Is It Radiculopathy or Referred Pain? Buttock Pain in Spinal Stenosis Patients
Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain. Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pai...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinics in orthopedic surgery Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 89 - 94 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
The Korean Orthopaedic Association
01.03.2019
대한정형외과학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2005-291X 2005-4408 2005-4408 |
DOI | 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89 |
Cover
Abstract | Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain.
Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis.
One day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B (
< 0.05).
The selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain.
Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis.
One day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B (
< 0.05).
The selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint. Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain.BACKGROUNDButtock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain.Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis.METHODSPatients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis.One day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B (p < 0.05).RESULTSOne day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B (p < 0.05).The selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint.CONCLUSIONSThe selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint. Background: Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint block for patients with degenerative spinal disease and buttock pain. Methods: Patients with degenerative spinal disease who presented with buttock pain, received a selective nerve root block (group A) or a facet joint block (group B) from June 2017 to September 2017, and were able to be followed up for more than 3 months were prospectively enrolled. Clinical results were assessed using a visual analog scale for comparative analysis. Results: One day after the procedure, an excellent response was found in 7% and 6% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 13% of groups A and B, respectively. Two weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 4% of groups A and B, respectively; a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. Six weeks later, an excellent response was found in 11% and 7% of groups A and B, respectively, and a good response was found in 41% and 20% of groups A and B, respectively. At the final follow-up, more than 47% and 46% of patients showed a good response in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the pre-procedure value of 5.01 to 2.74 on day 1, 2.51 at week 2, 2.38 at week 6, and 2.39 at week 12. In group B, the visual analog scale score improved compared to the preprocedure value of 5.24 to 3.94 on day 1, 3.99 at week 2, 3.24 at week 6, and 2.59 at week 12. On day 1 and at weeks 2 and 6, group A showed a significantly better outcome than group B (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The selective nerve root block showed superior results up to 6 weeks post-procedure. Considering that the selective nerve root block is effective for treating radiculopathy, the primary cause of buttock pain can be thought to be radiculopathy rather than degenerative changes of the facet joint. KCI Citation Count: 1 |
Author | Kim, Tae Gyun Kwon, Young Ho Shim, Dae Moo Koo, Jun Sung Kim, Chang Su |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea – name: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dae Moo surname: Shim fullname: Shim, Dae Moo organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Tae Gyun surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Tae Gyun organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Jun Sung surname: Koo fullname: Koo, Jun Sung organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Young Ho surname: Kwon fullname: Kwon, Young Ho organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Chang Su surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Chang Su organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002442612$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp1UVtrFDEUDlKxF_0Bvsg86sOOOZPLJC9KLV4Wisq2gm8hzSQ27myyJhmh_97M7lZUEAInJ_kuh_OdoqMQg0XoKeCWYsZeGh9z22GQLUALrZAP0EmHMVtQisXR4d5J-HqMTnP-jjFnvMeP0DHBggiA7gR9XOZmWZqVHryZxrjV5fauialZWWdTskPzWfvwunkzlRLNetc19VxtfdBjc1VsiNnn-l68DSU_Rg-dHrN9cqhn6Mu7t9cXHxaXn94vL84vF4YSUhaMGWsYkbqztLf9DeGEWseYIEY6yYFoibnDMPTckYodekKNE4ZrB3VsTs7Qi71uSE6tjVdR-139FtU6qfPV9VJRSoDKGftqj91ONxs7mDpn0qPaJr_R6W7H_Psn-Nuq81NxIiTruirw_CCQ4o_J5qI2Phs7jjrYOGXVgRBM9JSRCn32p9dvk_uFV0C_B5gUc07WKeNLXV6crf2oAKs5WjVHq-ZoFYACJWRlwj_Me_H_c34B2L-nZA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2020_06_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jos_2023_04_008 crossref_primary_10_18325_jkmr_2021_31_3_1 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31225-6 10.1213/00000539-196101000-00017 10.4055/jkoa.1997.32.4.1056 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90173-5 10.1097/00007632-198111000-00010 10.2214/AJR.09.2772 10.1111/ner.12247 10.1007/s00256-011-1153-z 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a3a9 10.12688/f1000research.8105.1 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06410.x 10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30429-7 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019 The Korean Orthopaedic Association |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019 The Korean Orthopaedic Association |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 2005-4408 |
EndPage | 94 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_4431496 PMC6389522 30838112 10_4055_cios_2019_11_1_89 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; |
GroupedDBID | --- 5-W 53G 8JR 8XY 9ZL AAYXX ADBBV ADRAZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV C1A CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EF. EMOBN F5P FRP GROUPED_DOAJ HYE KQ8 M48 O5R O5S OK1 PGMZT RPM SV3 TR2 W2D CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF M~E NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-55cec539a2e47e7b3634ef5583c9f9613a906f01d76f35ced734cf8c6af111263 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2005-291X 2005-4408 |
IngestDate | Sun Mar 09 07:53:09 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:14:28 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:39:05 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:54:13 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:50:42 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:47 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Buttocks Nerve block Pain Spinal stenosis |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c433t-55cec539a2e47e7b3634ef5583c9f9613a906f01d76f35ced734cf8c6af111263 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89 |
PMID | 30838112 |
PQID | 2188587453 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_4431496 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6389522 proquest_miscellaneous_2188587453 pubmed_primary_30838112 crossref_citationtrail_10_4055_cios_2019_11_1_89 crossref_primary_10_4055_cios_2019_11_1_89 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-03-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2019 text: 2019-03-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Clinics in orthopedic surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Orthop Surg |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | The Korean Orthopaedic Association 대한정형외과학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Korean Orthopaedic Association – name: 대한정형외과학회 |
References | Macnab (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref12) 1990 Lee (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref10) 2011; 40 Narozny (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref5) 2001; 131 Robinson (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref13) 1995; 6 Mooney (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref7) 1976 Lee (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref11) 2010; 194 Marks (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref14) 1989; 39 Cooper (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref3) 2004; 7 Donovan (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref8) 1981; 6 Goebert (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref2) 1961; 40 Krempen (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref1) 1975; 6 Mehta (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref15) 1979; 34 Hong (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref4) 1997; 32 Allegri (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref17) 2016; 5 Eubanks (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref6) 2007; 32 Laplante (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref9) 2012; 15 Krames (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref18) 2015; 18 Bernard (10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref16) 1987 |
References_xml | – volume: 7 start-page: 311 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref3 publication-title: Pain Physician – volume: 6 start-page: 311 issue: 1 year: 1975 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref1 publication-title: Orthop Clin North Am doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31225-6 – volume: 40 start-page: 130 year: 1961 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref2 publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/00000539-196101000-00017 – volume: 131 start-page: 75 issue: 5-6 year: 2001 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref5 publication-title: Swiss Med Wkly – volume: 32 start-page: 1056 issue: 4 year: 1997 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref4 publication-title: J Korean Orthop Assoc doi: 10.4055/jkoa.1997.32.4.1056 – volume: 39 start-page: 37 issue: 1 year: 1989 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref14 publication-title: Pain doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90173-5 – volume: 6 start-page: 591 issue: 6 year: 1981 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref8 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/00007632-198111000-00010 – volume: 194 start-page: 1095 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref11 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2772 – volume: 15 start-page: 171 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref9 publication-title: Pain Physician – volume: 18 start-page: 24 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref18 publication-title: Neuromodulation doi: 10.1111/ner.12247 – volume: 40 start-page: 1033 issue: 8 year: 2011 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref10 publication-title: Skeletal Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1153-z – start-page: 22 volume-title: Backache year: 1990 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref12 – volume: 32 start-page: 2058 issue: 19 year: 2007 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref6 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a3a9 – volume: 5 start-page: 1530 year: 2016 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref17 publication-title: F1000Res doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8105.1 – volume: 34 start-page: 768 issue: 8 year: 1979 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref15 publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06410.x – start-page: 266 issue: 217 year: 1987 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref16 publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res – volume: 6 start-page: 671 issue: 4 year: 1995 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref13 publication-title: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am doi: 10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30429-7 – start-page: 149 issue: 115 year: 1976 ident: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.89_ref7 publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res |
SSID | ssj0065670 |
Score | 2.1345348 |
Snippet | Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a facet joint... Background: Buttock pain is common, and there are no fixed guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. This study compared a selective nerve root block and a... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 89 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Buttocks Female Humans Male Middle Aged Nerve Block Original Pain Measurement Pain, Referred - etiology Pain, Referred - therapy Prospective Studies Radiculopathy - etiology Radiculopathy - therapy Spinal Nerve Roots Spinal Stenosis - complications Treatment Outcome Zygapophyseal Joint 정형외과학 |
Title | Is It Radiculopathy or Referred Pain? Buttock Pain in Spinal Stenosis Patients |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838112 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2188587453 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6389522 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002442612 |
Volume | 11 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2019, 11(1), , pp.89-94 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9RAFD60FaQvoniL1TKKT0LWncwlmaciYukKFrEu7NuQTGY0tCQ1m0L77z1nsru4svggBEKSuZAzMznfmZl8H8BbF4wSZU5TYHmdSleZlFBrmqF3r4z2GDLEXb7n-mwuPy_UYg_W8lYrAy53hnakJzXvrya3v-5OcMAjfp0g3FDvXdMR8TY3OP4nfFKYfbiHjklTLPZFbhYVELlE7bhIvpkZvhgXOXcXcQj3BaKTgvNsy2Ptt33YBUb_3lP5h5M6fQgPVuiSfRi7wyPY8-1jOJ8t2Wxg38qa5vo60iC-Y13PIsds72v2tWzaE0aS1fhxjFcMj4trEsxiFwPRiTdLvB8ZWJdPYH766fvHs3Qlo5A6KcSQKuW8U8KUmZe5zyuhhfRBqUI4Ewy689JMdZjyOtdBYNo6F9KFwukycPrBSDyFg7Zr_XNgjmsTMI4NxANXkRQgIoDM6KryvipKn8B0bSrrVhzjJHVxZTHWIENbMrQlQ2PoYbktTALvNlmuR4KNfyV-g_a3l66xRItN5x-dvewtgv-ZlQiGpNEJvF43j8WxQgsgZeu7GyyKF4Uifn-RwLOxuTZ1rls7gXyrITcJqMLtJ23zM_JxE-hDGPviv3MewSG95bi17SUcDP2Nf4VYZ6iO4xzBcezHvwFI1_xT |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is+It+Radiculopathy+or+Referred+Pain%3F+Buttock+Pain+in+Spinal+Stenosis+Patients&rft.jtitle=Clinics+in+orthopedic+surgery&rft.au=Shim%2C+Dae+Moo&rft.au=Kim%2C+Tae+Gyun&rft.au=Koo%2C+Jun+Sung&rft.au=Kwon%2C+Young+Ho&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.pub=The+Korean+Orthopaedic+Association&rft.issn=2005-291X&rft.eissn=2005-4408&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=94&rft_id=info:doi/10.4055%2Fcios.2019.11.1.89&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F30838112&rft.externalDocID=PMC6389522 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon |