Effects of congestion charging and subsidy policy on vehicle flow and revenue with user heterogeneity

Traffic congestion is a major issue in urban traffic networks. Both congestion charging and subsidy policy can solve traffic congestion to some extent, but which one is better? Based on this, this paper constructs a typical transit network consisting of three travel tools in four common travel modes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE Vol. 20; no. 7; pp. 12820 - 12842
Main Authors Fan, Dandan, Li, Dawei, Cheng, Fangzheng, Fu, Guanghua
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States AIMS Press 01.06.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Traffic congestion is a major issue in urban traffic networks. Both congestion charging and subsidy policy can solve traffic congestion to some extent, but which one is better? Based on this, this paper constructs a typical transit network consisting of three travel tools in four common travel modes. Travelers' values of time affect their choice of transportation in the congestion network, thus a stochastic user equilibrium model is established by considering travelers' heterogenous values of time to evaluate the effects of different combinations of congestion charging and subsidy policies on vehicle flow and revenue. Numerical results indicate that the effectiveness of congestion charging and subsidy policy in alleviating traffic congestion depends on the object of charging or subsidizing. Congestion charging for private cars can reduce traffic flow and alleviate traffic congestion, but charging for ridesharing cars does not reduce traffic flow and may even cause traffic congestion. Subsidizing public buses does not reduce traffic flow, but it can ease congestion by coordinating traffic flow on both edges of the dual-modal transport. The combination of no subsidy for public buses and charging for both private cars and ridesharing cars can obtain the greatest revenue, but it does not alleviate traffic congestion. Although the combination of charging for private cars and subsidizing public buses does not bring the most benefits, it can reduce traffic flow, and its revenue is also considerable. This study can provide quantitative decision support for the government to ease traffic congestion and improve government revenue.
AbstractList Traffic congestion is a major issue in urban traffic networks. Both congestion charging and subsidy policy can solve traffic congestion to some extent, but which one is better? Based on this, this paper constructs a typical transit network consisting of three travel tools in four common travel modes. Travelers' values of time affect their choice of transportation in the congestion network, thus a stochastic user equilibrium model is established by considering travelers' heterogenous values of time to evaluate the effects of different combinations of congestion charging and subsidy policies on vehicle flow and revenue. Numerical results indicate that the effectiveness of congestion charging and subsidy policy in alleviating traffic congestion depends on the object of charging or subsidizing. Congestion charging for private cars can reduce traffic flow and alleviate traffic congestion, but charging for ridesharing cars does not reduce traffic flow and may even cause traffic congestion. Subsidizing public buses does not reduce traffic flow, but it can ease congestion by coordinating traffic flow on both edges of the dual-modal transport. The combination of no subsidy for public buses and charging for both private cars and ridesharing cars can obtain the greatest revenue, but it does not alleviate traffic congestion. Although the combination of charging for private cars and subsidizing public buses does not bring the most benefits, it can reduce traffic flow, and its revenue is also considerable. This study can provide quantitative decision support for the government to ease traffic congestion and improve government revenue.
