Theories of Person Perception Predict Patterns of Neural Activity During Mentalizing

• Published in: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) Vol. 28; no. 10; pp. 3505 - 3520
• Main Authors: Thornton, Mark A, Mitchell, Jason P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Oxford University Press 01.10.2018
• Subjects: multivoxel pattern analysis; social cognition; theory of mind; functional magnetic resonance imaging
• ISSN: 1047-3211; 1460-2199
• DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx216

Abstract Social life requires making inferences about other people. What information do perceivers spontaneously draw upon to make such inferences? Here, we test 4 major theories of person perception, and 1 synthetic theory that combines their features, to determine whether the dimensions of such theories can serve as bases for describing patterns of neural activity during mentalizing. While undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants made social judgments about well-known public figures. Patterns of brain activity were then predicted using feature encoding models that represented target people's positions on theoretical dimensions such as warmth and competence. All 5 theories of person perception proved highly accurate at reconstructing activity patterns, indicating that each could describe the informational basis of mentalizing. Cross-validation indicated that the theories robustly generalized across both targets and participants. The synthetic theory consistently attained the best performance-approximately two-thirds of noise ceiling accuracy--indicating that, in combination, the theories considered here can account for much of the neural representation of other people. Moreover, encoding models trained on the present data could reconstruct patterns of activity associated with mental state representations in independent data, suggesting the use of a common neural code to represent others' traits and states.