Genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant soybean in the USA: adoption factors, impacts and prospects. A review
Transgenic crops are the subject of lively debate and controversy. Despite such controversy, transgenic soybean has undergone a rapid expansion. Among various types of transgenic crops, herbicide-tolerant crops appear to many to be of limited interest, especially in Europe. Nonetheless, herbicide-to...
Saved in:
Published in | Agronomy for sustainable development Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 21 - 32 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
01.01.2008
EDP Sciences Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1774-0746 1773-0155 |
DOI | 10.1051/agro:2007044 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Transgenic crops are the subject of lively debate and controversy. Despite such controversy, transgenic soybean has undergone a rapid expansion. Among various types of transgenic crops, herbicide-tolerant crops appear to many to be of limited interest, especially in Europe. Nonetheless, herbicide-tolerant crops are the most widely spread in the world. Indeed, glyphosate-tolerant soybean was notably the most cultivated transgenic plant in the world in 2006. In the USA 91% of soybean was transgenic in 2007. How can this particularly significant diffusion in the USA be explained, and what are its impacts? Such issues are addressed in this article, using surveys, studies of numerous statistical data and literature analysis. A first section underlines the importance of soybean in the current development of transgenic crops in the world, and the favourable context for their expansion in the USA. Then follows an analysis of the advantages and drawbacks of transgenic soybean for American farmers. Factors explaining the rapid diffusion of transgenic soybean are also analysed. A comparison of transgenic versus conventional soybean reveals that transgenic glyphosate-tolerant soybean allows both the simplification of weed control and greater work flexibility. Cropping transgenic soybean also fits well with conservation tillage. Transgenic soybean has an economic margin similar to conventional soybean, despite a higher seed cost. The next section describes the evolution of the use of herbicides with transgenic soybean, and some issues linked to the rapid increase in the use of glyphosate. At the beginning a smaller amount of herbicides was used, but this amount increased from 2002, though not steadily. Nonetheless, the environmental and toxicological impacts of pesticides do not only depend on the amounts applied. They also depend on the conditions of use and the levels of toxicity and ecotoxicity. The levels of ecotoxicity seem to have somewhat decreased. The success of transgenic soybeans for farmers has led to a higher use of glyphosate as a replacement for other herbicides, which has in turn led to a decline in its effectiveness. However, the issue here is not only genetic engineering in itself, but rather the management and governance of this innovation. Finally, the prospects of transgenic soybean are addressed. Transgenic soybean with new traits should be placed on the market. The conclusion describes economic context of the development of the first transgenic crops. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Transgenic crops are the subject of lively debate and controversy. Despite such controversy, transgenic soybean has undergone a rapid expansion. Among various types of transgenic crops, herbicide-tolerant crops appear to many to be of limited interest, especially in Europe. Nonetheless, herbicide-tolerant crops are the most widely spread in the world. Indeed, glyphosate-tolerant soybean was notably the most cultivated transgenic plant in the world in 2006. In the USA 91% of soybean was transgenic in 2007. How can this particularly significant diffusion in the USA be explained, and what are its impacts? Such issues are addressed in this article, using surveys, studies of numerous statistical data and literature analysis. A first section underlines the importance of soybean in the current development of transgenic crops in the world, and the favourable context for their expansion in the USA. Then follows an analysis of the advantages and drawbacks of transgenic soybean for American farmers. Factors explaining the rapid diffusion of transgenic soybean are also analysed. A comparison of transgenic versus conventional soybean reveals that transgenic glyphosate-tolerant soybean allows both the simplification of weed control and greater work flexibility. Cropping transgenic soybean also fits well with conservation tillage. Transgenic soybean has an economic margin similar to conventional soybean, despite a higher seed cost. The next section describes the evolution of the use of herbicides with transgenic soybean, and some issues linked to the rapid increase in the use of glyphosate. At the beginning a smaller amount of herbicides was used, but this amount increased from 2002, though not steadily. Nonetheless, the environmental and toxicological impacts of pesticides do not only depend on the amounts applied. They also depend on the conditions of use and the levels of toxicity and ecotoxicity. The levels of ecotoxicity seem to have somewhat decreased. The success of transgenic soybeans for farmers has led to a higher use of glyphosate as a replacement for other herbicides, which has in turn led to a decline in its effectiveness. However, the issue here is not only genetic engineering in itself, but rather the management and governance of this innovation. Finally, the prospects of transgenic soybean are addressed. Transgenic soybean with new traits should be placed on the market. The conclusion describes economic context of the development of the first transgenic crops. |
Author | Bonny, Sylvie |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sylvie surname: Bonny fullname: Bonny, Sylvie email: bonny@grignon.inra.fr organization: UMR Économie publique, INRA |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20385421$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://hal.science/hal-00886404$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNqFkk1r3DAQhk1JoEnaW3-ALi0txMnow5ad2xKapLCQQ9KzkCV5V0EruZI2Zf995ey2h9KPk0bDMy8v78xpdeSDN1X1DsMFhgZfylUMVwSAA2OvqhPMOa0BN83RS81q4Kx9XZ2m9ATA5s5J5W-NN9kq6dwObYK2ozUardxuWocks6lzcCZKn1EKu8FIj6xHeW3Q14fFFZI6TNkGj0apcojpHNnNVMqEpNdoiiFNpvwu0AJF82zN9zfV8ShdMm8P71n1ePP58fquXt7ffrleLGvFKMk1xUNjpGaDpG3xrEc6aEq7EUBRqikjjDZKwdBjQjreDa3qdK9g1IRAX5iz6tNedi2dmKLdyLgTQVpxt1iKuQfQdS0D9owL-2HPFrvftiZlsbFJGeekN2GbBOugZ7zn_wVxz1vaNLPix3-DHAPBGHBb0PcHVKayg7EkrWz6ZZkA7RpGZkmy51TJNEUzCmWznKPPUVonMIj5AsR8AeJwAWXo_Lehn7p_wes9ngrmVyaKp7CNvqzpz_wPX_rCjQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cropro_2009_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1071_CP21753 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2018_06_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12571_014_0357_1 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2011_2428 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsomega_3c08080 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants13060852 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2012_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2016_07_215 crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_15_00046_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_4424 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2016_00148 crossref_primary_10_4081_ija_2021_1854 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fct_2021_112601 crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj2017_12_0703 crossref_primary_10_5114_bta_2013_46417 crossref_primary_10_3917_rtm_226_0065 crossref_primary_10_1080_23311932_2018_1512837 crossref_primary_10_1051_agro_2008051 crossref_primary_10_1111_wre_12613 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoforum_2009_03_009 crossref_primary_10_1038_srep14180 crossref_primary_10_1080_00288233_2022_2141273 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bioeco_2021_100006 crossref_primary_10_1051_agro_2008059 crossref_primary_10_4161_gmcr_22748 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aqrep_2022_101422 crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_13_00077_1 crossref_primary_10_1017_wsc_2020_41 crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2018_62 crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_D_15_00056_1 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0376892920000089 crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_2212 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_7652_2011_00651_x crossref_primary_10_15446_agron_colomb_v36n1_67440 crossref_primary_10_2478_agri_2022_0010 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2012_2753 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nbt_2008_08_012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11248_008_9181_8 crossref_primary_10_1051_agro_2009055 crossref_primary_10_3390_su3091302 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_7652_2010_00565_x crossref_primary_10_1186_2047_2382_3_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcm_9017 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00267_015_0589_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2020_126815 crossref_primary_10_1126_sciadv_1600850 crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_15_00047_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_5974 crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_13_00085_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2012_04_054 crossref_primary_10_1080_19440049_2022_2066194 crossref_primary_10_1080_10942912_2020_1734613 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40003_021_00539_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2015_01_008 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants12030609 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11119_010_9199_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejbt_2021_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2022_134355 crossref_primary_10_1080_07352689_2020_1782568 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nbt_2011_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aca_2013_07_042 crossref_primary_10_1080_00288233_2023_2187425 crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_2159 crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_10_00133_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2018_02_043 crossref_primary_10_1080_15427528_2014_865410 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2011_2480 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2017_06_006 |
Cites_doi | 10.1094/CM-2003-0219-01-RS 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00011-9 10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00004-0 10.1002/1526-4998(200007)56:7<580::AID-PS187>3.0.CO;2-4 10.1017/S1074070800027073 10.1002/ps.1015 10.1177/00027640121956827 10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0 10.1079/PAVSNNR20061045 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200004)56:4<309::AID-PS143>3.0.CO;2-C 10.2134/jeq2005.0378 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Springer S+B Media B.V. 2008 2008 INIST-CNRS Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Springer S+B Media B.V. 2008 – notice: 2008 INIST-CNRS – notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW 7S9 L.6 7QO 7ST 7TV 7U6 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 1XC VOOES |
DOI | 10.1051/agro:2007044 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic Biotechnology Research Abstracts Environment Abstracts Pollution Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic Genetics Abstracts Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Sustainability Science Abstracts Engineering Research Database Pollution Abstracts Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | Genetics Abstracts AGRICOLA |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1773-0155 |
EndPage | 32 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_HAL_hal_00886404v1 20385421 10_1051_agro_2007044 |
GeographicLocations | United States North America America Europe USA |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Europe – name: United States – name: USA |