Traffic congestion is a major issue in urban traffic networks. Both congestion charging and subsidy policy can solve traffic congestion to some extent, but which one is better? Based on this, this paper constructs a typical transit network consisting of three travel tools in four common travel modes. Travelers' values of time affect their choice of transportation in the congestion network, thus a stochastic user equilibrium model is established by considering travelers' heterogenous values of time to evaluate the effects of different combinations of congestion charging and subsidy policies on vehicle flow and revenue. Numerical results indicate that the effectiveness of congestion charging and subsidy policy in alleviating traffic congestion depends on the object of charging or subsidizing. Congestion charging for private cars can reduce traffic flow and alleviate traffic congestion, but charging for ridesharing cars does not reduce traffic flow and may even cause traffic congestion. Subsidizing public buses does not reduce traffic flow, but it can ease congestion by coordinating traffic flow on both edges of the dual-modal transport. The combination of no subsidy for public buses and charging for both private cars and ridesharing cars can obtain the greatest revenue, but it does not alleviate traffic congestion. Although the combination of charging for private cars and subsidizing public buses does not bring the most benefits, it can reduce traffic flow, and its revenue is also considerable. This study can provide quantitative decision support for the government to ease traffic congestion and improve government revenue.Traffic congestion is a major issue in urban traffic networks. Both congestion charging and subsidy policy can solve traffic congestion to some extent, but which one is better? Based on this, this paper constructs a typical transit network consisting of three travel tools in four common travel modes. Travelers' values of time affect their choice of transportation in the congestion network, thus a stochastic user equilibrium model is established by considering travelers' heterogenous values of time to evaluate the effects of different combinations of congestion charging and subsidy policies on vehicle flow and revenue. Numerical results indicate that the effectiveness of congestion charging and subsidy policy in alleviating traffic congestion depends on the object of charging or subsidizing. Congestion charging for private cars can reduce traffic flow and alleviate traffic congestion, but charging for ridesharing cars does not reduce traffic flow and may even cause traffic congestion. Subsidizing public buses does not reduce traffic flow, but it can ease congestion by coordinating traffic flow on both edges of the dual-modal transport. The combination of no subsidy for public buses and charging for both private cars and ridesharing cars can obtain the greatest revenue, but it does not alleviate traffic congestion. Although the combination of charging for private cars and subsidizing public buses does not bring the most benefits, it can reduce traffic flow, and its revenue is also considerable. This study can provide quantitative decision support for the government to ease traffic congestion and improve government revenue.
Author Li, Dawei
Cheng, Fangzheng
Fan, Dandan
Fu, Guanghua
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dandan
  surname: Fan
  fullname: Fan, Dandan
  organization: College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Dawei
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Dawei
  organization: College of Statistics and Mathematics, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201209, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Fangzheng
  surname: Cheng
  fullname: Cheng, Fangzheng
  organization: Shanghai Yunji Zhixing Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 201114, China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Guanghua
  surname: Fu
  fullname: Fu, Guanghua
  organization: Institute of Logistics Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkdtrFDEUxoNU7EWffJc8CrI115nMo5RqCwVf9DnkcjKbMpusyUzL_vfNdtdSRAgknPPLdw7fd45OUk6A0EdKLvnAxdeNhUtGGJc9e4POqJR0RQhVJ6_ep-i81ntCuOBcvEOnvJeEik6dIbgOAdxccQ7Y5TRCnWNO2K1NGWMasUke18XW6Hd4m6fodri1H2Ad3QQ4TPnxGSnwAGkB_BjnNV4qFLyGGUoeIUGcd-_R22CmCh-O9wX6_f3619XN6u7nj9urb3crJzidV5ZZYNLITth2pGOh40qJ3jlPO6UM5dRwkHaw3nkiO9MJxXofPHVeWcf4Bbo96Pps7vW2xI0pO51N1M-FXEZtyrxfXQs2OEdB9CJYESQZrGsFwYErDtbLpvX5oLUt-c_SfNGbWB1Mk0mQl6qZkqLZKeXQ0E9HdLEb8C-D_9rcgC8HwJVca4HwglCi9yHqFqI-htho-g_t4mz2uczFxOm_f54AfY-gZg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranpol_2024_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trd_2024_104294
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.trb.2012.03.001
10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.001
10.3390/ijerph18031197
10.1016/j.trip.2021.100340
10.1016/j.trb.2015.08.013
10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.033
10.1016/j.tra.2009.09.004
10.1016/j.trb.2021.07.004
10.1080/15568318.2015.1083638
10.1109/VETECS.2007.15
10.1016/j.trb.2008.09.001
10.1016/j.tre.2022.102999
10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.013
10.4337/9781845420536.00014
10.1016/j.trc.2015.10.013
10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.021
10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00048-8
10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.012
10.1016/j.tra.2016.02.014
10.3141/2429-04
10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.005
10.1109/LCN.2009.5355052
10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.015
10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.003
10.1016/j.jue.2015.06.005
10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.007
10.1016/j.trb.2014.03.001
10.1007/s40534-017-0128-8
10.1109/ITSC.2015.243
10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.006
10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.005
10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.016
10.1016/j.trd.2016.07.002
10.1177/03611981211019737
10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.011
10.1007/s11066-008-9018-x
10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.013
10.1109/ITSC.2009.5309716
10.1155/2021/6627660
10.1287/trsc.27.2.133
10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00040-X
10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.005
10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.031
10.1007/s11067-019-9442-5
10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.01.004
10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.008
10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.003
10.7307/ptt.v34i1.3815
10.1016/j.tra.2006.07.002
10.1016/j.trb.2021.01.004
10.1016/j.ecotra.2018.08.001
10.1016/j.trb.2020.02.001
10.1016/j.jue.2014.02.001
10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.005
10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.001
10.1080/00207721.2012.743617
10.1155/2014/634926
10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.022
10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.002
