Is It Radiculopathy or Referred Pain? Buttock Pain in Spinal Stenosis Patients

Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain. Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinics in orthopedic surgery Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 89 - 94
Main Authors Shim, Dae Moo, Kim, Tae Gyun, Koo, Jun Sung, Kwon, Young Ho, Kim, Chang Su
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Orthopaedic Association 01.03.2019
대한정형외과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2005-291X
2005-4408
2005-4408
DOI10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89

Cover

Abstract Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain. Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis. One day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B ( < 0.05). The selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint.
AbstractList Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain. Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis. One day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B ( < 0.05). The selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint.
Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain.BACKGROUNDButtock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain.Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis.METHODSPatients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis.One day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B (p < 0.05).RESULTSOne day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B (p < 0.05).The selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint.CONCLUSIONSThe selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint.
Background: Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain. Methods: Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis. Results: One day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint. KCI Citation Count: 1
Author Kim, Tae Gyun
Kwon, Young Ho
Shim, Dae Moo
Koo, Jun Sung
Kim, Chang Su
AuthorAffiliation Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea
– name: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dae Moo
  surname: Shim
  fullname: Shim, Dae Moo
  organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tae Gyun
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Tae Gyun
  organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jun Sung
  surname: Koo
  fullname: Koo, Jun Sung
  organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Young Ho
  surname: Kwon
  fullname: Kwon, Young Ho
  organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Chang Su
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Chang Su
  organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002442612$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1UVtrFDEUDlKxF_0Bvsg86sOOOZPLJC9KLV4Wisq2gm8hzSQ27myyJhmh_97M7lZUEAInJ_kuh_OdoqMQg0XoKeCWYsZeGh9z22GQLUALrZAP0EmHMVtQisXR4d5J-HqMTnP-jjFnvMeP0DHBggiA7gR9XOZmWZqVHryZxrjV5fauialZWWdTskPzWfvwunkzlRLNetc19VxtfdBjc1VsiNnn-l68DSU_Rg-dHrN9cqhn6Mu7t9cXHxaXn94vL84vF4YSUhaMGWsYkbqztLf9DeGEWseYIEY6yYFoibnDMPTckYodekKNE4ZrB3VsTs7Qi71uSE6tjVdR-139FtU6qfPV9VJRSoDKGftqj91ONxs7mDpn0qPaJr_R6W7H_Psn-Nuq81NxIiTruirw_CCQ4o_J5qI2Phs7jjrYOGXVgRBM9JSRCn32p9dvk_uFV0C_B5gUc07WKeNLXV6crf2oAKs5WjVHq-ZoFYACJWRlwj_Me_H_c34B2L-nZA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2020_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jos_2023_04_008
crossref_primary_10_18325_jkmr_2021_31_3_1
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31225-6
10.1213/00000539-196101000-00017
10.4055/jkoa.1997.32.4.1056
10.1016/0304-3959(89)90173-5
10.1097/00007632-198111000-00010
10.2214/AJR.09.2772
10.1111/ner.12247
10.1007/s00256-011-1153-z
10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a3a9
10.12688/f1000research.8105.1
10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06410.x
10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30429-7
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019 The Korean Orthopaedic Association
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019 The Korean Orthopaedic Association
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2005-4408
EndPage 94
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_4431496
PMC6389522
30838112
10_4055_cios_2019_11_1_89
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: ;
GroupedDBID ---
5-W
53G
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
C1A
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EF.
EMOBN
F5P
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
KQ8
M48
O5R
O5S
OK1
PGMZT
RPM
SV3
TR2
W2D
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
M~E
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-55cec539a2e47e7b3634ef5583c9f9613a906f01d76f35ced734cf8c6af111263
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2005-291X
2005-4408
IngestDate Sun Mar 09 07:53:09 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:14:28 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:39:05 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:54:13 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:50:42 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:47 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Buttocks
Nerve block
Pain
Spinal stenosis
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c433t-55cec539a2e47e7b3634ef5583c9f9613a906f01d76f35ced734cf8c6af111263
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89
PMID 30838112
PQID 2188587453
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_4431496
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6389522
proquest_miscellaneous_2188587453
pubmed_primary_30838112
crossref_citationtrail_10_4055_cios_2019_11_1_89
crossref_primary_10_4055_cios_2019_11_1_89
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Clinics in orthopedic surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Orthop Surg
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
대한정형외과학회
Publisher_xml – name: The Korean Orthopaedic Association
– name: 대한정형외과학회
References Macnab (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref12) 1990
Lee (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref10) 2011; 40
Narozny (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref5) 2001; 131
Robinson (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref13) 1995; 6
Mooney (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref7) 1976
