Periodontal regenerative therapy in endo-periodontal lesions: a retrospective study over 5 years

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes and the survival rate after periodontal surgery using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen or DBBM with a collagen membrane in endo-periodontal lesions. A total of 52 cases (41 patients) with at least 5 yea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of periodontal & implant science Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 90 - 104
Main Authors Oh, Soram, Chung, Shin Hye, Han, Ji-Young
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Academy of Periodontology 01.04.2019
대한치주과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2093-2278
2093-2286
DOI10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes and the survival rate after periodontal surgery using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen or DBBM with a collagen membrane in endo-periodontal lesions. A total of 52 cases (41 patients) with at least 5 years of follow-up were included in this study. After scaling and root planing with or without endodontic treatment, periodontal regenerative procedures with DBBM with 10% collagen alone or DBBM with a collagen membrane were performed, yielding the DBBM + 10% collagen and DBBM + collagen membrane groups, respectively. Changes in clinical parameters including the plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, gingival recession, relative clinical attachment level, mobility, and radiographic bone gains were evaluated immediately before periodontal surgical procedures and at a 12-month follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up after regenerative procedures, improvements in clinical parameters and radiographic bone gains were observed in both treatment groups. The DBBM + 10% collagen group showed greater probing pocket depth reduction (4.52±1.06 mm) than the DBBM + collagen membrane group (4.04±0.82 mm). However, there were no significant differences between the groups. Additionally, the radiographic bone gain in the DBBM + 10% collagen group (5.15±1.54 mm) was comparable to that of the DBBM + collagen membrane group (5.35±1.84 mm). The 5-year survival rate of the teeth with endo-periodontal lesions after periodontal regenerative procedures was 92.31%. This study showed that regenerative procedures using DBBM with 10% collagen alone improved the clinical attachment level and radiographic bone level in endo-periodontal lesions. Successful maintenance of the results after regenerative procedures in endo-periodontal lesions can be obtained by repeated oral hygiene education within strict supportive periodontal treatment.
AbstractList The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes and the survival rate after periodontal surgery using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen or DBBM with a collagen membrane in endo-periodontal lesions.PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes and the survival rate after periodontal surgery using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen or DBBM with a collagen membrane in endo-periodontal lesions.A total of 52 cases (41 patients) with at least 5 years of follow-up were included in this study. After scaling and root planing with or without endodontic treatment, periodontal regenerative procedures with DBBM with 10% collagen alone or DBBM with a collagen membrane were performed, yielding the DBBM + 10% collagen and DBBM + collagen membrane groups, respectively. Changes in clinical parameters including the plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, gingival recession, relative clinical attachment level, mobility, and radiographic bone gains were evaluated immediately before periodontal surgical procedures and at a 12-month follow-up.METHODSA total of 52 cases (41 patients) with at least 5 years of follow-up were included in this study. After scaling and root planing with or without endodontic treatment, periodontal regenerative procedures with DBBM with 10% collagen alone or DBBM with a collagen membrane were performed, yielding the DBBM + 10% collagen and DBBM + collagen membrane groups, respectively. Changes in clinical parameters including the plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, gingival recession, relative clinical attachment level, mobility, and radiographic bone gains were evaluated immediately before periodontal surgical procedures and at a 12-month follow-up.At the 12-month follow-up after regenerative procedures, improvements in clinical parameters and radiographic bone gains were observed in both treatment groups. The DBBM + 10% collagen group showed greater probing pocket depth reduction (4.52±1.06 mm) than the DBBM + collagen membrane group (4.04±0.82 mm). However, there were no significant differences between the groups. Additionally, the radiographic bone gain in the DBBM + 10% collagen group (5.15±1.54 mm) was comparable to that of the DBBM + collagen membrane group (5.35±1.84 mm). The 5-year survival rate of the teeth with endo-periodontal lesions after periodontal regenerative procedures was 92.31%.RESULTSAt the 12-month follow-up after regenerative procedures, improvements in clinical parameters and radiographic bone gains were observed in both treatment groups. The DBBM + 10% collagen group showed greater probing pocket depth reduction (4.52±1.06 mm) than the DBBM + collagen membrane group (4.04±0.82 mm). However, there were no significant differences between the groups. Additionally, the radiographic bone gain in the DBBM + 10% collagen group (5.15±1.54 mm) was comparable to that of the DBBM + collagen membrane group (5.35±1.84 mm). The 5-year survival rate of the teeth with endo-periodontal lesions after periodontal regenerative procedures was 92.31%.This study showed that regenerative procedures using DBBM with 10% collagen alone improved the clinical attachment level and radiographic bone level in endo-periodontal lesions. Successful maintenance of the results after regenerative procedures in endo-periodontal lesions can be obtained by repeated oral hygiene education within strict supportive periodontal treatment.CONCLUSIONSThis study showed that regenerative procedures using DBBM with 10% collagen alone improved the clinical attachment level and radiographic bone level in endo-periodontal lesions. Successful maintenance of the results after regenerative procedures in endo-periodontal lesions can be obtained by repeated oral hygiene education within strict supportive periodontal treatment.
