Outcomes of Non-Operative Treatment for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer

We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gastric cancer Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 28 - 33
Main Authors Ali, Bandar Idrees, Park, Cho Hyun, Song, Kyo Young
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 01.03.2016
대한위암학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients' clinical outcomes were analyzed. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively. Non-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention.
AbstractList We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer.PURPOSEWe evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer.A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients' clinical outcomes were analyzed.MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients' clinical outcomes were analyzed.Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively.RESULTSDuodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively.Non-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention.CONCLUSIONSNon-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention.
Purpose: We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients’ clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively. Conclusions: Non-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention. KCI Citation Count: 0
We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients' clinical outcomes were analyzed. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively. Non-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention.
Author Park, Cho Hyun
Song, Kyo Young
Ali, Bandar Idrees
AuthorAffiliation Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Bandar Idrees
  surname: Ali
  fullname: Ali, Bandar Idrees
  organization: Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Cho Hyun
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Cho Hyun
  organization: Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Kyo Young
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Kyo Young
  organization: Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002096468$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1UU1v1DAQjVAR_aB3TshHOGSxHefrglQttFRasQgWiZs1sSdbd5M4tZ2i_nucbhcBEtZIY2nee_M07zQ5GuyASfKK0UXOM_rudqsWnLJiMdeCV8-SE07rLM0LwY4O_4r_OE7Ovb-l8eUFY5S_SI55yaigXJwk43oKyvboiW3JZzuk6xEdBHOPZOMQQo9DIK115MNkNQ7QkW9h6keyQtjBFgm0AR25Ah8cqmD7B2IG8iUKRJ4nP0242Q-NIksYFLqXyfMWOo_nT_0s-X75cbP8lK7WV9fLi1WqREZDqvI847pRIJhWDUCpBQfguipyVrdNSSETFdBC84aVulVNiawAjTTOUIs6O0ve7nUH18qdMtKCeexbK3dOXnzdXMt4BFHlRcS-32PHqelRq-jdQSdHZ3pwD4_MvyeDuYk691JUmShYFQXePAk4ezehD7I3XmHXwYB28pKVVVazuixnX6__3PV7ySGSCCj2AOWs9w5bqUyIB7XzatNF03KOX8b45Ry_nEvy2QT9h3jQ_i_lFyrItS8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_jscr_rjae444
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10120_019_00946_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radcr_2024_02_022
crossref_primary_10_11569_wcjd_v29_i2_99
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2017_0541
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_021_08582_z
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_26484
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2019_01020
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_019_0520_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12328_024_01965_4
crossref_primary_10_5230_jgc_2017_17_e40
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2018_03_082
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2022_02_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sopen_2023_09_015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10120_024_01538_x
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0394_9508_20_05183_9
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40792_019_0738_y
crossref_primary_10_5230_jgc_2020_20_e4
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00268-007-9114-3
10.1002/jso.22045
10.1007/s00270-012-0518-6
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d3d29b
10.1007/s00268-010-0741-8
10.2214/ajr.143.4.811
10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7571
10.4174/jkss.2010.78.3.165
10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00028-9
10.1016/0002-9610(91)90102-J
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2016
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2016
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2093-5641
EndPage 33
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1044856
PMC4834618
27104024
10_5230_jgc_2016_16_1_28
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 5-W
53G
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
CITATION
EF.
HYE
KQ8
KVFHK
M48
OK1
PGMZT
RPM
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-c5532dbca41dcbaa7d42aa2d86519fb70a348a06d2b17dfcb7e16ade0fb7ed493
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2093-582X
IngestDate Sun Mar 09 07:51:03 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:02:51 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:28:01 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:01:52 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:55:11 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:47 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Tube duodenostomy
Non-operative treatment
Duodenal stump leakage
Gastrectomy
Stomach neoplasms
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c430t-c5532dbca41dcbaa7d42aa2d86519fb70a348a06d2b17dfcb7e16ade0fb7ed493
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
G704-SER000001500.2016.16.1.001
http://pdf.medrang.co.kr/paper/pdf/Gasca/Gasca016-01-05.pdf
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28
PMID 27104024
PQID 1783919779
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1044856
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4834618
proquest_miscellaneous_1783919779
pubmed_primary_27104024
crossref_citationtrail_10_5230_jgc_2016_16_1_28
crossref_primary_10_5230_jgc_2016_16_1_28
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Journal of gastric cancer
PublicationTitleAlternate J Gastric Cancer
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
대한위암학회
Publisher_xml – name: The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
– name: 대한위암학회
References Oh (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref9) 2013; 36
Papanicolaou (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref8) 1984; 143
Strong (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref1) 2010; 251
Hur (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref3) 2010; 78
Tøttrup (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref5) 2010; 34
Isik (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref12) 2007; 31
Li (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref4) 2003; 116
Golub (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref2) 1997; 184
Yoo (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref6) 2011; 104
Pickleman (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref7) 1999; 188
Aurello (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref11) 2015; 21
Welch (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref10) 1954; 98
Burch (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref13) 1991; 162
17566821 - World J Surg. 2007 Aug;31(8):1616-24; discussion 1625-6
6332489 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Oct;143(4):811-5
20703469 - World J Surg. 2010 Nov;34(11):2752-4
13146489 - Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954 Mar;98(3):376-9
9100681 - J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Apr;184(4):364-72
21792945 - J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):734-40
10235574 - J Am Coll Surg. 1999 May;188(5):473-82
1670218 - Am J Surg. 1991 Dec;162(6):522-6
26140005 - World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 28;21(24):7571-6
23483281 - Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Oct;36(5):1344-9
20224369 - Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):640-6
12775223 - Chin Med J (Engl). 2003 Feb;116(2):171-5
References_xml – volume: 31
  start-page: 1616
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref12
  publication-title: World J Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9114-3
– volume: 104
  start-page: 734
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref6
  publication-title: J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1002/jso.22045
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1344
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref9
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0518-6
– volume: 251
  start-page: 640
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref1
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d3d29b
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2752
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref5
  publication-title: World J Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0741-8
– volume: 143
  start-page: 811
  year: 1984
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref8
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.143.4.811
– volume: 184
  start-page: 364
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref2
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
– volume: 21
  start-page: 7571
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref11
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7571
– volume: 78
  start-page: 165
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref3
  publication-title: J Korean Surg Soc
  doi: 10.4174/jkss.2010.78.3.165
– volume: 116
  start-page: 171
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref4
  publication-title: Chin Med J (Engl)
– volume: 188
  start-page: 473
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref7
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00028-9
– volume: 162
  start-page: 522
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref13
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90102-J
– volume: 98
  start-page: 376
  year: 1954
  ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref10
  publication-title: Surg Gynecol Obstet
– reference: 20703469 - World J Surg. 2010 Nov;34(11):2752-4
– reference: 9100681 - J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Apr;184(4):364-72
– reference: 1670218 - Am J Surg. 1991 Dec;162(6):522-6
– reference: 26140005 - World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 28;21(24):7571-6
– reference: 23483281 - Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Oct;36(5):1344-9
– reference: 12775223 - Chin Med J (Engl). 2003 Feb;116(2):171-5
– reference: 13146489 - Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954 Mar;98(3):376-9
– reference: 21792945 - J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):734-40
– reference: 17566821 - World J Surg. 2007 Aug;31(8):1616-24; discussion 1625-6
– reference: 6332489 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Oct;143(4):811-5
– reference: 20224369 - Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):640-6
– reference: 10235574 - J Am Coll Surg. 1999 May;188(5):473-82
SSID ssj0000561102
Score 2.4502928
Snippet We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 1,230...
We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer.PURPOSEWe...
Purpose: We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer....
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 28
SubjectTerms Original
일반외과학
Title Outcomes of Non-Operative Treatment for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104024
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1783919779
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4834618
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002096468
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Journal of Gastric Cancer, 2016, 16(1), , pp.28-33
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELfYkBAviPFZ2CaDeOHBXew6Tvo0ocEYiG5IrFLfLH9llI6kpKnE_nvu4rRQVCEkS3k420n8s32_89lnQl55dG7BzMdyHxSTQFiZKQrP_NDLkFpvVHuOe3Suzsby4ySd_D4e3TXgYqtph_dJjevr_s8fN8cw4IG_9nFN8-jbFcYi5KqPqS_yHXIb9FKGw3TUkf0Y6VuBrkO3ggAznqW5mES_5dZKNvTUTlkX2yjo3zsp_1BNp_fJvY5T0jexE-yRW6F8QO6MOq_5QzK_WDbQscKCVgU9r0p2MQ8x4De9XO0zp0Be6dtlBdMQVPWlAZTpp2BmMN3Q9h5x-t7guRLXVN9v6LSkn2NA1gXFldwonDp6gp2ofkTGp-8uT85Yd9MCc3KQNMyl6UB464zk3lljMi-FMcLnCgheYbPEDGRuEuWF5ZkvnM0CV8aHBGTBy-HgMdktqzI8JVQowwvgidmQBxDY3CiXC-sct4mD6aJHjlbtql0Xhhxvw7jWYI4gEhqQ0IiExqQFlHi9LjGPITj-kfclQKVnbqoxbjY-ryo9qzVYBx-gFBijqeqRFyskNQwm9JCYMlTLheYZ8EUOlHjYI08isutXCuBiYGzLHsk2MF9nwBduSsrp1zZgNy7YKp4_-5-Pe07u4g_FbW77ZLepl-EAeE9jD9vufNguSP0CKl8Clg
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes+of+Non-Operative+Treatment+for+Duodenal+Stump+Leakage+after+Gastrectomy+in+Patients+with+Gastric+Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+gastric+cancer&rft.au=Bandar+Idrees+Ali&rft.au=%EB%B0%95%EC%A1%B0%ED%98%84&rft.au=%EC%86%A1%EA%B5%90%EC%98%81&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%9C%84%EC%95%94%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=2093-582X&rft.eissn=2093-5641&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=33&rft_id=info:doi/10.5230%2Fjgc.2016.16.1.28&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1044856
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2093-582X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2093-582X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2093-582X&client=summon