How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
Objectives: The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings. Method: We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method appr...
Saved in:
Published in | Aging & mental health Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 149 - 167 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Routledge
01.02.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objectives: The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings.
Method: We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses.
Results: Seventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care.
Conclusions: Older adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objectives: The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings.
Method: We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses.
Results: Seventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care.
Conclusions: Older adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself. The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings. We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses. Seventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care. Older adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself. The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings.OBJECTIVESThe aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings.We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses.METHODWe conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses.Seventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care.RESULTSSeventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care.Older adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself.CONCLUSIONSOlder adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself. |
Author | Gastmans, Chris Vandemeulebroucke, Tijs de Casterlé, Bernadette Dierckx |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Tijs orcidid: 0000-0001-5683-6067 surname: Vandemeulebroucke fullname: Vandemeulebroucke, Tijs email: tijs.vandemeulebroucke@kuleuven.be organization: Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven - University of Leuven – sequence: 2 givenname: Bernadette Dierckx surname: de Casterlé fullname: de Casterlé, Bernadette Dierckx organization: Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven - University of Leuven – sequence: 3 givenname: Chris surname: Gastmans fullname: Gastmans, Chris organization: Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven - University of Leuven |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28282732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1URD_gJ4B85JLFE8eJAxdQBbRSpV7K2Zq1J8jIibd20u2e-Osku1sOHIp8sD16nhlp3nN2MsSBGHsLYgVCiw8ga9HoWq5KAc0KSl1XSr1gZ3O9KuoW1Mn-LYoFOmXnOf8SQkAF9St2Wur5NLI8Y7-v4pa7yGNwlDi6KYyZ0-OGkqfBEsfB8fljyT8Qz9F6DGHHMWefx6WU4jrOhh84_iTHLSb6yJHnXR6px9FbnujB05bHjt9PGPyIe28uumXAa_ayw5DpzfG-YD--fb27vCpubr9fX365KWwly7EAUVrlaiU711qlrVWtApAkZdU6BRU2YNvSQSdlK9dWg17rsoNGN2UDWCl5wd4f-m5SvJ8oj6b32VIIOFCcsgHd1FUra2hn9N0RndY9ObNJvse0M09LmwF1AGyKOSfq_iIgzBKOeQrHLOGYYziz9-kfz-7XEYcxoQ__tT8fbD90MfW4jSk4M-IuxNQlHKzPRj7f4g8HR6gR |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_023_01038_5 crossref_primary_10_1080_10376178_2018_1519374 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci11060738 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_futures_2020_102640 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20042965 crossref_primary_10_1109_TAFFC_2022_3143803 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_10857_9 crossref_primary_10_2196_48031 crossref_primary_10_3389_frobt_2022_731006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10209_019_00692_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_024_01188_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_archger_2021_104399 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40718_018_0179_x crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2021_2020007 crossref_primary_10_1080_0144929X_2021_1876763 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_022_00909_7 crossref_primary_10_1145_3451882 crossref_primary_10_1080_10400435_2024_2337194 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11042_020_09313_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2021_103476 crossref_primary_10_1080_10400435_2021_1877210 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11154139 crossref_primary_10_1080_17516234_2018_1492315 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41582_019_0188_y crossref_primary_10_1080_08927936_2019_1569906 crossref_primary_10_1080_11038128_2021_2009560 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10676_019_09524_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_021_01627_5 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0273479 crossref_primary_10_1111_opn_12239 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gerinurse_2023_10_012 crossref_primary_10_1080_10548408_2025_2468460 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_019_1227_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11370_021_00394_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph21050628 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11612_022_00641_w crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2020_1770592 