10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.007
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.3934/mbe.2023572
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1551-0018
EndPage 12842
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_429cc1e474fb4f509bc9cc43e383ebd5
37501468
10_3934_mbe_2023572
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
53G
5GY
AAYXX
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMVHM
CITATION
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
IAO
ITC
J9A
ML0
OK1
P2P
RAN
SV3
TUS
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b2be25a564b64b5c2f638847ccd1688a131a3e5b9bdcd056a64827dfd1cd8bc23
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1551-0018
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:24 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:13:38 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:51:27 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:15 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:58:37 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Keywords transit subsidy
traffic congestion
private car
public bus
value of time
ridesharing car
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c431t-b2be25a564b64b5c2f638847ccd1688a131a3e5b9bdcd056a64827dfd1cd8bc23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/429cc1e474fb4f509bc9cc43e383ebd5
PMID 37501468
PQID 2854433559
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 23
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_429cc1e474fb4f509bc9cc43e383ebd5
proquest_miscellaneous_2854433559
pubmed_primary_37501468
crossref_primary_10_3934_mbe_2023572
crossref_citationtrail_10_3934_mbe_2023572
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-Jun-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-Jun-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE
PublicationTitleAlternate Math Biosci Eng
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher AIMS Press
Publisher_xml – name: AIMS Press
References key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-42
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-41
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-40
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-35
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-34
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-33
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-32
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-39
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-38
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-37
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-36
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-31
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-30
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-29
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-24
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-23
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-22
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-21
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-28
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-27
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-26
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-25
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-60
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-20
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-62
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-61
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-9
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-19
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-18
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-3
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-13
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-57
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-4
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-12
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-56
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-1
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-11
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-55
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-2
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-10
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-54
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-7
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-17
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-8
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-16
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-5
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-15
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-59
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-6
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-14
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-58
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-53
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-52
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-51
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-50
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-46
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-45
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-44
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-43
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-49
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-48
key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-47
References_xml – ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-16
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.03.001
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-18
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.001
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-35
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031197
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-24
  doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100340
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-48
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.08.013
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-51
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-5
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.033
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-15
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2009.09.004
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-28
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.07.004
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-20
  doi: 10.1080/15568318.2015.1083638
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-1
  doi: 10.1109/VETECS.2007.15
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-60
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2008.09.001
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-34
  doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102999
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-31
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.013
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-29
  doi: 10.4337/9781845420536.00014
