins T, White R, et al: Oxygen free radicals and pelvic adhesions formation: I. Blocking oxygen free radical toxicity to prevent adhesion formation in an endometriosis model. Int J Fertil 1991;36:39–42.1672675 – reference: Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, et al: A prospective, randomised, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1310–1319.1453066710.1007%2Fs10350-004-6739-2 – reference: Duffy DM, diZerega GS: Adhesion controversies: pelvic pain as a cause of adhesions, crystalloids in preventing them. J Reprod Med 1996;41:19–26.8855072 – reference: Menzies D, Pascual MH, Walz MK, et al: Use of icodextrin 4% solution in the prevention of adhesion formation following general surgery: from the multicentre ARIEL Registry. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:375–382.1683485910.1308%2F003588406X114730 – reference: De Leon F, Toledo A, Sanfilippo J, et al: The prevention of adhesion formation by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an animal study comparing ibuprofen and indomethacin. Fertil Steril 1984;41:639–642.6705941 – reference: Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, et al: Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by seprafilm ahesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1–11.1632000510.1007%2Fs10350-005-0268-5 – reference: Kopernik G, Avinoach E, Grossman Y, et al: The effect of a high partial pressure of carbon dioxide environment on metabolism and immune functions of human peritoneal cells-relevance to carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1503–1510.985558810.1016%2FS0002-9378%2898%2970016-X – reference: Beck DE, Ferguson MA, Opelka FG, et al: Effect of previous surgery on abdominal opening time. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1749–1753.1115646210.1007%2FBF02236862 – reference: Tjandra JJ, Chan MK: A sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier facilitates closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:956–960.1821953010.1007%2Fs10350-007-9181-4 – reference: Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, et al: Peritoneal Adhesions: Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Significance. Dig Surg 2001;18:260–273.1152813310.1159%2F000050149 – reference: Beck DE, Opelka FG, Bailey HR, et al: Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:241–248; erratum in Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:578.1021150210.1007%2FBF02237135 – reference: Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, et al: Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:1–9.944959410.1016%2FS1072-7515%2897%2900127-0 – reference: Tang CL, Seow-Choen F, Fook-Chong S, et al: Bioresorbable adhesion barrier facilitates early closure of the defunctioning ileostomy after rectal excision: a prospective, randomised trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1200–1207.1297296410.1007%2Fs10350-004-6716-9 – reference: Zhang ZL, Xu SW, Zhou XL: Preventive effects of chitosan on peritoneal adhesion in rats. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:4572–4577.16874876 – reference: Holmdahl LE, Al-Jabreen M, Risberg B: Role of fibrinolysis in the formation of postoperative adhesions. Wound Repair Regen 1994;2:171–176.1715610810.1046%2Fj.1524-475X.1994.20306.x – reference: Maddern GJ: NOTES: progress or marketing? ANZ J Surg 2009;79:318–319.1956650710.1111%2Fj.1445-2197.2009.04880.x – reference: Kovacs EJ: Fibrogenic cytokines: the role of immune mediators in the development of scar tissue. Immunol Today 1991;12:17–23.201504410.1016%2F0167-5699%2891%2990107-5 – reference: Bellón JM, Rodríguez M, García-Honduvilla N, et al: Peritoneal effects of prosthetic meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects: monitoring adhesions by sequential laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007;17:160–166.1748464110.1089%2Flap.2006.0028 – reference: Moore RG, Partin AW, Adams JB, et al: Adhesion formation after transperitoneal nephrectomy: laparoscopic vs open approach. J Endourol 1995;9:277–280.755027410.1089%2Fend.1995.9.277 – reference: Haney A, Hesla J, Hurst B, et al: Prevention of pelvic side wall adhesion reformation using surgical barriers: expanded polytetrafluororethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) is superior to oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed TC7+) (abstract). Fertil Steril 1994;S210:265. – reference: Schreinemacher MH, Emans PJ, Gijbels MJ, et al: Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 2009;96:305–313.1922452110.1002%2Fbjs.6446 – reference: Johns DA, Ferland R, Dunn R: Initial feasibility study of a sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:334–338.1456780710.1016%2FS1074-3804%2805%2960257-5 – reference: Rosário MT, Ribeiro U Jr, Corbett CE, et al: Does CO2 pneumoperitoneum alter the ultra-structuture of the mesothelium? J Surg Res 2006;133:84–88.1636017510.1016%2Fj.jss.2005.09.032 – reference: Oncel M, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, et al: Liquid antiadhesive product (Adcon-p) prevents post-operative adhesions within the intra-abdominal organs in a rat model. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003;18:514–517.1282740710.1007%2Fs00384-003-0489-9 – reference: Berkkanoglu M, Zhang L, Ulukus M, et al: Inhibition of chemokines prevents intraperitoneal adhesions in mice. Hum Reprod 2005;20:3047–3052.1600646410.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdei182 – reference: Levy O, Martinowitz U, Oran A, et al: The use of fibrin tissue adhesive to reduce blood loss and the need for blood transfusion after total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:1580–1588.10565650 – reference: Chegini N, Kotseos K, Zhao Y, et al: Expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-1) and tissue inhibitor of MMP in serosal tissue of intraperitoneal organs and adhesions. Fertil Steril 2001;76:1212–1219.1173075310.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2902875-8 – reference: Leach RE, Burns JW, Dawe EJ, et al: Reduction of postsurgical adhesion formation in the rabbit uterine horn model with use of hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose gel. Fertil Steril 1998;69:415–418.953186910.1016%2FS0015-0282%2897%2900573-6 – reference: Rabea EI, Badawy ME, Stevens CV, et al: Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules 2003;4:1457–1465.1460686810.1021%2Fbm034130m – reference: Diamond MP: Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study. Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steril 1996;66:904–910.8941053 – reference: Linsky CB, Diamond MP, Cunningham T, et al: Adhesion reduction in the rabbit uterine horn model using an absorbable barrier, TC-7. J Reprod Med 1987;32:17–20.3560059 – reference: Cahill RA, Wang JH, Soohkai S, Redmond HP: Mast cells facilitate local VEGF release as an early event in the pathogenesis of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Surgery 2006;140:108–112.1685744810.1016%2Fj.surg.2006.01.020 – reference: Chapman WC, Lockstadt H, Slngla N, et al: Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical evaluation of recombinant human thrombin in multiple surgical indications. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:2083–2085.1696162110.1111%2Fj.1538-7836.2006.02067.x – reference: Kucukozkan T, Ersoy B, Uygur D, et al: Prevention of adhesions by sodium chromoglycate, dexamethasone, saline and aprotinin after pelvic surgery. ANZ J Surg 2004;74:1111–1115.1557415610.1111%2Fj.1445-1433.2004.03261.x – reference: Orita H, Fukasawa M, Girgis W, diZerega GS: Inhibition of postsurgical adhesions in a standardized rabbit model: intraperitoneal treatment with tissue plasminogen activator. Int J Fertil 1991;36:172–177.1678373 – reference: Hulka JF: Adnexal adhesions, a prognostic staging and classification system based on a 5-year survey of fertility surgery results at Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 1982;144:141–148.6214187 – reference: DeCherney AH, diZerega GS: Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation following general surgery and the use of adhesion prevention barriers. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:671–688.919488610.1016%2FS0039-6109%2805%2970574-0 – reference: Larsson B, Lalos O, Marsk L, et al: Effect of intraperitoneal instillation of 32% dextran 70 on postoperative adhesion formation after tubal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985;64:437–441.241496610.3109%2F00016348509155163 – reference: Chegini N, Rong H, Bennett B, et al: Peritoneal fluid cytokine and eicosanoid levels and their relation to the incidence of peritoneal adhesion. J Soc Gynecol Investig 1999;6:153–157.1037627210.1016%2FS1071-5576%2899%2900007-6 – reference: Diamond MP: Reduction of de novo postsurgical adhesions by intraoperative precoating with Sepracoat (HAL-C) solution: a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter study. The Sepracoat Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steril 1998;69:1067–1074.962729410.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900057-0 – reference: Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, et al: Adhesion prevention effects of fibrin sealants after laparoscopic myomectomy as determined by second look laparoscopy: a prospective randomised, controlled study. J Reprod Med 2005;50:571–577.16220761 – reference: Oncel M, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, et al: Application of Adcon-P or Seprafilm in consecutive laparotomies using a murine model. Am J Surg 2004;187:304–308.1476932610.1016%2Fj.amjsurg.2003.11.014 – reference: Menzies D, Ellis H: Intestinal obstruction from adhesions – how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:60–632301905 – reference: Menzies D, Ellis H: The role of plasminogen activator in adhesion prevention. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:362–366.1902993 – ident: ref69 doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1445-2197.2009.04880.x – ident: ref100 doi: 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900057-0 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.jss.2005.09.032 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1007%2Fs00464-006-9157-9 – ident: ref64 doi: 10.1016%2FS0002-9378%2898%2970016-X – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1524-475X.2008.00378.x – ident: ref51 doi: 10.1007%2Fs10350-007-9181-4 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F13.5.1194 – ident: ref65 doi: 10.1097%2FSLE.0b013e3181886ff4 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1097%2F00000658-196604000-00011 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1016%2FS1074-3804%2805%2960257-5 – ident: ref78 doi: 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900270-2 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1097%2F01.sla.0000251519.49405.55 – ident: ref83 doi: 10.1021%2Fbm034130m – ident: ref92 doi: 10.1159%2F000292042 – ident: ref98 doi: 10.1006%2Fjsre.1998.5317 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1538-7836.2006.02067.x – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1006%2Fjsre.1995.1236 – ident: ref61 doi: 10.1159%2F000018609 – ident: ref84 doi: 10.1002%2Fbjs.6446 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-0748-z – ident: ref99 doi: 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2897%2900574-8 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F16.8.1732 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2007.05.009 – ident: ref86 doi: 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-0954-8 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.surg.2003.07.005 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.1002%2Flsm.1900030103 – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2007.01360.x – ident: ref68 doi: 10.1097%2FSLA.0b013e3181656ce9 – ident: ref67 doi: 10.1001%2Farchsurg.139.7.739 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1006%2Fjsre.1996.0355 – ident: ref89 doi: 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-6716-9 – ident: ref70 doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1445-1433.2004.03261.x – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1016%2F0167-5699%2891%2990107-5 – ident: ref62 doi: 10.1007%2Fs004649900887 – ident: ref75 doi: 10.1046%2Fj.1524-475X.1994.20306.x – ident: ref77 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.ijsu.2008.08.004 – ident: ref63 doi: 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F15.8.1758 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2897%2900127-0 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1006%2Fjsre.1994.1011 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1046%2Fj.1365-2168.1998.00718.x – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1016%2FS0002-9378%2898%2970428-4 – ident: ref97 doi: 10.1097%2F01.sla.0000239619.93579.ca – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.surg.2006.01.020 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1093%2Fhumupd%2F7.6.556 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.amjsurg.2003.11.014 – ident: ref82 doi: 10.1080%2F10903120701205893 – ident: ref72 doi: 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdeg481 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.jamcollsurg.2005.02.034 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1006%2Fjsre.1996.0081 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2897%2900573-6 – ident: ref81 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.biomaterials.2008.07.034 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2008.01.052 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2803%2900759-3 – ident: ref85 doi: 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-6739-2 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1007%2Fs00384-003-0489-9 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1007%2FBF02237441 – ident: ref91 doi: 10.1097%2F00000658-200202000-00006 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1097%2F00006254-199306000-00001 – ident: ref71 doi: 10.1016%2F0022-4804%2884%2990076-3 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1046%2Fj.1365-2168.2000.01394.x – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1007%2FBF02237135 – ident: ref90 doi: 10.1097%2F01.sla.0000207837.71831.a2 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1007%2Fs10350-004-0741-6 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1006%2Fjsre.2000.6059 – ident: ref66 doi: 10.1381%2F0960892052993530 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1016%2FS1071-5576%2899%2900007-6 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2004.09.038 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1097%2F00000658-200108000-00016 – ident: ref95 doi: 10.3109%2F00016348509155163 – ident: ref55 doi: 10.1016%2FS0003-3944%2802%2900863-5 