crossref_primary_10_1080_13607863_2022_2130171 crossref_primary_10_3390_app14062374 crossref_primary_10_2196_46617 crossref_primary_10_1108_JSTP_04_2019_0088 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_020_00619_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_022_00884_z crossref_primary_10_1080_13607863_2018_1428938 crossref_primary_10_1080_0144929X_2023_2286528 crossref_primary_10_1080_15228835_2024_2447698 crossref_primary_10_1108_JSIT_03_2020_0038 crossref_primary_10_1145_3533726 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_022_00819_3 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3806199 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11948_022_00419_9 crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2020_1801172 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4654471 crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2021_1921365 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11091286 crossref_primary_10_1002_ejsp_2890 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_025_86255_w crossref_primary_10_1017_S0047279422000162 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2021_102700 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00146_024_01894_3 crossref_primary_10_1136_medethics_2019_105615 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11060904 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43154_020_00009_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2019_07_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techsoc_2019_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1093_geronb_gbz070 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_033096 crossref_primary_10_1145_3492850 crossref_primary_10_3166_rmp_2019_0051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2023_107854 crossref_primary_10_1093_geront_gny046 crossref_primary_10_20467_1091_5710_23_2_168 crossref_primary_10_3390_s22051717 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10103770 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191811319 crossref_primary_10_2196_23939 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17155335 crossref_primary_10_34133_research_0592 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_021_00577_8 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjqs_2018_008977 crossref_primary_10_1080_01634372_2024_2339992 crossref_primary_10_1080_13607863_2019_1699016 crossref_primary_10_1108_JSM_03_2022_0076 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19063630 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11257_022_09323_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diggeo_2024_100091 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20105915 crossref_primary_10_3390_robotics13060092 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11948_021_00296_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_023_01012_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00146_023_01705_1 crossref_primary_10_1108_JHTT_01_2022_0020 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12652_022_03806_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s00391_020_01780_9 |
Cites_doi | 10.1145/1506409.1506410 10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8892 10.1002/9781119959847.ch6 10.1145/1957656.1957816 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1205 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01810.x 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926259 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015 10.1177/135581960501000110 10.1177/0733464813515092 10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_3 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6 10.1155/2012/829835 10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Riek 10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00 10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143 10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_14 10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.003 10.1080/10400435.2014.978916 10.1145/2559636.2559681 10.1007/s12369-015-0322-y 10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_5 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.006 10.1007/978-94-009-1051-5 10.1007/s12369-014-0269-4 10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01530.x 10.1007/s10209-014-0355-2 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030 10.1136/bmj.b2700 10.1080/10447318.2013.873278 10.2147/CIA.S56435 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630717 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283643d26 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343810 10.1145/2070481.2070544 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141 10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_13 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1080/13607863.2017.1286455 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Psychology |
EISSN | 1364-6915 |
EndPage | 167 |
ExternalDocumentID | 28282732 10_1080_13607863_2017_1286455 1286455 |
Genre | Review Systematic Review Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .7I .QK 04C 0BK 0R~ 23M 2DF 36B 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS 6PF AAGZJ AAMFJ AAMIU AAPUL AATTQ AAWTL AAZMC ABCCY ABDBF ABFIM ABIVO ABJNI ABLIJ ABPEM ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ABZLS ACGEJ ACGFS ACHQT ACTIO ACTOA ADAHI ADBBV ADCVX ADKVQ ADOJX ADXPE ADZJE AECIN AEISY AEKEX AEMXT AENEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AEZRU AGDLA AGMYJ AGRBW AHDZW AIJEM AJWEG AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BLEHA BMOTO BMSDO BOHLJ CCCUG CQ1 CS3 DGFLZ DKSSO EAP EAS EBS ECF ECT ECV EHN EIHBH EJD EMB EMK ENB ENC ENX EPS EPT ESI ESX E~B E~C F5P FEDTE G-F GTTXZ H13 HF~ HVGLF HZ~ IPNFZ J.O KSSTO KYCEM LGLTD M4Z NA5 O9- P2P Q~Q RIG RNANH ROSJB RSYQP S-F STATR SV3 TBQAZ TDBHL TEH TFH TFL TFW TNJ TNTFI TRJHH TUROJ UT5 UT9 VAE WQ9 ~01 ~S~ 4H- AACLK AAGDL AAHIA AAIFK AAYXX ABITY ABLUQ ABYAV ADYSH AEFOU AFRVT AFUSO AIYEW AMPGV CAG CITATION COF DAOCQ DTEEQ DYOWO LJTGL PPYGK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM TASJS 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-102c5d653fd9c58cc595113e3349d514a71c92d1f3393bc818b82f1787271a453 |
ISSN | 1360-7863 1364-6915 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 22:08:21 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:22:05 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:24:41 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:38 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:02:23 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | lived experiences robotics socially assistive robots Elderly aged care |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c432t-102c5d653fd9c58cc595113e3349d514a71c92d1f3393bc818b82f1787271a453 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-5683-6067 |
PMID | 28282732 |
PQID | 1876493619 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 19 |
ParticipantIDs | informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_13607863_2017_1286455 proquest_miscellaneous_1876493619 crossref_primary_10_1080_13607863_2017_1286455 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_13607863_2017_1286455 pubmed_primary_28282732 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2018-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2018 text: 2018-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Aging & mental health |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Aging Ment Health |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Publisher_xml | – name: Routledge |
References | cit0033 cit0034 cit0031 cit0032 Bemelmans R. (cit0006) 2012; 13 cit0030 World Health Organization (WHO) (cit0048) 2015 Draper H. (cit0015) 2014 cit0039 cit0037 cit0038 cit0035 Akrich M. (cit0002) 1992 cit0036 cit0022 cit0023 cit0020 cit0021 Verbeek P.-P. (cit0046) 2014 Draper H. (cit0014) 2014 cit0028 cit0029 cit0026 cit0024 cit0025 cit0011 cit0012 cit0053 cit0051 cit0052 Akrich M. (cit0003) 1992 cit0050 Anders G. (cit0004) 1956; 3 cit0019 cit0017 cit0018 cit0016 cit0013 Latour B. (cit0027) 1992 cit0044 cit0001 cit0045 cit0042 cit0043 cit0040 cit0041 cit0008 cit0007 cit0005 cit0049 cit0047 |
References_xml | – ident: cit0045 doi: 10.1145/1506409.1506410 – volume-title: Op de Vleugels van Icarus. Hoe techniek en moraal met elkaar meebewegen [On the wings of Icarus. How technics and morality develop with each other] year: 2014 ident: cit0046 – ident: cit0026 doi: 10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8892 – ident: cit0025 doi: 10.1002/9781119959847.ch6 – ident: cit0022 doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957816 – ident: cit0020 doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1205 – ident: cit0001 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01810.x – start-page: 259 volume-title: Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change year: 1992 ident: cit0003 – ident: cit0029 doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926259 – ident: cit0030 doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015 – start-page: 125 volume-title: Social Robotics. 6th International Conference, ICSR 2014 year: 2014 ident: cit0015 – ident: cit0012 doi: 10.1177/135581960501000110 – volume-title: Paper presented at: AISB50 – 50th Annual Convention of the AISB year: 2014 ident: cit0014 – ident: cit0051 doi: 10.1177/0733464813515092 – ident: cit0019 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_3 – ident: cit0044 doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6 – ident: cit0017 doi: 10.1155/2012/829835 – ident: cit0036 doi: 10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Riek – ident: cit0007 doi: 10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00 – ident: cit0016 doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143 – volume-title: World report on ageing and health year: 2015 ident: cit0048 – ident: cit0013 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_14 – ident: cit0049 doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.003 – ident: cit0005 doi: 10.1080/10400435.2014.978916 – ident: cit0008 doi: 10.1145/2559636.2559681 – ident: cit0023 doi: 10.1007/s12369-015-0322-y – ident: cit0032 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_5 – ident: cit0037 doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.006 – ident: cit0042 doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-1051-5 – ident: cit0035 doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0269-4 – ident: cit0041 doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0 – ident: cit0043 