Comparison of Multiparametric and Biparametric MRI in First Round Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Patients with PSA Levels under 10 ng/mL
To determine the efficacy of cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (b-MRI) for patients with prostate-specific antigen levels under 10 ng/mL. We reviewed data from 123 consecutive patients who underwent cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using prostate MRI....
Saved in:
Published in | Yonsei medical journal Vol. 58; no. 5; pp. 994 - 999 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
Yonsei University College of Medicine
01.09.2017
연세대학교의과대학 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0513-5796 1976-2437 1976-2437 |
DOI | 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To determine the efficacy of cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (b-MRI) for patients with prostate-specific antigen levels under 10 ng/mL.
We reviewed data from 123 consecutive patients who underwent cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using prostate MRI. Of these patients, the first 55 underwent prostate biopsy using multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI), and the remaining 68 underwent prostate biopsy using b-MRI. For b-MRI, we generated T2 weighted axial imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. We found that 62 of the 123 men had suspicious lesions on MRI (32 of the 55 men in the mp-MRI group and 30 of the 68 men in the b-MRI group). We compared the prostate cancer detection rates and the proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer between the different MRI sequences.
Between the two MRI groups, there were no statistically significant differences in prostate cancer detection rate and proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer (41.8% vs. 30.9%, p=0.208 and 82.6% vs. 76.2%, p=0.598). Among the 62 men who had suspicious lesions on MRI, the prostate cancer detection rates were 62.5% and 63.3% (p=0.709) in the mp-MRI and b-MRI groups, respectively, and the proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer were 95.0% and 84.2% (p=0.267).
Prostate biopsy using b-MRI showed similar performance to that using mp-MRI for detecting prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. Considering the satisfactory performance and cost effectiveness of b-MRI, this technique could be a good option for obtaining intraprostatic information for first round prostate biopsy. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To determine the efficacy of cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (b-MRI) for patients with prostate-specific antigen levels under 10 ng/mL.PURPOSETo determine the efficacy of cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (b-MRI) for patients with prostate-specific antigen levels under 10 ng/mL.We reviewed data from 123 consecutive patients who underwent cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using prostate MRI. Of these patients, the first 55 underwent prostate biopsy using multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI), and the remaining 68 underwent prostate biopsy using b-MRI. For b-MRI, we generated T2 weighted axial imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. We found that 62 of the 123 men had suspicious lesions on MRI (32 of the 55 men in the mp-MRI group and 30 of the 68 men in the b-MRI group). We compared the prostate cancer detection rates and the proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer between the different MRI sequences.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe reviewed data from 123 consecutive patients who underwent cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using prostate MRI. Of these patients, the first 55 underwent prostate biopsy using multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI), and the remaining 68 underwent prostate biopsy using b-MRI. For b-MRI, we generated T2 weighted axial imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. We found that 62 of the 123 men had suspicious lesions on MRI (32 of the 55 men in the mp-MRI group and 30 of the 68 men in the b-MRI group). We compared the prostate cancer detection rates and the proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer between the different MRI sequences.Between the two MRI groups, there were no statistically significant differences in prostate cancer detection rate and proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer (41.8% vs. 30.9%, p=0.208 and 82.6% vs. 76.2%, p=0.598). Among the 62 men who had suspicious lesions on MRI, the prostate cancer detection rates were 62.5% and 63.3% (p=0.709) in the mp-MRI and b-MRI groups, respectively, and the proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer were 95.0% and 84.2% (p=0.267).RESULTSBetween the two MRI groups, there were no statistically significant differences in prostate cancer detection rate and proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer (41.8% vs. 30.9%, p=0.208 and 82.6% vs. 76.2%, p=0.598). Among the 62 men who had suspicious lesions on MRI, the prostate cancer detection rates were 62.5% and 63.3% (p=0.709) in the mp-MRI and b-MRI groups, respectively, and the proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer were 95.0% and 84.2% (p=0.267).Prostate biopsy using b-MRI showed similar performance to that using mp-MRI for detecting prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. Considering the satisfactory performance and cost effectiveness of b-MRI, this technique could be a good option for obtaining intraprostatic information for first round prostate biopsy.CONCLUSIONProstate biopsy using b-MRI showed similar performance to that using mp-MRI for detecting prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. Considering the satisfactory performance and cost effectiveness of b-MRI, this technique could be a good option for obtaining intraprostatic information for first round prostate biopsy. Purpose: To determine the efficacy of cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (b-MRI) for patients with prostate-specific antigen levels under 10 ng/mL. Materials and Methods: We reviewed data from 123 consecutive patients who underwent cognitive targeted prostate biopsy usingprostate MRI. Of these patients, the first 55 underwent prostate biopsy using multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI), and the remaining68 underwent prostate biopsy using b-MRI. For b-MRI, we generated T2 weighted axial imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. We found that 62 of the 123 men had suspicious lesions on MRI (32 of the 55 men in the mp-MRI group and 30 of the 68 men in the b-MRI group). We compared the prostate cancer detection rates and the proportions of clinically significantprostate cancer between the different MRI sequences. Results: Between the two MRI groups, there were no statistically significant differences in prostate cancer detection rate and proportionsof clinically significant prostate cancer (41.8% vs. 30.9%, p=0.208 and 82.6% vs. 76.2%, p=0.598). Among the 62 men who had suspicious lesions on MRI, the prostate cancer detection rates were 62.5% and 63.3% (p=0.709) in the mp-MRI and b-MRI groups, respectively, and the proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer were 95.0% and 84.2% (p=0.267). Conclusion: Prostate biopsy using b-MRI showed similar performance to that using mp-MRI for detecting prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. Considering the satisfactory performance and cost effectiveness of b-MRI, this technique could be a good option for obtaining intraprostatic information for first round prostate biopsy. KCI Citation Count: 3 To determine the efficacy of cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (b-MRI) for patients with prostate-specific antigen levels under 10 ng/mL. We reviewed data from 123 consecutive patients who underwent cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using prostate MRI. Of these patients, the first 55 underwent prostate biopsy using multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI), and the remaining 68 underwent prostate biopsy using b-MRI. For b-MRI, we generated T2 weighted axial imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. We found that 62 of the 123 men had suspicious lesions on MRI (32 of the 55 men in the mp-MRI group and 30 of the 68 men in the b-MRI group). We compared the prostate cancer detection rates and the proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer between the different MRI sequences. Between the two MRI groups, there were no statistically significant differences in prostate cancer detection rate and proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer (41.8% vs. 30.9%, p=0.208 and 82.6% vs. 76.2%, p=0.598). Among the 62 men who had suspicious lesions on MRI, the prostate cancer detection rates were 62.5% and 63.3% (p=0.709) in the mp-MRI and b-MRI groups, respectively, and the proportions of clinically significant prostate cancer were 95.0% and 84.2% (p=0.267). Prostate biopsy using b-MRI showed similar performance to that using mp-MRI for detecting prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. Considering the satisfactory performance and cost effectiveness of b-MRI, this technique could be a good option for obtaining intraprostatic information for first round prostate biopsy. |
Author | Lee, Dong Hoon Lee, Seung Soo Han, Ji-Yeon Nam, Jong Kil Lee, Joon Woo Chung, Moon Kee Park, Sung Woo |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea 2 Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea – name: 1 Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dong Hoon surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Dong Hoon organization: Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Jong Kil surname: Nam fullname: Nam, Jong Kil organization: Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Seung Soo surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Seung Soo organization: Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Ji-Yeon surname: Han fullname: Han, Ji-Yeon organization: Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Joon Woo surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Joon Woo organization: Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea – sequence: 6 givenname: Moon Kee surname: Chung fullname: Chung, Moon Kee organization: Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea – sequence: 7 givenname: Sung Woo surname: Park fullname: Park, Sung Woo organization: Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28792144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002251842$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp1UstuEzEUtVARTQsfwAZ5CYtM_RyPN0ghohApFVEIa8uZeFK3M3Zqe4LyFf3lepoWFSRWV_Y9D_n4nIET550B4D1GBaVMXhy6m4IgLApeFbyQkr0CIyxFOSaMihMwQhzTMReyPAVnMd4gRARG5A04JZWQBDM2AvdT3-10sNE76Bt41bfJ5rPuTAq2htpt4JeXF1fLGbQOXtoQE1z6Pu-nfutssnsDVzpsTTIbuAg-Jp1M5vpdPAyMhU7WuBThb5uu4eLnBM7N3rQRZgkTIEbQbS-6-VvwutFtNO-e5jn4dfl1Nf0-nv_4NptO5uOaUZrGZblmtakwFmwtEOaSUiooqhjSnOIGG0FLJGq6kZhqxnTJCEO1lGaNNdUNpufg01HXhUbd1lZ5bR_n1qvboCbL1UwNKTJSZuznI3bXrzuzqfMzgm7VLthOh8Mj8--Ns9dZZ68456TkPAt8fBII_q43ManOxtq0rXbG91FhSQSXrBQyQz-89Ppj8vxjGSCOgDpnHINpVG1z1NYP1rZVGKmhGyp3Qw3dULxSXOVuZCb-h_ks_n_OAyxVvU4 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmoop_2022_100518 crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20190929 crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_15545 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12040799 crossref_primary_10_1177_17562872221096377 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD012663_pub2 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_019_0158_x crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_59470 crossref_primary_10_5534_wjmh_190079 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2020_02_005 crossref_primary_10_3390_life12060804 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_20_23219 crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2019_60_4_346 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12254_018_0458_1 |