GroupedDBID | -EM 06D 0R~ 0VY 203 23M 29~ 2KG 2KM 2LR 2VQ 30V 4.4 406 408 4P2 5GY 67N 6J9 8UJ 96X AAAVM AABCJ AACDK AAFNC AAHBH AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AAOTM AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH AAZMS ABAKF ABDBF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMQK ABPLI ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABUBZ ABULA ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACPIV ACREN ACUHS ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETCA AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFLOW AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHKAY AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR ANMIH AOCGG ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN BGNMA BSONS CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DNIVK DPUIP EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD ESBYG ESX FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FYJPI GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GQ7 H13 HF~ HG6 HMJXF HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ IKXTQ ITM IWAJR J-C JBSCW JZLTJ KOV LLZTM M4Y ML. NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9I O9J PT4 R9I RED ROL RSV S1Z S27 S3A S3B SBL SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE T13 TSG TUS U2A U9L UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VFIZW Z7U Z7V Z7W Z81 Z83 ZMTXR ZOVNA AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION ABRTQ IQODW 7S9 L.6 7QO 7ST 7TV 7U6 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 1XC VOOES |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-31b5ead4ba36746df3bd338f00c33d342435cc0b9122878b6c8d9c0fd22090c3 |
IEDL.DBID | U2A |
ISSN | 1774-0746 |
IngestDate | Sun Jun 22 12:33:46 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 10:21:04 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 21:19:44 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 11:31:04 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:01 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:11 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:30:13 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:32:15 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | soybean herbicide tolerance genetically modified crop agricultural economics United States impact herbicide transgenic crop glyphosate Agricultural development Biotechnology Systemic Review Soybean Glyphosate Agronomy Dicotyledones Angiospermae Transgenic plant Pesticide resistance Industrialized country Influence factor Genetic transformation Pesticides Tolerance Innovation adoption Organic phosphonate Impact study Biosafety Agricultural economics Glycine max Herbicide Grain legume Leguminosae Producing country Environment impact 2000-2010 Spermatophyta Genetic engineering Economic impact Genetically modified organism Oil plant (vegetal) Chemical weed control |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c432t-31b5ead4ba36746df3bd338f00c33d342435cc0b9122878b6c8d9c0fd22090c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://hal.science/hal-00886404 |
PQID | 1710211016 |
PQPubID | 24069 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00886404v1 proquest_miscellaneous_48094797 proquest_miscellaneous_19763551 proquest_miscellaneous_1710211016 pascalfrancis_primary_20385421 crossref_citationtrail_10_1051_agro_2007044 crossref_primary_10_1051_agro_2007044 springer_journals_10_1051_agro_2007044 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2008-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2008-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2008 text: 2008-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Dordrecht |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Dordrecht – name: Les Ulis |
PublicationTitle | Agronomy for sustainable development |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Agron. Sustain. Dev |
PublicationYear | 2008 |
Publisher | Springer Netherlands EDP Sciences Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Netherlands – name: EDP Sciences – name: Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA |
References | JamesC.Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 20062007Ithaca, NYISAAA Briefs N 35. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications) CarpenterJ.GianessiL.SantanielloV.EvensonR.E.ZilbermanD.Case Study in Benefits and Risks of Agricultural Biotechnology: RR SoybeansMarket Development for Genetically Modified Food2002WallingfordCABI Publishing227243 BarnesR.L.Why the American Soybean Association supports transgenic soybeansPest Manage. Sci.20005658058310.1002/1526-4998(200007)56:7<580::AID-PS187>3.0.CO;2-41:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXks1yntL8%3D Gomez-Barbero M., Rodriguez-Cerezo E. (2006) Economic Impact of Dominant GM Crops Worldwide: a Review, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the EC, 48 p. US GAOInformation on prices of genetically modified seeds in the United States and Argentina2000WashingtonUS General Accounting Office BonnyS.How are opinions about GMOs changing over time?The case in the EU and the USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress2007Glasgow (UK)BCPC166167 Fernandez-Cornejo J., Caswell M. (2006) The First Decade of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States, USDA ERS, Economic Information Bulletin (11), April 2006. Owen M.D.K. (2007) Genetically modified crops: successes and problems in the Midwest USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress, Glasgow, 2007, BCPC, pp 506–507. Carpenter J., Gianessi L. (2000) Agricultural Biotechnology: Benefits of Transgenic Soybeans, NCFAP, Washington, April 2000, 105 p. LemariéS.Analyse économique du développement des cultures à base d’organismes génétiquement modifiés aux Etats-Unis, Volet 1: Le développement des OGM Agronomiques2000GrenobleINRA-SERD FAPRIUS and World Agricultural Outlook 2007, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute2007Ames (Iowa, USA)Iowa State University Fernandez-CornejoJ.HendricksC.MishraA.Technology Adoption and Off-Farm Household Income The Case of Herbicide-Tolerant SoybeansJ. Agr. Appl. Econ.200537549563 Monsanto (2003) Executive Presentation to Members of the Financial and investment Community, Spring 2003 investor meetings. 12 May 2003. SanvidoO.RomeisJ.BiglerF.Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivationAdv. Biochem. Eng. Biotech.20071072352781:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpsleit7g%3D WesselerJ.H.H.Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops2005DordrechtSpringer FAO (2004) The State Of Food And Agriculture 2003–2004, Agricultural Biotechnology Meeting the needs of the poor? Rome, FAO 2004. Devillers J., Farret R., Girardin P., Rivière J.L., Soulas G. (2005) Indicateurs pour évaluer les risques liés à l’utilisation des pesticides, Lavoisier, Tec&Doc, 278 p. BonnyS.Why are most Europeans opposed to GMOs? Factors explaining rejection in France and EuropeEJB The Electron. J. Biotechnol.200362041 CarpenterJ.GianessiL.Herbicide Tolerant Soybeans: Why Growers are adopting Roundup Ready VarietiesAgBioForum199926572 Fernandez-Cornejo J., McBride W.D. (2002) Adoption of Bioengineered Crops. Agricultural Economic Report, No. AER810, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, 2002 www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer810/aer810.pdf. USDA ERS (2007a) Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. Data sets, USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/. July 2007. Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat (2005) International Public Opinion Research on Emerging Technologies, A Canada — US Public Opinion Research Study on Emerging Technologies. UIUCIllinois Agronomy Handbook 1999–20001999Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of Illinois, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences BullockD.NitsiE.Roundup Ready Soybean Technology and Farm Production Costs: Measuring the Incentive to adopt genetically modified seedsAmerican Behavioral Scientist2001441283130110.1177/00027640121956827 Monsanto (2006) 2006 Annual report, Saint Louis (Missouri, USA), 128 p. Ash M. (2001) Soybeans: Background and Issues for Farm Legislation, USDA-ERS report No. OSC-0701-01, July 2001, 9 p. Benbrook C.M. (2004) Genetically Engineered Crops and Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Nine Years, BioTech InfoNet, Technical Paper N. 7, Sandpoint, Idaho (USA), 53 p. Heimlich R.E. et al. (2000) Genetically Engineered Crops: Has Adoption Reduced Pesticide Use? Agricultural Outlook (USDA ERS), August 2000, 13–17. AspelinA.GrubeA.H.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1996 and 1997 Market Estimates1999WashingtonUSEPA KalaitzandonakesN.G.The economic and environmental impacts of agbiotech: A global perspective2003New YorkKluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers Carpenter J., Gianessi L. (2001) Agricultural Biotechnology: Updated Benefit Estimates. NCFAP, Washington, Jan. 2001, 48 p. CerdeiraA.L.DukeS.O.The Current Status And Environmental Impact Of Glyphosate Resistant Crop: A ReviewJ. Environ. Qual.200635163316581689973610.2134/jeq2005.03781:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVCktr7M Alexander C. (2006) Framer decisions to adopt genetically modified corps. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 1, N. 045, 9 p., DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20061045. GardnerJ.C.NelsonG.C.Assessing the environmental consequences of glyphosate-resistant weeds in the US, 11th International Conference on “Agricultural Biotechnologies: New Frontiers and Products”2007Ravello — Scala, ItalyInternational Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology Research (ICABR) GianessiL.P.SilversC.S.SankulaS.CarpenterJ.E.Plant Biotechnology Current and Potential Impact For Improving Pest Management In U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of 40 Case Studies2002WashingtonNCFAP (National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy) ServiceR.F.A Growing Threat Down on the FarmScience2007316114117 USDA ERS (2007b) Commodity Costs and Returns, USDA Economic Research Service http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/CostsAndReturns/. Foreman L., Livezey J. (2002) Characteristics and Production Costs of U.S. Soybean Farms. USDA-ERS Statistical Bulletin N SB974-4. April 2002. NelsonG.C.BullockD.S.Simulating a relative environmental effect of glyphosate-resistant soybeansEcol. Econ.20034518920210.1016/S0921-8009(03)00011-9 Gardner J.G., Nelson C.H. (2007a) Genetically Modified Crops and Labor Savings in US Crop Production, Paper presented at the 2007 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, 4–7 February 2007, Mobile, Alabama, 20 p. BullockD.DesquilbetM.The economics of non-GMO segregation and identity preservationFood Policy200227819710.1016/S0306-9192(02)00004-0 OwenM.D.K.ZelayaI.A.Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicidesPest Manage. Sci.20056130131110.1002/ps.10151:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitFOgu7w%3D KielyT.DonaldsonD.GrubeA.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2000 and 2001 Market Estimates2004WashingtonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Knezevic S.Z., Evans S.P., Mainz M. (2003) Yield penalty due to delayed weed control in corn and soybean, Crop Manage., www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/research/2003/delay/. Agbios (2007) GM Crop Database. Agbios, Ontario, Canada 2007. Duke S.O., Ragsdale N.N. (2005) (Eds.) Special Issue: Herbicideresistant Crops from Biotechnology, Pest Management Science 61, 209–325. Worldviews (2002) Worldviews 2002: American and European Public Opinion on Foreign Policy, Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, The German Marshall Fund of the US. Hinsch A. (2006) Soja de alto valor, Argentina perder el tren? 3er Congreso de Soja del Mercosur, Rosario (Argentina), 27–30 June 2006. USDA NASSAgricultural Chemical Usage. 1990 to 2006 Field Crops Summary, Annual publication from USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System1991USAAlbert R. Mann Library, Cornell University BonnyS.Regnault-RogerC.Quelle place des cultures transgéniques en protection des plantes? Aspects agro-économiquesEnjeux phytosanitaires pour l’agriculture et l’environnement2005ParisÉditions Tec et Doc Lavoisier895917 NelsonG.C.Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture, Economics and Politics2001LondonAcademic Press FraleyR.T.FessendenMacDonald J.Commercialization of Genetically Modified Plants: Progress Towards the MarketplaceAgricultural Biotechnology & the Public Good1994Ithaca, New YorkNABC (National Agricultural Biotechnology Council) Report 63341 Steiner J. (2006) Innovating for the Future: World Trends, Seed Traits and Crop Inputs, Presentation at Minnesota Crop Production Retailers, 5 Dec. 2006. BonnyS.SausseC.Les cultures transgéniques permettent-elles de réduire l’usage des produits phytosanitaires? Considérations à partir du cas du soja tolérant au glyphosate, OCL Oléagineux, Corps grasLipides20041185911:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXntFOksro%3D MarschP.LlewellynR.PowlesS.Social Costs of Herbicide Resistance: the Case of Resistance to Glyphosate50th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society2006AustraliaSydney, NSW Bonny S. (2005a) The Growth Of Transgenic Crops In The USA: What It Tells Us, INRA Sciences Sociales, English version, 2005/01, No. 4–5. Tinland B. (2007) Monsanto and Renessen’s pipeline products, Presentation at EFSA (European Food Safety Autority) GMO scientific hearing with applicants, 21 March 2007. DonaldsonD.KielyT.GrubeA.