How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

Objectives: The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings. Method: We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method appr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAging & mental health Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 149 - 167
Main Authors Vandemeulebroucke, Tijs, de Casterlé, Bernadette Dierckx, Gastmans, Chris
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Routledge 01.02.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objectives: The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings. Method: We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses. Results: Seventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care. Conclusions: Older adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself.
AbstractList Objectives: The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings. Method: We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses. Results: Seventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care. Conclusions: Older adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself.
The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings. We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses. Seventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care. Older adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself.
The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings.OBJECTIVESThe aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) in aged care settings.We conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses.METHODWe conducted a literature search for studies that used a qualitative or a mixed-method approach having a significant qualitative element. Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried. Candidate articles published in journals and conference proceedings were considered for review. Two independent reviewers assessed the included studies for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, after which data on subjects' self-reported opinions and perceptions were extracted and synthesized using thematic analyses.Seventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care.RESULTSSeventeen studies producing 23 publications were included. Based on the opinions of older adults, four themes emerged in relation to the use of SARS: (1) roles of a SAR; (2) interaction between the older adult and the SAR, which could be further subdivided into (a) the technical aspect of the interaction and (b) the human aspect of the interaction; (3) appearance of the SAR; and (4) normative/ethical issues regarding the use of SARs in aged care.Older adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself.CONCLUSIONSOlder adults have clear positive and negative opinions about different aspects of SARs in aged care. Nonetheless, some opinions can be ambiguous and need more attention if SARs are to be considered for use in aged care. Understanding older adults' lived experiences with SARs creates the possibility of using an approach that embeds technological innovation into the care practice itself.
Author Gastmans, Chris
Vandemeulebroucke, Tijs
de Casterlé, Bernadette Dierckx
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Tijs
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5683-6067
  surname: Vandemeulebroucke
  fullname: Vandemeulebroucke, Tijs
  email: tijs.vandemeulebroucke@kuleuven.be
  organization: Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven - University of Leuven
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Bernadette Dierckx
  surname: de Casterlé
  fullname: de Casterlé, Bernadette Dierckx
  organization: Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven - University of Leuven
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Chris
  surname: Gastmans
  fullname: Gastmans, Chris
  organization: Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven - University of Leuven
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28282732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1URD_gJ4B85JLFE8eJAxdQBbRSpV7K2Zq1J8jIibd20u2e-Osku1sOHIp8sD16nhlp3nN2MsSBGHsLYgVCiw8ga9HoWq5KAc0KSl1XSr1gZ3O9KuoW1Mn-LYoFOmXnOf8SQkAF9St2Wur5NLI8Y7-v4pa7yGNwlDi6KYyZ0-OGkqfBEsfB8fljyT8Qz9F6DGHHMWefx6WU4jrOhh84_iTHLSb6yJHnXR6px9FbnujB05bHjt9PGPyIe28uumXAa_ayw5DpzfG-YD--fb27vCpubr9fX365KWwly7EAUVrlaiU711qlrVWtApAkZdU6BRU2YNvSQSdlK9dWg17rsoNGN2UDWCl5wd4f-m5SvJ8oj6b32VIIOFCcsgHd1FUra2hn9N0RndY9ObNJvse0M09LmwF1AGyKOSfq_iIgzBKOeQrHLOGYYziz9-kfz-7XEYcxoQ__tT8fbD90MfW4jSk4M-IuxNQlHKzPRj7f4g8HR6gR
