Review and expert survey of allocation methods used in life cycle assessment of milk and beef
Purpose Beef and dairy production systems produce several by-products, such as fertilizers, bioenergy, hides, and pet foods, among which the environmental impacts arising from production should be allocated. The choice of allocation method therefore inevitably affects the results of life cycle asses...
Saved in:
Published in | The international journal of life cycle assessment Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 191 - 204 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.02.2022
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose
Beef and dairy production systems produce several by-products, such as fertilizers, bioenergy, hides, and pet foods, among which the environmental impacts arising from production should be allocated. The choice of allocation method therefore inevitably affects the results of life cycle assessment (LCA) for milk and beef. The aims of this study were to map out the different allocation methods used in dairy and beef LCA studies and to clarify the rationale for selecting a certain method.
Methods
A literature review was conducted to identify the different allocation methods used in LCA studies of milk and beef production and the products using beef by-products as a raw material. The justifications for the use of different methods in the studies were also collected. To map out the perspectives of LCA practitioners and further clarify the reasoning behind the use of certain allocation methods, a mixed method survey with quantitative questions and qualitative explanatory fields was sent to the authors included in the literature review.
Results and discussion
The literature review showed that the most commonly used allocation method between milk and meat was biophysical allocation, which is also the recommended method in LCA guidelines of milk production. Economic allocation was the second most common method, although the rationale for using economic allocation was weak. By-products, such as inedible body parts, were not considered in milk studies and were taken into account in only a small number of beef studies. This might be because most of the studies have cradle-to-farm gate system boundaries. According to the survey, a significantly higher share of LCA practitioners would allocate impacts also to these by-products.
Conclusions
The allocation is usually done between milk and meat, and other by-products are not taken into account. Since these materials are an unavoidable part of production and there are numerous uses for them, these outputs should be recognized as products and also taken into consideration in LCA studies. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose
Beef and dairy production systems produce several by-products, such as fertilizers, bioenergy, hides, and pet foods, among which the environmental impacts arising from production should be allocated. The choice of allocation method therefore inevitably affects the results of life cycle assessment (LCA) for milk and beef. The aims of this study were to map out the different allocation methods used in dairy and beef LCA studies and to clarify the rationale for selecting a certain method.
Methods
A literature review was conducted to identify the different allocation methods used in LCA studies of milk and beef production and the products using beef by-products as a raw material. The justifications for the use of different methods in the studies were also collected. To map out the perspectives of LCA practitioners and further clarify the reasoning behind the use of certain allocation methods, a mixed method survey with quantitative questions and qualitative explanatory fields was sent to the authors included in the literature review.
Results and discussion
The literature review showed that the most commonly used allocation method between milk and meat was biophysical allocation, which is also the recommended method in LCA guidelines of milk production. Economic allocation was the second most common method, although the rationale for using economic allocation was weak. By-products, such as inedible body parts, were not considered in milk studies and were taken into account in only a small number of beef studies. This might be because most of the studies have cradle-to-farm gate system boundaries. According to the survey, a significantly higher share of LCA practitioners would allocate impacts also to these by-products.
Conclusions
The allocation is usually done between milk and meat, and other by-products are not taken into account. Since these materials are an unavoidable part of production and there are numerous uses for them, these outputs should be recognized as products and also taken into consideration in LCA studies. PurposeBeef and dairy production systems produce several by-products, such as fertilizers, bioenergy, hides, and pet foods, among which the environmental impacts arising from production should be allocated. The choice of allocation method therefore inevitably affects the results of life cycle assessment (LCA) for milk and beef. The aims of this study were to map out the different allocation methods used in dairy and beef LCA studies and to clarify the rationale for selecting a certain method.MethodsA literature review was conducted to identify the different allocation methods used in LCA studies of milk and beef production and the products using beef by-products as a raw material. The justifications for the use of different methods in the studies were also collected. To map out the perspectives of LCA practitioners and further clarify the reasoning behind the use of certain allocation methods, a mixed method survey with quantitative questions and qualitative explanatory fields was sent to the authors included in the literature review.Results and discussionThe literature review showed that the most commonly used allocation method between milk and meat was biophysical allocation, which is also the recommended method in LCA guidelines of milk production. Economic allocation was the second most common method, although the rationale for using economic allocation was weak. By-products, such as inedible body parts, were not considered in milk studies and were taken into account in only a small number of beef studies. This might be because most of the studies have cradle-to-farm gate system boundaries. According to the survey, a significantly higher share of LCA practitioners would allocate impacts also to these by-products.ConclusionsThe allocation is usually done between milk and meat, and other by-products are not taken into account. Since these materials are an unavoidable part of production and there are numerous uses for them, these outputs should be recognized as products and also taken into consideration in LCA studies. |
Author | Kyttä, Venla Astaptsev, Aleksi Saarinen, Merja Tuomisto, Hanna L. Roitto, Marja |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Venla orcidid: 0000-0003-3700-5959 surname: Kyttä fullname: Kyttä, Venla email: venla.kytta@helsinki.fi organization: Future Sustainable Food Systems – research group, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki – sequence: 2 givenname: Marja surname: Roitto fullname: Roitto, Marja organization: Future Sustainable Food Systems – research group, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki – sequence: 3 givenname: Aleksi surname: Astaptsev fullname: Astaptsev, Aleksi organization: Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University – sequence: 4 givenname: Merja surname: Saarinen fullname: Saarinen, Merja organization: Natural Resources Institute Finland – sequence: 5 givenname: Hanna L. surname: Tuomisto fullname: Tuomisto, Hanna L. organization: Future Sustainable Food Systems – research group, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki, Natural Resources Institute Finland |
BookMark | eNp9kEtLAzEURoNUsK3-AVcB16N5TSZZSvEFBUF0KSHO3OjUmaQm02r_vbEjuHMR7uacL3BmaOKDB4ROKTmnhFQXiVIuq4Iwmh-huhAHaEolFUVVEjZBU6KFKjgX-gjNUlqRTBJdTtHzA2xb-MTWNxi-1hAHnDZxCzscHLZdF2o7tMHjHoa30CS8SdDg1uOudYDrXd0BtilBSj344cfp2-59v_YC4I7RobNdgpPfO0dP11ePi9tieX9zt7hcFrVgeihqW2nJBVGUARWESaYcUE4VZ1ZrcKAVk0IR2khHWS0t1c6VSpSirjRAw-fobNxdx_CxgTSYVdhEn780LA9LqZlQmWIjVceQUgRn1rHtbdwZSsxPRjNmNDmO2Wc0Ikt8lFKG_SvEv-l_rG_pkHZT |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2024_141703 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_022_02089_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_023_02264_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biteb_2022_101234 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_162507 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_023_02157_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfoodeng_2024_112147 crossref_primary_10_1186_s42779_022_00165_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_su16051919 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_134845 crossref_primary_10_2508_chikusan_94_397 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14020990 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsci_2024_103745 crossref_primary_10_1680_jtran_23_00044 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2023_103798 crossref_primary_10_1590_1984_3143_ar2023_0060 crossref_primary_10_3390_su151713002 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN23300 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_134552 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s11367-016-1201-y 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00434.x 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.028 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.017 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.105 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.009 10.1080/20430779.2011.637670 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.002 10.1126/science.aaq0216 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2017.06.071 10.1007/s11367-011-0283-9 10.3168/jds.2009-2162 10.1065/Ica2003.07.126 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.078 10.1007/s11367-016-1161-2 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00337.x 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.062 10.1007/s11367-014-0812-4 10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.015 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133841 10.1016/s0958-6946(97)88755-9 10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.08.012 10.2788/38479 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2021 The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2021 – notice: The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7ST 7TB 7XB 88I 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO F28 FR3 GNUQQ HCIFZ KR7 L6V M2P M7S PATMY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY Q9U SOI |
DOI | 10.1007/s11367-021-02019-4 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Environment Abstracts Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Science Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Civil Engineering Abstracts ProQuest Engineering Collection Science Database (ProQuest) Engineering Database Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic Environment Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central ProQuest Engineering Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Engineering Collection ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Civil Engineering Abstracts Engineering Database ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection Environmental Science Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Environment Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Central Student |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: SpringerOpen url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Business Economics |
EISSN | 1614-7502 |
EndPage | 204 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1007_s11367_021_02019_4 |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Ravitsemuksen Tutkimussäätiö – fundername: The Finnish Association of Academic Agronomists – fundername: University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital |
GroupedDBID | --- -5A -5G -5~ -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 199 1N0 2.D 203 29J 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 4P2 5VS 67M 67Z 6NX 78A 7XC 88I 8FE 8FG 8FH 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AABYN AAFGU AAHNG AAIAL AAIKC AAJKR AAMNW AAMRO AANZL AARHV AARTL AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYFA AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAZAB ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABEOS ABFGW ABFTD ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABJCF ABJNI ABJOX ABKAS ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACBMV ACBRV ACBXY ACBYP ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACHSB ACHXU ACIGE ACIHN ACIPQ ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACREN ACSNA ACTTH ACVWB ACWMK ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADMDM ADOXG ADQRH ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEAQA AEBTG AEEQQ AEFTE AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AESTI AETLH AEVLU AEVTX AEXYK AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFNRJ AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGBP AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIIXL AILAN AIMYW AITGF AJBLW AJDOV AJRNO AJZVZ AKQUC ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG ATCPS AVWKF AXYYD AYJHY AZFZN AZQEC B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA BHPHI BPHCQ C6C CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EBD EBLON EBS EDH EIOEI EJD ESBYG FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GXS HCIFZ HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ IJ- IKXTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Y I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV L6V LAS LLZTM M2P M4Y M7S MA- ML. N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NF0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM P19 P2P PATMY PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PT4 PT5 PTHSS PYCSY Q2X QOK QOS R89 R9I RHV RMD RNI RNS ROL RPX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S3B SAP SCK SCLPG SDH SEV SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 T16 TSG TSK TSV TUC U2A UCJ UG4 UNUBA UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WK6 WK8 Y6R YLTOR Z45 Z5O Z7R Z7S Z7U Z7V Z7W Z7X Z7Y Z7Z Z81 Z83 Z85 Z86 Z88 Z8M Z8N Z8P Z8Q Z8R Z8S Z8T Z8W Z92 ZMTXR AACDK AAEOY AAHBH AAJBT AASML AAYXX AAYZH ABAKF ABQSL ACAOD ACDTI ACZOJ AEFQL AEMSY AFBBN AFEUZ AGQEE AGRTI AIGIU CITATION H13 7ST 7TB 7XB 8FD 8FK BSONS C1K F28 FR3 KR7 PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U SOI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ca796340812e1402628fe131832a99efe98264801d6f12c6a19ff58454c79eed3 |
IEDL.DBID | AGYKE |
ISSN | 0948-3349 |
IngestDate | Sat Dec 14 03:18:55 EST 2024 Fri Dec 06 02:08:36 EST 2024 Sat Dec 16 12:09:08 EST 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Allocation methods By-product LCA System expansion Integrated dairy-beef production |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c429t-ca796340812e1402628fe131832a99efe98264801d6f12c6a19ff58454c79eed3 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-3700-5959 |
OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11367-021-02019-4 |
PQID | 2634669248 |
PQPubID | 54409 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2634669248 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_021_02019_4 springer_journals_10_1007_s11367_021_02019_4 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2022 text: 2022-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Berlin/Heidelberg |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Dordrecht |
PublicationTitle | The international journal of life cycle assessment |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Int J Life Cycle Assess |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – sequence: 0 name: Springer Nature B.V – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
References | Opio, Gerber, Mottet, Falcucci, Tempio, MacLeod, Vellinga, Henderson, Steinfeld (CR25) 2013 Cederberg, Stadig (CR5) 2003; 8 Baldini, Gardoni, Guarino (CR2) 2017 CR17 CR16 Nguyen, Doreau, Corson, Eugène, Delaby, Chesneau, Gallard, Van Der Werf (CR24) 2013; 120 Rotz, Montes, Chianese (CR30) 2010; 93 CR15 Ardente, Cellura (CR1) 2012; 16 CR13 CR11 CR32 Kristensen, Mogensen, Knudsen, Hermansen (CR19) 2011; 140 Pelletier, Tyedmers (CR26) 2011; 15 Brander, Wylie (CR4) 2011; 1 (CR10) 2015 Poore, Nemecek (CR28) 2018; 360 Weiler, Udo, Viets, Crane, De Boer (CR33) 2014; 8 Weiss, Leip (CR34) 2012; 149 Saarinen, Fogelholm, Tahvonen, Kurppa (CR31) 2017; 149 Pelletier, Ardente, Brandão, De Camillis, Pennington (CR27) 2015; 20 CR3 CR8 CR7 Mackenzie, Leinonen, Kyriazakis (CR20) 2017; 22 Kiefer, Menzel, Bahrs (CR18) 2015; 152 CR9 CR23 CR21 Chen, Wilfart, Puillet, Aubin (CR6) 2017; 22 Flysjö, Cederberg, Henriksson, Ledgard (CR12) 2011; 16 Rice, O’Brien, Shalloo, Holden (CR29) 2017; 202 Mogensen, Nguyen, Madsen, Pontoppidan, Preda, Hermansen (CR22) 2016; 133 (CR14) 2010; 445 V Weiler (2019_CR33) 2014; 8 2019_CR32 2019_CR8 2019_CR9 2019_CR17 2019_CR15 2019_CR16 2019_CR13 2019_CR11 N Pelletier (2019_CR27) 2015; 20 N Pelletier (2019_CR26) 2011; 15 CA Rotz (2019_CR30) 2010; 93 2019_CR3 C Cederberg (2019_CR5) 2003; 8 2019_CR7 IDF (2019_CR14) 2010; 445 C Opio (2019_CR25) 2013 2019_CR21 M Saarinen (2019_CR31) 2017; 149 P Rice (2019_CR29) 2017; 202 F Weiss (2019_CR34) 2012; 149 F Ardente (2019_CR1) 2012; 16 T Kristensen (2019_CR19) 2011; 140 M Brander (2019_CR4) 2011; 1 SG Mackenzie (2019_CR20) 2017; 22 TTH Nguyen (2019_CR24) 2013; 120 A Flysjö (2019_CR12) 2011; 16 2019_CR23 LR Kiefer (2019_CR18) 2015; 152 C Baldini (2019_CR2) 2017 X Chen (2019_CR6) 2017; 22 L Mogensen (2019_CR22) 2016; 133 J Poore (2019_CR28) 2018; 360 FAO (2019_CR10) 2015 |
References_xml | – year: 2013 ident: CR25 publication-title: Animal Production and Health Division — a global life cycle assessment contributor: fullname: Steinfeld – volume: 22 start-page: 883 year: 2017 end-page: 895 ident: CR6 article-title: A new method of biophysical allocation in LCA of livestock co-products: modeling metabolic energy requirements of body-tissue growth publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1201-y contributor: fullname: Aubin – volume: 16 start-page: 387 year: 2012 end-page: 398 ident: CR1 article-title: Economic allocation in life cycle assessment publication-title: J Ind Ecol doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00434.x contributor: fullname: Cellura – ident: CR16 – volume: 120 start-page: 127 year: 2013 end-page: 137 ident: CR24 article-title: Effect of dairy production system, breed and co-product handling methods on environmental impacts at farm level publication-title: J Environ Manage doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.028 contributor: fullname: Van Der Werf – volume: 152 start-page: 11 year: 2015 end-page: 18 ident: CR18 article-title: Integration of ecosystem services into the carbon footprint of milk of South German dairy farms publication-title: J Environ Manage doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.017 contributor: fullname: Bahrs – volume: 133 start-page: 284 year: 2016 end-page: 293 ident: CR22 article-title: Environmental impact of beef sourced from different production systems — focus on the slaughtering stage: input and output publication-title: J Clean Prod doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.105 contributor: fullname: Hermansen – volume: 8 start-page: 29 year: 2014 end-page: 38 ident: CR33 article-title: Handling multi-functionality of livestock in a life cycle assessment: the case of smallholder dairying in Kenya publication-title: Curr Opin Environ Sustain doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.009 contributor: fullname: De Boer – ident: CR8 – volume: 1 start-page: 161 year: 2011 end-page: 166 ident: CR4 article-title: The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment publication-title: Greenh Gas Meas Manag doi: 10.1080/20430779.2011.637670 contributor: fullname: Wylie – volume: 140 start-page: 136 year: 2011 end-page: 148 ident: CR19 article-title: Effect of production system and farming strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from commercial dairy farms in a life cycle approach publication-title: Livest Sci doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.002 contributor: fullname: Hermansen – volume: 360 start-page: 987 issue: 6392 year: 2018 end-page: 992 ident: CR28 article-title: Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216 contributor: fullname: Nemecek – ident: CR23 – volume: 202 start-page: 311 year: 2017 end-page: 319 ident: CR29 article-title: Evaluation of allocation methods for calculation of carbon footprint of grass-based dairy production publication-title: J Environ Manage doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2017.06.071 contributor: fullname: Holden – ident: CR21 – volume: 16 start-page: 420 year: 2011 end-page: 430 ident: CR12 article-title: How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1007/s11367-011-0283-9 contributor: fullname: Ledgard – volume: 93 start-page: 1266 year: 2010 end-page: 1282 ident: CR30 article-title: The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment publication-title: J Dairy Sci doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2162 contributor: fullname: Chianese – ident: CR3 – ident: CR15 – volume: 8 start-page: 350 year: 2003 end-page: 356 ident: CR5 article-title: System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1065/Ica2003.07.126 contributor: fullname: Stadig – ident: CR17 – year: 2017 ident: CR2 article-title: A critical review of the recent evolution of life cycle assessment applied to milk production publication-title: J Clean Prod doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.078 contributor: fullname: Guarino – ident: CR13 – ident: CR11 – ident: CR9 – volume: 22 start-page: 128 year: 2017 end-page: 137 ident: CR20 article-title: The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems—is “biophysical” allocation progress? publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1161-2 contributor: fullname: Kyriazakis – ident: CR32 – volume: 15 start-page: 342 year: 2011 end-page: 354 ident: CR26 article-title: An ecological economic critique of the use of market information in life cycle assessment research publication-title: J Ind Ecol doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00337.x contributor: fullname: Tyedmers – ident: CR7 – year: 2015 ident: CR10 publication-title: Environmental performance of large ruminant supply chains: guidelines for assessment – volume: 149 start-page: 828 year: 2017 end-page: 844 ident: CR31 article-title: Taking nutrition into account within the life cycle assessment of food products publication-title: J Clean Prod doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.062 contributor: fullname: Kurppa – volume: 20 start-page: 74 year: 2015 end-page: 86 ident: CR27 article-title: Rationales for and limitations of preferred solutions for multi-functionality problems in LCA: is increased consistency possible? publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1007/s11367-014-0812-4 contributor: fullname: Pennington – volume: 149 start-page: 124 year: 2012 end-page: 134 ident: CR34 article-title: Greenhouse gas emissions from the EU livestock sector: a life cycle assessment carried out with the CAPRI model publication-title: Agric Ecosyst Environ doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.015 contributor: fullname: Leip – volume: 445 start-page: 46 issue: 2010 year: 2010 ident: CR14 article-title: A common carbon footprint approach for dairy The IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology for the dairy sector publication-title: Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 – ident: 2019_CR11 – volume: 93 start-page: 1266 year: 2010 ident: 2019_CR30 publication-title: J Dairy Sci doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2162 contributor: fullname: CA Rotz – ident: 2019_CR8 – ident: 2019_CR13 – volume: 8 start-page: 350 year: 2003 ident: 2019_CR5 publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1065/Ica2003.07.126 contributor: fullname: C Cederberg – ident: 2019_CR17 – ident: 2019_CR3 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133841 – volume: 133 start-page: 284 year: 2016 ident: 2019_CR22 publication-title: J Clean Prod doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.105 contributor: fullname: L Mogensen – volume: 120 start-page: 127 year: 2013 ident: 2019_CR24 publication-title: J Environ Manage doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.028 contributor: fullname: TTH Nguyen – ident: 2019_CR21 – ident: 2019_CR23 – volume: 16 start-page: 420 year: 2011 ident: 2019_CR12 publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1007/s11367-011-0283-9 contributor: fullname: A Flysjö – volume: 20 start-page: 74 year: 2015 ident: 2019_CR27 publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1007/s11367-014-0812-4 contributor: fullname: N Pelletier – ident: 2019_CR15 doi: 10.1016/s0958-6946(97)88755-9 – volume: 8 start-page: 29 year: 2014 ident: 2019_CR33 publication-title: Curr Opin Environ Sustain doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.009 contributor: fullname: V Weiler – volume: 149 start-page: 124 year: 2012 ident: 2019_CR34 publication-title: Agric Ecosyst Environ doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.015 contributor: fullname: F Weiss – volume: 202 start-page: 311 year: 2017 ident: 2019_CR29 publication-title: J Environ Manage doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2017.06.071 contributor: fullname: P Rice – ident: 2019_CR7 – ident: 2019_CR16 – volume: 22 start-page: 128 year: 2017 ident: 2019_CR20 publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1161-2 contributor: fullname: SG Mackenzie – volume-title: Environmental performance of large ruminant supply chains: guidelines for assessment year: 2015 ident: 2019_CR10 contributor: fullname: FAO – volume: 16 start-page: 387 year: 2012 ident: 2019_CR1 publication-title: J Ind Ecol doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00434.x contributor: fullname: F Ardente – volume: 1 start-page: 161 year: 2011 ident: 2019_CR4 publication-title: Greenh Gas Meas Manag doi: 10.1080/20430779.2011.637670 contributor: fullname: M Brander – volume: 140 start-page: 136 year: 2011 ident: 2019_CR19 publication-title: Livest Sci doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.002 contributor: fullname: T Kristensen – volume: 149 start-page: 828 year: 2017 ident: 2019_CR31 publication-title: J Clean Prod doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.062 contributor: fullname: M Saarinen – volume: 445 start-page: 46 issue: 2010 year: 2010 ident: 2019_CR14 publication-title: Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 contributor: fullname: IDF – volume: 15 start-page: 342 year: 2011 ident: 2019_CR26 publication-title: J Ind Ecol doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00337.x contributor: fullname: N Pelletier – year: 2017 ident: 2019_CR2 publication-title: J Clean Prod doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.078 contributor: fullname: C Baldini – ident: 2019_CR32 doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.08.012 – volume: 22 start-page: 883 year: 2017 ident: 2019_CR6 publication-title: Int J Life Cycle Assess doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1201-y contributor: fullname: X Chen – ident: 2019_CR9 doi: 10.2788/38479 – volume: 360 start-page: 987 issue: 6392 year: 2018 ident: 2019_CR28 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216 contributor: fullname: J Poore – volume-title: Animal Production and Health Division — a global life cycle assessment year: 2013 ident: 2019_CR25 contributor: fullname: C Opio – volume: 152 start-page: 11 year: 2015 ident: 2019_CR18 publication-title: J Environ Manage doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.017 contributor: fullname: LR Kiefer |
SSID | ssj0021095 |
Score | 2.4941132 |
Snippet | Purpose
Beef and dairy production systems produce several by-products, such as fertilizers, bioenergy, hides, and pet foods, among which the environmental... PurposeBeef and dairy production systems produce several by-products, such as fertilizers, bioenergy, hides, and pet foods, among which the environmental... |
SourceID | proquest crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 191 |
SubjectTerms | Beef Body parts By products Byproducts Earth and Environmental Science Economics Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Economics Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental impact Fertilizers Lca for Agricultural Practices and Biobased Indusctrial Products Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Life cycles Literature reviews Meat Meat production Methods Milk Milk production Petfoods Polls & surveys |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection dbid: 8FG link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NS8MwFA86Qb2ITsXplBy8abAfaZacRMQ5BD052EVKkiYwnN1cO2H_vS9pu6Gg59J3eB_5ve-H0GXIM9AjHhAjjCagIYoorgIilaaKBSaz2g04P7-wwZA-jZJRnXAr6rbK5k30D3U21S5HfhOxmDIG0QK_nX0SdzXKVVfrExqbaCuMesy19PH-4yrgCgN_dQUiGE7imIp6aKYanXO7yohrUACHKRSE_gSmtbf5q0Dqcae_j_ZqhxHfVRI-QBsmb6Ptpl-9jXaa0eLiEL1VmX4s8wz71f0lLhbzL7PEU4tdhb3Kz-HqbHSBF4XJ8DjHk7E1WC-BPparTZ3un4_x5N1TU8bYIzTsP7zeD0h9P4FoQJmSaNkD86IA-pGBOCpiEbcm9EYshTDWCO7624IwYzaMNJOhsBYckoTqngDsjI9RK5_m5gRhGegkFoZZxSQF-fHEVfSoBiyjCde6g64a5qWzak1Gul6I7FidAqtTz-qUdlC34W9am0yRrgXcQdcNz9ef_6Z2-j-1M7QbuZEF32ndRa1yvjDn4EiU6sJryzcSJ8Mu priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Review and expert survey of allocation methods used in life cycle assessment of milk and beef |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-021-02019-4 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2634669248 |
Volume | 27 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEB58gHjxLa4vcvCmkbabxuS4LruKooi4oAcpTZrAslrF7Qr6652krcXXwUsLfQzpZCYz0_lmArAXigzlSATUSKMpSoiiSqiApkozxQOTWe0KnC8u-emAnd3Gt00dtwe71xlJv1A3tW6uuRh1iAL0cEJJ2TTMou1x2jjbObk7733GWWHgN1vBwEXQdpvJqlbmdypf7VHjZH7Li3pz01-Em7pop0SZjA4nhTrU7z97OP7nS5ZgoXI_SaeUl2WYMvkKzNXo91W4L3MFJM0z4pv_F2Q8eXk1b-TJEpejL__wkXLj6TGZjE1Ghjl5GFpD9BvSJOlnr0_3zuPwYeSpKWPsGgz6vZvuKa12YKAa7VRBdXqECsrQbYgMRmIRj4Q1oV8GUimNNVI4hFwQZtyGkeZpKK1FlyZm-kii9W2vw0z-lJsNIGmg47Y03CqeMpQAEbucINNoDVkstG7Bfj0PyXPZaCNpWio7jiXIscRzLGEt2K6nKqmUbpxEOFTOMaAULTioWd_c_pva5v8e34L5yBVBeOz2NswULxOzg65JoXZhWvRPdiuBxPNx7_LqGq92eRePg6jzARUk3IQ |
link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,12765,21388,27924,27925,33373,33744,41081,41120,41523,42150,42189,42592,43600,43805,51576,52111,52234,74035,74302 |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1JS8NAFH64gHoRV6zrHLzpYJbJOHMSEWvV2lMLvUhIJjNQrGltWsF_75tJ0qKg55B3eMt8b38A577IUI-ER7XUiqKGpDQVqUeTVLGUezozyg44v3R4q8ee-lG_SrgVVVtl_Sa6hzobKZsjvwp4yDjHaEHcjD-ovRplq6vVCY1lWGUhQredFG8-zAMu33NXVzCCETQMmayGZsrROburjNoGBXSYfEnZT2BaeJu_CqQOd5pbsFk5jOS2lPA2LOl8B9bqfvUdWK9Hi4tdeC0z_STJM-JW909JMZt86i8yMsRW2Mv8HCnPRhdkVuiMDHIyHBhN1BfSJ8l8U6f9530wfHPUUq3NHvSa9927Fq3uJ1CFKDOlKrlG82II-oHGOCrggTDad0acSKmNlsL2t3l-xo0fKJ740hh0SCKmriViZ7gPK_ko1wdAEk9FodTcpDxhKD8R2YoeU4hlLBJKNeCiZl48LtdkxIuFyJbVMbI6dqyOWQOOa_7GlckU8ULADbiseb74_De1w_-pncF6q_vSjtuPnecj2Ajs-ILruj6Glelkpk_QqZimp05zvgFJD8YQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LS8NAEB60gnoRrYr1uQdvupjHZrt7El_FZxFR8CIh2exCsabVtIL_3tlk06Kg55A5zGPn9c0MwL4vMtQj4VEttaKoISlNRerRJFUs5Z7OjLIDznddfvnErp-jZ4d_Khyssn4Ty4c6GyhbIz8KeMg4x2xBHBkHi7g_7xwP36m9IGU7re6cxizMoVf0ggbMnV507x8m6ZfvlTdYMJ8RNAyZdCM01SCd3VxGLVwBwydfUvbTTU1jz1_t0tILdZZhyYWP5KSS9wrM6LwJ8zV6vQkL9aBxsQovVd2fJHlGykX-I1KMPz71FxkYYvvtVbWOVEekCzIudEZ6Oen3jCbqC-mTZLK30_7z1uu_ltRSrc0aPHUuHs8uqbumQBX6nBFVSRuNjWEIEGjMqgIeCKP90qQTKbXRUli0m-dn3PiB4okvjcHwJGKqLdGThuvQyAe53gCSeCoKpeYm5QlDaYrI9veYQs_GIqFUCw5q5sXDamlGPF2PbFkdI6vjktUxa8F2zd_YGVART8XdgsOa59PPf1Pb_J_aHsyj2sS3V92bLVgM7CxDCcHehsboY6x3MMIYpbtOdb4BJ3LLrA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review+and+expert+survey+of+allocation+methods+used+in+life+cycle+assessment+of+milk+and+beef&rft.jtitle=The+international+journal+of+life+cycle+assessment&rft.au=Kytt%C3%A4%2C+Venla&rft.au=Roitto%2C+Marja&rft.au=Astaptsev%2C+Aleksi&rft.au=Saarinen%2C+Merja&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.pub=Springer+Berlin+Heidelberg&rft.issn=0948-3349&rft.eissn=1614-7502&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=204&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11367-021-02019-4&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s11367_021_02019_4 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0948-3349&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0948-3349&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0948-3349&client=summon |