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1998 and 1999 Market Estimates2002WashingtonUSEPA KovachJ.PetzoldtC.DegniJ.TetteJ.A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 1391992Ithaca, NYCornell University USDA NASSAgricultural Prices1992Washington DC, USAAnnual publication from USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service CTICNational crop residue management survey2004West Lafayette (Indiana, USA)CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center) WoodburnA.T.Glyphosate: production, pricing and use worldwidePest Manage. Sci.20005630931210.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200004)56:4<309::AID-PS143>3.0.CO;2- D. Bullock (280100021_CR14) 2002; 27 P. Marsch (280100021_CR48) 2006 O. Sanvido (280100021_CR56) 2007; 107 S. Lemarié (280100021_CR46) 2000 US GAO (280100021_CR61) 2000 280100021_CR63 J. Carpenter (280100021_CR20) 2002 280100021_CR62 (280100021_CR67) 2005 A. Aspelin (280100021_CR5) 1999 280100021_CR23 280100021_CR25 280100021_CR69 S. Bonny (280100021_CR10) 2005 280100021_CR27 280100021_CR26 280100021_CR29 G. Brookes (280100021_CR13) 2005; 8 A.L. Cerdeira (280100021_CR21) 2006; 35 280100021_CR2 280100021_CR3 280100021_CR4 R.L. Barnes (280100021_CR6) 2000; 56 280100021_CR1 J.C. Gardner (280100021_CR35) 2007 S. Bonny (280100021_CR11) 2007 280100021_CR30 280100021_CR32 R.T. Fraley (280100021_CR33) 1994 280100021_CR34 280100021_CR38 G.C. Nelson (280100021_CR52) 2003; 45 USDA NASS (280100021_CR64) 2000 280100021_CR37 S. Sankula (280100021_CR55) 2005 280100021_CR7 280100021_CR39 UIUC (280100021_CR60) 1999 280100021_CR9 S. Bonny (280100021_CR8) 2003; 6 CTIC (280100021_CR22) 2004 280100021_CR40 FAPRI (280100021_CR28) 2007 USDA NASS (280100021_CR65) 1992 280100021_CR44 280100021_CR47 A.T. Woodburn (280100021_CR68) 2000; 56 J. Kovach (280100021_CR45) 1992 280100021_CR49 N.G. Kalaitzandonakes (280100021_CR42) 2003 C. James (280100021_CR41) 2007 L.P. Gianessi (280100021_CR36) 2002 D. Bullock (280100021_CR15) 2001; 44 S. Bonny (280100021_CR12) 2004; 11 280100021_CR50 T. Kiely (280100021_CR43) 2004 USDA NASS (280100021_CR66) 1991 J. Fernandez-Cornejo (280100021_CR31) 2005; 37 (280100021_CR51) 2001 D. Donaldson (280100021_CR24) 2002 280100021_CR53 R.F. Service (280100021_CR57) 2007; 316 280100021_CR58 280100021_CR16 280100021_CR59 280100021_CR18 J. Carpenter (280100021_CR17) 1999; 2 M.D.K. Owen (280100021_CR54) 2005; 61 280100021_CR19 |
References_xml | – reference: Carpenter J., Gianessi L. (2001) Agricultural Biotechnology: Updated Benefit Estimates. NCFAP, Washington, Jan. 2001, 48 p. – reference: Agbios (2007) GM Crop Database. Agbios, Ontario, Canada 2007. – reference: BonnyS.How are opinions about GMOs changing over time?The case in the EU and the USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress2007Glasgow (UK)BCPC166167 – reference: Fernandez-Cornejo J., McBride W.D. (2002) Adoption of Bioengineered Crops. Agricultural Economic Report, No. AER810, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, 2002 www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer810/aer810.pdf. – reference: FraleyR.T.FessendenMacDonald J.Commercialization of Genetically Modified Plants: Progress Towards the MarketplaceAgricultural Biotechnology & the Public Good1994Ithaca, New YorkNABC (National Agricultural Biotechnology Council) Report 63341 – reference: Benbrook C.M. (2004) Genetically Engineered Crops and Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Nine Years, BioTech InfoNet, Technical Paper N. 7, Sandpoint, Idaho (USA), 53 p. – reference: US GAOInformation on prices of genetically modified seeds in the United States and Argentina2000WashingtonUS General Accounting Office – reference: ASA (American Soybean Association) (2001) Conservation Tillage Study, Saint-Louis (MO), Nov. 2001, 22p. – reference: Steiner J. (2006) Innovating for the Future: World Trends, Seed Traits and Crop Inputs, Presentation at Minnesota Crop Production Retailers, 5 Dec. 2006. – reference: BullockD.DesquilbetM.The economics of non-GMO segregation and identity preservationFood Policy200227819710.1016/S0306-9192(02)00004-0 – reference: Tinland B. (2007) Monsanto and Renessen’s pipeline products, Presentation at EFSA (European Food Safety Autority) GMO scientific hearing with applicants, 21 March 2007. – reference: GianessiL.P.SilversC.S.SankulaS.CarpenterJ.E.Plant Biotechnology Current and Potential Impact For Improving Pest Management In U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of 40 Case Studies2002WashingtonNCFAP (National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy) – reference: WesselerJ.H.H.Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops2005DordrechtSpringer – reference: ServiceR.F.A Growing Threat Down on the FarmScience2007316114117 – reference: USDA NASSAgricultural Chemical Usage. 1990 to 2006 Field Crops Summary, Annual publication from USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System1991USAAlbert R. Mann Library, Cornell University – reference: LemariéS.Analyse économique du développement des cultures à base d’organismes génétiquement modifiés aux Etats-Unis, Volet 1: Le développement des OGM Agronomiques2000GrenobleINRA-SERD – reference: CTICNational crop residue management survey2004West Lafayette (Indiana, USA)CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center) – reference: Marra M.C., Piggott N.E., Carlson G.A. (2004). The Net Benefits, Including Convenience, of Roundup Ready® Soybeans: Results from a National Survey, NSF Center for Integrated Pest Management, Technical Bulletin 2004-3, Raleigh, NC, 40 p. – reference: BarnesR.L.Why the American Soybean Association supports transgenic soybeansPest Manage. Sci.20005658058310.1002/1526-4998(200007)56:7<580::AID-PS187>3.0.CO;2-41:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXks1yntL8%3D – reference: Fernandez-CornejoJ.HendricksC.MishraA.Technology Adoption and Off-Farm Household Income The Case of Herbicide-Tolerant SoybeansJ. Agr. Appl. Econ.200537549563 – reference: KielyT.DonaldsonD.GrubeA.