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.1615%2FJLongTermEffMedImplants.v13.i5.50 – ident: ref56 doi: 10.1016%2Fj.jvs.2008.01.034 – ident: ref74 doi: 10.1006%2Fjsre.1993.1038 – ident: ref94 doi: 10.1016%2FS0039-6109%2805%2970574-0 – ident: ref88 doi: 10.1007%2Fs00595-005-3061-0 – ident: ref73 doi: 10.1006%2Fjsre.1993.1038 – ident: ref60 doi: 10.1016%2FS1078-5884%2805%2980203-5 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1007%2FBF02236862 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2902875-8 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1016%2FS0002-9610%2801%2900617-1 – ident: ref87 doi: 10.1007%2Fs10350-005-0268-5 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdei182 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1159%2F000050149 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1089%2Flap.2008.0366 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2005.00857.x – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2000.tb11083.x – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1016%2FS0039-6060%2896%2980096-1 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.1185%2F030079908X273426 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1089%2Fend.1995.9.277 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1007%2Fs00464-004-0056-7 – ident: ref93 doi: 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2901954-9 – ident: ref76 doi: 10.1152%2Fajprenal.00313.2004 – ident: ref96 doi: 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2898%2900116-2 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1089%2Flap.2006.0028 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2901964-1 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F10.1.161 – ident: ref79 doi: 10.1308%2F003588406X114730 – ident: ref80 doi: 10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F17.4.1031 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2007.01358.x |
| SSID | ssj0003691 |
| Score | 2.173796 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Background: Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality.... Adhesion formation remains an almost inevitable consequence of abdominal procedures, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There is an... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref karger |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 347 |
| SubjectTerms | Abdomen - surgery Animals Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods Humans Peritoneum - pathology Peritoneum - surgery Review Tissue Adhesions - epidemiology Tissue Adhesions - physiopathology Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control |
| Title | Abdominal Adhesion Prevention: Still a Sticky Subject |
| URI | https://karger.com/doi/10.1159/000314805 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20847564 https://www.proquest.com/docview/816420737 https://www.proquest.com/docview/812133924 |
| Volume | 27 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LS8QwEB58IV7Et-uqFPHgpdht2iT1IqsoIijiA_ZWmheKS-tj9-C_d6ZNiwf1FGiHQCfTeSST7wM4zKTWimsZuowozAgLQDJlQ5cWcSaUlYMa7Pnmll89JdejdOR7cz59W2XrE2tHbSpNe-THEvP6GO1RnL69h0QaRYernkFjFuYJuYw6usSoq7fQNzeEeXHKQrRT7oGFMIDT_QWGhQCR1v0IRwuv1H398XeyWQedyxVY9tliMGyWdxVmbLkGizf-PHwd-FCZqqblCobm2dLOV9CCMlXlSfAweRmPg4JG_foVoJegbZfTDXi6vHg8vwo9E0KoE8YmoXOGMaOkkwOBo3IDZ7hOMRmLCsEKE8VZpDCWs0RjxSOUiIxT0lr6VqczyTZhrqxKuw1BwgsumeWRdSYpHAYjVQguuNIppjKJ68FRq5Bce5hwYqsY53W5kGZ5p7seHHSibw02xm9CG41WO5H2eb9Vcu5_m8-8W-QeBN1btHc6xChKW01JJMayGqvGHmw1S9NNHEcYalOe7Pw7dR-W6g6A-j7hLsxNPqZ2DxOLidqvzWcf5s8ubu_uvwGzSMm2 |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1JS-xAEC50FJ8XcX2OayMKXoKZdNLpCA8ZN8ZlBnGBucX0huKQuIyIP8r_-Kqz4UG9eWpIqvtQXV1VXy_1AWxGXErBJHdMZCnMbC0AToV2TJB4USg0b-XFnrs91rnxT_tBfwQ-qrcw9lpl5RNzR60yaffIdzjm9R7aY7j3-ORY0ih7uFoxaBRWcabf3xCxvfw7OcTp3fK846Prg45Tkgo40qd06BijKFWCG94KsRWmZRSTAeY1bhLSRLle5AoMi9SXCB5CEbrKCK41Zk6RkRGnOO4ojPkUkUwDxvaPeheXteunrKDo8wLq4MpgZSkj7GpfTFCEHpYm71MAHH-w972fv09v8zB3PA1TZX5K2oVBzcCITmdholuewM8BawuV5URgpK3utN1rI1UZqCzdJVfD-8GAJLaVD-8E_ZLd6Nmbh5tfUdMCNNIs1YtAfJYwTjVztVF-YjD8iSRkIRMywOTJN03YrhQSy7IwueXHGMQ5QAmiuNZdEzZq0ceiGsdXQvOFVmuR6vtypeS4XKgvcW1WTSD1X1xh9tgkSXX2akU8BPKIU5vwt5iaemDPxeAeMH_px6HX4U_nunsen5_0zpZhMr9_kL9mXIHG8PlVr2JaMxRrpTERuP1t-_0PP3wG-A |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abdominal+Adhesion+Prevention%3A+Still+a+Sticky+Subject&rft.jtitle=Digestive+surgery&rft.au=Lauder%2C+Chris+I.W.&rft.au=Garcea%2C+Giuseppe&rft.au=Strickland%2C+Andrew&rft.au=Maddern%2C+Guy+J.&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.issn=0253-4886&rft.eissn=1421-9883&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159%2F000314805&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1159_000314805 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0253-4886&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0253-4886&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0253-4886&client=summon |