Modern management of anal fistula

Ideal surgical treatment for anal fistula should aim to eradicate sepsis and promote healing of the tract,whilst preserving the sphincters and the mechanism of continence.For the simple and most distal fistulae,conventional surgical options such as laying open of the fistula tract seem to be relativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 12 - 20
Main Author Limura, Elsa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 07.01.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ideal surgical treatment for anal fistula should aim to eradicate sepsis and promote healing of the tract,whilst preserving the sphincters and the mechanism of continence.For the simple and most distal fistulae,conventional surgical options such as laying open of the fistula tract seem to be relatively safe and therefore,well accepted in clinical practise.However,for the more complex fistulae where a significant proportion of the anal sphincter is involved,great concern remains about damaging the sphincter and subsequent poor functional outcome,which is quite inevitable following conventional surgical treatment.For this reason,over the last twodecades,many sphincter-preserving procedures for the treatment of anal fistula have been introduced with the common goal of minimising the injury to the anal sphincters and preserving optimal function.Among them,the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure appears to be safe and effective and may be routinely considered for complex anal fistula.Another technique,the anal fistula plug,derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa,is safe but modestly effective in long-term follow-up,with success rates varying from 24%-88%.The failure rate may be due to its extrusion from the fistula tract.To obviate that,a new designed plug(GORE BioA ) was introduced,but long term data regarding its efficacy are scant.Fibrin glue showed poor and variable healing rate(14%-74%).Fi La C and video-assisted anal fistula treatment procedures,respectively using laser and electrode energy,are expensive and yet to be thoroughly assessed in clinical practise.Recently,a therapy using autologous adiposederived stem cells has been described.Their properties of regenerating tissues and suppressing inflammatory response must be better investigated on anal fistulae,and studies remain in progress.The aim of this present article is to review the pertinent literature,describing the advantages and limitations of new sphincterpreserving techniques.
Bibliography:Anal fistula management;Ligation of intersphincter
Elsa Limura;Pasquale Giordano;Department of Colorectal Surgery,Whipps Cross Hospital,Barts Health NHS Trust,London E11 1NR,United Kingdom
Ideal surgical treatment for anal fistula should aim to eradicate sepsis and promote healing of the tract,whilst preserving the sphincters and the mechanism of continence.For the simple and most distal fistulae,conventional surgical options such as laying open of the fistula tract seem to be relatively safe and therefore,well accepted in clinical practise.However,for the more complex fistulae where a significant proportion of the anal sphincter is involved,great concern remains about damaging the sphincter and subsequent poor functional outcome,which is quite inevitable following conventional surgical treatment.For this reason,over the last twodecades,many sphincter-preserving procedures for the treatment of anal fistula have been introduced with the common goal of minimising the injury to the anal sphincters and preserving optimal function.Among them,the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure appears to be safe and effective and may be routinely considered for complex anal fistula.Another technique,the anal fistula plug,derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa,is safe but modestly effective in long-term follow-up,with success rates varying from 24%-88%.The failure rate may be due to its extrusion from the fistula tract.To obviate that,a new designed plug(GORE BioA ) was introduced,but long term data regarding its efficacy are scant.Fibrin glue showed poor and variable healing rate(14%-74%).Fi La C and video-assisted anal fistula treatment procedures,respectively using laser and electrode energy,are expensive and yet to be thoroughly assessed in clinical practise.Recently,a therapy using autologous adiposederived stem cells has been described.Their properties of regenerating tissues and suppressing inflammatory response must be better investigated on anal fistulae,and studies remain in progress.The aim of this present article is to review the pertinent literature,describing the advantages and limitations of new sphincterpreserving techniques.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Author contributions: Limura E acquisition of data, management of the database, data analysis and interpretation, drafting and revising; Giordano P conception and design, drafting and revising.
Correspondence to: Pasquale Giordano, MD FRCS, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whipps Cross road, London E11 1NR, United Kingdom. p.giordano@londoncolorectal.org
Telephone: +44-20-85356656 Fax: +44-20-85356656
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.12