The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes and the survival rate after periodontal surgery using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen or DBBM with a collagen membrane in endo-periodontal lesions. A total of 52 cases (41 patients) with at least 5 years of follow-up were included in this study. After scaling and root planing with or without endodontic treatment, periodontal regenerative procedures with DBBM with 10% collagen alone or DBBM with a collagen membrane were performed, yielding the DBBM + 10% collagen and DBBM + collagen membrane groups, respectively. Changes in clinical parameters including the plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, gingival recession, relative clinical attachment level, mobility, and radiographic bone gains were evaluated immediately before periodontal surgical procedures and at a 12-month follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up after regenerative procedures, improvements in clinical parameters and radiographic bone gains were observed in both treatment groups. The DBBM + 10% collagen group showed greater probing pocket depth reduction (4.52±1.06 mm) than the DBBM + collagen membrane group (4.04±0.82 mm). However, there were no significant differences between the groups. Additionally, the radiographic bone gain in the DBBM + 10% collagen group (5.15±1.54 mm) was comparable to that of the DBBM + collagen membrane group (5.35±1.84 mm). The 5-year survival rate of the teeth with endo-periodontal lesions after periodontal regenerative procedures was 92.31%. This study showed that regenerative procedures using DBBM with 10% collagen alone improved the clinical attachment level and radiographic bone level in endo-periodontal lesions. Successful maintenance of the results after regenerative procedures in endo-periodontal lesions can be obtained by repeated oral hygiene education within strict supportive periodontal treatment.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes and the survival rate after periodontal surgery using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen or DBBM with a collagen membrane in endo-periodontal lesions. Methods: A total of 52 cases (41 patients) with at least 5 years of follow-up were included in this study. After scaling and root planing with or without endodontic treatment, periodontal regenerative procedures with DBBM with 10% collagen alone or DBBM with a collagen membrane were performed, yielding the DBBM + 10% collagen and DBBM + collagen membrane groups, respectively. Changes in clinical parameters including the plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, gingival recession, relative clinical attachment level, mobility, and radiographic bone gains were evaluated immediately before periodontal surgical procedures and at a 12-month follow-up. Results: At the 12-month follow-up after regenerative procedures, improvements in clinical parameters and radiographic bone gains were observed in both treatment groups. The DBBM + 10% collagen group showed greater probing pocket depth reduction (4.52±1.06 mm) than the DBBM + collagen membrane group (4.04±0.82 mm). However, there were no significant differences between the groups. Additionally, the radiographic bone gain in the DBBM + 10% collagen group (5.15±1.54 mm) was comparable to that of the DBBM + collagen membrane group (5.35±1.84 mm). The 5-year survival rate of the teeth with endo-periodontal lesions after periodontal regenerative procedures was 92.31%. Conclusions: This study showed that regenerative procedures using DBBM with 10% collagen alone improved the clinical attachment level and radiographic bone level in endo-periodontal lesions. Successful maintenance of the results after regenerative procedures in endo-periodontal lesions can be obtained by repeated oral hygiene education within strict supportive periodontal treatment. KCI Citation Count: 0
Author Chung, Shin Hye
Han, Ji-Young
Oh, Soram
AuthorAffiliation 3 Department of Dentistry and Periodontology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 Department of Dental Biomaterials Science and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Department of Dental Biomaterials Science and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea
– name: 1 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea
– name: 3 Department of Dentistry and Periodontology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Soram
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8843-2144
  surname: Oh
  fullname: Oh, Soram
  organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Shin Hye
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9037-1950
  surname: Chung
  fullname: Chung, Shin Hye
  organization: Department of Dental Biomaterials Science and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ji-Young
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2364-8366
  surname: Han
  fullname: Han, Ji-Young
  organization: Department of Dentistry and Periodontology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31098330$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002462154$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1kc1q3DAUhUVJaH6aB-imeNku7EhXli11UQihSQOBlpKuVVm-kyjxSK7kGZi3jzyThLRQbe4FfeccpHNE9nzwSMh7RitBBTu9H12qgDJV1aqCStE35BCo4iWAbPZe9lYekJOU7mk-HBRw-ZYccEaV5Jwekt8_MLrQBz-ZoYh4ix6jmdwai-kub-OmcL5A34dyfAUOmFzw6XNhsmaKIY1ot6I0rfpNEdYYC1Fs0MT0juwvzJDw5Gkek18XX2_Ov5XX3y-vzs-uS1tzPpXM5tk1dddJisL2nWEIUvUN0IaC5dQ0rEGLsmu57EG1VMqaKZGfJJVaAD8mn3a-Pi70g3U6GLedt0E_RH328-ZKCxBCUpHZLzt2XHVL7C36KZpBj9EtTdxslX_feHeXfda6qVXdtnU2-PhkEMOfFaZJL12yOAzGY1glDcCBCgpCZvTD66yXkOcKMtDuAJv_MUVcaOumXEGYo92gGdVz33ruW89961pp0GpWsn-Uz-b_1zwCaaCvwA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_848
crossref_primary_10_1111_iej_13936
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12060170
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12614_020_9463_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj11090219
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18126220
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13010093
crossref_primary_10_3390_app14010179
Cites_doi 10.1902/jop.2015.130685
10.1902/jop.1995.66.5.397
10.1111/jcpe.12265
10.1111/jcpe.12414
10.1902/jop.1995.66.4.261
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00402.x
10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290801.x
10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.023
10.1902/jop.1972.43.4.202
10.1007/s00784-011-0531-1
10.1002/JPER.16-0642
10.1016/0030-4220(85)90120-3
10.1111/prd.12086
10.1902/jop.2010.100144
10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00380.x
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00911.x
10.3109/00016356408993968
10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177
10.1902/jop.1993.64.4.269
10.1111/prd.12048
10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00206.x
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00542.x
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01474.x
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01532.x
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01768.x
10.1902/jop.2007.060097
10.1007/s00784-004-0254-7
10.1016/S0300-9785(79)80016-2
10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.672
10.1016/j.cden.2009.08.011
10.1007/s007840050123
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2019. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2019 Korean Academy of Periodontology
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2019. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2019 Korean Academy of Periodontology
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2093-2286
EndPage 104
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_5255805
PMC6494774
31098330
10_5051_jpis_2019_49_2_90
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 5-W
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ACYCR
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EF.
F5P
FRP
HYE
KQ8
KVFHK
M48
O5R
O5S
OK1
PGMZT
RPM
W2D
.UV
M~E
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-1cc43b64bb80e5cdba1e289d620602c30a616ece8b738d2970884195329899f23
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2093-2278
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:34:41 EST 2023
Thu Aug 21 18:25:49 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:30:26 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:54:33 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:21:03 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:54:55 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Periapical periodontitis
Periodontitis
Regenerative endodontics
Oral hygiene
Guided tissue regeneration
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c433t-1cc43b64bb80e5cdba1e289d620602c30a616ece8b738d2970884195329899f23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
https://www.jpis.org/search.php?where=aview&id=10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90&code=1150JPIS&vmode=FULL
ORCID 0000-0002-9037-1950
0000-0002-2364-8366
0000-0002-8843-2144
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90
PMID 31098330
PQID 2232050258
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_5255805
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6494774
proquest_miscellaneous_2232050258
pubmed_primary_31098330
crossref_citationtrail_10_5051_jpis_2019_49_2_90
crossref_primary_10_5051_jpis_2019_49_2_90
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Journal of periodontal & implant science
PublicationTitleAlternate J Periodontal Implant Sci
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
대한치주과학회
Publisher_xml – name: Korean Academy of Periodontology
– name: 대한치주과학회
References Löe (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref1) 1965; 36
Hartman (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref14) 2004; 24
Becker (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref18) 1993; 1
Björn (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref24) 1969; 20
Schmidt (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref30) 2014; 41
Skoglund (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref7) 1985; 59
Liñares (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref25) 2006; 33
Fabricius (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref3) 2006; 114
Hirsch (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref6) 1979; 8
Nevins (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref12) 2003; 23
Camelo (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref27) 1998; 18
Brkovic (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref16) 2012; 16
Silness (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref21) 1964; 22
Nygaard-Østby (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref37) 2010; 37
Cortellini (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref10) 2015; 68
Cortellini (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref34) 1996; 23
Cortellini (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref38) 2004; 75
Kao (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref9) 2015; 86
Cortellini (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref22) 1995; 66
Cortellini (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref32) 2011; 38
Villar (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref19) 2010; 54
Simon (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref4) 1972; 43
Paolantonio (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref28) 2001; 21
Tonetti (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref26) 1993; 64
Lee (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref17) 2015; 42
Schulz (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref31) 2000; 4
Sculean (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref13) 2004; 8
Herrera (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref5) 2018; 89
Zehnder (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref2) 2002; 29
Cortellini (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref23) 1999; 19
Camelo (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref29) 2001; 21
Nickles (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref36) 2009; 36
Sculean (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref11) 2015; 68
Anderegg (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref20) 1995; 66
Siciliano (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref33) 2011; 82
Kim (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref8) 2008; 34
Guillemin (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref15) 1993; 20
Eickholz (10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref35) 2007; 78
References_xml – volume: 86
  start-page: S77
  issue: Suppl
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref9
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.130685
– volume: 23
  start-page: 9
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref12
  publication-title: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
– volume: 19
  start-page: 589
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref23
  publication-title: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
– volume: 21
  start-page: 109
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref29
  publication-title: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
– volume: 66
  start-page: 397
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref20
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.5.397
– volume: 41
  start-page: 779
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref30
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12265
– volume: 42
  start-page: 678
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref17
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12414
– volume: 66
  start-page: 261
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref22
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.4.261
– volume: 20
  start-page: 528
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref15
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00402.x
– volume: 29
  start-page: 663
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref2
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290801.x
– volume: 34
  start-page: 546
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref8
  publication-title: J Endod
  doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.023
– volume: 43
  start-page: 202
  year: 1972
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref4
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.4.202
– volume: 16
  start-page: 581
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref16
  publication-title: Clin Oral Investig
  doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0531-1
– volume: 89
  start-page: S85
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref5
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0642
– volume: 59
  start-page: 78
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref7
  publication-title: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
  doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(85)90120-3
– volume: 68
  start-page: 182
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref11
  publication-title: Periodontol 2000
  doi: 10.1111/prd.12086
– volume: 82
  start-page: 62
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref33
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100144
– volume: 114
  start-page: 278
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref3
  publication-title: Eur J Oral Sci
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00380.x
– volume: 33
  start-page: 351
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref25
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00911.x
– volume: 22
  start-page: 121
  year: 1964
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref21
  publication-title: Acta Odontol Scand
  doi: 10.3109/00016356408993968
– volume: 36
  start-page: 177
  year: 1965
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref1
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177
– volume: 64
  start-page: 269
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref26
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.4.269
– volume: 20
  start-page: 165
  year: 1969
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref24
  publication-title: Odontol Revy
– volume: 68
  start-page: 282
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref10
  publication-title: Periodontol 2000
  doi: 10.1111/prd.12048
– volume: 1
  start-page: 46
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref18
  publication-title: Periodontol 2000
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00206.x
– volume: 23
  start-page: 106
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref34
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00542.x
– volume: 21
  start-page: 505
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref28
  publication-title: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
– volume: 36
  start-page: 976
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref36
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01474.x
– volume: 37
  start-page: 366
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref37
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01532.x
– volume: 38
  start-page: 915
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref32
  publication-title: J Clin Periodontol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01768.x
– volume: 18
  start-page: 321
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref27
  publication-title: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
– volume: 78
  start-page: 37
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref35
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060097
– volume: 8
  start-page: 70
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref13
  publication-title: Clin Oral Investig
  doi: 10.1007/s00784-004-0254-7
– volume: 8
  start-page: 173
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref6
  publication-title: Int J Oral Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0300-9785(79)80016-2
– volume: 24
  start-page: 127
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref14
  publication-title: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
– volume: 75
  start-page: 672
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref38
  publication-title: J Periodontol
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.672
– volume: 54
  start-page: 73
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref19
  publication-title: Dent Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.08.011
– volume: 4
  start-page: 98
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.90_ref31
  publication-title: Clin Oral Investig
  doi: 10.1007/s007840050123
SSID ssj0000329238
Score 2.173393
Snippet The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes and the survival rate after periodontal surgery using deproteinized bovine bone mineral...
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes and the survival rate after periodontal surgery using deproteinized bovine...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 90
SubjectTerms 치의학
Title Periodontal regenerative therapy in endo-periodontal lesions: a retrospective study over 5 years
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31098330
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2232050258
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6494774
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002462154
Volume 49
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 2019, 49(2), , pp.90-104
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELZKuXBBoPJIKZVBnJASHL_icEEIURWkIg6s1JuxHadsu0q22a3U_ffMJNlVt1ohTj7EiePx6_tszzeEvFO545VwRVp7X6XSBJW6olbIeTwXtYiSoXPy2Q99OpHfz9X5HlmHtxoNuNhJ7TCe1KSbZbfXq08w4AG_ZrB-5x8u51MU3s7LTJYZz0pg8A9hYdLIxc5GtN9PzIIDnOlj1AGPT9EJdDjn3P2VrZXqQdPVu0Do_buUdxankyfk8Ygq6eehGzwle7E5IL9_Qu8C1on-jrSLF73ANM5udHC6WtFpQ2NTten8TsZZxP2zxUfq4J1l165dMWkvREvxxidVdAUDZPGMTE6-_vpymo4BFdIghVimeYDUa-m9YVGFyrs8AuGqNGea8SCY07mOIRpfCFPxsoApSOI5G8q0lzUXz8l-0zbxJaGKCQdUD3dDgjQ1utMazXzlmICp3IiEsLXxbBjVxjHoxcwC60B7W7S3RXtbWVpuS5aQ95tX5oPUxr8yv4UWsVdhalEgG9OL1l51FmjAN6uAKBmmEvJm3WAWRg0ehbgmtjfwKQCSTAHeMwl5MTTgpkzUSjVQsYQUW027yYAFbj9ppn96ZW4tSwl4-vB_fu4VeYQVGm4BHZH9ZXcTXwPAWfrjvtse9ztPfwFPbfoj
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periodontal+regenerative+therapy+in+endo-periodontal+lesions%3A+a+retrospective+study+over+5+years&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+periodontal+%26+implant+science&rft.au=%EC%98%A4%EC%86%8C%EB%9E%8C&rft.au=%EC%A0%95%EC%8B%A0%ED%98%9C&rft.au=%ED%95%9C%EC%A7%80%EC%98%81&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%B9%98%EC%A3%BC%EA%B3%BC%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=2093-2278&rft.eissn=2093-2286&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=104&rft_id=info:doi/10.5051%2Fjpis.2019.49.2.90&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_5255805
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2093-2278&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2093-2278&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2093-2278&client=summon