Genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant soybean in the USA: adoption factors, impacts and prospects. A review

Transgenic crops are the subject of lively debate and controversy. Despite such controversy, transgenic soybean has undergone a rapid expansion. Among various types of transgenic crops, herbicide-tolerant crops appear to many to be of limited interest, especially in Europe. Nonetheless, herbicide-to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAgronomy for sustainable development Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 21 - 32
Main Author Bonny, Sylvie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.01.2008
EDP Sciences
Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA
Subjects
USA
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1774-0746
1773-0155
DOI10.1051/agro:2007044

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Transgenic crops are the subject of lively debate and controversy. Despite such controversy, transgenic soybean has undergone a rapid expansion. Among various types of transgenic crops, herbicide-tolerant crops appear to many to be of limited interest, especially in Europe. Nonetheless, herbicide-tolerant crops are the most widely spread in the world. Indeed, glyphosate-tolerant soybean was notably the most cultivated transgenic plant in the world in 2006. In the USA 91% of soybean was transgenic in 2007. How can this particularly significant diffusion in the USA be explained, and what are its impacts? Such issues are addressed in this article, using surveys, studies of numerous statistical data and literature analysis. A first section underlines the importance of soybean in the current development of transgenic crops in the world, and the favourable context for their expansion in the USA. Then follows an analysis of the advantages and drawbacks of transgenic soybean for American farmers. Factors explaining the rapid diffusion of transgenic soybean are also analysed. A comparison of transgenic versus conventional soybean reveals that transgenic glyphosate-tolerant soybean allows both the simplification of weed control and greater work flexibility. Cropping transgenic soybean also fits well with conservation tillage. Transgenic soybean has an economic margin similar to conventional soybean, despite a higher seed cost. The next section describes the evolution of the use of herbicides with transgenic soybean, and some issues linked to the rapid increase in the use of glyphosate. At the beginning a smaller amount of herbicides was used, but this amount increased from 2002, though not steadily. Nonetheless, the environmental and toxicological impacts of pesticides do not only depend on the amounts applied. They also depend on the conditions of use and the levels of toxicity and ecotoxicity. The levels of ecotoxicity seem to have somewhat decreased. The success of transgenic soybeans for farmers has led to a higher use of glyphosate as a replacement for other herbicides, which has in turn led to a decline in its effectiveness. However, the issue here is not only genetic engineering in itself, but rather the management and governance of this innovation. Finally, the prospects of transgenic soybean are addressed. Transgenic soybean with new traits should be placed on the market. The conclusion describes economic context of the development of the first transgenic crops.
AbstractList Transgenic crops are the subject of lively debate and controversy. Despite such controversy, transgenic soybean has undergone a rapid expansion. Among various types of transgenic crops, herbicide-tolerant crops appear to many to be of limited interest, especially in Europe. Nonetheless, herbicide-tolerant crops are the most widely spread in the world. Indeed, glyphosate-tolerant soybean was notably the most cultivated transgenic plant in the world in 2006. In the USA 91% of soybean was transgenic in 2007. How can this particularly significant diffusion in the USA be explained, and what are its impacts? Such issues are addressed in this article, using surveys, studies of numerous statistical data and literature analysis. A first section underlines the importance of soybean in the current development of transgenic crops in the world, and the favourable context for their expansion in the USA. Then follows an analysis of the advantages and drawbacks of transgenic soybean for American farmers. Factors explaining the rapid diffusion of transgenic soybean are also analysed. A comparison of transgenic versus conventional soybean reveals that transgenic glyphosate-tolerant soybean allows both the simplification of weed control and greater work flexibility. Cropping transgenic soybean also fits well with conservation tillage. Transgenic soybean has an economic margin similar to conventional soybean, despite a higher seed cost. The next section describes the evolution of the use of herbicides with transgenic soybean, and some issues linked to the rapid increase in the use of glyphosate. At the beginning a smaller amount of herbicides was used, but this amount increased from 2002, though not steadily. Nonetheless, the environmental and toxicological impacts of pesticides do not only depend on the amounts applied. They also depend on the conditions of use and the levels of toxicity and ecotoxicity. The levels of ecotoxicity seem to have somewhat decreased. The success of transgenic soybeans for farmers has led to a higher use of glyphosate as a replacement for other herbicides, which has in turn led to a decline in its effectiveness. However, the issue here is not only genetic engineering in itself, but rather the management and governance of this innovation. Finally, the prospects of transgenic soybean are addressed. Transgenic soybean with new traits should be placed on the market. The conclusion describes economic context of the development of the first transgenic crops.
Author Bonny, Sylvie
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sylvie
  surname: Bonny
  fullname: Bonny, Sylvie
  email: bonny@grignon.inra.fr
  organization: UMR Économie publique, INRA
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20385421$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://hal.science/hal-00886404$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNqFkk1r3DAQhk1JoEnaW3-ALi0txMnow5ad2xKapLCQQ9KzkCV5V0EruZI2Zf995ey2h9KPk0bDMy8v78xpdeSDN1X1DsMFhgZfylUMVwSAA2OvqhPMOa0BN83RS81q4Kx9XZ2m9ATA5s5J5W-NN9kq6dwObYK2ozUardxuWocks6lzcCZKn1EKu8FIj6xHeW3Q14fFFZI6TNkGj0apcojpHNnNVMqEpNdoiiFNpvwu0AJF82zN9zfV8ShdMm8P71n1ePP58fquXt7ffrleLGvFKMk1xUNjpGaDpG3xrEc6aEq7EUBRqikjjDZKwdBjQjreDa3qdK9g1IRAX5iz6tNedi2dmKLdyLgTQVpxt1iKuQfQdS0D9owL-2HPFrvftiZlsbFJGeekN2GbBOugZ7zn_wVxz1vaNLPix3-DHAPBGHBb0PcHVKayg7EkrWz6ZZkA7RpGZkmy51TJNEUzCmWznKPPUVonMIj5AsR8AeJwAWXo_Lehn7p_wes9ngrmVyaKp7CNvqzpz_wPX_rCjQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cropro_2009_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1071_CP21753
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2018_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12571_014_0357_1
crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2011_2428
crossref_primary_10_1021_acsomega_3c08080
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants13060852
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2012_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2016_07_215
crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_15_00046_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_4424
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2016_00148
crossref_primary_10_4081_ija_2021_1854
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fct_2021_112601
crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj2017_12_0703
crossref_primary_10_5114_bta_2013_46417
crossref_primary_10_3917_rtm_226_0065
crossref_primary_10_1080_23311932_2018_1512837
crossref_primary_10_1051_agro_2008051
crossref_primary_10_1111_wre_12613
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoforum_2009_03_009
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep14180
crossref_primary_10_1080_00288233_2022_2141273
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bioeco_2021_100006
crossref_primary_10_1051_agro_2008059
crossref_primary_10_4161_gmcr_22748
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aqrep_2022_101422
crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_13_00077_1
crossref_primary_10_1017_wsc_2020_41
crossref_primary_10_1017_wet_2018_62
crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_D_15_00056_1
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0376892920000089
crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_2212
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_7652_2011_00651_x
crossref_primary_10_15446_agron_colomb_v36n1_67440
crossref_primary_10_2478_agri_2022_0010
crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2012_2753
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nbt_2008_08_012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11248_008_9181_8
crossref_primary_10_1051_agro_2009055
crossref_primary_10_3390_su3091302
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_7652_2010_00565_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_2047_2382_3_8
crossref_primary_10_1002_rcm_9017
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00267_015_0589_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2020_126815
crossref_primary_10_1126_sciadv_1600850
crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_15_00047_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_5974
crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_13_00085_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2012_04_054
crossref_primary_10_1080_19440049_2022_2066194
crossref_primary_10_1080_10942912_2020_1734613
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40003_021_00539_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2015_01_008
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants12030609
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11119_010_9199_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejbt_2021_11_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2022_134355
crossref_primary_10_1080_07352689_2020_1782568
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nbt_2011_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aca_2013_07_042
crossref_primary_10_1080_00288233_2023_2187425
crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_2159
crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_D_10_00133_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2018_02_043
crossref_primary_10_1080_15427528_2014_865410
crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2011_2480
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2017_06_006
Cites_doi 10.1094/CM-2003-0219-01-RS
10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00011-9
10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00004-0
10.1002/1526-4998(200007)56:7<580::AID-PS187>3.0.CO;2-4
10.1017/S1074070800027073
10.1002/ps.1015
10.1177/00027640121956827
10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0
10.1079/PAVSNNR20061045
10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200004)56:4<309::AID-PS143>3.0.CO;2-C
10.2134/jeq2005.0378
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Springer S+B Media B.V. 2008
2008 INIST-CNRS
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright_xml – notice: Springer S+B Media B.V. 2008
– notice: 2008 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
7S9
L.6
7QO
7ST
7TV
7U6
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
RC3
1XC
VOOES
DOI 10.1051/agro:2007044
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Pollution Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
Genetics Abstracts
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Pollution Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList Genetics Abstracts
AGRICOLA

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1773-0155
EndPage 32
ExternalDocumentID oai_HAL_hal_00886404v1
20385421
10_1051_agro_2007044
GeographicLocations United States
North America
America
Europe
USA
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Europe
– name: United States
– name: USA
GroupedDBID -EM
06D
0R~
0VY
203
23M
29~
2KG
2KM
2LR
2VQ
30V
4.4
406
408
4P2
5GY
67N
6J9
8UJ
96X
AAAVM
AABCJ
AACDK
AAFNC
AAHBH
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AAOTM
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
AAZMS
ABAKF
ABDBF
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABMQK
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTHY
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABUBZ
ABULA
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACPIV
ACREN
ACUHS
ACZOJ
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETCA
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHKAY
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
ANMIH
AOCGG
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
BGNMA
BSONS
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DNIVK
DPUIP
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
ESBYG
ESX
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FYJPI
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GQ7
H13
HF~
HG6
HMJXF
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
IKXTQ
ITM
IWAJR
J-C
JBSCW
JZLTJ
KOV
LLZTM
M4Y
ML.
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9I
O9J
PT4
R9I
RED
ROL
RSV
S1Z
S27
S3A
S3B
SBL
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
T13
TSG
TUS
U2A
U9L
UG4
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VFIZW
Z7U
Z7V
Z7W
Z81
Z83
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
ABRTQ
IQODW
7S9
L.6
7QO
7ST
7TV
7U6
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
RC3
1XC
VOOES
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-31b5ead4ba36746df3bd338f00c33d342435cc0b9122878b6c8d9c0fd22090c3
IEDL.DBID U2A
ISSN 1774-0746
IngestDate Sun Jun 22 12:33:46 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 10:21:04 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 21:19:44 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 11:31:04 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:13:01 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:11 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:30:13 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:32:15 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords soybean
herbicide tolerance
genetically modified crop
agricultural economics
United States
impact
herbicide
transgenic crop
glyphosate
Agricultural development
Biotechnology
Systemic
Review
Soybean
Glyphosate
Agronomy
Dicotyledones
Angiospermae
Transgenic plant
Pesticide resistance
Industrialized country
Influence factor
Genetic transformation
Pesticides
Tolerance
Innovation adoption
Organic phosphonate
Impact study
Biosafety
Agricultural economics
Glycine max
Herbicide
Grain legume
Leguminosae
Producing country
Environment impact
2000-2010
Spermatophyta
Genetic engineering
Economic impact
Genetically modified organism
Oil plant (vegetal)
Chemical weed control
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c432t-31b5ead4ba36746df3bd338f00c33d342435cc0b9122878b6c8d9c0fd22090c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://hal.science/hal-00886404
PQID 1710211016
PQPubID 24069
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00886404v1
proquest_miscellaneous_48094797
proquest_miscellaneous_19763551
proquest_miscellaneous_1710211016
pascalfrancis_primary_20385421
crossref_citationtrail_10_1051_agro_2007044
crossref_primary_10_1051_agro_2007044
springer_journals_10_1051_agro_2007044
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2008-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2008-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2008
  text: 2008-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Dordrecht
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Dordrecht
– name: Les Ulis
PublicationTitle Agronomy for sustainable development
PublicationTitleAbbrev Agron. Sustain. Dev
PublicationYear 2008
Publisher Springer Netherlands
EDP Sciences
Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Netherlands
– name: EDP Sciences
– name: Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA
References JamesC.Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 20062007Ithaca, NYISAAA Briefs N 35. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications)
CarpenterJ.GianessiL.SantanielloV.EvensonR.E.ZilbermanD.Case Study in Benefits and Risks of Agricultural Biotechnology: RR SoybeansMarket Development for Genetically Modified Food2002WallingfordCABI Publishing227243
BarnesR.L.Why the American Soybean Association supports transgenic soybeansPest Manage. Sci.20005658058310.1002/1526-4998(200007)56:7<580::AID-PS187>3.0.CO;2-41:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXks1yntL8%3D
Gomez-Barbero M., Rodriguez-Cerezo E. (2006) Economic Impact of Dominant GM Crops Worldwide: a Review, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the EC, 48 p.
US GAOInformation on prices of genetically modified seeds in the United States and Argentina2000WashingtonUS General Accounting Office
BonnyS.How are opinions about GMOs changing over time?The case in the EU and the USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress2007Glasgow (UK)BCPC166167
Fernandez-Cornejo J., Caswell M. (2006) The First Decade of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States, USDA ERS, Economic Information Bulletin (11), April 2006.
Owen M.D.K. (2007) Genetically modified crops: successes and problems in the Midwest USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress, Glasgow, 2007, BCPC, pp 506–507.
Carpenter J., Gianessi L. (2000) Agricultural Biotechnology: Benefits of Transgenic Soybeans, NCFAP, Washington, April 2000, 105 p.
LemariéS.Analyse économique du développement des cultures à base d’organismes génétiquement modifiés aux Etats-Unis, Volet 1: Le développement des OGM Agronomiques2000GrenobleINRA-SERD
FAPRIUS and World Agricultural Outlook 2007, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute2007Ames (Iowa, USA)Iowa State University
Fernandez-CornejoJ.HendricksC.MishraA.Technology Adoption and Off-Farm Household Income The Case of Herbicide-Tolerant SoybeansJ. Agr. Appl. Econ.200537549563
Monsanto (2003) Executive Presentation to Members of the Financial and investment Community, Spring 2003 investor meetings. 12 May 2003.
SanvidoO.RomeisJ.BiglerF.Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivationAdv. Biochem. Eng. Biotech.20071072352781:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpsleit7g%3D
WesselerJ.H.H.Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops2005DordrechtSpringer
FAO (2004) The State Of Food And Agriculture 2003–2004, Agricultural Biotechnology Meeting the needs of the poor? Rome, FAO 2004.
Devillers J., Farret R., Girardin P., Rivière J.L., Soulas G. (2005) Indicateurs pour évaluer les risques liés à l’utilisation des pesticides, Lavoisier, Tec&Doc, 278 p.
BonnyS.Why are most Europeans opposed to GMOs? Factors explaining rejection in France and EuropeEJB The Electron. J. Biotechnol.200362041
CarpenterJ.GianessiL.Herbicide Tolerant Soybeans: Why Growers are adopting Roundup Ready VarietiesAgBioForum199926572
Fernandez-Cornejo J., McBride W.D. (2002) Adoption of Bioengineered Crops. Agricultural Economic Report, No. AER810, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, 2002 www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer810/aer810.pdf.
USDA ERS (2007a) Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. Data sets, USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/. July 2007.
Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat (2005) International Public Opinion Research on Emerging Technologies, A Canada — US Public Opinion Research Study on Emerging Technologies.
UIUCIllinois Agronomy Handbook 1999–20001999Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of Illinois, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences
BullockD.NitsiE.Roundup Ready Soybean Technology and Farm Production Costs: Measuring the Incentive to adopt genetically modified seedsAmerican Behavioral Scientist2001441283130110.1177/00027640121956827
Monsanto (2006) 2006 Annual report, Saint Louis (Missouri, USA), 128 p.
Ash M. (2001) Soybeans: Background and Issues for Farm Legislation, USDA-ERS report No. OSC-0701-01, July 2001, 9 p.
Benbrook C.M. (2004) Genetically Engineered Crops and Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Nine Years, BioTech InfoNet, Technical Paper N. 7, Sandpoint, Idaho (USA), 53 p.
Heimlich R.E. et al. (2000) Genetically Engineered Crops: Has Adoption Reduced Pesticide Use? Agricultural Outlook (USDA ERS), August 2000, 13–17.
AspelinA.GrubeA.H.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1996 and 1997 Market Estimates1999WashingtonUSEPA
KalaitzandonakesN.G.The economic and environmental impacts of agbiotech: A global perspective2003New YorkKluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
Carpenter J., Gianessi L. (2001) Agricultural Biotechnology: Updated Benefit Estimates. NCFAP, Washington, Jan. 2001, 48 p.
CerdeiraA.L.DukeS.O.The Current Status And Environmental Impact Of Glyphosate Resistant Crop: A ReviewJ. Environ. Qual.200635163316581689973610.2134/jeq2005.03781:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVCktr7M
Alexander C. (2006) Framer decisions to adopt genetically modified corps. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 1, N. 045, 9 p., DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20061045.
GardnerJ.C.NelsonG.C.Assessing the environmental consequences of glyphosate-resistant weeds in the US, 11th International Conference on “Agricultural Biotechnologies: New Frontiers and Products”2007Ravello — Scala, ItalyInternational Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology Research (ICABR)
GianessiL.P.SilversC.S.SankulaS.CarpenterJ.E.Plant Biotechnology Current and Potential Impact For Improving Pest Management In U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of 40 Case Studies2002WashingtonNCFAP (National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy)
ServiceR.F.A Growing Threat Down on the FarmScience2007316114117
USDA ERS (2007b) Commodity Costs and Returns, USDA Economic Research Service http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/CostsAndReturns/.
Foreman L., Livezey J. (2002) Characteristics and Production Costs of U.S. Soybean Farms. USDA-ERS Statistical Bulletin N SB974-4. April 2002.