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_023_01038_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_10376178_2018_1519374
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci11060738
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_futures_2020_102640
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20042965
crossref_primary_10_1109_TAFFC_2022_3143803
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_10857_9
crossref_primary_10_2196_48031
crossref_primary_10_3389_frobt_2022_731006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10209_019_00692_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_024_01188_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_archger_2021_104399
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40718_018_0179_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2021_2020007
crossref_primary_10_1080_0144929X_2021_1876763
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_022_00909_7
crossref_primary_10_1145_3451882
crossref_primary_10_1080_10400435_2024_2337194
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11042_020_09313_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2021_103476
crossref_primary_10_1080_10400435_2021_1877210
crossref_primary_10_3390_su11154139
crossref_primary_10_1080_17516234_2018_1492315
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41582_019_0188_y
crossref_primary_10_1080_08927936_2019_1569906
crossref_primary_10_1080_11038128_2021_2009560
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10676_019_09524_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_021_01627_5
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0273479
crossref_primary_10_1111_opn_12239
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gerinurse_2023_10_012
crossref_primary_10_1080_10548408_2025_2468460
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_019_1227_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11370_021_00394_3
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph21050628
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11612_022_00641_w
crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2020_1770592
crossref_primary_10_1080_13607863_2022_2130171
crossref_primary_10_3390_app14062374
crossref_primary_10_2196_46617
crossref_primary_10_1108_JSTP_04_2019_0088
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_020_00619_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_022_00884_z
crossref_primary_10_1080_13607863_2018_1428938
crossref_primary_10_1080_0144929X_2023_2286528
crossref_primary_10_1080_15228835_2024_2447698
crossref_primary_10_1108_JSIT_03_2020_0038
crossref_primary_10_1145_3533726
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_022_00819_3
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3806199
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11948_022_00419_9
crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2020_1801172
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4654471
crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2021_1921365
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11091286
crossref_primary_10_1002_ejsp_2890
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_025_86255_w
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0047279422000162
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2021_102700
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00146_024_01894_3
crossref_primary_10_1136_medethics_2019_105615
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11060904
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43154_020_00009_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2019_07_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techsoc_2019_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1093_geronb_gbz070
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_033096
crossref_primary_10_1145_3492850
crossref_primary_10_3166_rmp_2019_0051
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2023_107854
crossref_primary_10_1093_geront_gny046
crossref_primary_10_20467_1091_5710_23_2_168
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22051717
crossref_primary_10_3390_su10103770
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191811319
crossref_primary_10_2196_23939
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17155335
crossref_primary_10_34133_research_0592
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_021_00577_8
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjqs_2018_008977
crossref_primary_10_1080_01634372_2024_2339992
crossref_primary_10_1080_13607863_2019_1699016
crossref_primary_10_1108_JSM_03_2022_0076