Lee (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref11) 2010; 194
Marks (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref14) 1989; 39
Cooper (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref3) 2004; 7
Donovan (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref8) 1981; 6
Goebert (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref2) 1961; 40
Krempen (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref1) 1975; 6
Mehta (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref15) 1979; 34
Hong (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref4) 1997; 32
Allegri (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref17) 2016; 5
Eubanks (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref6) 2007; 32
Laplante (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref9) 2012; 15
Krames (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref18) 2015; 18
Bernard (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref16) 1987
References_xml – volume: 7
  start-page: 311
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref3
  publication-title: Pain Physician
– volume: 6
  start-page: 311
  issue: 1
  year: 1975
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref1
  publication-title: Orthop Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31225-6
– volume: 40
  start-page: 130
  year: 1961
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref2
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-196101000-00017
– volume: 131
  start-page: 75
  issue: 5-6
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref5
  publication-title: Swiss Med Wkly
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1056
  issue: 4
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref4
  publication-title: J Korean Orthop Assoc
  doi: 10.4055/jkoa.1997.32.4.1056
– volume: 39
  start-page: 37
  issue: 1
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref14
  publication-title: Pain
  doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90173-5
– volume: 6
  start-page: 591
  issue: 6
  year: 1981
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref8
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-198111000-00010
– volume: 194
  start-page: 1095
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref11
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2772
– volume: 15
  start-page: 171
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref9
  publication-title: Pain Physician
– volume: 18
  start-page: 24
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref18
  publication-title: Neuromodulation
  doi: 10.1111/ner.12247
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1033
  issue: 8
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref10
  publication-title: Skeletal Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1153-z
– start-page: 22
  volume-title: Backache
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref12
– volume: 32
  start-page: 2058
  issue: 19
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref6
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a3a9
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1530
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref17
  publication-title: F1000Res
  doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8105.1
– volume: 34
  start-page: 768
  issue: 8
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref15
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06410.x
– start-page: 266
  issue: 217
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref16
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
– volume: 6
  start-page: 671
  issue: 4
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref13
  publication-title: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am
  doi: 10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30429-7
– start-page: 149
  issue: 115
  year: 1976
  ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref7
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
SSID ssj0065670
Score 2.1345348
Snippet Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint...
Background: Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 89
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Buttocks
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nerve Block
Original
Pain Measurement
Pain, Referred - etiology
Pain, Referred - therapy
Prospective Studies
Radiculopathy - etiology
Radiculopathy - therapy
Spinal Nerve Roots
Spinal Stenosis - complications
Treatment Outcome
Zygapophyseal Joint
정형외과학
Title Is It Radiculopathy or Referred Pain? Buttock Pain in Spinal Stenosis Patients
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838112
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2188587453
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6389522
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002442612
Volume 11
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2019, 11(1), , pp.89-94
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9RAFD60FaQvoniL1TKKT0LWncwlmaciYukKFrEu7NuQTGY0tCQ1m0L77z1nsru4svggBEKSuZAzMznfmZl8H8BbF4wSZU5TYHmdSleZlFBrmqF3r4z2GDLEXb7n-mwuPy_UYg_W8lYrAy53hnakJzXvrya3v-5OcMAjfp0g3FDvXdMR8TY3OP4nfFKYfbiHjklTLPZFbhYVELlE7bhIvpkZvhgXOXcXcQj3BaKTgvNsy2Ptt33YBUb_3lP5h5M6fQgPVuiSfRi7wyPY8-1jOJ8t2Wxg38qa5vo60iC-Y13PIsds72v2tWzaE0aS1fhxjFcMj4trEsxiFwPRiTdLvB8ZWJdPYH766fvHs3Qlo5A6KcSQKuW8U8KUmZe5zyuhhfRBqUI4Ewy689JMdZjyOtdBYNo6F9KFwukycPrBSDyFg7Zr_XNgjmsTMI4NxANXkRQgIoDM6KryvipKn8B0bSrrVhzjJHVxZTHWIENbMrQlQ2PoYbktTALvNlmuR4KNfyV-g_a3l66xRItN5x-dvewtgv-ZlQiGpNEJvF43j8WxQgsgZeu7GyyKF4Uifn-RwLOxuTZ1rls7gXyrITcJqMLtJ23zM_JxE-hDGPviv3MewSG95bi17SUcDP2Nf4VYZ6iO4xzBcezHvwFI1_xT
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is+It+Radiculopathy+or+Referred+Pain%3F+Buttock+Pain+in+Spinal+Stenosis+Patients&rft.jtitle=Clinics+in+orthopedic+surgery&rft.au=Shim%2C+Dae+Moo&rft.au=Kim%2C+Tae+Gyun&rft.au=Koo%2C+Jun+Sung&rft.au=Kwon%2C+Young+Ho&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.pub=The+Korean+Orthopaedic+Association&rft.issn=2005-291X&rft.eissn=2005-4408&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=94&rft_id=info:doi/10.4055%2Fcios.2019.11.1.89&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F30838112&rft.externalDocID=PMC6389522
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon