A retrospective cohort study to examine factors affecting live birth after hysteroscopic treatment of intrauterine adhesions

To evaluate independent factors that affect the chance of live birth (LB) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions. Retrospective cohort study. Hysteroscopic center of Fuxing Hospital in Beijing, China. Patients diagnosed with Asherman syndrome between June 2020, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFertility and sterility Vol. 121; no. 5; pp. 873 - 880
Main Authors Zhao, Yuting, Huang, Xiaowu, Huang, Rui, Xu, Ruonan, Xia, Enlan, Li, Tin Chiu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0015-0282
1556-5653
1556-5653
DOI10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To evaluate independent factors that affect the chance of live birth (LB) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions. Retrospective cohort study. Hysteroscopic center of Fuxing Hospital in Beijing, China. Patients diagnosed with Asherman syndrome between June 2020, and February 2022. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is followed by a second look hysteroscopy to assess the outcome and follow-up for a year. Live birth rate (LBR) without the use of assisted reproductive technologies at 12-month follow-up. Of the 544 women included in the cohort, the pregnancy rate at the end of 1 year of follow-up was 47.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.5%–49.7%), and the LBR was 41.0% (95% CI 38.9%–43.1%). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis identified three independent predictors of LB in decreasing order of significance: increase in menstrual flow after surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.69, 95% CI 1.77–8.21), postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31–1.80), and the severity of recurred adhesion at second-look hysteroscopy (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.76). Among subjects with good independent prognostic factors, namely, increased menstrual flow after surgery, postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase >6 mm, and no or minimal recurrence of adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy, the LBR was 69.0% (95% CI 65.4%–72.6%). On the other hand, in women (n = 26) without any of the three good prognostic factors, none had a successful LB (0). Overall, the LBR after treatment for Asherman syndrome was 41.0%. The prognosis is dependent on three outcome measures after surgery, namely, improvement in menstrual flow, postoperative endometrial thickness, and the minimal degree of recurrent adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy. Estudio retrospectivo de cohorte para evaluar los factores que afectan los nacimientos vivos después del tratamiento histeroscópico de las adherencias intrauterinas Evaluar los factores independientes que afectan la probabilidad de nacido vivo (NV) después de la adhesiólisis histeroscópica en pacientes con adherencias intrauterinas. Estudio retrospectivo de cohorte. Centro histeroscópico del Hospital Fuxing en Pekín, China. Pacientes diagnosticados con síndrome de Asherman entre Junio 2020, y Febrero 2022. La adhesiólisis histeroscópica es seguida de una histeroscopia de segunda mirada para evaluar el resultado y el seguimiento durante un año. Tasa de nacido vivo (TNV) sin el uso de tecnologías de reproducción asistida a los 12 meses de seguimiento. De las 544 mujeres incluidas en la cohorte, la tasa de embarazo al final de 1 año de seguimiento fue del 47.6 % (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95 %: 45.5%–49.7 %), y la TNV fue del 41.0 % (IC del 95 %: 38.9%–43.1 %). El análisis de regresión logística múltiple por pasos identificó tres factores predictivos independientes de NV en orden decreciente de significancia: aumento del flujo menstrual después de la cirugía (odds ratio [OR] 3.69, IC del 95%: 1.77-8.21), grosor endometrial postoperatorio en la fase lútea media (OR 1.53; IC del 95%: 1.31-1.80) y la severidad de adherencias recurrentes en la histeroscopia de segunda mirada (OR 0.62; IC del 95%: 0.50-0.76). Entre los sujetos con buenos factores pronósticos independientes, es decir, aumento del flujo menstrual después de la cirugía, grosor endometrial postoperatorio en la fase lútea media >6 mm y ninguna o mínima recurrencia de adherencias en la histeroscopia de segunda mirada, la TNV fue del 69.0 % (IC del 95 %: 65.4%-72.6 %). Por otro lado, en las mujeres (n = 26) sin alguno de los tres factores de buen pronóstico, ninguna tuvo un NV exitoso (0). En general, la TNV tras el tratamiento del síndrome de Asherman fue del 41.0%. El pronóstico depende de tres medidas de resultado después de la cirugía, es decir, la mejoría en el flujo menstrual, el grosor endometrial postoperatorio y un grado mínimo de adherencias recurrentes en la histeroscopia de segunda mirada.
