Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJBRA assisted reproduction Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 240 - 246
Main Authors Dieamant, Felipe, Petersen, Claudia G., Mauri, Ana L., Comar, Vanessa, Mattila, Marina, Vagnini, Laura D., Renzi, Adriana, Petersen, Bruna, Ricci, Juliana, Oliveira, João Batista A., Baruffi, Ricardo L.R., Franco Júnior, Jose G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction) 2017
Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p=0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p=0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p=0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p=0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles.
AbstractList This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p=0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p=0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p=0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p=0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles.This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p=0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p=0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p=0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p=0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles.
This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p=0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p=0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p=0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p=0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles.
This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p =0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p =0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p =0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p =0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles.
Author Oliveira, João Batista A.
Franco Júnior, Jose G.
Mattila, Marina
Comar, Vanessa
Vagnini, Laura D.
Petersen, Bruna
Baruffi, Ricardo L.R.
Petersen, Claudia G.
Renzi, Adriana
Ricci, Juliana
Dieamant, Felipe
Mauri, Ana L.
AuthorAffiliation 1 Center for Human Reproduction Prof. Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
2 Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Center for Human Reproduction Prof. Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
– name: 2 Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Felipe
  surname: Dieamant
  fullname: Dieamant, Felipe
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Claudia G.
  surname: Petersen
  fullname: Petersen, Claudia G.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ana L.
  surname: Mauri
  fullname: Mauri, Ana L.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Vanessa
  surname: Comar
  fullname: Comar, Vanessa
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Marina
  surname: Mattila
  fullname: Mattila, Marina
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Laura D.
  surname: Vagnini
  fullname: Vagnini, Laura D.
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Adriana
  surname: Renzi
  fullname: Renzi, Adriana
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Bruna
  surname: Petersen
  fullname: Petersen, Bruna
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Juliana
  surname: Ricci
  fullname: Ricci, Juliana
– sequence: 10
  givenname: João Batista A.
  surname: Oliveira
  fullname: Oliveira, João Batista A.
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Ricardo L.R.
  surname: Baruffi
  fullname: Baruffi, Ricardo L.R.
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Jose G.
  surname: Franco Júnior
  fullname: Franco Júnior, Jose G.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28837034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Uk1v1DAQtVARLUv_AAdkiQuXFDv-SMKBqqr4kipxAM7WxDu76yqxF9vZau_8cBxttyo9cBrLfu953rx5SU588EjIa84uVCfUe654WzGlmoua8YYxqZ6Rs4fLk0fnU3Ke0i1jjHe8FpK9IKd124qGCXlG_vxwfj0g3WFMU6IJf0_os4OB2mnIU0Q64tJN4wd6t3F2Q12iPeaMkUKmbtzGsCsCNPh1mOs24tqDt3saIWO6pFc07VPGEbKzNOLO4R0FvyyqGSrwMOyTS6_I8xUMCc_v64L8-vzp5_XX6ub7l2_XVzeVlYLlSneAzaqpccVANboBrWyrtERc2p7ZGmTH-1brJdNWC94z0fcgal6ca9CSiwX5eNDdTn2xZYvTCIPZRjdC3JsAzvz74t3GrMPOlClKLZsi8O5eIIYyqJTN6JLFYQCPYUqGd-U73amS0IK8fQK9DVMshmeUYqphB8E3jzt6aOUYUAG0B4CNIaWIK2NdLsMMc4NuMJyZeR3MnLaZ0zbHdSjU-gn1qP4f0l_My7jT
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skac043
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2024_07_018
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deaa138
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_repbio_2020_08_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbmo_2019_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deab038
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_018_1195_4
crossref_primary_10_1071_RD23168
crossref_primary_10_1111_and_12964
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2018_09_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gofs_2024_12_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2022_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2020_3045772
crossref_primary_10_1080_03009734_2020_1728444
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_021_02187_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2020_08_001
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms20225650
crossref_primary_10_1093_hropen_hoz031
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.5935/1518-0557.20170045
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
Publicly Available Content Database

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1518-0557
EndPage 246
ExternalDocumentID PMC5574647
28837034
10_5935_1518_0557_20170045
Genre Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GroupedDBID 53G
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAYXX
ABUWG
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AFKRA
AHMBA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BENPR
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CITATION
FYUFA
HMCUK
HYE
M1P
M48
OK1
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RPM
UKHRP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-69ae7f72ef0a5767a65c8564eedcb0c2a491b866d06c631b03bba3210016a6413
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1518-0557
1517-5693
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:19:43 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 02:57:23 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 08:01:27 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:23:33 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:31:57 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords meta-analysis
controlled clinical trials
randomized
embryo culture techniques
pregnancy
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c430t-69ae7f72ef0a5767a65c8564eedcb0c2a491b866d06c631b03bba3210016a6413
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/1950570647?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 28837034
PQID 1950570647
PQPubID 2045587
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5574647
proquest_miscellaneous_1932169559
proquest_journals_1950570647
pubmed_primary_28837034
crossref_citationtrail_10_5935_1518_0557_20170045
crossref_primary_10_5935_1518_0557_20170045
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2017
  text: 2017-00-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Brazil
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Brazil
– name: Brasilia
PublicationTitle JBRA assisted reproduction
PublicationTitleAlternate JBRA Assist Reprod
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)
Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
Publisher_xml – name: Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)
– name: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
SSID ssj0001912340
ssib001134770
ssib019568316
Score 2.1676748
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted...
This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 240
SubjectTerms Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology
Culture Media
Embryo Culture Techniques - methods
Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data
Evidence-based medicine
Female
Humans
Meta-analysis
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Review
Systematic review
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9wwELYoXHqpWrWlaSmaSr1Vpk5iO2suCCEQqgQXuhK3yDYOu9I2C7tZFe78cGbiZGGh5RRFduLHjD0z9sw3jH1P3SCvpMy4CSpwiSYDd5V3PKC14VwlKnwhb4tTfTyUv87V-Rrr0x11Ezj_p2lH-aSGs8nOzfXtHi541F93lMnVTxRaA05YUuSpRXDt6hXbQMlUUEaDk0fqfkpxkw_82YbK5Z161J7JGNzHYwylws1baZPHOJv_NLMqy54pqE_9LB8JrqO37E2nccJ-ZJF3bC3U79ndGYqsSQByyljMITpU42KfQITiCECX7os_u_B3NPYjGM_BtYE_YBsY9wcRMK0vp_S8moVLQu64BUKemO_BPjxAREMMjwFbX-BfG8ttB4TygQ2PDn8fHPMuIQP3MhcN18aGoiqyUAmLdkphtfIDpSXKWe-Ez6w0SHutL4T2Ok-dyJ2zFCSEeqXVKC4_svV6WodPDDLcOAovTIYqiAxpsMYK69KBFoVxxqUJS_upLX2HVk5JMyYlWi1EjpLIURI5yp4cCfux_OYqYnW8WHurp1jZs11JSXFVQQG4Cfu2LMYVR9cotg7TBdXBIWlC7kvYZiTwsjnK3Yx7qExYsUL6ZQVC814tqcejFtUb-yax3c8vd-sLe00DiIdAW2y9mS3CV1SLGrfd8vo9QtUFoA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28837034
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1950570647
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1932169559
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5574647
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La9wwEBZtcumlpPTl5oEKvRUR2ZZkq5eQloRQaChtA3szklbOLmzsbewl5N4fnhlL3u22kJOxJT_kGc2MRjPfEPIhtWVeC5Ex7aVnApYMzNbOMg-rDWtrXsMJRltcqosr8XUiJ9Hh1sWwylEmDoJ62jr0kR9juVJZYGrkyfI3w6pRuLsaS2g8JbsIXYZcXUw26jTFPMkNPw6pcXk0hwYfjAa5HXImJQhrqXQe8mqkzuUxXCsZQlRhABiiwMtt3fWfQfpvXOVfiup8jzyPFiY9DSzxgjzxzUvy5yeoqIWnGISx6mgIoIbJvaABesNT3GRf3Xyid7O5m9F5R-2Q6ENNT-ej44G2zXWLx-Wtv0akjnuKSBPdCT2lG0hoGtJhqGmm8NTeMBOBT16Rq_OzX18uWCzAwJzIec-UNr6oi8zX3MC6pDBKulIqAXrVWe4yIzTQWqkpV07lqeW5tQaTgsCONArU42uy07SNf0toBoKicFxnYHIIn3qjDTc2LRUvtNU2TUg6_trKRXRyLJKxqGCVguSokBwVkqMayZGQj-t7lgGb49HeByPFqjhPu2rDVQl5v26GGYbbJqbx7Qr7wJAUIvUl5E0g8Pp1WKsZZKZISLFF-nUHRO_ebmnmswHFG75NwHvfPf5Z--QZDiA4fQ7ITn-78odgBvX2aOD1I7L7-ezy-w84-ybKBwsJBSI
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Nb9MwFLfGOMBlAvEVGGAkOCFrTmI79SQ0TcDUsbELm9RbsF1nrVSSbkk17b6_h7-R9-KkpSDttlPVxk3i_F7eh_3e7xHyPraDtBAiYdpLzwSEDMwWzjIP0Ya1BS_gC2ZbnKjhmfg2kqMN8ruvhcG0yl4ntop6XDlcI9_BdqUyw9LIvfkFw65RuLvat9AIYnHkr68gZKs_HX4BfD8kycHX089D1nUVYE6kvGFKG58VWeILbsDZzoySbiCVAGPhLHeJERomoNSYK6fS2PLUWoOVLuAcGQU6H857j9wHw8sx2MtGK_MdY13mSv7bUry0c7_aNR8NdiLUaEowDlLpNNTxSJ3KHfhtwJASCxPOkHVertvK_xzgf_M4_zKMB4_IVufR0v0ggo_Jhi-fkJsfYBJnnmLSx6KmIWEblMmMBqoPT3FTf_Frl15Npm5CpzW1bWERNQ2d9gsdtCrPK_ycX_pzZAa5pshsUe_RfbqioKah_IaacgxnbQwzHdHKU3J2J9A8I5tlVfoXhCagmDLHdQIujvCxN9pwY-OB4pm22sYRiftHm7uODR2bcsxyiIoQjhzhyBGOvIcjIh-X_5kHLpBbR2_3iOWdXqjzlRRH5N3yMLzRuE1jSl8tcAxMSSEzYESeB4CXl8Pe0KCjRUSyNeiXA5AtfP1IOZ20rOFwbwKu-_L223pLHgxPvx_nx4cnR6_IQ5xMWHDaJpvN5cK_BhessW9auafk512_aH8APjs-sw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFD4anYR4QSBugQFGgicUNRfbqZHQNNiqjaFqAibtLdius1YqSVlaTXvnV_HrOCdOWgrS3vZUpXEuzmefi33OdwBex2aQFpwnoXLChRxdhtAU1oQOvQ1jiqjAA4q2GMnDU_7pTJxtwe8uF4bCKjuZ2AjqcWVpjbxP5UpFRqmR_aINizjZH-7Of4ZUQYp2WrtyGn6IHLurS3Tf6vdH-4j1myQZHnz7eBi2FQZCy9NoEUqlXVZkiSsijYZ3pqWwAyE5Kg5rIptorrAzUo4jaWUamyg1RlPWCxpKWqL8x_vegu2MvKIebH84GJ18WRsjlKW5ng1NYl7aGmPNCpBCreEzNgWqCiFV6rN6hEpFH_8bhESQReFnxEEvNjXnf-bwv1Gdf6nJ4T2429q3bM8PyPuw5coH8OsrKsiZYxQCsqyZD99G0TJjnvjDMdriX_54xy4nUzth05qZJs2I6QWbdsserCrPK_qdX7hz4gm5YsRzUe-yPbYmpGY-GYfpcox3XehQt7QrD-H0RsB5BL2yKt0TYAmKqcxGKkGDh7vYaaUjbeKBjDJllIkDiLtPm9uWG51KdMxy9JEIjpzgyAmOvIMjgLera-aeGeTa1jsdYnkrJep8PaYDeLU6jfObNm106aoltcEuSeIJDOCxB3j1OKoUjRKbB5BtQL9qQNzhm2fK6aThEMd34_jcp9e_1ku4jZMs_3w0On4Gd6gvfvVpB3qLi6V7jvbYwrxoBz6D7zc91_4A0SVETg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single+versus+sequential+culture+medium%3A+which+is+better+at+improving+ongoing+pregnancy+rates%3F+A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=JBRA+assisted+reproduction&rft.au=Dieamant+Felipe&rft.au=Petersen%2C+Claudia+G&rft.au=Mauri%2C+Ana+L&rft.au=Comar+Vanessa&rft.date=2017&rft.pub=Sociedade+Brasileira+de+Reprodu%C3%A7%C3%A3o+Humana+%28Brazilian+Society+of+Assisted+Reproduction%29&rft.issn=1517-5693&rft.eissn=1518-0557&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=246&rft_id=info:doi/10.5935%2F1518-0557.20170045&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1518-0557&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1518-0557&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1518-0557&client=summon