Evaluation of Neutralizing Capacity of Tixagevimab plus Cilgavimab (AZD7442) against Different SARS‐CoV‐2 Variants: A Case Report Study with Comparison to a Vaccinated Population

AZD7442 (150 mg of tixagevimab plus 150 mg of cilgavimab) has been approved for the preexposure prophylaxis of COVID‐19 and for the treatment of adults and adolescents with COVID‐19 who do not require supplemental oxygen and who are at increased risk of severe COVID‐19. Thus, the aim of the present...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCase reports in infectious diseases Vol. 2024; no. 1; p. 9163490
Main Authors Gillot, Constant, Bayart, Jean-Louis, Maloteau, Vincent, Dogné, Jean-Michel, Douxfils, Jonathan, Favresse, Julien
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Egypt John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2024
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AZD7442 (150 mg of tixagevimab plus 150 mg of cilgavimab) has been approved for the preexposure prophylaxis of COVID‐19 and for the treatment of adults and adolescents with COVID‐19 who do not require supplemental oxygen and who are at increased risk of severe COVID‐19. Thus, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the neutralizing capacity of tixagevimab and cilgavimab across different SARS‐CoV‐2 variants in two patients who received AZD7442 for immunoprophylaxis. A cohort of subjects ( n  = 45) who had received the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine has been included to compare these two preventive strategies. Neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers against several variants were assessed against the wild‐type, alpha, beta, gamma, delta, omicron BA.5, and XBB.1.5 variants. Binding antibodies have also been measured. NAbs T 1/2 for AZD7442 was 8.1 days (95% CI: 5.1–19.5 days) and was 11.8 days (95% CI: 7.9–23.7 days) for the primo‐vaccination cohort. The time to reach neutralization negativity was 108.3 days (95% CI: 66.9–130.7) for AZD7442 compared to 95.4 days (95% CI: 31.0–119.7 days) for the primo‐vaccination cohort. The time to reach NAbs’ negativity differs between variants with the maximum value obtained for alpha (i.e., 101.1 days (95% CI: 30.0–135.4 days)) and the minimum obtained for beta (i.e., 61.2 days (95% CI: 37.8–77.1 days)). Our results reinforce the need of reviewing the use of AZD7442 in relation to variants of concern and potentially adapting its administration schedule. AZD7442 could be indicated for short‐term prophylaxis in frail patients who may be acutely exposed to SARS‐CoV‐2.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
content type line 23
Academic Editor: Piyush Baindara
ISSN:2090-6625
2090-6633
DOI:10.1155/2024/9163490