NelsonG.C.BullockD.S.Simulating a relative environmental effect of glyphosate-resistant soybeansEcol. Econ.20034518920210.1016/S0921-8009(03)00011-9
Gardner J.G., Nelson C.H. (2007a) Genetically Modified Crops and Labor Savings in US Crop Production, Paper presented at the 2007 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, 4–7 February 2007, Mobile, Alabama, 20 p.
BullockD.DesquilbetM.The economics of non-GMO segregation and identity preservationFood Policy200227819710.1016/S0306-9192(02)00004-0
OwenM.D.K.ZelayaI.A.Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicidesPest Manage. Sci.20056130131110.1002/ps.10151:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitFOgu7w%3D
KielyT.DonaldsonD.GrubeA.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2000 and 2001 Market Estimates2004WashingtonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Knezevic S.Z., Evans S.P., Mainz M. (2003) Yield penalty due to delayed weed control in corn and soybean, Crop Manage., www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/research/2003/delay/.
Agbios (2007) GM Crop Database. Agbios, Ontario, Canada 2007.
Duke S.O., Ragsdale N.N. (2005) (Eds.) Special Issue: Herbicideresistant Crops from Biotechnology, Pest Management Science 61, 209–325.
Worldviews (2002) Worldviews 2002: American and European Public Opinion on Foreign Policy, Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, The German Marshall Fund of the US.
Hinsch A. (2006) Soja de alto valor, Argentina perder el tren? 3er Congreso de Soja del Mercosur, Rosario (Argentina), 27–30 June 2006.
USDA NASSAgricultural Chemical Usage. 1990 to 2006 Field Crops Summary, Annual publication from USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System1991USAAlbert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
BonnyS.Regnault-RogerC.Quelle place des cultures transgéniques en protection des plantes? Aspects agro-économiquesEnjeux phytosanitaires pour l’agriculture et l’environnement2005ParisÉditions Tec et Doc Lavoisier895917
NelsonG.C.Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture, Economics and Politics2001LondonAcademic Press
FraleyR.T.FessendenMacDonald J.Commercialization of Genetically Modified Plants: Progress Towards the MarketplaceAgricultural Biotechnology & the Public Good1994Ithaca, New YorkNABC (National Agricultural Biotechnology Council) Report 63341
Steiner J. (2006) Innovating for the Future: World Trends, Seed Traits and Crop Inputs, Presentation at Minnesota Crop Production Retailers, 5 Dec. 2006.
BonnyS.SausseC.Les cultures transgéniques permettent-elles de réduire l’usage des produits phytosanitaires? Considérations à partir du cas du soja tolérant au glyphosate, OCL Oléagineux, Corps grasLipides20041185911:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXntFOksro%3D
MarschP.LlewellynR.PowlesS.Social Costs of Herbicide Resistance: the Case of Resistance to Glyphosate50th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society2006AustraliaSydney, NSW
Bonny S. (2005a) The Growth Of Transgenic Crops In The USA: What It Tells Us, INRA Sciences Sociales, English version, 2005/01, No. 4–5.
Tinland B. (2007) Monsanto and Renessen’s pipeline products, Presentation at EFSA (European Food Safety Autority) GMO scientific hearing with applicants, 21 March 2007.
DonaldsonD.KielyT.GrubeA.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1998 and 1999 Market Estimates2002WashingtonUSEPA
KovachJ.PetzoldtC.DegniJ.TetteJ.A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 1391992Ithaca, NYCornell University
USDA NASSAgricultural Prices1992Washington DC, USAAnnual publication from USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
CTICNational crop residue management survey2004West Lafayette (Indiana, USA)CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center)
WoodburnA.T.Glyphosate: production, pricing and use worldwidePest Manage. Sci.20005630931210.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200004)56:4<309::AID-PS143>3.0.CO;2-
D. Bullock (280100021_CR14) 2002; 27
P. Marsch (280100021_CR48) 2006
O. Sanvido (280100021_CR56) 2007; 107
S. Lemarié (280100021_CR46) 2000
US GAO (280100021_CR61) 2000
280100021_CR63
J. Carpenter (280100021_CR20) 2002
280100021_CR62
(280100021_CR67) 2005
A. Aspelin (280100021_CR5) 1999
280100021_CR23
280100021_CR25
280100021_CR69
S. Bonny (280100021_CR10) 2005
280100021_CR27
280100021_CR26
280100021_CR29
G. Brookes (280100021_CR13) 2005; 8
A.L. Cerdeira (280100021_CR21) 2006; 35
280100021_CR2
280100021_CR3
280100021_CR4
R.L. Barnes (280100021_CR6) 2000; 56
280100021_CR1
J.C. Gardner (280100021_CR35) 2007
S. Bonny (280100021_CR11) 2007
280100021_CR30
280100021_CR32
R.T. Fraley (280100021_CR33) 1994
280100021_CR34
280100021_CR38
G.C. Nelson (280100021_CR52) 2003; 45
USDA NASS (280100021_CR64) 2000
280100021_CR37
S. Sankula (280100021_CR55) 2005
280100021_CR7
280100021_CR39
UIUC (280100021_CR60) 1999
280100021_CR9
S. Bonny (280100021_CR8) 2003; 6
CTIC (280100021_CR22) 2004
280100021_CR40
FAPRI (280100021_CR28) 2007
USDA NASS (280100021_CR65) 1992
280100021_CR44
280100021_CR47
A.T. Woodburn (280100021_CR68) 2000; 56
J. Kovach (280100021_CR45) 1992
280100021_CR49
N.G. Kalaitzandonakes (280100021_CR42) 2003
C. James (280100021_CR41) 2007
L.P. Gianessi (280100021_CR36) 2002
D. Bullock (280100021_CR15) 2001; 44
S. Bonny (280100021_CR12) 2004; 11
280100021_CR50
T. Kiely (280100021_CR43) 2004
USDA NASS (280100021_CR66) 1991
J. Fernandez-Cornejo (280100021_CR31) 2005; 37
(280100021_CR51) 2001
D. Donaldson (280100021_CR24) 2002
280100021_CR53
R.F. Service (280100021_CR57) 2007; 316
280100021_CR58
280100021_CR16
280100021_CR59
280100021_CR18
J. Carpenter (280100021_CR17) 1999; 2
M.D.K. Owen (280100021_CR54) 2005; 61
280100021_CR19
References_xml – reference: Carpenter J., Gianessi L. (2001) Agricultural Biotechnology: Updated Benefit Estimates. NCFAP, Washington, Jan. 2001, 48 p.