Cites_doi | 10.1148/radiol.09090475 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.002 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059 10.1007/s00330-008-1190-8 10.1007/s00234-016-1658-1 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11646.x 10.1002/cncr.28216 10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.035 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318263f0fd 10.1093/jjco/hyt041 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.012 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.076 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.3.565 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.052 10.1093/jnci/djp001 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09808.x 10.1111/bju.12639 10.1093/jnci/djq099 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2017 Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2017 2017 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2017 – notice: Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2017 2017 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1976-2437 |
EndPage | 999 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2437426 PMC5552655 28792144 10_3349_ymj_2017_58_5_994 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; grantid: 30-2015-027 |
GroupedDBID | --- .55 .GJ 123 29R 2WC 36B 5-W 53G 5RE 8JR 8XY 9ZL AAYXX ACYCR ADBBV ADRAZ AEGXH AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EF. EMB EMOBN F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE KQ8 L7B M48 MK0 O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT RNS RPM SV3 TR2 X7M XSB ZGI ZXP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM M~E |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-66b4ce81174b70159333730840a531f1e73607c3d913a44a64240c99eb1a3af13 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 0513-5796 1976-2437 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:47:45 EST 2023 Thu Aug 21 13:18:09 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:23:41 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:59:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:03:08 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:47 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | prostate biopsy Prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c433t-66b4ce81174b70159333730840a531f1e73607c3d913a44a64240c99eb1a3af13 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 https://www.eymj.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994 |
PMID | 28792144 |
PQID | 1927594679 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_2437426 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5552655 proquest_miscellaneous_1927594679 pubmed_primary_28792144 crossref_citationtrail_10_3349_ymj_2017_58_5_994 crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2017_58_5_994 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2017 text: 2017-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Yonsei medical journal |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Yonsei Med J |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Yonsei University College of Medicine 연세대학교의과대학 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Yonsei University College of Medicine – name: 연세대학교의과대학 |
References | Draisma (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref1) 2009; 101 de Rooij (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref19) 2014; 66 Yerram (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref10) 2012; 110 Lee (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref8) 2016; 57 Welch (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref2) 2010; 102 Stojanov (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref13) 2016; 58 Lee (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref3) 2013; 43 Selnæs (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref5) 2012; 47 Cheikh (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref16) 2009; 19 Turkbey (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref6) 2010; 255 Rastinehad (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref9) 2011; 185 Delongchamps (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref17) 2011; 107 Weinreb (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref18) 2016; 69 Rais-Bahrami (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref12) 2013; 190 Fascelli (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref15) 2016; 88 Siddiqui (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref7) 2013; 64 Rais-Bahrami (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref14) 2015; 115 Stamatakis (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref11) 2013; 119 Bul (10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref4) 2012; 62 18925403 - Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):770-8 26427566 - Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40 23821585 - Cancer. 2013 Sep 15;119(18):3359-66 24377803 - Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):430-6 24447678 - BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):381-8 23580758 - Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 May;43(5):553-8 26680244 - Urology. 2016 Feb;88:125-34 23130821 - BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E783-8 20413742 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 5;102(9):605-13 26873830 - Neuroradiology. 2016 May;58(5):433-41 26996553 - Yonsei Med J. 2016 May;57(3):565-71 21239006 - J Urol. 2011 Mar;185(3):815-20 19276453 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):374-83 23727310 - J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1721-1727 21044250 - BJU Int. 2011 May;107(9):1411-8 20308447 - Radiology. 2010 Apr;255(1):89-99 23787357 - Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):713-719 23011187 - Invest Radiol. 2012 Nov;47(11):624-33 22342775 - Eur Urol. 2012 Aug;62(2):195-200 |
References_xml | – volume: 255 start-page: 89 year: 2010 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref6 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090475 – volume: 62 start-page: 195 year: 2012 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref4 publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.002 – volume: 64 start-page: 713 year: 2013 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref7 publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059 – volume: 19 start-page: 770 year: 2009 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref16 publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1190-8 – volume: 58 start-page: 433 year: 2016 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref13 publication-title: Neuroradiology doi: 10.1007/s00234-016-1658-1 – volume: 110 start-page: E783 issue: 11 Pt B year: 2012 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref10 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11646.x – volume: 119 start-page: 3359 year: 2013 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref11 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.28216 – volume: 88 start-page: 125 year: 2016 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref15 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.035 – volume: 47 start-page: 624 year: 2012 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref5 publication-title: Invest Radiol doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318263f0fd – volume: 43 start-page: 553 year: 2013 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref3 publication-title: Jpn J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt041 – volume: 69 start-page: 16 year: 2016 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref18 publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052 – volume: 66 start-page: 430 year: 2014 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref19 publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.012 – volume: 185 start-page: 815 year: 2011 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref9 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.076 – volume: 57 start-page: 565 year: 2016 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref8 publication-title: Yonsei Med J doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.3.565 – volume: 190 start-page: 1721 year: 2013 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref12 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.052 – volume: 101 start-page: 374 year: 2009 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref1 publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp001 – volume: 107 start-page: 1411 year: 2011 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref17 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09808.x – volume: 115 start-page: 381 year: 2015 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref14 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12639 – volume: 102 start-page: 605 year: 2010 ident: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.994_ref2 publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq099 – reference: 21239006 - J Urol. 2011 Mar;185(3):815-20 – reference: 23821585 - Cancer. 2013 Sep 15;119(18):3359-66 – reference: 26873830 - Neuroradiology. 2016 May;58(5):433-41 – reference: 21044250 - BJU Int. 2011 May;107(9):1411-8 – reference: 19276453 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):374-83 – reference: 24447678 - BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):381-8 – reference: 23580758 - Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 May;43(5):553-8 – reference: 23130821 - BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E783-8 – reference: 24377803 - Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):430-6 – reference: 20308447 - Radiology. 2010 Apr;255(1):89-99 – reference: 23787357 - Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):713-719 – reference: 26427566 - Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40 – reference: 26680244 - Urology. 2016 Feb;88:125-34 – reference: 26996553 - Yonsei Med J. 2016 May;57(3):565-71 – reference: 23727310 - J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1721-1727 – reference: 20413742 - J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 5;102(9):605-13 – reference: 18925403 - Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):770-8 – reference: 23011187 - Invest Radiol. 2012 Nov;47(11):624-33 – reference: 22342775 - Eur Urol. 2012 Aug;62(2):195-200 |
SSID | ssj0027102 |
Score | 2.2353463 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | To determine the efficacy of cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (b-MRI) for patients with prostate-specific... Purpose: To determine the efficacy of cognitive targeted prostate biopsy using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (b-MRI) for patients with... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 994 |
SubjectTerms | Biopsy Cognition Humans Image-Guided Biopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Middle Aged Original Prostate - pathology Prostate-Specific Antigen - metabolism Prostatectomy Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Treatment Outcome 의학일반 |
Title | Comparison of Multiparametric and Biparametric MRI in First Round Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Patients with PSA Levels under 10 ng/mL |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28792144 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1927594679 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5552655 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002251842 |
Volume | 58 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Yonsei Medical Journal, 2017, 58(5), , pp.994-999 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELfWISFeEN9kQGUQT0jpktiO4weERkW1oRVVYxV7s9zYGWVrsiWdRP8K_mXu8lFWVHiKlNix4jvn7mff_Y6Qt4rZILbM-CZykc-jWeDPEp74SWRlai0YiBCTk8df4sMp_3wmznZIV96qncBqK7TDelLT8nLw83r1ARb8e0ScjKv91eIHxmjJgUgGYqAU75E7YJhixGJjnvzBX2EQNQeb27shMXAiFZKIbVipXl5m2xzQv-Mobxmm0QNyv_Uo6UGjAg_Jjssfkbvj9sz8Mfk1XJcapEVG64xbJPxeYC2tlJrc0o-3b4xPjug8p6M5-IX0BKsu0WEXY0RP68BxZ-kEs0XAT4W-xVW1wh6ThqK1ori3SydfD-gxRiRVFPPUShoGND_fXxw_IdPRp9Phod-WYfBTztjSj-MZTx0mpPKZBO9BMcbgvwDI0IAks9BJFgcyZVaFzHBuANHwIFUKrIBhJgvZU7KbF7l7Tii3MmLWscwFBnCPVVmUcSlDZ6OQZTz1SNBNu05bjnIslXGpAaug0DQITaPQtEi00CA0j7xbd7lqCDr-1_gNyFJfpHONtNp4PS_0RakBPBxp5GYEh8UjrztRa1hreIBiclfcVBq8YSkUmBblkWeN6NdjdprjEbmhFOsGOODmk3z-vebzFgJrFIi9f77zBbmHn9GEtr0ku8vyxr0CX2g565Oe8L_1652Efq3tvwFpHAfX |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Multiparametric+and+Biparametric+MRI+in+First+Round+Cognitive+Targeted+Prostate+Biopsy+in+Patients+with+PSA+Levels+under+10+ng%2FmL&rft.jtitle=Yonsei+medical+journal&rft.au=Lee%2C+Dong+Hoon&rft.au=Nam%2C+Jong+Kil&rft.au=Lee%2C+Seung+Soo&rft.au=Han%2C+Ji+Yeon&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.eissn=1976-2437&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=994&rft_id=info:doi/10.3349%2Fymj.2017.58.5.994&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28792144&rft.externalDocID=28792144 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0513-5796&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0513-5796&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0513-5796&client=summon |