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-40
  doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.10.013
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-59
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.021
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-62
  doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00048-8
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-7
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.012
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-36
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.02.014
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-57
  doi: 10.3141/2429-04
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-14
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.005
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-8
  doi: 10.1109/LCN.2009.5355052
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-37
  doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.015
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-45
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.003
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-19
  doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2015.06.005
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-33
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.007
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-39
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.03.001
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-50
  doi: 10.1007/s40534-017-0128-8
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-10
  doi: 10.1109/ITSC.2015.243
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-3
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.006
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-23
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.005
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-47
  doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.016
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-56
  doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.07.002
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-42
  doi: 10.1177/03611981211019737
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-52
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.011
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-30
  doi: 10.1007/s11066-008-9018-x
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-6
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.013
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-9
  doi: 10.1109/ITSC.2009.5309716
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-27
  doi: 10.1155/2021/6627660
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-53
  doi: 10.1287/trsc.27.2.133
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-54
  doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00040-X
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-46
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.005
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-55
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.031
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-32
  doi: 10.1007/s11067-019-9442-5
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-43
  doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.01.004
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-2
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.008
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-38
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.003
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-21
  doi: 10.7307/ptt.v34i1.3815
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-11
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.07.002
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-49
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.01.004
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-41
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecotra.2018.08.001
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-26
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.02.001
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-44
  doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2014.02.001
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-58
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.005
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-4
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.001
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-22
  doi: 10.1080/00207721.2012.743617
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-61
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-12
  doi: 10.1155/2014/634926
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-25
  doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.022
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-13
  doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.002
– ident: key-10.3934/mbe.2023572-17
  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.007
SSID ssj0034334
Score 2.301236
Snippet Traffic congestion is a major issue in urban traffic networks. Both congestion charging and subsidy policy can solve traffic congestion to some extent, but...
SourceID doaj
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 12820
SubjectTerms private car
public bus
ridesharing car
traffic congestion
transit subsidy
value of time
Title Effects of congestion charging and subsidy policy on vehicle flow and revenue with user heterogeneity
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501468
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2854433559
https://doaj.org/article/429cc1e474fb4f509bc9cc43e383ebd5
Volume 20
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA5SELyIb-uLCD0JS9lNst0eVZQi6MlCb0sySahQd4ttlf57Z5JtUVC8CHvKDrvJZJJvJo9vGOsQqOkcZCKzHiTSe50YI1WiEPxzItCyju4OPz7lg6F8GKnRl1RfdCYs0gNHxXVxvgRInexJb6RHeDOABVI4DK2csYG9FDFvFUzFOVhIIWS8jSf6QnZfDTFiErNL9g1_Ak3_775lwJj7HbbdOIf8OlZql224ao9txnSRy33mItXwjNeeYxhLO0OoVR7IjhCBuK4sn-FE8GKXfBr4fjm-fndj-hr3k_ojiATSpoXjtATLaZGCj-lMTI2m5NAnP2DD-7vn20HSpElIUA3pPDGZcZnSKpcGHwWZxzGFoANg07wodCpSLZwyfWPBor-jc6L-tN6mYAsDmThkraqu3DHjSum-txJSS2tD4AswSmcOhM-lFxba7GqlvBIaDnFKZTEpMZYgTZeo6bLRdJt11sLTSJ3xs9gN9cJahPiuQwFaQdlYQfmXFbTZ5aoPSxwftOmhK1cvZiXdEEVrwMCpzY5i565_JXq0q5oXJ_9RhVO2RS2Kx8jOWGv-tnDn6LDMzUWwzU8du-wZ
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+of+congestion+charging+and+subsidy+policy+on+vehicle+flow+and+revenue+with+user+heterogeneity&rft.jtitle=Mathematical+biosciences+and+engineering+%3A+MBE&rft.au=Dandan+Fan&rft.au=Dawei+Li&rft.au=Fangzheng+Cheng&rft.au=Guanghua+Fu&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.pub=AIMS+Press&rft.eissn=1551-0018&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=12820&rft.epage=12842&rft_id=info:doi/10.3934%2Fmbe.2023572&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_429cc1e474fb4f509bc9cc43e383ebd5
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1551-0018&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1551-0018&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1551-0018&client=summon