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19063630
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11257_022_09323_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diggeo_2024_100091
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20105915
crossref_primary_10_3390_robotics13060092
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11948_021_00296_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_023_01012_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00146_023_01705_1
crossref_primary_10_1108_JHTT_01_2022_0020
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12652_022_03806_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00391_020_01780_9
Cites_doi 10.1145/1506409.1506410
10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8892
10.1002/9781119959847.ch6
10.1145/1957656.1957816
10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1205
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01810.x
10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926259
10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015
10.1177/135581960501000110
10.1177/0733464813515092
10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_3
10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6
10.1155/2012/829835
10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Riek
10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00
10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143
10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_14
10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.003
10.1080/10400435.2014.978916
10.1145/2559636.2559681
10.1007/s12369-015-0322-y
10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_5
10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.006
10.1007/978-94-009-1051-5
10.1007/s12369-014-0269-4
10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0
10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2
10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01530.x
10.1007/s10209-014-0355-2
10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x
10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030
10.1136/bmj.b2700
10.1080/10447318.2013.873278
10.2147/CIA.S56435
10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630717
10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283643d26
10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68
10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343810
10.1145/2070481.2070544
10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141
10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_13
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/13607863.2017.1286455
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Psychology
EISSN 1364-6915
EndPage 167
ExternalDocumentID 28282732
10_1080_13607863_2017_1286455
1286455
Genre Review
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.7I
.QK
04C
0BK
0R~
23M
2DF
36B
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
6PF
AAGZJ
AAMFJ
AAMIU
AAPUL
AATTQ
AAWTL
AAZMC
ABCCY
ABDBF
ABFIM
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABPEM
ABTAI
ABXUL
ABXYU
ABZLS
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACTIO
ACTOA
ADAHI
ADBBV
ADCVX
ADKVQ
ADOJX
ADXPE
ADZJE
AECIN
AEISY
AEKEX
AEMXT
AENEX
AEOZL
AEPSL
AEYOC
AEZRU
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AGRBW
AHDZW
AIJEM
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BEJHT
BLEHA
BMOTO
BMSDO
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CQ1
CS3
DGFLZ
DKSSO
EAP
EAS
EBS
ECF
ECT
ECV
EHN
EIHBH
EJD
EMB
EMK
ENB
ENC
ENX
EPS
EPT
ESI
ESX
E~B
E~C
F5P
FEDTE
G-F
GTTXZ
H13
HF~
HVGLF
HZ~
IPNFZ
J.O
KSSTO
KYCEM
LGLTD
M4Z
NA5
O9-
P2P
Q~Q
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RSYQP
S-F
STATR
SV3
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TEH
TFH
TFL
TFW
TNJ
TNTFI
TRJHH
TUROJ
UT5
UT9
VAE
WQ9
~01
~S~
4H-
AACLK
AAGDL
AAHIA
AAIFK
AAYXX
ABITY
ABLUQ
ABYAV
ADYSH
AEFOU
AFRVT
AFUSO
AIYEW
AMPGV
CAG
CITATION
COF
DAOCQ
DTEEQ
DYOWO
LJTGL
PPYGK
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
TASJS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-102c5d653fd9c58cc595113e3349d514a71c92d1f3393bc818b82f1787271a453
ISSN 1360-7863
1364-6915
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 22:08:21 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:22:05 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:24:41 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:38 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:02:23 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords lived experiences
robotics
socially assistive robots
Elderly
aged care
