Outcomes of Non-Operative Treatment for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer
We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and the...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of gastric cancer Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 28 - 33 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
01.03.2016
대한위암학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer.
A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients' clinical outcomes were analyzed.
Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively.
Non-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer.PURPOSEWe evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer.A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients' clinical outcomes were analyzed.MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients' clinical outcomes were analyzed.Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively.RESULTSDuodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively.Non-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention.CONCLUSIONSNon-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention. Purpose: We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients’ clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively. Conclusions: Non-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention. KCI Citation Count: 0 We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 1,230 patients underwent gastrectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2014. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in 19 patients (1.5%), and these patients were included in this study. The management options varied with patient condition; patients were managed conservatively, with a pigtail catheter drain, or by tube duodenostomy via a Foley catheter. The patients' clinical outcomes were analyzed. Duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed in all 19 patients within a median of 10 days (range, 1~20 days). The conservative group comprised of 5 patients (26.3%), the pigtail catheter group of 11 patients (57.9%), and the Foley catheter group of 3 patients (15.8%). All 3 management modalities were successful; none of the patients needed further operative intervention. The median hospital stay was 18, 33, and 42 days, respectively. Non-operative management of duodenal stump leakage for selected groups of patients with gastric cancer was effective for control of intra-abdominal sepsis. This management modality can help obviate the need for surgical intervention. |
Author | Park, Cho Hyun Song, Kyo Young Ali, Bandar Idrees |
AuthorAffiliation | Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Bandar Idrees surname: Ali fullname: Ali, Bandar Idrees organization: Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Cho Hyun surname: Park fullname: Park, Cho Hyun organization: Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Kyo Young surname: Song fullname: Song, Kyo Young organization: Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002096468$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp1UU1v1DAQjVAR_aB3TshHOGSxHefrglQttFRasQgWiZs1sSdbd5M4tZ2i_nucbhcBEtZIY2nee_M07zQ5GuyASfKK0UXOM_rudqsWnLJiMdeCV8-SE07rLM0LwY4O_4r_OE7Ovb-l8eUFY5S_SI55yaigXJwk43oKyvboiW3JZzuk6xEdBHOPZOMQQo9DIK115MNkNQ7QkW9h6keyQtjBFgm0AR25Ah8cqmD7B2IG8iUKRJ4nP0242Q-NIksYFLqXyfMWOo_nT_0s-X75cbP8lK7WV9fLi1WqREZDqvI847pRIJhWDUCpBQfguipyVrdNSSETFdBC84aVulVNiawAjTTOUIs6O0ve7nUH18qdMtKCeexbK3dOXnzdXMt4BFHlRcS-32PHqelRq-jdQSdHZ3pwD4_MvyeDuYk691JUmShYFQXePAk4ezehD7I3XmHXwYB28pKVVVazuixnX6__3PV7ySGSCCj2AOWs9w5bqUyIB7XzatNF03KOX8b45Ry_nEvy2QT9h3jQ_i_lFyrItS8 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_jscr_rjae444 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10120_019_00946_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radcr_2024_02_022 crossref_primary_10_11569_wcjd_v29_i2_99 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2017_0541 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_021_08582_z crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_26484 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2019_01020 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_019_0520_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s12328_024_01965_4 crossref_primary_10_5230_jgc_2017_17_e40 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2018_03_082 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2022_02_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sopen_2023_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10120_024_01538_x crossref_primary_10_23736_S0394_9508_20_05183_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40792_019_0738_y crossref_primary_10_5230_jgc_2020_20_e4 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00268-007-9114-3 10.1002/jso.22045 10.1007/s00270-012-0518-6 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d3d29b 10.1007/s00268-010-0741-8 10.2214/ajr.143.4.811 10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7571 10.4174/jkss.2010.78.3.165 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00028-9 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90102-J |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2016 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2016 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2093-5641 |
EndPage | 33 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1044856 PMC4834618 27104024 10_5230_jgc_2016_16_1_28 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 5-W 53G 8JR 8XY 9ZL AAYXX ABDBF ADBBV ADRAZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS CITATION EF. HYE KQ8 KVFHK M48 OK1 PGMZT RPM NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-c5532dbca41dcbaa7d42aa2d86519fb70a348a06d2b17dfcb7e16ade0fb7ed493 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2093-582X |
IngestDate | Sun Mar 09 07:51:03 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:02:51 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 01:28:01 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:01:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:55:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:47 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Tube duodenostomy Non-operative treatment Duodenal stump leakage Gastrectomy Stomach neoplasms |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c430t-c5532dbca41dcbaa7d42aa2d86519fb70a348a06d2b17dfcb7e16ade0fb7ed493 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 G704-SER000001500.2016.16.1.001 http://pdf.medrang.co.kr/paper/pdf/Gasca/Gasca016-01-05.pdf |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28 |
PMID | 27104024 |
PQID | 1783919779 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1044856 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4834618 proquest_miscellaneous_1783919779 pubmed_primary_27104024 crossref_citationtrail_10_5230_jgc_2016_16_1_28 crossref_primary_10_5230_jgc_2016_16_1_28 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-03-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2016 text: 2016-03-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Journal of gastric cancer |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Gastric Cancer |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 대한위암학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Korean Gastric Cancer Association – name: 대한위암학회 |
References | Oh (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref9) 2013; 36 Papanicolaou (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref8) 1984; 143 Strong (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref1) 2010; 251 Hur (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref3) 2010; 78 Tøttrup (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref5) 2010; 34 Isik (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref12) 2007; 31 Li (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref4) 2003; 116 Golub (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref2) 1997; 184 Yoo (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref6) 2011; 104 Pickleman (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref7) 1999; 188 Aurello (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref11) 2015; 21 Welch (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref10) 1954; 98 Burch (10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref13) 1991; 162 17566821 - World J Surg. 2007 Aug;31(8):1616-24; discussion 1625-6 6332489 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Oct;143(4):811-5 20703469 - World J Surg. 2010 Nov;34(11):2752-4 13146489 - Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954 Mar;98(3):376-9 9100681 - J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Apr;184(4):364-72 21792945 - J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):734-40 10235574 - J Am Coll Surg. 1999 May;188(5):473-82 1670218 - Am J Surg. 1991 Dec;162(6):522-6 26140005 - World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 28;21(24):7571-6 23483281 - Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Oct;36(5):1344-9 20224369 - Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):640-6 12775223 - Chin Med J (Engl). 2003 Feb;116(2):171-5 |
References_xml | – volume: 31 start-page: 1616 year: 2007 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref12 publication-title: World J Surg doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9114-3 – volume: 104 start-page: 734 year: 2011 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref6 publication-title: J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1002/jso.22045 – volume: 36 start-page: 1344 year: 2013 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref9 publication-title: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0518-6 – volume: 251 start-page: 640 year: 2010 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref1 publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d3d29b – volume: 34 start-page: 2752 year: 2010 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref5 publication-title: World J Surg doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0741-8 – volume: 143 start-page: 811 year: 1984 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref8 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.143.4.811 – volume: 184 start-page: 364 year: 1997 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref2 publication-title: J Am Coll Surg – volume: 21 start-page: 7571 year: 2015 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref11 publication-title: World J Gastroenterol doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7571 – volume: 78 start-page: 165 year: 2010 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref3 publication-title: J Korean Surg Soc doi: 10.4174/jkss.2010.78.3.165 – volume: 116 start-page: 171 year: 2003 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref4 publication-title: Chin Med J (Engl) – volume: 188 start-page: 473 year: 1999 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref7 publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00028-9 – volume: 162 start-page: 522 year: 1991 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref13 publication-title: Am J Surg doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90102-J – volume: 98 start-page: 376 year: 1954 ident: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28_ref10 publication-title: Surg Gynecol Obstet – reference: 20703469 - World J Surg. 2010 Nov;34(11):2752-4 – reference: 9100681 - J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Apr;184(4):364-72 – reference: 1670218 - Am J Surg. 1991 Dec;162(6):522-6 – reference: 26140005 - World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 28;21(24):7571-6 – reference: 23483281 - Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Oct;36(5):1344-9 – reference: 12775223 - Chin Med J (Engl). 2003 Feb;116(2):171-5 – reference: 13146489 - Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954 Mar;98(3):376-9 – reference: 21792945 - J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):734-40 – reference: 17566821 - World J Surg. 2007 Aug;31(8):1616-24; discussion 1625-6 – reference: 6332489 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Oct;143(4):811-5 – reference: 20224369 - Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):640-6 – reference: 10235574 - J Am Coll Surg. 1999 May;188(5):473-82 |
SSID | ssj0000561102 |
Score | 2.4502928 |
Snippet | We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer.
A total of 1,230... We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer.PURPOSEWe... Purpose: We evaluated the clinical outcomes of the non-operative management of post-gastrectomy duodenal stump leakage in patients with gastric cancer.... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 28 |
SubjectTerms | Original 일반외과학 |
Title | Outcomes of Non-Operative Treatment for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104024 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1783919779 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4834618 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002096468 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Journal of Gastric Cancer, 2016, 16(1), , pp.28-33 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELfYkBAviPFZ2CaDeOHBXew6Tvo0ocEYiG5IrFLfLH9llI6kpKnE_nvu4rRQVCEkS3k420n8s32_89lnQl55dG7BzMdyHxSTQFiZKQrP_NDLkFpvVHuOe3Suzsby4ySd_D4e3TXgYqtph_dJjevr_s8fN8cw4IG_9nFN8-jbFcYi5KqPqS_yHXIb9FKGw3TUkf0Y6VuBrkO3ggAznqW5mES_5dZKNvTUTlkX2yjo3zsp_1BNp_fJvY5T0jexE-yRW6F8QO6MOq_5QzK_WDbQscKCVgU9r0p2MQ8x4De9XO0zp0Be6dtlBdMQVPWlAZTpp2BmMN3Q9h5x-t7guRLXVN9v6LSkn2NA1gXFldwonDp6gp2ofkTGp-8uT85Yd9MCc3KQNMyl6UB464zk3lljMi-FMcLnCgheYbPEDGRuEuWF5ZkvnM0CV8aHBGTBy-HgMdktqzI8JVQowwvgidmQBxDY3CiXC-sct4mD6aJHjlbtql0Xhhxvw7jWYI4gEhqQ0IiExqQFlHi9LjGPITj-kfclQKVnbqoxbjY-ryo9qzVYBx-gFBijqeqRFyskNQwm9JCYMlTLheYZ8EUOlHjYI08isutXCuBiYGzLHsk2MF9nwBduSsrp1zZgNy7YKp4_-5-Pe07u4g_FbW77ZLepl-EAeE9jD9vufNguSP0CKl8Clg |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes+of+Non-Operative+Treatment+for+Duodenal+Stump+Leakage+after+Gastrectomy+in+Patients+with+Gastric+Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+gastric+cancer&rft.au=Bandar+Idrees+Ali&rft.au=%EB%B0%95%EC%A1%B0%ED%98%84&rft.au=%EC%86%A1%EA%B5%90%EC%98%81&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%9C%84%EC%95%94%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=2093-582X&rft.eissn=2093-5641&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=33&rft_id=info:doi/10.5230%2Fjgc.2016.16.1.28&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1044856 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2093-582X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2093-582X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2093-582X&client=summon |