Radionuclide migration in forest ecosystems – results of a model validation study

The primary objective of the IAEA's BIOMASS Forest Working Group (FWG) was to bring together experimental radioecologists and modellers to facilitate the exchange of information which could be used to improve our ability to understand and forecast radionuclide transfers within forests. This pap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of environmental radioactivity Vol. 84; no. 2; pp. 285 - 296
Main Authors Shaw, G., Venter, A., Avila, R., Bergman, R., Bulgakov, A., Calmon, P., Fesenko, S., Frissel, M., Goor, F., Konoplev, A., Linkov, I., Mamikhin, S., Moberg, L., Orlov, A., Rantavaara, A., Spiridonov, S., Thiry, Y.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2005
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0265-931X
1879-1700
DOI10.1016/j.jenvrad.2003.09.006

Cover

More Information
Summary:The primary objective of the IAEA's BIOMASS Forest Working Group (FWG) was to bring together experimental radioecologists and modellers to facilitate the exchange of information which could be used to improve our ability to understand and forecast radionuclide transfers within forests. This paper describes a blind model validation exercise which was conducted by the FWG to test nine models which members of the group had developed in response to the need to predict the fate of radiocaesium in forests in Europe after the Chernobyl accident. The outcomes and conclusions of this exercise are summarised. It was concluded that, as a group, the models are capable of providing an envelope of predictions which can be expected to enclose experimental data for radiocaesium contamination in forests over the time scale tested. However, the models are subject to varying degrees of conceptual uncertainty which gives rise to a very high degree of divergence between individual model predictions, particularly when forecasting edible mushroom contamination. Furthermore, the forecasting capability of the models over future decades currently remains untested.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0265-931X
1879-1700
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2003.09.006