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c432t-102c5d653fd9c58cc595113e3349d514a71c92d1f3393bc818b82f1787271a453
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ORCID 0000-0001-5683-6067
PMID 28282732
PQID 1876493619
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 19
ParticipantIDs informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_13607863_2017_1286455
proquest_miscellaneous_1876493619
crossref_primary_10_1080_13607863_2017_1286455
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_13607863_2017_1286455
pubmed_primary_28282732
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Aging & mental health
PublicationTitleAlternate Aging Ment Health
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Routledge
Publisher_xml – name: Routledge
References cit0033
cit0034
cit0031
cit0032
Bemelmans R. (cit0006) 2012; 13
cit0030
World Health Organization (WHO) (cit0048) 2015
Draper H. (cit0015) 2014
cit0039
cit0037
cit0038
cit0035
Akrich M. (cit0002) 1992
cit0036
cit0022
cit0023
cit0020
cit0021
Verbeek P.-P. (cit0046) 2014
Draper H. (cit0014) 2014
cit0028
cit0029
cit0026
cit0024
cit0025
cit0011
cit0012
cit0053
cit0051
cit0052
Akrich M. (cit0003) 1992
cit0050
Anders G. (cit0004) 1956; 3
cit0019
cit0017
cit0018
cit0016
cit0013
Latour B. (cit0027) 1992
cit0044
cit0001
cit0045
cit0042
cit0043
cit0040
cit0041
cit0008
cit0007
cit0005
cit0049
cit0047
References_xml – ident: cit0045
  doi: 10.1145/1506409.1506410
– volume-title: Op de Vleugels van Icarus. Hoe techniek en moraal met elkaar meebewegen [On the wings of Icarus. How technics and morality develop with each other]
  year: 2014
  ident: cit0046
– ident: cit0026
  doi: 10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8892
– ident: cit0025
  doi: 10.1002/9781119959847.ch6
– ident: cit0022
  doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957816
– ident: cit0020
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1205
– ident: cit0001
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01810.x
– start-page: 259
  volume-title: Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change
  year: 1992
  ident: cit0003
– ident: cit0029
  doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926259
– ident: cit0030
  doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015
– start-page: 125
  volume-title: Social Robotics. 6th International Conference, ICSR 2014
  year: 2014
  ident: cit0015
– ident: cit0012
  doi: 10.1177/135581960501000110
– volume-title: Paper presented at: AISB50 – 50th Annual Convention of the AISB
  year: 2014
  ident: cit0014
– ident: cit0051
  doi: 10.1177/0733464813515092
– ident: cit0019
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_3
– ident: cit0044
  doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6
– ident: cit0017
  doi: 10.1155/2012/829835
– ident: cit0036
  doi: 10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Riek
– ident: cit0007
  doi: 10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00
– ident: cit0016
  doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143
– volume-title: World report on ageing and health
  year: 2015
  ident: cit0048
– ident: cit0013
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_14
– ident: cit0049
  doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.003
– ident: cit0005
  doi: 10.1080/10400435.2014.978916
– ident: cit0008
  doi: 10.1145/2559636.2559681
– ident: cit0023
  doi: 10.1007/s12369-015-0322-y
– ident: cit0032
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_5
– ident: cit0037
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.006
– ident: cit0042
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-1051-5
– ident: cit0035
  doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0269-4
– ident: cit0041
  doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0
– ident: cit0043
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
– ident: cit0038
  doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2
– ident: cit0031
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01530.x
– ident: cit0052
  doi: 10.1007/s10209-014-0355-2
– ident: cit0034
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x
– ident: cit0011
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030
– ident: cit0028
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
– start-page: 205
  volume-title: Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change
  year: 1992
  ident: cit0002
– volume: 13
  start-page: 114
  year: 2012
  ident: cit0006
  publication-title: JAMDA
– ident: cit0024
  doi: 10.1080/10447318.2013.873278
– start-page: 225
  volume-title: Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change
  year: 1992
  ident: cit0027
– ident: cit0050
  doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56435
– ident: cit0040
  doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630717
– ident: cit0053
  doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283643d26
– ident: cit0021
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68
– volume: 3
  start-page: 146
  issue: 2
  year: 1956
  ident: cit0004
  publication-title: Dissent
– ident: cit0039
  doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343810
– ident: cit0047
  doi: 10.1145/2070481.2070544
– ident: cit0033
  doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141
– ident: cit0018
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_13
SSID ssj0001416
Score 2.4916682
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Objectives: The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially...
The aim of this review was to gain a better understanding of how older adults experience, perceive, think, and feel about the use of socially assistive robots...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 149
SubjectTerms Aged
aged care
Aging - psychology
Elderly
Health Services for the Aged
Humans
lived experiences
Robotics
Self-Help Devices
Social Perception
socially assistive robots
Title How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13607863.2017.1286455
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28282732
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1876493619
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9NAEF6FVkK9ICivlIcWiVvkkF2vH8utqkBRpXJAKerNsr1rBE3iijqo5cLf4Wcy49l13BJUHhcr2sRZJ_N5Xv5mhrGXSWQim5g8KKoqDlQhZKCrqAo0WGtjJkUxqbBQ-OhdPD1WhyfRyWDwo8daWjXFuPy2sa7kX6QKayBXrJL9C8l2XwoL8BrkC0eQMBz_SMY4D87UoxonbVMnjXPXst_6QoAzJK4gO4iS4_PLEXjLeF9_RWZhUTctHxaUimmbVFPt8_X2zm1pC5VfUp9w62aR9l3b_Y-UdYhHi36JpZfoB8xWL-xqDkF4jWQOQsrnzqc3dnSQY9uGOT28b5GH2UqDbCTQzfBLTi86vhB8dOGCgLZBQj99IVLPeN7IeyIdHMZIcnR6z_o1FcSaKj-94payB1DZ08KCuqA6gy5o3scvtoLIlbgbboYsv2QM1jpW1Df4Whtu984tti0hIAGNuj17fziddlZfqHbMbnfxvlosnbzauMUVP-hKl9zfxzqtzzO7y-64YIXvE_LusYFd7rLbR46Osct2OvN5eZ99BzRyU_MWjZzQyNdo5CB_7tHIPRp5h0ZOaOSflhzRyBGNr3nO11jkhEVeV7yHRe6x-IAdv30zO5gGbrxHUKpQNuAAyDIycRRWRpdRWpYRePuYlA-VNuDH54kotTSiCkMdFiV4lkUqKwEWRiYiV1H4kG0t66V9zHgysQoXcRaqSqRJpYXAWUc2tTKXeTpkyv_ZWel63-MIlnkmXItcL6MMZZQ5GQ3ZuDvtjJq_3HSC7ksya9qsW0UjcrLwhnNfeLFnoOLxuV2-tPXqPBPgsSgdxkIP2SPCQ3c5mDGBCETu_cfOT9jO-s58yraaLyv7DFztpnjuUP4TuTbPqg
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7BVoJeeJTX8jQS1ywbP5KYG0JUoXR7QFupNyvxQ6qokqrNCpULf52ZOAktUtVDr44msZ3xvDzzDcCHXDnlc1cldQhZIuuUJzqokGjU1s4t63oZqFB4dZCVh3LvSB1dqoWhtEryoUMEiuhlNR1uCkaPKXEfU5GhZssEZWblC5SwmVTqLmwpLUUxg631j72ynORxKvsGqESUENVYx3Pdi65oqCv4pddbob022n0IdlxHTEL5udh09cL-_g_i8XYLfQQPBmOVfY7c9Rju-GYH7q2G6_gd2J7E58UT-FO2v5hrWUt9v1mP63HO_ISkzHAW7JTSaFC-shiqP7lgaLuTlMGhs7ZukeK4YSjiHKOUtE-sYv-gplkss2FtYLEUtMcsZ37oi_oUDne_rr-UydDeIbFS8A4VALfKZUoEp60qrFVo7VFQVkjt0I6r8tRq7tIghBa1RcuiLnhIUcLwPK2kEs9g1rSNfwEsX3pJg9QLU-bcFdyj46SVLzyveFXMQY6_1NgB-5xacJyYdIBIHXfa0E6bYafnsJjITiP4x00E-jK_mK6PuoTYIsWIG2jfj8xl8IjTvU3V-HZzblLUWFILdHXn8Dxy3TQd8pjRAuUvb_Hld3C_XK_2zf63g--vYBsfFTEv_TXMurONf4NmV1e_Hc7VX--zHiw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7BVqp64VFey9NIXLOsX0nMDQGrUGiFUCtxs-LYlhBVsupmhcqFv844dgJFqnro1dEktjP-ZmzPfAPwqpBWusLWmfE-z4ShLFNe-kyhtbZ2aczSh0Thw6O8OhEH3-QYTbhJYZVhD-0jUcSA1WFxr60fI-JeU56jYct5CMwqFgiwuZDyJuzkgQ5vBjvHXw-qaoJjKob6p0EoC1JjGs9lL7pgoC7Ql17uhA7GaHUbzDiMGIPyY7HtzaL59R_D47XGeQduJVeVvI26dRduuHYfdg_TZfw-7E3geX4PflfdT2I70oWq32Rg9dgQN_EoE-wEWYcgGkRXEg_qT88Jeu4BY7DprDMdSnxvCQKcJSEg7Q2pyV-iaRKTbEjnSUwEHRjLiUtVUe_DyerD8bsqS8UdskZw1iP8s0baXHJvVSPLppHo64UjWS6URS-uLmijmKWec8VNg36FKZmniC-soLWQ_AHM2q51j4AUSydCY6iEKQpmS-Zw26SkKx2rWV3OQYx_VDeJ-TwU4DjVNBGkjjOtw0zrNNNzWExi60j9cZWA-ldddD-cufhYIEXzK2RfjrqlcYGHW5u6dd12oynaK6E4bnTn8DAq3dSdsF9G_5M9vsaXX8Dul_cr_fnj0acnsIdPyhiU_hRm_dnWPUOfqzfP06r6A0QhHNA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+do+older+adults+experience+and+perceive+socially+assistive+robots+in+aged+care%3A+a+systematic+review+of+qualitative+evidence&rft.jtitle=Aging+%26+mental+health&rft.au=Vandemeulebroucke%2C+Tijs&rft.au=de+Casterl%C3%A9%2C+Bernadette+Dierckx&rft.au=Gastmans%2C+Chris&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.pub=Routledge&rft.issn=1360-7863&rft.eissn=1364-6915&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F13607863.2017.1286455&rft.externalDocID=1286455
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1360-7863&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1360-7863&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1360-7863&client=summon