Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units in Active Range of Motion Assessment in the Hip Joint

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 23; no. 21; p. 8782
• Main Authors: Stołowski, Łukasz, Niedziela, Maciej, Lubiatowski, Bartłomiej, Lubiatowski, Przemysław, Piontek, Tomasz
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 28.10.2023
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Arthritis; goniometer; Hip joint; hip range of motion; IMU; inclinometer; Knee; Medical equipment; Microelectromechanical systems; Motion capture; Osteoarthritis; Range of motion; Sensors; Smartphones; Poland
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s23218782

Measuring joint range of motion has traditionally occurred with a universal goniometer, inclinometer, or expensive laboratory systems. The popularity of the inertial measurement unit (IMU) is growing, enabling the small and even single portable device to measure the range of motion. Until now, they were not used to assess hip joint range of motion. Our study aimed to check the validity of IMUs in assessing hip range of motion and compare them to other measurement devices—universal goniometer and inclinometer. Twenty participants completed three hip movements (flexion in standing and prone internal and external rotation) on both hips. Two testers independently assessed each movement with a goniometer, digital inclinometer, and IMU at different time points. To assess the agreement of active hip ROM between devices, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis were used. Furthermore, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were also assessed by using ICC and Bland–Altman analysis. Limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated using Bland–Altman plots. The IMU demonstrated good to excellent validity (ICC: 0.87–0.99) compared to the goniometer and digital inclinometer, with LOAs < 9°, across all tested movements. Intra-rater reliability was excellent for all devices (ICC: 0.87–0.99) with LOAs < 7°. However, inter-rater reliability was moderate for flexion (ICC: 0.58–0.59, LOAs < 22.4) and poor for rotations (ICC: −0.33–0.04, LOAs < 7.8°). The present study shows that a single inertial measurement unit (RSQ Motion, RSQ Technologies, Poznan, Poland) could be successfully used to assess the active hip range of motion in healthy subjects, comparable to other methods accuracy.