Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for monitoring liver steatosis

Purpose To compare noninvasive MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) methods with liver biopsy to quantify liver fat content. Materials and Methods Quantification of liver fat was compared by liver biopsy, proton MRS, and MRI using in‐phase/out‐of‐phase (IP/OP) and plus/minus fat saturation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 28; no. 4; pp. 937 - 945
Main Authors Cowin, Gary J., Jonsson, Julie R., Bauer, Judith D., Ash, Susan, Ali, Azmat, Osland, Emma J., Purdie, David M., Clouston, Andrew D., Powell, Elizabeth E., Galloway, Graham J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.10.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To compare noninvasive MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) methods with liver biopsy to quantify liver fat content. Materials and Methods Quantification of liver fat was compared by liver biopsy, proton MRS, and MRI using in‐phase/out‐of‐phase (IP/OP) and plus/minus fat saturation (±FS) techniques. The reproducibility of each MR measure was also determined. An additional group of overweight patients with steatosis underwent hepatic MRI and MRS before and after a six‐month weight‐loss program. Results A close correlation was demonstrated between histological assessment of steatosis and measurement of intrahepatocellular lipid (IHCL) by MRS (rs = 0.928, P < 0.0001) and MRI (IP/OP rs = 0.942, P < 0.0001; FS rs = 0.935, P < 0.0001). Following weight reduction, four of five patients with >5% weight loss had a decrease in IHCL of ≥50%. Conclusion These findings suggest that standard MRI protocols provide a rapid, safe, and quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis. This is important because MRS is not available on all clinical MRI systems. This will enable noninvasive monitoring of the effects of interventions such as weight loss or pharmacotherapy in patients with fatty liver diseases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:937–945. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:Sasakawa Foundation (Royal Children's Hospital)
ark:/67375/WNG-75WPZ7S0-F
Wesley Research Institute
Princess Alexandra Hospital Research and Development Foundation
Queensland Government's Smart State Health and Medical Research Fund
ArticleID:JMRI21542
National Health and Medical Research Council
istex:B95E8E3D2B502CE630D4F193391AD2924216E8C1
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.21542