Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis
This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a s...
Saved in:
Published in | JBRA assisted reproduction Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 240 - 246 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Brazil
Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)
2017
Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p=0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p=0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p=0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p=0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p=0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p=0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p=0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p=0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles.This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p=0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p=0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p=0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p=0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles. This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p=0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p=0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p=0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p=0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles. This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p =0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p =0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p =0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p =0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles. |
Author | Oliveira, João Batista A. Franco Júnior, Jose G. Mattila, Marina Comar, Vanessa Vagnini, Laura D. Petersen, Bruna Baruffi, Ricardo L.R. Petersen, Claudia G. Renzi, Adriana Ricci, Juliana Dieamant, Felipe Mauri, Ana L. |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Center for Human Reproduction Prof. Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil 2 Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Center for Human Reproduction Prof. Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil – name: 2 Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Felipe surname: Dieamant fullname: Dieamant, Felipe – sequence: 2 givenname: Claudia G. surname: Petersen fullname: Petersen, Claudia G. – sequence: 3 givenname: Ana L. surname: Mauri fullname: Mauri, Ana L. – sequence: 4 givenname: Vanessa surname: Comar fullname: Comar, Vanessa – sequence: 5 givenname: Marina surname: Mattila fullname: Mattila, Marina – sequence: 6 givenname: Laura D. surname: Vagnini fullname: Vagnini, Laura D. – sequence: 7 givenname: Adriana surname: Renzi fullname: Renzi, Adriana – sequence: 8 givenname: Bruna surname: Petersen fullname: Petersen, Bruna – sequence: 9 givenname: Juliana surname: Ricci fullname: Ricci, Juliana – sequence: 10 givenname: João Batista A. surname: Oliveira fullname: Oliveira, João Batista A. – sequence: 11 givenname: Ricardo L.R. surname: Baruffi fullname: Baruffi, Ricardo L.R. – sequence: 12 givenname: Jose G. surname: Franco Júnior fullname: Franco Júnior, Jose G. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28837034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9Uk1v1DAQtVARLUv_AAdkiQuXFDv-SMKBqqr4kipxAM7WxDu76yqxF9vZau_8cBxttyo9cBrLfu953rx5SU588EjIa84uVCfUe654WzGlmoua8YYxqZ6Rs4fLk0fnU3Ke0i1jjHe8FpK9IKd124qGCXlG_vxwfj0g3WFMU6IJf0_os4OB2mnIU0Q64tJN4wd6t3F2Q12iPeaMkUKmbtzGsCsCNPh1mOs24tqDt3saIWO6pFc07VPGEbKzNOLO4R0FvyyqGSrwMOyTS6_I8xUMCc_v64L8-vzp5_XX6ub7l2_XVzeVlYLlSneAzaqpccVANboBrWyrtERc2p7ZGmTH-1brJdNWC94z0fcgal6ca9CSiwX5eNDdTn2xZYvTCIPZRjdC3JsAzvz74t3GrMPOlClKLZsi8O5eIIYyqJTN6JLFYQCPYUqGd-U73amS0IK8fQK9DVMshmeUYqphB8E3jzt6aOUYUAG0B4CNIaWIK2NdLsMMc4NuMJyZeR3MnLaZ0zbHdSjU-gn1qP4f0l_My7jT |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skac043 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2024_07_018 crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deaa138 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_repbio_2020_08_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbmo_2019_02_009 crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deab038 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_018_1195_4 crossref_primary_10_1071_RD23168 crossref_primary_10_1111_and_12964 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2018_09_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gofs_2024_12_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2022_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2020_3045772 crossref_primary_10_1080_03009734_2020_1728444 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_021_02187_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2020_08_001 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms20225650 crossref_primary_10_1093_hropen_hoz031 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.5935/1518-0557.20170045 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1518-0557 |
EndPage | 246 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5574647 28837034 10_5935_1518_0557_20170045 |
Genre | Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 53G 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAYXX ABUWG ADBBV ADRAZ AFKRA AHMBA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CITATION FYUFA HMCUK HYE M1P M48 OK1 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RPM UKHRP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-69ae7f72ef0a5767a65c8564eedcb0c2a491b866d06c631b03bba3210016a6413 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1518-0557 1517-5693 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:19:43 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:57:23 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 08:01:27 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:23:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:31:57 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | meta-analysis controlled clinical trials randomized embryo culture techniques pregnancy |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c430t-69ae7f72ef0a5767a65c8564eedcb0c2a491b866d06c631b03bba3210016a6413 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1950570647?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 28837034 |
PQID | 1950570647 |
PQPubID | 2045587 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5574647 proquest_miscellaneous_1932169559 proquest_journals_1950570647 pubmed_primary_28837034 crossref_citationtrail_10_5935_1518_0557_20170045 crossref_primary_10_5935_1518_0557_20170045 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2017 text: 2017-00-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Brazil |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Brazil – name: Brasilia |
PublicationTitle | JBRA assisted reproduction |
PublicationTitleAlternate | JBRA Assist Reprod |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction) Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction |
Publisher_xml | – name: Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction) – name: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction |
SSID | ssj0001912340 ssib001134770 ssib019568316 |
Score | 2.1676748 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted... This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 240 |
SubjectTerms | Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology Culture Media Embryo Culture Techniques - methods Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data Evidence-based medicine Female Humans Meta-analysis Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Review Systematic review |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9wwELYoXHqpWrWlaSmaSr1Vpk5iO2suCCEQqgQXuhK3yDYOu9I2C7tZFe78cGbiZGGh5RRFduLHjD0z9sw3jH1P3SCvpMy4CSpwiSYDd5V3PKC14VwlKnwhb4tTfTyUv87V-Rrr0x11Ezj_p2lH-aSGs8nOzfXtHi541F93lMnVTxRaA05YUuSpRXDt6hXbQMlUUEaDk0fqfkpxkw_82YbK5Z161J7JGNzHYwylws1baZPHOJv_NLMqy54pqE_9LB8JrqO37E2nccJ-ZJF3bC3U79ndGYqsSQByyljMITpU42KfQITiCECX7os_u_B3NPYjGM_BtYE_YBsY9wcRMK0vp_S8moVLQu64BUKemO_BPjxAREMMjwFbX-BfG8ttB4TygQ2PDn8fHPMuIQP3MhcN18aGoiqyUAmLdkphtfIDpSXKWe-Ez6w0SHutL4T2Ok-dyJ2zFCSEeqXVKC4_svV6WodPDDLcOAovTIYqiAxpsMYK69KBFoVxxqUJS_upLX2HVk5JMyYlWi1EjpLIURI5yp4cCfux_OYqYnW8WHurp1jZs11JSXFVQQG4Cfu2LMYVR9cotg7TBdXBIWlC7kvYZiTwsjnK3Yx7qExYsUL6ZQVC814tqcejFtUb-yax3c8vd-sLe00DiIdAW2y9mS3CV1SLGrfd8vo9QtUFoA priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28837034 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1950570647 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1932169559 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5574647 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La9wwEBZtcumlpPTl5oEKvRUR2ZZkq5eQloRQaChtA3szklbOLmzsbewl5N4fnhlL3u22kJOxJT_kGc2MRjPfEPIhtWVeC5Ex7aVnApYMzNbOMg-rDWtrXsMJRltcqosr8XUiJ9Hh1sWwylEmDoJ62jr0kR9juVJZYGrkyfI3w6pRuLsaS2g8JbsIXYZcXUw26jTFPMkNPw6pcXk0hwYfjAa5HXImJQhrqXQe8mqkzuUxXCsZQlRhABiiwMtt3fWfQfpvXOVfiup8jzyPFiY9DSzxgjzxzUvy5yeoqIWnGISx6mgIoIbJvaABesNT3GRf3Xyid7O5m9F5R-2Q6ENNT-ej44G2zXWLx-Wtv0akjnuKSBPdCT2lG0hoGtJhqGmm8NTeMBOBT16Rq_OzX18uWCzAwJzIec-UNr6oi8zX3MC6pDBKulIqAXrVWe4yIzTQWqkpV07lqeW5tQaTgsCONArU42uy07SNf0toBoKicFxnYHIIn3qjDTc2LRUvtNU2TUg6_trKRXRyLJKxqGCVguSokBwVkqMayZGQj-t7lgGb49HeByPFqjhPu2rDVQl5v26GGYbbJqbx7Qr7wJAUIvUl5E0g8Pp1WKsZZKZISLFF-nUHRO_ebmnmswHFG75NwHvfPf5Z--QZDiA4fQ7ITn-78odgBvX2aOD1I7L7-ezy-w84-ybKBwsJBSI |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Nb9MwFLfGOMBlAvEVGGAkOCFrTmI79SQ0TcDUsbELm9RbsF1nrVSSbkk17b6_h7-R9-KkpSDttlPVxk3i_F7eh_3e7xHyPraDtBAiYdpLzwSEDMwWzjIP0Ya1BS_gC2ZbnKjhmfg2kqMN8ruvhcG0yl4ntop6XDlcI9_BdqUyw9LIvfkFw65RuLvat9AIYnHkr68gZKs_HX4BfD8kycHX089D1nUVYE6kvGFKG58VWeILbsDZzoySbiCVAGPhLHeJERomoNSYK6fS2PLUWoOVLuAcGQU6H857j9wHw8sx2MtGK_MdY13mSv7bUry0c7_aNR8NdiLUaEowDlLpNNTxSJ3KHfhtwJASCxPOkHVertvK_xzgf_M4_zKMB4_IVufR0v0ggo_Jhi-fkJsfYBJnnmLSx6KmIWEblMmMBqoPT3FTf_Frl15Npm5CpzW1bWERNQ2d9gsdtCrPK_ycX_pzZAa5pshsUe_RfbqioKah_IaacgxnbQwzHdHKU3J2J9A8I5tlVfoXhCagmDLHdQIujvCxN9pwY-OB4pm22sYRiftHm7uODR2bcsxyiIoQjhzhyBGOvIcjIh-X_5kHLpBbR2_3iOWdXqjzlRRH5N3yMLzRuE1jSl8tcAxMSSEzYESeB4CXl8Pe0KCjRUSyNeiXA5AtfP1IOZ20rOFwbwKu-_L223pLHgxPvx_nx4cnR6_IQ5xMWHDaJpvN5cK_BhessW9auafk512_aH8APjs-sw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFD4anYR4QSBugQFGgicUNRfbqZHQNNiqjaFqAibtLdius1YqSVlaTXvnV_HrOCdOWgrS3vZUpXEuzmefi33OdwBex2aQFpwnoXLChRxdhtAU1oQOvQ1jiqjAA4q2GMnDU_7pTJxtwe8uF4bCKjuZ2AjqcWVpjbxP5UpFRqmR_aINizjZH-7Of4ZUQYp2WrtyGn6IHLurS3Tf6vdH-4j1myQZHnz7eBi2FQZCy9NoEUqlXVZkiSsijYZ3pqWwAyE5Kg5rIptorrAzUo4jaWUamyg1RlPWCxpKWqL8x_vegu2MvKIebH84GJ18WRsjlKW5ng1NYl7aGmPNCpBCreEzNgWqCiFV6rN6hEpFH_8bhESQReFnxEEvNjXnf-bwv1Gdf6nJ4T2429q3bM8PyPuw5coH8OsrKsiZYxQCsqyZD99G0TJjnvjDMdriX_54xy4nUzth05qZJs2I6QWbdsserCrPK_qdX7hz4gm5YsRzUe-yPbYmpGY-GYfpcox3XehQt7QrD-H0RsB5BL2yKt0TYAmKqcxGKkGDh7vYaaUjbeKBjDJllIkDiLtPm9uWG51KdMxy9JEIjpzgyAmOvIMjgLera-aeGeTa1jsdYnkrJep8PaYDeLU6jfObNm106aoltcEuSeIJDOCxB3j1OKoUjRKbB5BtQL9qQNzhm2fK6aThEMd34_jcp9e_1ku4jZMs_3w0On4Gd6gvfvVpB3qLi6V7jvbYwrxoBz6D7zc91_4A0SVETg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single+versus+sequential+culture+medium%3A+which+is+better+at+improving+ongoing+pregnancy+rates%3F+A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=JBRA+assisted+reproduction&rft.au=Dieamant+Felipe&rft.au=Petersen%2C+Claudia+G&rft.au=Mauri%2C+Ana+L&rft.au=Comar+Vanessa&rft.date=2017&rft.pub=Sociedade+Brasileira+de+Reprodu%C3%A7%C3%A3o+Humana+%28Brazilian+Society+of+Assisted+Reproduction%29&rft.issn=1517-5693&rft.eissn=1518-0557&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=246&rft_id=info:doi/10.5935%2F1518-0557.20170045&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1518-0557&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1518-0557&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1518-0557&client=summon |