Transferability of Covariates to Predict Soil Organic Carbon in Cropland Soils

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 15; no. 4; p. 876
• Main Authors: Broeg, Tom, Blaschek, Michael, Seitz, Steffen, Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Ruhollah, Zepp, Simone, Scholten, Thomas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.02.2023
• Subjects: Accuracy; Agricultural land; Algorithms; Carbon; Carbon content; climate; Climate effects; Climate models; Comparative analysis; cropland; data collection; Datasets; Digital Elevation Models; Digital mapping; digital soil mapping; Elevation; extrapolation; Germany; Land use; landscapes; Machine learning; Mapping; model transfer; Multispectral photography; Organic carbon; Organic soils; reflectance; Remote sensing; satellites; soil; Soil mapping; soil organic carbon; Soil properties; soil reflectance composite; Soils; Terrain; Vegetation; Germany; Bavaria Germany; Alps
• DOI: 10.3390/rs15040876
• ISSN: 2072-4292

Precise knowledge about the soil organic carbon (SOC) content in cropland soils is one requirement to design and execute effective climate and food policies. In digital soil mapping (DSM), machine learning algorithms are used to predict soil properties from covariates derived from traditional soil mapping, digital elevation models, land use, and Earth observation (EO). However, such DSM models are trained for a specific dataset and region and have so far only allowed limited general statements to be made that would enable the models to be transferred to different regions. In this study, we test the transferability of SOC models for cropland soils using five different covariate groups: multispectral soil reflectance composites (satellite), soil legacy data (soil), digital elevation model derivatives (terrain), climate parameters (climate), and combined models (combined). The transferability was analyzed using data from two federal states in southern Germany: Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg. First, baseline models were trained for each state with combined models performing best in both cases (R2 = 0.68/0.48). Next, the models were transferred and tested with soil samples from the other state whose data were not used during model calibration. Only satellite and combined models were transferable, but accuracy declined in both cases. In the final step, models were trained with samples from both states (mixed-data models) and applied to each state separately. This process significantly improved the accuracies of satellite, terrain, and combined models, while it showed no effect on climate models and decreased the models based on soil covariates. The experiment underlines the importance of EO for the transfer and extrapolation of DSM models.