– reference: Agbios (2007) GM Crop Database. Agbios, Ontario, Canada 2007.
– reference: BonnyS.How are opinions about GMOs changing over time?The case in the EU and the USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress2007Glasgow (UK)BCPC166167
– reference: Fernandez-Cornejo J., McBride W.D. (2002) Adoption of Bioengineered Crops. Agricultural Economic Report, No. AER810, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, 2002 www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer810/aer810.pdf.
– reference: FraleyR.T.FessendenMacDonald J.Commercialization of Genetically Modified Plants: Progress Towards the MarketplaceAgricultural Biotechnology & the Public Good1994Ithaca, New YorkNABC (National Agricultural Biotechnology Council) Report 63341
– reference: Benbrook C.M. (2004) Genetically Engineered Crops and Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Nine Years, BioTech InfoNet, Technical Paper N. 7, Sandpoint, Idaho (USA), 53 p.
– reference: US GAOInformation on prices of genetically modified seeds in the United States and Argentina2000WashingtonUS General Accounting Office
– reference: ASA (American Soybean Association) (2001) Conservation Tillage Study, Saint-Louis (MO), Nov. 2001, 22p.
– reference: Steiner J. (2006) Innovating for the Future: World Trends, Seed Traits and Crop Inputs, Presentation at Minnesota Crop Production Retailers, 5 Dec. 2006.
– reference: BullockD.DesquilbetM.The economics of non-GMO segregation and identity preservationFood Policy200227819710.1016/S0306-9192(02)00004-0
– reference: Tinland B. (2007) Monsanto and Renessen’s pipeline products, Presentation at EFSA (European Food Safety Autority) GMO scientific hearing with applicants, 21 March 2007.
– reference: GianessiL.P.SilversC.S.SankulaS.CarpenterJ.E.Plant Biotechnology Current and Potential Impact For Improving Pest Management In U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of 40 Case Studies2002WashingtonNCFAP (National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy)
– reference: WesselerJ.H.H.Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops2005DordrechtSpringer
– reference: ServiceR.F.A Growing Threat Down on the FarmScience2007316114117
– reference: USDA NASSAgricultural Chemical Usage. 1990 to 2006 Field Crops Summary, Annual publication from USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System1991USAAlbert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
– reference: LemariéS.Analyse économique du développement des cultures à base d’organismes génétiquement modifiés aux Etats-Unis, Volet 1: Le développement des OGM Agronomiques2000GrenobleINRA-SERD
– reference: CTICNational crop residue management survey2004West Lafayette (Indiana, USA)CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center)
– reference: Marra M.C., Piggott N.E., Carlson G.A. (2004). The Net Benefits, Including Convenience, of Roundup Ready® Soybeans: Results from a National Survey, NSF Center for Integrated Pest Management, Technical Bulletin 2004-3, Raleigh, NC, 40 p.
– reference: BarnesR.L.Why the American Soybean Association supports transgenic soybeansPest Manage. Sci.20005658058310.1002/1526-4998(200007)56:7<580::AID-PS187>3.0.CO;2-41:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXks1yntL8%3D
– reference: Fernandez-CornejoJ.HendricksC.MishraA.Technology Adoption and Off-Farm Household Income The Case of Herbicide-Tolerant SoybeansJ. Agr. Appl. Econ.200537549563
– reference: KielyT.DonaldsonD.GrubeA.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2000 and 2001 Market Estimates2004WashingtonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
– reference: Worldviews (2002) Worldviews 2002: American and European Public Opinion on Foreign Policy, Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, The German Marshall Fund of the US.
– reference: USDA ERS (2007b) Commodity Costs and Returns, USDA Economic Research Service http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/CostsAndReturns/.
– reference: DonaldsonD.KielyT.GrubeA.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1998 and 1999 Market Estimates2002WashingtonUSEPA
– reference: BonnyS.SausseC.Les cultures transgéniques permettent-elles de réduire l’usage des produits phytosanitaires? Considérations à partir du cas du soja tolérant au glyphosate, OCL Oléagineux, Corps grasLipides20041185911:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXntFOksro%3D
– reference: Carpenter J., Gianessi L. (2000) Agricultural Biotechnology: Benefits of Transgenic Soybeans, NCFAP, Washington, April 2000, 105 p.
– reference: Hinsch A. (2006) Soja de alto valor, Argentina perder el tren? 3er Congreso de Soja del Mercosur, Rosario (Argentina), 27–30 June 2006.
– reference: USDA NASSAcreage. Crop Production Supplement2000WashingtonUSDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service
– reference: USDA NASSAgricultural Prices1992Washington DC, USAAnnual publication from USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
– reference: NelsonG.C.Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture, Economics and Politics2001LondonAcademic Press
– reference: Ash M. (2001) Soybeans: Background and Issues for Farm Legislation, USDA-ERS report No. OSC-0701-01, July 2001, 9 p.
– reference: Duke S.O., Ragsdale N.N. (2005) (Eds.) Special Issue: Herbicideresistant Crops from Biotechnology, Pest Management Science 61, 209–325.
– reference: NelsonG.C.BullockD.S.Simulating a relative environmental effect of glyphosate-resistant soybeansEcol. Econ.20034518920210.1016/S0921-8009(03)00011-9
– reference: CarpenterJ.GianessiL.SantanielloV.EvensonR.E.ZilbermanD.Case Study in Benefits and Risks of Agricultural Biotechnology: RR SoybeansMarket Development for Genetically Modified Food2002WallingfordCABI Publishing227243
– reference: SanvidoO.RomeisJ.BiglerF.Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivationAdv. Biochem. Eng. Biotech.20071072352781:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpsleit7g%3D
– reference: CarpenterJ.GianessiL.Herbicide Tolerant Soybeans: Why Growers are adopting Roundup Ready VarietiesAgBioForum199926572
– reference: Knezevic S.Z., Evans S.P., Mainz M. (2003) Yield penalty due to delayed weed control in corn and soybean, Crop Manage., www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/research/2003/delay/.
– reference: BrookesG.BarfootP.GM Crops: The Global Economie and Environmental Impact — The First Nine Years 1996–2004AgBioForum20058187196
– reference: Monsanto (2003) Executive Presentation to Members of the Financial and investment Community, Spring 2003 investor meetings. 12 May 2003.
– reference: FAO (2004) The State Of Food And Agriculture 2003–2004, Agricultural Biotechnology Meeting the needs of the poor? Rome, FAO 2004.
– reference: Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat (2005) International Public Opinion Research on Emerging Technologies, A Canada — US Public Opinion Research Study on Emerging Technologies.
– reference: Owen M.D.K. (2007) Genetically modified crops: successes and problems in the Midwest USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress, Glasgow, 2007, BCPC, pp 506–507.
– reference: Heimlich R.E. et al. (2000) Genetically Engineered Crops: Has Adoption Reduced Pesticide Use? Agricultural Outlook (USDA ERS), August 2000, 13–17.
– reference: KalaitzandonakesN.G.The economic and environmental impacts of agbiotech: A global perspective2003New YorkKluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
– reference: Alexander C. (2006) Framer decisions to adopt genetically modified corps. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 1, N. 045, 9 p., DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20061045.
– reference: FAPRIUS and World Agricultural Outlook 2007, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute2007Ames (Iowa, USA)Iowa State University
– reference: OwenM.D.K.ZelayaI.A.Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicidesPest Manage. Sci.20056130131110.1002/ps.10151:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitFOgu7w%3D
– reference: CerdeiraA.L.DukeS.O.The Current Status And Environmental Impact Of Glyphosate Resistant Crop: A ReviewJ. Environ. Qual.200635163316581689973610.2134/jeq2005.03781:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVCktr7M
– reference: USDA ERS (2007a) Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. Data sets, USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/. July 2007.
– reference: Heap I. (2007) International survey of herbicide resistant weeds, Herbicide Resistance Action Committee, and Weed Sci. Soc. Am. www.weedscience.org
– reference: Fernandez-Cornejo J., Caswell M. (2006) The First Decade of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States, USDA ERS, Economic Information Bulletin (11), April 2006.
– reference: WoodburnA.T.Glyphosate: production, pricing and use worldwidePest Manage. Sci.20005630931210.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200004)56:4<309::AID-PS143>3.0.CO;2-C1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXisVeqs74%3D
– reference: SankulaS.MarmonG.BlumenthalE.Biotechnology derived crops planted in 2004. Impacts on US agriculture2005WashingtonNCFAP (National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy)
– reference: BonnyS.Regnault-RogerC.Quelle place des cultures transgéniques en protection des plantes? Aspects agro-économiquesEnjeux phytosanitaires pour l’agriculture et l’environnement2005ParisÉditions Tec et Doc Lavoisier895917
– reference: BonnyS.Why are most Europeans opposed to GMOs? Factors explaining rejection in France and EuropeEJB The Electron. J. Biotechnol.200362041
– reference: Bonny S. (2005a) The Growth Of Transgenic Crops In The USA: What It Tells Us, INRA Sciences Sociales, English version, 2005/01, No. 4–5.
– reference: Gomez-Barbero M., Rodriguez-Cerezo E. (2006) Economic Impact of Dominant GM Crops Worldwide: a Review, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the EC, 48 p.
– reference: Eurobarometer (2006) Europeans and biotechnology in 2005. Eurobarometer 64.3, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels, CE, DG Research. July 2006, 88 p.
– reference: MarschP.LlewellynR.PowlesS.Social Costs of Herbicide Resistance: the Case of Resistance to Glyphosate50th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society2006AustraliaSydney, NSW
– reference: Devillers J., Farret R., Girardin P., Rivière J.L., Soulas G. (2005) Indicateurs pour évaluer les risques liés à l’utilisation des pesticides, Lavoisier, Tec&Doc, 278 p.
– reference: KovachJ.PetzoldtC.DegniJ.TetteJ.A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 1391992Ithaca, NYCornell University
– reference: JamesC.Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 20062007Ithaca, NYISAAA Briefs N 35. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications)
– reference: UIUCIllinois Agronomy Handbook 1999–20001999Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of Illinois, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences
– reference: BullockD.NitsiE.Roundup Ready Soybean Technology and Farm Production Costs: Measuring the Incentive to adopt genetically modified seedsAmerican Behavioral Scientist2001441283130110.1177/00027640121956827
– reference: Gardner J.G., Nelson C.H. (2007a) Genetically Modified Crops and Labor Savings in US Crop Production, Paper presented at the 2007 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, 4–7 February 2007, Mobile, Alabama, 20 p.
– reference: Monsanto (2006) 2006 Annual report, Saint Louis (Missouri, USA), 128 p.
– reference: AspelinA.GrubeA.H.Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1996 and 1997 Market Estimates1999WashingtonUSEPA
– reference: Foreman L., Livezey J. (2002) Characteristics and Production Costs of U.S. Soybean Farms. USDA-ERS Statistical Bulletin N SB974-4. April 2002.
– reference: GardnerJ.C.NelsonG.C.Assessing the environmental consequences of glyphosate-resistant weeds in the US, 11th International Conference on “Agricultural Biotechnologies: New Frontiers and Products”2007Ravello — Scala, ItalyInternational Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology Research (ICABR)
– volume: 2
  start-page: 65
  year: 1999
  ident: 280100021_CR17
  publication-title: AgBioForum
– ident: 280100021_CR44
  doi: 10.1094/CM-2003-0219-01-RS
– volume: 45
  start-page: 189
  year: 2003
  ident: 280100021_CR52
  publication-title: Ecol. Econ.
  doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00011-9
– ident: 280100021_CR29
– volume-title: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2006
  year: 2007
  ident: 280100021_CR41
– volume-title: Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops
  year: 2005
  ident: 280100021_CR67
– ident: 280100021_CR25
– ident: 280100021_CR50
– volume-title: A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 139
  year: 1992
  ident: 280100021_CR45
– ident: 280100021_CR58
– ident: 280100021_CR19
– start-page: 166
  volume-title: The case in the EU and the USA, Proceedings of the 16th International Plant Protection Congress
  year: 2007
  ident: 280100021_CR11
– volume: 27
  start-page: 81
  year: 2002
  ident: 280100021_CR14
  publication-title: Food Policy
  doi: 10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00004-0
– ident: 280100021_CR39
– ident: 280100021_CR16
– volume-title: US and World Agricultural Outlook 2007, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute
  year: 2007
  ident: 280100021_CR28
– ident: 280100021_CR49
– volume: 56
  start-page: 580
  year: 2000
  ident: 280100021_CR6
  publication-title: Pest Manage. Sci.
  doi: 10.1002/1526-4998(200007)56:7<580::AID-PS187>3.0.CO;2-4
– volume-title: Agricultural Chemical Usage. 1990 to 2006 Field Crops Summary, Annual publication from USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
  year: 1991
  ident: 280100021_CR66
– volume-title: Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture, Economics and Politics
  year: 2001
  ident: 280100021_CR51
– ident: 280100021_CR1
– ident: 280100021_CR30
– ident: 280100021_CR34
– volume: 316
  start-page: 114
  year: 2007
  ident: 280100021_CR57
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 37
  start-page: 549
  year: 2005
  ident: 280100021_CR31
  publication-title: J. Agr. Appl. Econ.
  doi: 10.1017/S1074070800027073
– volume: 8
  start-page: 187
  year: 2005
  ident: 280100021_CR13
  publication-title: AgBioForum
– ident: 280100021_CR59
– ident: 280100021_CR9
– volume-title: Plant Biotechnology Current and Potential Impact For Improving Pest Management In U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of 40 Case Studies
  year: 2002
  ident: 280100021_CR36
– volume: 61
  start-page: 301
  year: 2005
  ident: 280100021_CR54
  publication-title: Pest Manage. Sci.
  doi: 10.1002/ps.1015
– ident: 280100021_CR40
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1283
  year: 2001
  ident: 280100021_CR15
  publication-title: American Behavioral Scientist
  doi: 10.1177/00027640121956827
– ident: 280100021_CR38
– volume-title: Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2000 and 2001 Market Estimates
  year: 2004
  ident: 280100021_CR43
– ident: 280100021_CR69
– volume-title: Acreage. Crop Production Supplement
  year: 2000
  ident: 280100021_CR64
– ident: 280100021_CR27
– volume-title: Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1996 and 1997 Market Estimates
  year: 1999
  ident: 280100021_CR5
– ident: 280100021_CR23
– volume-title: Assessing the environmental consequences of glyphosate-resistant weeds in the US, 11th International Conference on “Agricultural Biotechnologies: New Frontiers and Products”
  year: 2007
  ident: 280100021_CR35
– volume-title: Biotechnology derived crops planted in 2004. Impacts on US agriculture
  year: 2005
  ident: 280100021_CR55
– ident: 280100021_CR4
– volume: 107
  start-page: 235
  year: 2007
  ident: 280100021_CR56
  publication-title: Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotech.
– ident: 280100021_CR37
– ident: 280100021_CR62
– ident: 280100021_CR18
– ident: 280100021_CR47
– volume-title: Illinois Agronomy Handbook 1999–2000
  year: 1999
  ident: 280100021_CR60
– volume: 6
  start-page: 20
  year: 2003
  ident: 280100021_CR8
  publication-title: EJB The Electron. J. Biotechnol.
– start-page: 227
  volume-title: Market Development for Genetically Modified Food
  year: 2002
  ident: 280100021_CR20
– ident: 280100021_CR26
– ident: 280100021_CR3
– ident: 280100021_CR53
– ident: 280100021_CR32
– ident: 280100021_CR7
– volume-title: The economic and environmental impacts of agbiotech: A global perspective
  year: 2003
  ident: 280100021_CR42
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0
– volume: 11
  start-page: 85
  year: 2004
  ident: 280100021_CR12
  publication-title: Lipides
– volume-title: Information on prices of genetically modified seeds in the United States and Argentina
  year: 2000
  ident: 280100021_CR61
– volume-title: National crop residue management survey
  year: 2004
  ident: 280100021_CR22
– ident: 280100021_CR2
  doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20061045
– ident: 280100021_CR63
– volume-title: Analyse économique du développement des cultures à base d’organismes génétiquement modifiés aux Etats-Unis, Volet 1: Le développement des OGM Agronomiques
  year: 2000
  ident: 280100021_CR46
– start-page: 895
  volume-title: Enjeux phytosanitaires pour l’agriculture et l’environnement
  year: 2005
  ident: 280100021_CR10
– volume: 56
  start-page: 309
  year: 2000
  ident: 280100021_CR68
  publication-title: Pest Manage. Sci.
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200004)56:4<309::AID-PS143>3.0.CO;2-C
– volume-title: Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1998 and 1999 Market Estimates
  year: 2002
  ident: 280100021_CR24
– start-page: 33
  volume-title: Agricultural Biotechnology & the Public Good
  year: 1994
  ident: 280100021_CR33
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1633
  year: 2006
  ident: 280100021_CR21
  publication-title: J. Environ. Qual.
  doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0378
– volume-title: 50th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society
  year: 2006
  ident: 280100021_CR48
– volume-title: Agricultural Prices
  year: 1992
  ident: 280100021_CR65
SSID ssj0041774
Score 2.1650944
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Transgenic crops are the subject of lively debate and controversy. Despite such controversy, transgenic soybean has undergone a rapid expansion. Among various...