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2000 and 2001 Market Estimates2004WashingtonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency – reference: Worldviews (2002) Worldviews 2002: American and European Public Opinion on Foreign Policy, Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, The German Marshall Fund of the US. – reference: USDA ERS (2007b) Commodity Costs and Returns, USDA Economic Research Service http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/CostsAndReturns/. – reference: DonaldsonD.KielyT.GrubeA.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1998 and 1999 Market Estimates2002WashingtonUSEPA – reference: BonnyS.SausseC.Les cultures transgéniques permettent-elles de réduire l’usage des produits phytosanitaires? Considérations à partir du cas du soja tolérant au glyphosate, OCL Oléagineux, Corps grasLipides20041185911:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXntFOksro%3D – reference: Carpenter J., Gianessi L. (2000) Agricultural Biotechnology: Benefits of Transgenic Soybeans, NCFAP, Washington, April 2000, 105 p. – reference: Hinsch A. (2006) Soja de alto valor, Argentina perder el tren? 3er Congreso de Soja del Mercosur, Rosario (Argentina), 27–30 June 2006. – reference: USDA NASSAcreage. Crop Production Supplement2000WashingtonUSDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service – reference: USDA NASSAgricultural Prices1992Washington DC, USAAnnual publication from USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service – reference: NelsonG.C.Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture, Economics and Politics2001LondonAcademic Press – reference: Ash M. (2001) Soybeans: Background and Issues for Farm Legislation, USDA-ERS report No. OSC-0701-01, July 2001, 9 p. – reference: Duke S.O., Ragsdale N.N. (2005) (Eds.) Special Issue: Herbicideresistant Crops from Biotechnology, Pest Management Science 61, 209–325. – reference: NelsonG.C.BullockD.S.Simulating a relative environmental effect of glyphosate-resistant soybeansEcol. Econ.20034518920210.1016/S0921-8009(03)00011-9 – reference: CarpenterJ.GianessiL.SantanielloV.EvensonR.E.ZilbermanD.Case Study in Benefits and Risks of Agricultural Biotechnology: RR SoybeansMarket Development for Genetically Modified Food2002WallingfordCABI Publishing227243 – reference: SanvidoO.RomeisJ.BiglerF.Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivationAdv. Biochem. Eng. Biotech.20071072352781:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpsleit7g%3D – reference: CarpenterJ.GianessiL.Herbicide Tolerant Soybeans: Why Growers are adopting Roundup Ready VarietiesAgBioForum199926572 – reference: Knezevic S.Z., Evans S.P., Mainz M. (2003) Yield penalty due to delayed weed control in corn and soybean, Crop Manage., www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/research/2003/delay/. – reference: BrookesG.BarfootP.GM Crops: The Global Economie and Environmental Impact — The First Nine Years 1996–2004AgBioForum20058187196 – reference: Monsanto (2003) Executive Presentation to Members of the Financial and investment Community, Spring 2003 investor meetings. 12 May 2003. – reference: FAO (2004) The State Of Food And Agriculture 2003–2004, Agricultural Biotechnology Meeting the needs of the poor? Rome, FAO 2004. – reference: Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat (2005) International Public Opinion Research on Emerging Technologies, A Canada — US Public Opinion Research Study on Emerging Technologies. – reference: Owen M.D.K. (2007) Genetically modified crops: successes and problems in the Midwest USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress, Glasgow, 2007, BCPC, pp 506–507. – reference: Heimlich R.E. et al. (2000) Genetically Engineered Crops: Has Adoption Reduced Pesticide Use? Agricultural Outlook (USDA ERS), August 2000, 13–17. – reference: KalaitzandonakesN.G.The economic and environmental impacts of agbiotech: A global perspective2003New YorkKluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers – reference: Alexander C. (2006) Framer decisions to adopt genetically modified corps. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 1, N. 045, 9 p., DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20061045. – reference: FAPRIUS and World Agricultural Outlook 2007, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute2007Ames (Iowa, USA)Iowa State University – reference: OwenM.D.K.ZelayaI.A.Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicidesPest Manage. Sci.20056130131110.1002/ps.10151:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitFOgu7w%3D – reference: CerdeiraA.L.DukeS.O.The Current Status And Environmental Impact Of Glyphosate Resistant Crop: A ReviewJ. Environ. Qual.200635163316581689973610.2134/jeq2005.03781:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVCktr7M – reference: USDA ERS (2007a) Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. Data sets, USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/. July 2007. – reference: Heap I. (2007) International survey of herbicide resistant weeds, Herbicide Resistance Action Committee, and Weed Sci. Soc. Am. www.weedscience.org – reference: Fernandez-Cornejo J., Caswell M. (2006) The First Decade of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States, USDA ERS, Economic Information Bulletin (11), April 2006. – reference: WoodburnA.T.Glyphosate: production, pricing and use worldwidePest Manage. Sci.20005630931210.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200004)56:4<309::AID-PS143>3.0.CO;2-C1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXisVeqs74%3D – reference: SankulaS.MarmonG.BlumenthalE.Biotechnology derived crops planted in 2004. Impacts on US agriculture2005WashingtonNCFAP (National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy) – reference: BonnyS.Regnault-RogerC.Quelle place des cultures transgéniques en protection des plantes? Aspects agro-économiquesEnjeux phytosanitaires pour l’agriculture et l’environnement2005ParisÉditions Tec et Doc Lavoisier895917 – reference: BonnyS.Why are most Europeans opposed to GMOs? Factors explaining rejection in France and EuropeEJB The Electron. J. Biotechnol.200362041 – reference: Bonny S. (2005a) The Growth Of Transgenic Crops In The USA: What It Tells Us, INRA Sciences Sociales, English version, 2005/01, No. 4–5. – reference: Gomez-Barbero M., Rodriguez-Cerezo E. (2006) Economic Impact of Dominant GM Crops Worldwide: a Review, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the EC, 48 p. – reference: Eurobarometer (2006) Europeans and biotechnology in 2005. Eurobarometer 64.3, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels, CE, DG Research. July 2006, 88 p. – reference: MarschP.LlewellynR.PowlesS.Social Costs of Herbicide Resistance: the Case of Resistance to Glyphosate50th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society2006AustraliaSydney, NSW – reference: Devillers J., Farret R., Girardin P., Rivière J.L., Soulas G. (2005) Indicateurs pour évaluer les risques liés à l’utilisation des pesticides, Lavoisier, Tec&Doc, 278 p. – reference: KovachJ.PetzoldtC.DegniJ.TetteJ.A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 1391992Ithaca, NYCornell University – reference: JamesC.Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 20062007Ithaca, NYISAAA Briefs N 35. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications) – reference: UIUCIllinois Agronomy Handbook 1999–20001999Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of Illinois, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences – reference: BullockD.NitsiE.Roundup Ready Soybean Technology and Farm Production Costs: Measuring the Incentive to adopt genetically modified seedsAmerican Behavioral Scientist2001441283130110.1177/00027640121956827 – reference: Gardner J.G., Nelson C.H. (2007a) Genetically Modified Crops and Labor Savings in US Crop Production, Paper presented at the 2007 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, 4–7 February 2007, Mobile, Alabama, 20 p. – reference: Monsanto (2006) 2006 Annual report, Saint Louis (Missouri, USA), 128 p. – reference: AspelinA.GrubeA.H.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1996 and 1997 Market Estimates1999WashingtonUSEPA – reference: Foreman L., Livezey J. (2002) Characteristics and Production Costs of U.S. Soybean Farms. USDA-ERS Statistical Bulletin N SB974-4. April 2002. – reference: GardnerJ.C.NelsonG.C.Assessing the environmental consequences of glyphosate-resistant weeds in the US, 11th International Conference on “Agricultural Biotechnologies: New Frontiers and Products”2007Ravello — Scala, ItalyInternational Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology Research (ICABR) – volume: 2 start-page: 65 year: 1999 ident: 280100021_CR17 publication-title: AgBioForum – ident: 280100021_CR44 doi: 10.1094/CM-2003-0219-01-RS – volume: 45 start-page: 189 year: 2003 ident: 280100021_CR52 publication-title: Ecol. Econ. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00011-9 – ident: 280100021_CR29 – volume-title: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2006 year: 2007 ident: 280100021_CR41 – volume-title: Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops year: 2005 ident: 280100021_CR67 – ident: 280100021_CR25 – ident: 280100021_CR50 – volume-title: A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 139 year: 1992 ident: 280100021_CR45 – ident: 280100021_CR58 – ident: 280100021_CR19 – start-page: 166 volume-title: The case in the EU and the USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress year: 2007 ident: 280100021_CR11 – volume: 27 start-page: 81 year: 2002 ident: 280100021_CR14 publication-title: Food Policy doi: 10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00004-0 – ident: 280100021_CR39 – ident: 280100021_CR16 – volume-title: US and World Agricultural Outlook 2007, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute year: 2007 ident: 280100021_CR28 – ident: 280100021_CR49 – volume: 56 start-page: 580 year: 2000 ident: 280100021_CR6 publication-title: Pest Manage. Sci. doi: 10.1002/1526-4998(200007)56:7<580::AID-PS187>3.0.CO;2-4 – volume-title: Agricultural Chemical Usage. 1990 to 2006 Field Crops Summary, Annual publication from USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System year: 1991 ident: 280100021_CR66 – volume-title: Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture, Economics and Politics year: 2001 ident: 280100021_CR51 – ident: 280100021_CR1 – ident: 280100021_CR30 – ident: 280100021_CR34 – volume: 316 start-page: 114 year: 2007 ident: 280100021_CR57 publication-title: Science – volume: 37 start-page: 549 year: 2005 ident: 280100021_CR31 publication-title: J. Agr. Appl. Econ. doi: 10.1017/S1074070800027073 – volume: 8 start-page: 187 year: 2005 ident: 280100021_CR13 publication-title: AgBioForum – ident: 280100021_CR59 – ident: 280100021_CR9 – volume-title: Plant Biotechnology Current and Potential Impact For Improving Pest Management In U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of 40 Case Studies year: 2002 ident: 280100021_CR36 – volume: 61 start-page: 301 year: 2005 ident: 280100021_CR54 publication-title: Pest Manage. Sci. doi: 10.1002/ps.1015 – ident: 280100021_CR40 – volume: 44 start-page: 1283 year: 2001 ident: 280100021_CR15 publication-title: American Behavioral Scientist doi: 10.1177/00027640121956827 – ident: 280100021_CR38 – volume-title: Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2000 and 2001 Market Estimates year: 2004 ident: 280100021_CR43 – ident: 280100021_CR69 – volume-title: Acreage. Crop Production Supplement year: 2000 ident: 280100021_CR64 – ident: 280100021_CR27 – volume-title: Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1996 and 1997 Market Estimates year: 1999 ident: 280100021_CR5 – ident: 280100021_CR23 – volume-title: Assessing the environmental consequences of glyphosate-resistant weeds in the US, 11th International Conference on “Agricultural Biotechnologies: New Frontiers and Products” year: 2007 ident: 280100021_CR35 – volume-title: Biotechnology derived crops planted in 2004. Impacts on US agriculture year: 2005 ident: 280100021_CR55 – ident: 280100021_CR4 – volume: 107 start-page: 235 year: 2007 ident: 280100021_CR56 publication-title: Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotech. – ident: 280100021_CR37 – ident: 280100021_CR62 – ident: 280100021_CR18 – ident: 280100021_CR47 – volume-title: Illinois Agronomy Handbook 1999–2000 year: 1999 ident: 280100021_CR60 – volume: 6 start-page: 20 year: 2003 ident: 280100021_CR8 publication-title: EJB The Electron. J. Biotechnol. – start-page: 227 volume-title: Market Development for Genetically Modified Food year: 2002 ident: 280100021_CR20 – ident: 280100021_CR26 – ident: 280100021_CR3 – ident: 280100021_CR53 – ident: 280100021_CR32 – ident: 280100021_CR7 – volume-title: The economic and environmental impacts of agbiotech: A global perspective year: 2003 ident: 280100021_CR42 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0 – volume: 11 start-page: 85 year: 2004 ident: 280100021_CR12 publication-title: Lipides – volume-title: Information on prices of genetically modified seeds in the United States and Argentina year: 2000 ident: 280100021_CR61 – volume-title: National crop residue management survey year: 2004 ident: 280100021_CR22 – ident: 280100021_CR2 doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20061045 – ident: 280100021_CR63 – volume-title: Analyse économique du développement des cultures à base d’organismes génétiquement modifiés aux Etats-Unis, Volet 1: Le développement des OGM Agronomiques year: 2000 ident: 280100021_CR46 – start-page: 895 volume-title: Enjeux phytosanitaires pour l’agriculture et l’environnement year: 2005 ident: 280100021_CR10 – volume: 56 start-page: 309 year: 2000 ident: 280100021_CR68 publication-title: Pest Manage. Sci. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200004)56:4<309::AID-PS143>3.0.CO;2-C – volume-title: Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1998 and 1999 Market Estimates year: 2002 ident: 280100021_CR24 – start-page: 33 volume-title: Agricultural Biotechnology & the Public Good year: 1994 ident: 280100021_CR33 – volume: 35 start-page: 1633 year: 2006 ident: 280100021_CR21 publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0378 – volume-title: 50th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society year: 2006 ident: 280100021_CR48 – volume-title: Agricultural Prices year: 1992 ident: 280100021_CR65 |
SSID | ssj0041774 |
Score | 2.1650944 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Transgenic crops are the subject of lively debate and controversy. Despite such controversy, transgenic soybean has undergone a rapid expansion. Among various... |
SourceID | hal proquest pascalfrancis crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 21 |
SubjectTerms | Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions Agricultural sciences Agriculture Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biotechnology Chemical control conservation tillage crops Ecology, environment economic analysis ecotoxicology environmental impact Europe farmers Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetic engineering Genetic engineering applications Genetic technics Genetics and breeding of economic plants Glycine max glyphosate governance herbicide resistance herbicide-resistant weeds Life Sciences markets Methods. Procedures. Technologies Parasitic plants. Weeds Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Plant breeding: fundamental aspects and methodology Review Article Soil Science & Conservation soybeans surveys Sustainable Development toxicity Transgenic animals and transgenic plants Transgenic plants United States Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims weed control Weeds |
Title | Genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant soybean in the USA: adoption factors, impacts and prospects. A review |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1051/agro:2007044 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1710211016 https://www.proquest.com/docview/19763551 https://www.proquest.com/docview/48094797 https://hal.science/hal-00886404 |
Volume | 28 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3di9QwEB-8uxdFxE-sH2sU9UWrSZp223srcufi14u3cD6VpEn3DtZ22faE_e-dadOFPVzwqVB-pW0mmfzmIzMAr4XsC56KsFJThQaK02HGrQtFlbpMS62GiOn3H8lsrr6cx-feUGzHbPcxJNlr6qEXrfioF-vmmDxrXKkDOIrJasf5O5f5qHmVmPZVl-kSUh8Nn-h-_emdLejgghIgb690i2NSDc0sdtjmtQBpv--c3oU7njCyfJDwPbjh6vtwK1-sfdEM9wBqqh3d-6SXG_a7sZcV8kq2WG5WF02LXDLsmqXDd3asbTbG6Zpd1gyJH5v_zI-Ztk2vNphvvfOeDScnW6Zry_AL-8OY7QeWs-Gcy0M4Oz05-zQLfR-FsFSR7FDNmhgnjDI6SnBUbBUZi5ZpxXkZRTZSEilTWXKTCYn2U2qSMrVZySsrJc8Q8wgO66Z2j4ElWsWx4UYLlyiTJhlZuMZasvpKGdsA3o0jW5S-xji1ulgWfaw7FgXJofByCODNFr0aamvswb1CIW0hVBB7ln8r6B4ymDRRXP0RAUx2ZLiFS4p9KomAl6NQC1xCFBfRtWuu2kIQyxLkxgjgxT5MRpX7YrEfoVK0lKfZNIC344wpvD5o__lbT_4X-BRuDlkq5Ph5Bofd-so9RyrUmQkc5Z9_fT2Z9OvgL1juBj8 |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwED-x8QAIIT5FgG0GAS-QzXacNNlbhJgKdHuhlfZm2bHTTSpJ1WRI_e85O0mlTqvEU6ToFyXx2effffgO4CPjvuApC0sxEmigWBVm1NiQlanNFFeii5ieXyTjmfh5GV_2hmIzZLsPIUmvqbtetOxEzVf1qfOsUSH24D7SgNSlcM14PmhewUa-6rK7hK6PRp_ofvvprS1o78olQD5eqgbHpOyaWWyxzVsBUr_vnD2FJz1hJHkn4Wdwz1bP4VE-X_VFM-wLqFztaO-TXqzJn9pcl8gryXyxXl7VDXLJsK0XFt_ZkqZea6sqcl0RJH5k9js_JcrUXm2QvvXOV9KdnGyIqgzBL_SHMZtjkpPunMtLmJ59n34bh30fhbAQEW9RzeoYJ4zQKkpwVEwZaYOWaUlpEUUmEhwpU1FQnTGO9lOqkyI1WUFLwznNEPMK9qu6sq-BJErEsaZaMZsInSaZs3C1Mc7qK3hsAvgyjKws-hrjrtXFQvpYd8ykk4Ps5RDApw162dXW2IH7gELaQFxB7HE-ke4eMpg0EVT8ZQEcbslwA-cu9ik4At4PQpW4hFxcRFW2vmkkcyyLOTdGAEe7MJmr3Bez3QiRoqU8ykYBfB5mjOz1QXPnb735X-ARPBhPzydy8uPi11t42GWsOCfQO9hvVzf2AGlRqw_9WvgHoboHng |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3fa9RAEF5sBVGk1F8Yte0q6ovG7m42uaRvQT1OrUWwB31bdrOba-FMjksq3H_vTLI5uNIDnwLhC0l2NpNvdma_IeQtF53gKQ9LOZIQoDgdZsy6kJepy7TQss-Y_jxLJlP5_SK-8FWVzVDtPqQk-z0NqNJUtccLW_q-tPxYz5b1Ca6yMSl3yF1wxBxn9FTkgxeWfNQpMOMhxJ4avuj95tUbv6OdSyyGfLjQDYxP2Te22GCeN5Kl3T9ovE_2PHmkeW_tR-SOqx6TB_ls6QU03BNSoY50tz49X9E_tb0qgWPS2Xy1uKwb4JVhW88d3LOlTb0yTlf0qqJAAun0d35Cta07F0J9G56PtN9F2VBdWQpP2G3MbD7RnPZ7Xp6S8_HX88-T0PdUCAsZiRZcrolh8kijowRGxZaRsRCllowVUWQjKYA-FQUzGRcQS6UmKVKbFay0QrAMMM_IblVX7jmhiZZxbJjR3CXSpEmG0a6xFiPAQsQ2IB-GkVWF1xvHthdz1eW9Y67QDsrbISDv1uhFr7OxBfcGjLSGoDj2JD9VeA7YTJpIJv_ygBxu2HANF5gHlQIArwejKvicMEeiK1dfN4oj4-K4pBGQo22YDFX8Yr4dIVOImkfZKCDvhxmjvG9obn2tF_8LPCL3fn0Zq9NvZz9ekvt98QquB70iu-3y2h0AQ2rNYfcp_ANTcQva |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetically+modified+glyphosate-tolerant+soybean+in+the+USA%3A+adoption+factors%2C+impacts+and+prospects.+A+review&rft.jtitle=Agronomy+for+sustainable+development&rft.au=Bonny%2C+Sylvie&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.issn=1774-0746&rft.eissn=1773-0155&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=32&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051%2Fagro%3A2007044&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1051_agro_2007044 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1774-0746&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1774-0746&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1774-0746&client=summon |