AbstractList To evaluate independent factors that affect the chance of live birth (LB) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions. Retrospective cohort study. Hysteroscopic center of Fuxing Hospital in Beijing, China. Patients diagnosed with Asherman syndrome between June 2020, and February 2022. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is followed by a second look hysteroscopy to assess the outcome and follow-up for a year. Live birth rate (LBR) without the use of assisted reproductive technologies at 12-month follow-up. Of the 544 women included in the cohort, the pregnancy rate at the end of 1 year of follow-up was 47.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.5%-49.7%), and the LBR was 41.0% (95% CI 38.9%-43.1%). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis identified three independent predictors of LB in decreasing order of significance: increase in menstrual flow after surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.69, 95% CI 1.77-8.21), postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31-1.80), and the severity of recurred adhesion at second-look hysteroscopy (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.76). Among subjects with good independent prognostic factors, namely, increased menstrual flow after surgery, postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase >6 mm, and no or minimal recurrence of adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy, the LBR was 69.0% (95% CI 65.4%-72.6%). On the other hand, in women (n = 26) without any of the three good prognostic factors, none had a successful LB (0). Overall, the LBR after treatment for Asherman syndrome was 41.0%. The prognosis is dependent on three outcome measures after surgery, namely, improvement in menstrual flow, postoperative endometrial thickness, and the minimal degree of recurrent adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy.
To evaluate independent factors that affect the chance of live birth (LB) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions.OBJECTIVETo evaluate independent factors that affect the chance of live birth (LB) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions.Retrospective cohort study.DESIGNRetrospective cohort study.Hysteroscopic center of Fuxing Hospital in Beijing, China.SETTINGHysteroscopic center of Fuxing Hospital in Beijing, China.Patients diagnosed with Asherman syndrome between June 2020, and February 2022.PATIENT(S)Patients diagnosed with Asherman syndrome between June 2020, and February 2022.Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is followed by a second look hysteroscopy to assess the outcome and follow-up for a year.INTERVENTION(S)Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is followed by a second look hysteroscopy to assess the outcome and follow-up for a year.Live birth rate (LBR) without the use of assisted reproductive technologies at 12-month follow-up.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)Live birth rate (LBR) without the use of assisted reproductive technologies at 12-month follow-up.Of the 544 women included in the cohort, the pregnancy rate at the end of 1 year of follow-up was 47.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.5%-49.7%), and the LBR was 41.0% (95% CI 38.9%-43.1%). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis identified three independent predictors of LB in decreasing order of significance: increase in menstrual flow after surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.69, 95% CI 1.77-8.21), postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31-1.80), and the severity of recurred adhesion at second-look hysteroscopy (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.76). Among subjects with good independent prognostic factors, namely, increased menstrual flow after surgery, postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase >6 mm, and no or minimal recurrence of adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy, the LBR was 69.0% (95% CI 65.4%-72.6%). On the other hand, in women (n = 26) without any of the three good prognostic factors, none had a successful LB (0).RESULT(S)Of the 544 women included in the cohort, the pregnancy rate at the end of 1 year of follow-up was 47.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.5%-49.7%), and the LBR was 41.0% (95% CI 38.9%-43.1%). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis identified three independent predictors of LB in decreasing order of significance: increase in menstrual flow after surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.69, 95% CI 1.77-8.21), postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31-1.80), and the severity of recurred adhesion at second-look hysteroscopy (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.76). Among subjects with good independent prognostic factors, namely, increased menstrual flow after surgery, postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase >6 mm, and no or minimal recurrence of adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy, the LBR was 69.0% (95% CI 65.4%-72.6%). On the other hand, in women (n = 26) without any of the three good prognostic factors, none had a successful LB (0).Overall, the LBR after treatment for Asherman syndrome was 41.0%. The prognosis is dependent on three outcome measures after surgery, namely, improvement in menstrual flow, postoperative endometrial thickness, and the minimal degree of recurrent adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy.CONCLUSION(S)Overall, the LBR after treatment for Asherman syndrome was 41.0%. The prognosis is dependent on three outcome measures after surgery, namely, improvement in menstrual flow, postoperative endometrial thickness, and the minimal degree of recurrent adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy.
