Rittayamai, N., Tscheikuna, J., & Rujiwit, P. (2014). High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy after endotracheal extubation: A randomized crossover physiologic study. Respiratory care, 59(4), 485. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02397
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationRittayamai, Nuttapol, Jamsak Tscheikuna, and Pitchayapa Rujiwit. "High-flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Endotracheal Extubation: A Randomized Crossover Physiologic Study." Respiratory Care 59, no. 4 (2014): 485. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02397.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationRittayamai, Nuttapol, et al. "High-flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy After Endotracheal Extubation: A Randomized Crossover Physiologic Study." Respiratory Care, vol. 59, no. 4, 2014, p. 485, https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02397.