SourceID hal
proquest
pascalfrancis
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 21
SubjectTerms Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions
Agricultural sciences
Agriculture
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biotechnology
Chemical control
conservation tillage
crops
Ecology, environment
economic analysis
ecotoxicology
environmental impact
Europe
farmers
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetic engineering
Genetic engineering applications
Genetic technics
Genetics and breeding of economic plants
Glycine max
glyphosate
governance
herbicide resistance
herbicide-resistant weeds
Life Sciences
markets
Methods. Procedures. Technologies
Parasitic plants. Weeds
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Plant breeding: fundamental aspects and methodology
Review Article
Soil Science & Conservation
soybeans
surveys
Sustainable Development
toxicity
Transgenic animals and transgenic plants
Transgenic plants
United States
Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims
weed control
Weeds
Title Genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant soybean in the USA: adoption factors, impacts and prospects. A review
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1051/agro:2007044
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1710211016
https://www.proquest.com/docview/19763551
https://www.proquest.com/docview/48094797
https://hal.science/hal-00886404
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3di9QwEB-8uxdFxE-sH2sU9UWrSZp223srcufi14u3cD6VpEn3DtZ22faE_e-dadOFPVzwqVB-pW0mmfzmIzMAr4XsC56KsFJThQaK02HGrQtFlbpMS62GiOn3H8lsrr6cx-feUGzHbPcxJNlr6qEXrfioF-vmmDxrXKkDOIrJasf5O5f5qHmVmPZVl-kSUh8Nn-h-_emdLejgghIgb690i2NSDc0sdtjmtQBpv--c3oU7njCyfJDwPbjh6vtwK1-sfdEM9wBqqh3d-6SXG_a7sZcV8kq2WG5WF02LXDLsmqXDd3asbTbG6Zpd1gyJH5v_zI-Ztk2vNphvvfOeDScnW6Zry_AL-8OY7QeWs-Gcy0M4Oz05-zQLfR-FsFSR7FDNmhgnjDI6SnBUbBUZi5ZpxXkZRTZSEilTWXKTCYn2U2qSMrVZySsrJc8Q8wgO66Z2j4ElWsWx4UYLlyiTJhlZuMZasvpKGdsA3o0jW5S-xji1ulgWfaw7FgXJofByCODNFr0aamvswb1CIW0hVBB7ln8r6B4ymDRRXP0RAUx2ZLiFS4p9KomAl6NQC1xCFBfRtWuu2kIQyxLkxgjgxT5MRpX7YrEfoVK0lKfZNIC344wpvD5o__lbT_4X-BRuDlkq5Ph5Bofd-so9RyrUmQkc5Z9_fT2Z9OvgL1juBj8
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwED-x8QAIIT5FgG0GAS-QzXacNNlbhJgKdHuhlfZm2bHTTSpJ1WRI_e85O0mlTqvEU6ToFyXx2effffgO4CPjvuApC0sxEmigWBVm1NiQlanNFFeii5ieXyTjmfh5GV_2hmIzZLsPIUmvqbtetOxEzVf1qfOsUSH24D7SgNSlcM14PmhewUa-6rK7hK6PRp_ofvvprS1o78olQD5eqgbHpOyaWWyxzVsBUr_vnD2FJz1hJHkn4Wdwz1bP4VE-X_VFM-wLqFztaO-TXqzJn9pcl8gryXyxXl7VDXLJsK0XFt_ZkqZea6sqcl0RJH5k9js_JcrUXm2QvvXOV9KdnGyIqgzBL_SHMZtjkpPunMtLmJ59n34bh30fhbAQEW9RzeoYJ4zQKkpwVEwZaYOWaUlpEUUmEhwpU1FQnTGO9lOqkyI1WUFLwznNEPMK9qu6sq-BJErEsaZaMZsInSaZs3C1Mc7qK3hsAvgyjKws-hrjrtXFQvpYd8ykk4Ps5RDApw162dXW2IH7gELaQFxB7HE-ke4eMpg0EVT8ZQEcbslwA-cu9ik4At4PQpW4hFxcRFW2vmkkcyyLOTdGAEe7MJmr3Bez3QiRoqU8ykYBfB5mjOz1QXPnb735X-ARPBhPzydy8uPi11t42GWsOCfQO9hvVzf2AGlRqw_9WvgHoboHng
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3fa9RAEF5sBVGk1F8Yte0q6ovG7m42uaRvQT1OrUWwB31bdrOba-FMjksq3H_vTLI5uNIDnwLhC0l2NpNvdma_IeQtF53gKQ9LOZIQoDgdZsy6kJepy7TQss-Y_jxLJlP5_SK-8FWVzVDtPqQk-z0NqNJUtccLW_q-tPxYz5b1Ca6yMSl3yF1wxBxn9FTkgxeWfNQpMOMhxJ4avuj95tUbv6OdSyyGfLjQDYxP2Te22GCeN5Kl3T9ovE_2PHmkeW_tR-SOqx6TB_ls6QU03BNSoY50tz49X9E_tb0qgWPS2Xy1uKwb4JVhW88d3LOlTb0yTlf0qqJAAun0d35Cta07F0J9G56PtN9F2VBdWQpP2G3MbD7RnPZ7Xp6S8_HX88-T0PdUCAsZiRZcrolh8kijowRGxZaRsRCllowVUWQjKYA-FQUzGRcQS6UmKVKbFay0QrAMMM_IblVX7jmhiZZxbJjR3CXSpEmG0a6xFiPAQsQ2IB-GkVWF1xvHthdz1eW9Y67QDsrbISDv1uhFr7OxBfcGjLSGoDj2JD9VeA7YTJpIJv_ygBxu2HANF5gHlQIArwejKvicMEeiK1dfN4oj4-K4pBGQo22YDFX8Yr4dIVOImkfZKCDvhxmjvG9obn2tF_8LPCL3fn0Zq9NvZz9ekvt98QquB70iu-3y2h0AQ2rNYfcp_ANTcQva
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetically+modified+glyphosate-tolerant+soybean+in+the+USA%3A+adoption+factors%2C+impacts+and+prospects.+A+review&rft.jtitle=Agronomy+for+sustainable+development&rft.au=Bonny%2C+Sylvie&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.issn=1774-0746&rft.eissn=1773-0155&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=32&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051%2Fagro%3A2007044&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1051_agro_2007044
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1774-0746&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1774-0746&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1774-0746&client=summon