To evaluate independent factors that affect the chance of live birth (LB) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions. Retrospective cohort study. Hysteroscopic center of Fuxing Hospital in Beijing, China. Patients diagnosed with Asherman syndrome between June 2020, and February 2022. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is followed by a second look hysteroscopy to assess the outcome and follow-up for a year. Live birth rate (LBR) without the use of assisted reproductive technologies at 12-month follow-up. Of the 544 women included in the cohort, the pregnancy rate at the end of 1 year of follow-up was 47.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.5%–49.7%), and the LBR was 41.0% (95% CI 38.9%–43.1%). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis identified three independent predictors of LB in decreasing order of significance: increase in menstrual flow after surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.69, 95% CI 1.77–8.21), postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31–1.80), and the severity of recurred adhesion at second-look hysteroscopy (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.76). Among subjects with good independent prognostic factors, namely, increased menstrual flow after surgery, postoperative endometrial thickness in the midluteal phase >6 mm, and no or minimal recurrence of adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy, the LBR was 69.0% (95% CI 65.4%–72.6%). On the other hand, in women (n = 26) without any of the three good prognostic factors, none had a successful LB (0). Overall, the LBR after treatment for Asherman syndrome was 41.0%. The prognosis is dependent on three outcome measures after surgery, namely, improvement in menstrual flow, postoperative endometrial thickness, and the minimal degree of recurrent adhesions at second-look hysteroscopy. Estudio retrospectivo de cohorte para evaluar los factores que afectan los nacimientos vivos después del tratamiento histeroscópico de las adherencias intrauterinas Evaluar los factores independientes que afectan la probabilidad de nacido vivo (NV) después de la adhesiólisis histeroscópica en pacientes con adherencias intrauterinas. Estudio retrospectivo de cohorte. Centro histeroscópico del Hospital Fuxing en Pekín, China. Pacientes diagnosticados con síndrome de Asherman entre Junio 2020, y Febrero 2022. La adhesiólisis histeroscópica es seguida de una histeroscopia de segunda mirada para evaluar el resultado y el seguimiento durante un año. Tasa de nacido vivo (TNV) sin el uso de tecnologías de reproducción asistida a los 12 meses de seguimiento. De las 544 mujeres incluidas en la cohorte, la tasa de embarazo al final de 1 año de seguimiento fue del 47.6 % (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95 %: 45.5%–49.7 %), y la TNV fue del 41.0 % (IC del 95 %: 38.9%–43.1 %). El análisis de regresión logística múltiple por pasos identificó tres factores predictivos independientes de NV en orden decreciente de significancia: aumento del flujo menstrual después de la cirugía (odds ratio [OR] 3.69, IC del 95%: 1.77-8.21), grosor endometrial postoperatorio en la fase lútea media (OR 1.53; IC del 95%: 1.31-1.80) y la severidad de adherencias recurrentes en la histeroscopia de segunda mirada (OR 0.62; IC del 95%: 0.50-0.76). Entre los sujetos con buenos factores pronósticos independientes, es decir, aumento del flujo menstrual después de la cirugía, grosor endometrial postoperatorio en la fase lútea media >6 mm y ninguna o mínima recurrencia de adherencias en la histeroscopia de segunda mirada, la TNV fue del 69.0 % (IC del 95 %: 65.4%-72.6 %). Por otro lado, en las mujeres (n = 26) sin alguno de los tres factores de buen pronóstico, ninguna tuvo un NV exitoso (0). En general, la TNV tras el tratamiento del síndrome de Asherman fue del 41.0%. El pronóstico depende de tres medidas de resultado después de la cirugía, es decir, la mejoría en el flujo menstrual, el grosor endometrial postoperatorio y un grado mínimo de adherencias recurrentes en la histeroscopia de segunda mirada.