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 – ident: cit0038 doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2 – ident: cit0031 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01530.x – ident: cit0052 doi: 10.1007/s10209-014-0355-2 – ident: cit0034 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x – ident: cit0011 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030 – ident: cit0028 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700 – start-page: 205 volume-title: Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change year: 1992 ident: cit0002 – volume: 13 start-page: 114 year: 2012 ident: cit0006 publication-title: JAMDA – ident: cit0024 doi: 10.1080/10447318.2013.873278 – start-page: 225 volume-title: Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change year: 1992 ident: cit0027 – ident: cit0050 doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56435 – ident: cit0040 doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630717 – ident: cit0053 doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283643d26 – ident: cit0021 doi: 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 – volume: 3 start-page: 146 issue: 2 year: 1956 ident: cit0004 publication-title: Dissent – ident: cit0039 doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343810 – ident: cit0047 doi: 10.1145/2070481.2070544 – ident: cit0033 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141 – ident: cit0018 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_13 |
SSID | ssj0001416 |
Score | 2.4916682 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Objectives: The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially... The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref informaworld |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 149 |
SubjectTerms | Aged aged care Aging - psychology Elderly Health Services for the Aged Humans lived experiences Robotics Self-Help Devices Social Perception socially assistive robots |
Title | How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13607863.2017.1286455 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28282732 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1876493619 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9NAEF6FVkK9ICivlIcWiVvkkF2vH8utqkBRpXJAKerNsr1rBE3iijqo5cLf4Wcy49l13BJUHhcr2sRZJ_N5Xv5mhrGXSWQim5g8KKoqDlQhZKCrqAo0WGtjJkUxqbBQ-OhdPD1WhyfRyWDwo8daWjXFuPy2sa7kX6QKayBXrJL9C8l2XwoL8BrkC0eQMBz_SMY4D87UoxonbVMnjXPXst_6QoAzJK4gO4iS4_PLEXjLeF9_RWZhUTctHxaUimmbVFPt8_X2zm1pC5VfUp9w62aR9l3b_Y-UdYhHi36JpZfoB8xWL-xqDkF4jWQOQsrnzqc3dnSQY9uGOT28b5GH2UqDbCTQzfBLTi86vhB8dOGCgLZBQj99IVLPeN7IeyIdHMZIcnR6z_o1FcSaKj-94payB1DZ08KCuqA6gy5o3scvtoLIlbgbboYsv2QM1jpW1Df4Whtu984tti0hIAGNuj17fziddlZfqHbMbnfxvlosnbzauMUVP-hKl9zfxzqtzzO7y-64YIXvE_LusYFd7rLbR46Osct2OvN5eZ99BzRyU_MWjZzQyNdo5CB_7tHIPRp5h0ZOaOSflhzRyBGNr3nO11jkhEVeV7yHRe6x-IAdv30zO5gGbrxHUKpQNuAAyDIycRRWRpdRWpYRePuYlA-VNuDH54kotTSiCkMdFiV4lkUqKwEWRiYiV1H4kG0t66V9zHgysQoXcRaqSqRJpYXAWUc2tTKXeTpkyv_ZWel63-MIlnkmXItcL6MMZZQ5GQ3ZuDvtjJq_3HSC7ksya9qsW0UjcrLwhnNfeLFnoOLxuV2-tPXqPBPgsSgdxkIP2SPCQ3c5mDGBCETu_cfOT9jO-s58yraaLyv7DFztpnjuUP4TuTbPqg |
linkProvider | Taylor & Francis |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7BVoJeeJTX8jQS1ywbP5KYG0JUoXR7QFupNyvxQ6qokqrNCpULf52ZOAktUtVDr44msZ3xvDzzDcCHXDnlc1cldQhZIuuUJzqokGjU1s4t63oZqFB4dZCVh3LvSB1dqoWhtEryoUMEiuhlNR1uCkaPKXEfU5GhZssEZWblC5SwmVTqLmwpLUUxg631j72ynORxKvsGqESUENVYx3Pdi65oqCv4pddbob022n0IdlxHTEL5udh09cL-_g_i8XYLfQQPBmOVfY7c9Rju-GYH7q2G6_gd2J7E58UT-FO2v5hrWUt9v1mP63HO_ISkzHAW7JTSaFC-shiqP7lgaLuTlMGhs7ZukeK4YSjiHKOUtE-sYv-gplkss2FtYLEUtMcsZ37oi_oUDne_rr-UydDeIbFS8A4VALfKZUoEp60qrFVo7VFQVkjt0I6r8tRq7tIghBa1RcuiLnhIUcLwPK2kEs9g1rSNfwEsX3pJg9QLU-bcFdyj46SVLzyveFXMQY6_1NgB-5xacJyYdIBIHXfa0E6bYafnsJjITiP4x00E-jK_mK6PuoTYIsWIG2jfj8xl8IjTvU3V-HZzblLUWFILdHXn8Dxy3TQd8pjRAuUvb_Hld3C_XK_2zf63g--vYBsfFTEv_TXMurONf4NmV1e_Hc7VX--zHiw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7BVqp64VFey9NIXLOsX0nMDQGrUGiFUCtxs-LYlhBVsupmhcqFv844dgJFqnro1dEktjP-ZmzPfAPwqpBWusLWmfE-z4ShLFNe-kyhtbZ2aczSh0Thw6O8OhEH3-QYTbhJYZVhD-0jUcSA1WFxr60fI-JeU56jYct5CMwqFgiwuZDyJuzkgQ5vBjvHXw-qaoJjKob6p0EoC1JjGs9lL7pgoC7Ql17uhA7GaHUbzDiMGIPyY7HtzaL59R_D47XGeQduJVeVvI26dRduuHYfdg_TZfw-7E3geX4PflfdT2I70oWq32Rg9dgQN_EoE-wEWYcgGkRXEg_qT88Jeu4BY7DprDMdSnxvCQKcJSEg7Q2pyV-iaRKTbEjnSUwEHRjLiUtVUe_DyerD8bsqS8UdskZw1iP8s0baXHJvVSPLppHo64UjWS6URS-uLmijmKWec8VNg36FKZmniC-soLWQ_AHM2q51j4AUSydCY6iEKQpmS-Zw26SkKx2rWV3OQYx_VDeJ-TwU4DjVNBGkjjOtw0zrNNNzWExi60j9cZWA-ldddD-cufhYIEXzK2RfjrqlcYGHW5u6dd12oynaK6E4bnTn8DAq3dSdsF9G_5M9vsaXX8Dul_cr_fnj0acnsIdPyhiU_hRm_dnWPUOfqzfP06r6A0QhHNA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+do+older+adults+experience+and+perceive+socially+assistive+robots+in+aged+care%3A+a+systematic+review+of+qualitative+evidence&rft.jtitle=Aging+%26+mental+health&rft.au=Vandemeulebroucke%2C+Tijs&rft.au=de+Casterl%C3%A9%2C+Bernadette+Dierckx&rft.au=Gastmans%2C+Chris&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.pub=Routledge&rft.issn=1360-7863&rft.eissn=1364-6915&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F13607863.2017.1286455&rft.externalDocID=1286455 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1360-7863&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1360-7863&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1360-7863&client=summon |