Author Huang, Rui
Li, Tin Chiu
Xu, Ruonan
Huang, Xiaowu
Xia, Enlan
Zhao, Yuting
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yuting
  surname: Zhao
  fullname: Zhao, Yuting
  organization: Hysteroscopy Center, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xiaowu
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Xiaowu
  organization: Hysteroscopy Center, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Rui
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Rui
  organization: Hysteroscopy Center, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ruonan
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, Ruonan
  organization: Hysteroscopy Center, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Enlan
  surname: Xia
  fullname: Xia, Enlan
  organization: Hysteroscopy Center, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Tin Chiu
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Tin Chiu
  email: tinchiu.li@gmail.com
  organization: Hysteroscopy Center, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38246404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkc2OFCEUhYkZ4_SMvoJh6abKCw31szGOE_-SSdzomlDUxaatghaoiZ348FLpUZNZ9QYS-PhyOeeKXPjgkRDKoGbAmtf72mLMPuWy1hy4qIHVwPkTsmFSNpVs5PaCbACYrIB3_JJcpbQHgIa1_Bm53HZcNALEhvy-oRFzDOmAJrt7pCbsQsw05WU80hwo_tKz80itNjnERLW1K-m_02nFBxfzrhyWSejuuA4UkgkHZ2iOqPOMPtNgqfM56qXcrio97jC54NNz8tTqKeGLh_2afPvw_uvtp-ruy8fPtzd3lRFblque913bj1qLdWxstLEtDJ22HEHyDsZh4EzigC00RkrbMSn6sTWt1pqJrttek1cn7yGGnwumrGaXDE6T9hiWpHjPWimZYKygLx_QZZhxVIfoZh2P6m9iBehOgCk_TRHtP4SBWstRe_W_HLWWo4CpUk55-ubRU-OyziWJEo6bzhG8OwmwhHXvMKpkHHqDo4ulFDUGd47k7SOJmZx3Rk8_8Hie4g_0KswB
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrras_2025_101319
crossref_primary_10_31083_j_ceog5105117
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13669_025_00412_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2025_01_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2024_108599
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13287_025_04183_y
Cites_doi 10.1046/j.1365-2508.1999.00245.x
10.1016/j.jmig.2006.04.013
10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.016
10.1111/jog.15629
10.1186/1477-7827-8-30
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.070
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59942-7
10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.09.005
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.025
10.1007/s00404-017-4314-z
10.1007/s00404-009-1117-x
10.1093/humrep/14.5.1230
10.2147/IJWH.S151283
10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.10.026
10.21037/atm.2019.11.115
10.1097/GCO.0b013e32814a6473
10.1093/humrep/deaa273
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096
10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.018
10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.11.040
10.1093/humrep/dey237
10.1093/humupd/dmt045
10.1002/ijgo.13606
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x
10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.01.019
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.099
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024
– notice: Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1556-5653
EndPage 880
ExternalDocumentID 38246404
10_1016_j_fertnstert_2024_01_022
S0015028224000256
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-~X
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
0R~
1B1
1P~
1~5
29H
34R
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
85S
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFWJ
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABCQX
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABWVN
ACGFO
ACIUM
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEFWE
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AI.
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
C5W
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
J5H
K-O
KOM
L7B
M41
MO0
N9A
NQ-
O9-
OK1
OQ.
P2P
PH~
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SSZ
UNMZH
UV1
VH1
W2D
X7M
XH2
XJT
XPP
YOC
YZZ
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~S-
0SF
AACTN
AAIAV
ADPAM
AGZHU
ALXNB
RIG
ZA5
AAYXX
AFCTW
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-929879daa48246e6acf70b8af2e05280dbb215ebe706c55f81549d7c7aaa14883
ISSN 0015-0282
1556-5653
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 08:28:02 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:55:40 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:01:43 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:03 EDT 2025
Sat May 04 15:44:24 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 26 16:56:58 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords independent predictors
Asherman syndrome
live birth
Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
pregnancy
Language English
License Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c431t-929879daa48246e6acf70b8af2e05280dbb215ebe706c55f81549d7c7aaa14883
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 38246404
PQID 2917551411
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2917551411
pubmed_primary_38246404
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2024_01_022
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2024_01_022
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2024_01_022
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2024_01_022
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate May 2024
2024-05-00
2024-May
20240501
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2024
  text: May 2024
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Fertility and sterility
PublicationTitleAlternate Fertil Steril
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Zhao, Liu, Zhang, Gao, Feng, Huang (bib12) 2020; 8
Gargett, Schwab, Deane (bib23) 2016; 22
Yu, Li, Xia, Huang, Liu, Peng (bib3) 2008; 89
Zhao, Chen, Cai (bib10) 2017; 295
MMFH, EVDM, Sebastiaan Veersema, van der Meij, Veersema, Emanuel (bib7) 2021; 116
Deans, Vancaillie, Ledger, Liu, Abbott (bib9) 2018; 33
Movilla, Wang, Chen, Morales, Wang, Williams (bib30) 2020; 35
Chen, Zhang, Wang, Xie, Gao, Song (bib4) 2017; 24
Xu, Zhang, Yang, Zhang, Lin (bib6) 2018; 50
Wamsteker, De Block (bib19) 1998
Zhang, Shao, Wang, Gao, Cui, Chu (bib2) 2023; 49
Hooker, Lemmers, Thurkow, Heymans, Opmeer, Brölmann (bib13) 2014; 20
Higham, O’Brien, Shaw (bib18) 1990; 97
Wang, Yi, Xie, Du, Li, Zheng (bib16) 2019; 18
Yu, Wong, Cheong, Xia, Li (bib21) 2008; 89
Baradwan, Shafi, Baradwan, Bashir, Al-Jaroudi (bib24) 2018; 10
Feng, Yang, Shao, Liu (bib8) 1999; 8
Fernandez, Al-Najjar, Chauveaud-Lambling, Frydman, Gervaise (bib15) 2006; 13
Kodaman, Arici (bib31) 2007; 19
Roy, Baruah, Sharma, Kumar, Kachawa, Singh (bib11) 2010; 281
Xiao, Wan, Xue, Zeng, Xiao, Xu (bib5) 2014; 125
Capella-Allouc, Morsad, Rongières-Bertrand, Taylor, Fernandez (bib14) 1999; 14
Bhandari, Bhave, Ganguly, Baxi, Agarwal (bib1) 2015; 16
(bib20) 1988; 49
Zhang, Li, Wang, Lu, Yu (bib26) 2022; 156
Chen, Wu, Luo, Chen, Shi, Zheng (bib25) 2010; 8
Deans, Abbott (bib22) 2010; 17
Gao, Cui, Li, Ding, Zhang, Zhang (bib29) 2020; 40
Xu, Zhang, Jin, Mao, Shi, Huang (bib28) 2021; 12
Li, Duan, Wang (bib17) 2023; 46
Mahutte, Hartman, Meng, Lanes, Luo, Liu (bib27) 2022; 117
Mahutte (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib27) 2022; 117
Roy (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib11) 2010; 281
MMFH (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib7) 2021; 116
Capella-Allouc (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib14) 1999; 14
Yu (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib21) 2008; 89
(10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib20) 1988; 49
Kodaman (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib31) 2007; 19
Zhao (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib10) 2017; 295
Xiao (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib5) 2014; 125
Fernandez (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib15) 2006; 13
Xu (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib28) 2021; 12
Xu (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib6) 2018; 50
Deans (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib22) 2010; 17
Zhao (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib12) 2020; 8
Yu (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib3) 2008; 89
Wang (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib16) 2019; 18
Movilla (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib30) 2020; 35
Zhang (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib26) 2022; 156
Gao (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib29) 2020; 40
Wamsteker (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib19) 1998
Zhang (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib2) 2023; 49
Chen (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib4) 2017; 24
Deans (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib9) 2018; 33
Hooker (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib13) 2014; 20
Feng (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib8) 1999; 8
Li (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib17) 2023; 46
Chen (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib25) 2010; 8
Bhandari (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib1) 2015; 16
Higham (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib18) 1990; 97
Gargett (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib23) 2016; 22
Baradwan (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib24) 2018; 10
References_xml – volume: 24
  start-page: 299
  year: 2017
  end-page: 304
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Reproductive outcomes in patients with intrauterine adhesions following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: experience from the largest women’s hospital in China
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1230
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1233
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Hysteroscopic treatment of severe Asherman’s syndrome and subsequent fertility
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
– volume: 116
  start-page: 1181
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1187
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Live births after Asherman syndrome treatment
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 10
  start-page: 77
  year: 2018
  end-page: 82
  ident: bib24
  article-title: The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcome in patients with Asherman’s syndrome post-hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
  publication-title: Int J Womens Health
– start-page: 511
  year: 1998
  end-page: 524
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Diagnostic hysteroscopy: technique and documentation
  publication-title: Endoscopic surgery for gynecologists
– volume: 17
  start-page: 555
  year: 2010
  end-page: 569
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Review of intrauterine adhesions
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
– volume: 8
  start-page: 95
  year: 1999
  end-page: 98
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy for traumatic intrauterine adhesions after induced abortions: clinical analysis of 365 cases
  publication-title: Gynaecol Endoscopy
– volume: 125
  start-page: 121
  year: 2014
  end-page: 124
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Etiology, treatment, and reproductive prognosis of women with moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
– volume: 20
  start-page: 262
  year: 2014
  end-page: 278
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome
  publication-title: Hum Reprod Update
– volume: 50
  start-page: 49
  year: 2018
  end-page: 54
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Effect of early second-look hysteroscopy on reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesion, a retrospective study in China
  publication-title: Int J Surg
– volume: 19
  start-page: 207
  year: 2007
  end-page: 214
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Intra-uterine adhesions and fertility outcome: how to optimize success?
  publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 46
  start-page: 965
  year: 2023
  end-page: 972
  ident: bib17
  article-title: An XGBoost predictive model of ongoing pregnancy in patients following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
– volume: 89
  start-page: 715
  year: 2008
  end-page: 722
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2746
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2754
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Endometrial thickness measurements among Asherman syndrome patients prior to embryo transfer
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
– volume: 8
  start-page: 30
  year: 2010
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study
  publication-title: Reprod Biol Endocrinol
– volume: 13
  start-page: 398
  year: 2006
  end-page: 402
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Fertility after treatment of Asherman’s syndrome stage 3 and 4
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
– volume: 12
  year: 2021
  ident: bib28
  article-title: The effects of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes of fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of over 40,000 cycles among five reproductive centers in China
  publication-title: Front Endocrinol
– volume: 40
  start-page: 124
  year: 2020
  end-page: 133
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Endometrial thickness and IVF cycle outcomes: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
– volume: 281
  start-page: 355
  year: 2010
  end-page: 361
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman’s syndrome
  publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1847
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1853
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Live birth rate and obstetric complications following the hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions including Asherman syndrome
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
– volume: 89
  start-page: 759
  year: 2008
  end-page: 779
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Asherman syndrome-one century later
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 117
  start-page: 792
  year: 2022
  end-page: 800
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Optimal endometrial thickness in fresh and frozen-thaw in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of live birth rates from 96,000 autologous embryo transfers
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 156
  start-page: 55
  year: 2022
  end-page: 63
  ident: bib26
  article-title: The relationship and optimal threshold of endometrial thickness with early clinical pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
– volume: 16
  start-page: 229
  year: 2015
  end-page: 235
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Reproductive outcome of patients with Asherman’s syndrome: a SAIMS experience
  publication-title: J Reprod Infertil
– volume: 97
  start-page: 734
  year: 1990
  end-page: 739
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart
  publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol
– volume: 18
  start-page: 3675
  year: 2019
  end-page: 3680
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Factors affecting pregnancy outcomes following the surgical removal of intrauterine adhesions and subsequent in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
  publication-title: Exp Ther Med
– volume: 49
  start-page: 1571
  year: 2023
  end-page: 1578
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Chitosan combined with intrauterine device prevents intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a target trial emulation study
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Res
– volume: 295
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 5
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Dominant factors affecting reproductive outcomes of fertility-desiring young women with intrauterine adhesions
  publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet
– volume: 8
  start-page: 49
  year: 2020
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Logistic regression analyses of factors affecting fertility of intrauterine adhesions patients
  publication-title: Ann Transl Med
– volume: 49
  start-page: 944
  year: 1988
  end-page: 955
  ident: bib20
  article-title: The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 22
  start-page: 137
  year: 2016
  end-page: 163
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Endometrial stem/progenitor cells: the first 10 years
  publication-title: Hum Reprod Update
– volume: 8
  start-page: 95
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib8
  article-title: Diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy for traumatic intrauterine adhesions after induced abortions: clinical analysis of 365 cases
  publication-title: Gynaecol Endoscopy
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.1999.00245.x
– volume: 13
  start-page: 398
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib15
  article-title: Fertility after treatment of Asherman’s syndrome stage 3 and 4
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.04.013
– volume: 17
  start-page: 555
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib22
  article-title: Review of intrauterine adhesions
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.016
– volume: 49
  start-page: 1571
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib2
  article-title: Chitosan combined with intrauterine device prevents intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a target trial emulation study
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Res
  doi: 10.1111/jog.15629
– volume: 8
  start-page: 30
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib25
  article-title: Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study
  publication-title: Reprod Biol Endocrinol
  doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-30
– volume: 89
  start-page: 715
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib3
  article-title: Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.070
– volume: 49
  start-page: 944
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib20
  article-title: The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59942-7
– volume: 40
  start-page: 124
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib29
  article-title: Endometrial thickness and IVF cycle outcomes: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
  doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.09.005
– volume: 117
  start-page: 792
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib27
  article-title: Optimal endometrial thickness in fresh and frozen-thaw in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of live birth rates from 96,000 autologous embryo transfers
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.025
– volume: 295
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib10
  article-title: Dominant factors affecting reproductive outcomes of fertility-desiring young women with intrauterine adhesions
  publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4314-z
– volume: 18
  start-page: 3675
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib16
  article-title: Factors affecting pregnancy outcomes following the surgical removal of intrauterine adhesions and subsequent in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
  publication-title: Exp Ther Med
– volume: 281
  start-page: 355
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib11
  article-title: Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman’s syndrome
  publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1117-x
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1230
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib14
  article-title: Hysteroscopic treatment of severe Asherman’s syndrome and subsequent fertility
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1230
– volume: 10
  start-page: 77
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib24
  article-title: The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcome in patients with Asherman’s syndrome post-hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
  publication-title: Int J Womens Health
  doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S151283
– volume: 125
  start-page: 121
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib5
  article-title: Etiology, treatment, and reproductive prognosis of women with moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.10.026
– volume: 8
  start-page: 49
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib12
  article-title: Logistic regression analyses of factors affecting fertility of intrauterine adhesions patients
  publication-title: Ann Transl Med
  doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.115
– volume: 19
  start-page: 207
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib31
  article-title: Intra-uterine adhesions and fertility outcome: how to optimize success?
  publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32814a6473
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2746
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib30
  article-title: Endometrial thickness measurements among Asherman syndrome patients prior to embryo transfer
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa273
– volume: 89
  start-page: 759
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib21
  article-title: Asherman syndrome-one century later
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096
– volume: 24
  start-page: 299
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib4
  article-title: Reproductive outcomes in patients with intrauterine adhesions following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: experience from the largest women’s hospital in China
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.018
– volume: 50
  start-page: 49
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib6
  article-title: Effect of early second-look hysteroscopy on reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesion, a retrospective study in China
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.11.040
– start-page: 511
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib19
  article-title: Diagnostic hysteroscopy: technique and documentation
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1847
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib9
  article-title: Live birth rate and obstetric complications following the hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions including Asherman syndrome
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey237
– volume: 20
  start-page: 262
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib13
  article-title: Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome
  publication-title: Hum Reprod Update
  doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt045
– volume: 156
  start-page: 55
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib26
  article-title: The relationship and optimal threshold of endometrial thickness with early clinical pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13606
– volume: 22
  start-page: 137
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib23
  article-title: Endometrial stem/progenitor cells: the first 10 years
  publication-title: Hum Reprod Update
– volume: 16
  start-page: 229
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib1
  article-title: Reproductive outcome of patients with Asherman’s syndrome: a SAIMS experience
  publication-title: J Reprod Infertil
– volume: 97
  start-page: 734
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib18
  article-title: Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart
  publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x
– volume: 46
  start-page: 965
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib17
  article-title: An XGBoost predictive model of ongoing pregnancy in patients following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
  doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.01.019
– volume: 12
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib28
  article-title: The effects of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes of fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of over 40,000 cycles among five reproductive centers in China
  publication-title: Front Endocrinol
– volume: 116
  start-page: 1181
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022_bib7
  article-title: Live births after Asherman syndrome treatment
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.099
SSID ssj0006172
Score 2.4787931
Snippet To evaluate independent factors that affect the chance of live birth (LB) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions....
To evaluate independent factors that affect the chance of live birth (LB) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions.OBJECTIVETo...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 873
SubjectTerms Adult
Asherman syndrome
China - epidemiology
Cohort Studies
Female
Gynatresia - diagnosis
Gynatresia - etiology
Gynatresia - surgery
Humans
Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
Hysteroscopy
independent predictors
Live Birth
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Retrospective Studies
Tissue Adhesions - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Uterine Diseases - diagnosis
Uterine Diseases - surgery
Title A retrospective cohort study to examine factors affecting live birth after hysteroscopic treatment of intrauterine adhesions
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0015028224000256
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38246404
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2917551411
Volume 121
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdZC2MvY9_NvtBgb8XFdmxLYU_ZaFdG2sFIRvYkZFmmKZ1dUpuVsT9-d_pwXJpCtheTHDk79v18-ul0uiPkvc7SclTIMIhh9AgAIWmQl9g1tZBJqDlXsdnHfXKaHc-TL4t0MRhc97KW2iY_UL837iv5H6uCDOyKu2T_wbLdSUEAn8G-cAQLw3ErG0_2V7pZ1X635D52u101tmQskkp9LX8ii_RNdaRJ3sDgwIVJWl_imo3tEn6GFZ2xsmV9uVS99HNbUWIlsfMDnkoWZ_qqi_H5_p6YnG34vAnD40_xWy8obQKyP9rGD5QGSC5UvVjK-ld7S_ytXXrZorUCmDVU_TBFnKyTAr1nTbMA2KP1ZnqDzLvjOOrhLu05V26bntxy-jb-cH5Qws1WeI-YIxsnthxrvB7o_OL-6VdxNJ9OxexwMbtHdmPGcIF_9_PH6fdJN4ojszO1dt1fdFlgNjdw85XuojZ3TV0MhZk9Ig_d3INOLJAek4GunpD7Jy674in5M6E38EQtnqjBE21q6vBEHZ5ohyeKeKIGT9Tgid7AE-3wROuS9vFEOzw9I_Ojw9mn48B15wgUkM4mAF7N2biQMuFxkulMqpKFOZdlrMM05mGR50AnwUewMFNpWnIsBlgwxaSUMAfno-dkp6orvUdoWHJZpIVKSzlK8rGSBdOsTLgaMV5E-XhImH-wQrnS9dhB5UL4HMVzsTaJQJOIMBJgkiGJOs1LW75lC52xt53w25NhQBUAty10P3S6jsJaarql9jsPFQFeHpfuZKXr9krEY6D5MLeJoiF5YTHU3c8In38SJi-30H5FHqxfztdkp1m1-g2w6iZ_616Av2hi2NI
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+retrospective+cohort+study+to+examine+factors+affecting+live+birth+after+hysteroscopic+treatment+of+intrauterine+adhesions&rft.jtitle=Fertility+and+sterility&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Yuting&rft.au=Huang%2C+Xiaowu&rft.au=Huang%2C+Rui&rft.au=Xu%2C+Ruonan&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.issn=1556-5653&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2024.01.022&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon