Identification of Adhesins in Plant Beneficial Rhizobacteria Bacillus velezensis SQR9 and Their Effect on Root Colonization

Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied proc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular plant-microbe interactions Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 64 - 72
Main Authors Huang, Rong, Feng, Haichao, Xu, Zhihui, Zhang, Nan, Liu, Yunpeng, Shao, Jiahui, Shen, Qirong, Zhang, Ruifu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Phytopathological Society 01.01.2022
The American Phytopathological Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .
AbstractList Probiotic colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations Δ , Δ , Δ , Δ , and Δ reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only Δ had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.[Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.[Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.[Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .
Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.[Graphic: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.
Author Liu, Yunpeng
Shen, Qirong
Huang, Rong
Zhang, Nan
Feng, Haichao
Shao, Jiahui
Xu, Zhihui
Zhang, Ruifu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Rong
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1347-841X
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Rong
  organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Haichao
  surname: Feng
  fullname: Feng, Haichao
  organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Zhihui
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3987-8836
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, Zhihui
  organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Nan
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Nan
  organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Yunpeng
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3016-7165
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Yunpeng
  organization: Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources Collection and Preservation, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R. China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jiahui
  surname: Shao
  fullname: Shao, Jiahui
  organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Qirong
  surname: Shen
  fullname: Shen, Qirong
  organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Ruifu
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3334-4286
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Ruifu
  organization: Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources Collection and Preservation, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R. China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34698535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkktvEzEUhS1URNPCD2CDLLHpZoofY8942UaFRmpFCWVtOZ5r4mhiF9tBIvx5nKRlUQmxsmR_59yHzwk6CjEAQm8pOadEtR9u725nDVENow1hvG3mL9CEqpY3XUfkEZqQXrX1pWfH6CTnFSFUSSFeoWPeStULLibo92yAULzz1hQfA44OXwxLyD5k7AO-G00o-BICVMKbEc-XfhsXxhZI3uBLY_04bjL-CSNsIWSf8dcvc4VNGPD9EnzCV86BLbhaz2MseBrHGPx2X-w1eunMmOHN43mKvn28up9eNzefP82mFzeNbVlfGg6K99K5njhBRLvgjg3OcEcGbhe0IqaO64QVnQTqKihbMQySSWdV3wHhp2h28B2iWemH5Ncm_dLReL2_iOm7Nql4O4JuBWfSut4walvDxUJ0wrBakzg3gITqdXbwekjxxwZy0WufLYx1TxA3WTPJZUcVJ-L_qOhrp4xKXtH3z9BV3KRQl7IzJIJ1ivWVevdIbRZrGP5O8vSbFegOgE0x5wROW1_2qy7J-FFTone50bvcaKI0o3qXGz2vSvpM-WT-b80fBEjE4g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_03572_22
crossref_primary_10_3390_biology13020095
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11061486
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_994716
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms241310980
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42729_022_00958_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24108527
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00284_023_03206_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms10030575
crossref_primary_10_1128_msystems_00778_22
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocontrol_2024_105510
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pestbp_2022_105272
crossref_primary_10_1093_jambio_lxae248
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1199024
crossref_primary_10_1094_MPMI_02_24_0020_R
crossref_primary_10_1094_MPMI_01_22_0021_A
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2022_105294
crossref_primary_10_1093_femsre_fuad066
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micres_2025_128072
crossref_primary_10_1111_1758_2229_13250
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jafc_2c01745
crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_01147_24
crossref_primary_10_3390_horticulturae8090779
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micres_2024_127726
crossref_primary_10_1093_jambio_lxad009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mib_2023_102269
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pbi_2023_102483
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plaphy_2023_108245
crossref_primary_10_1094_MPMI_09_22_0193_A
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.bej.2009.11.014
10.1128/JB.00566-07
10.1205/096030802321154835
10.1128/JB.00673-06
10.1128/IAI.69.12.7937-7940.2001
10.1128/IAI.68.10.5690-5695.2000
10.1128/AEM.03943-13
10.1128/AEM.02744-17
10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.12.022
10.1128/JB.183.22.6579-6589.2001
10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.019
10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.038
10.1128/IAI.66.3.1000-1007.1998
10.1038/7545
10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.06.023
10.1128/iai.50.1.152-159.1985
10.1007/s00374-013-0835-1
10.1128/jb.171.7.4054-4062.1989
10.3389/fmicb.2020.01228
10.1099/00221287-139-9-2261
10.1007/s002030050732
10.1016/j.femsre.2004.05.002
10.1080/08927014.2019.1575960
10.1128/AEM.01600-14
10.1099/mic.0.28875-0
10.1128/JB.186.19.6617-6625.2004
10.1128/AEM.02872-10
10.1128/AEM.02645-12
10.1007/s00253-016-7906-9
10.1006/bbrc.1999.1707
10.1371/journal.pone.0117414
10.1099/00221287-147-12-3413
10.1007/s00203-010-0651-z
10.1371/journal.pone.0023626
10.1099/13500872-142-2-299
10.1016/j.resmic.2018.01.004
10.1128/JB.01315-09
10.1128/aem.63.10.4111-4115.1997
10.1016/j.carres.2004.07.028
10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00748-0
10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.061
10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.014
10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03615.x
10.1038/nrmicro2960
10.1111/mmi.12103
10.1038/nrmicro821
10.1128/jb.168.2.821-827.1986
10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.023
10.1007/s00284-004-4447-8
10.1002/bit.10321
10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.076
10.1099/00221287-138-9-1949
10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00265-4
10.1094/MPMI-01-18-0003-R
10.1128/jb.178.17.5302-5308.1996
10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01791.x
10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05057.x
10.1093/nar/gkaa913
10.3389/fmicb.2016.02039
10.1128/JB.01654-12
10.3389/fmicb.2016.01025
10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.006
10.1007/s00374-011-0556-2
10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02187.x
10.1038/nrmicro1838
10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01061.x
10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01323.x
10.1099/mic.0.025288-0
10.1007/s00253-012-4572-4
10.1128/JB.01620-09
10.1099/00221287-144-9-2599
10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01238.x
10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140310
10.1038/nsb1097-833
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright American Phytopathological Society Jan 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright American Phytopathological Society Jan 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
7S9
L.6
DOA
DOI 10.1094/MPMI-09-21-0234-R
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef

AGRICOLA
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
Biology
EISSN 1943-7706
EndPage 72
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_45326cf8a21c4a35b575a24b30ffde6e
34698535
10_1094_MPMI_09_21_0234_R
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
123
29M
2WC
53G
7X2
7X7
88E
8AO
8CJ
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FW
8R4
8R5
AAHBH
AAYJJ
AAYXX
ABDNZ
ABRJW
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACPRK
ACYGS
ADBBV
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFRAH
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATCPS
BAWUL
BBNVY
BENPR
BES
BHPHI
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
D1J
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FRP
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYO
LK8
M0K
M1P
M7P
MVM
OK1
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
RPS
S0X
TR2
UKHRP
~KM
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
YCJ
K9.
7X8
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-3e9386ff80f5054b3f2dfa3f0d3cb1428a770f5c576e1f6ff645dd626fc987e03
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 0894-0282
1943-7706
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:18 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:20:14 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 00:23:35 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 08:43:34 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:05:11 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:38:54 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:05 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords root surface
abiotic surface
Bacillus velezensis SQR9
adhesin
colonization
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c428t-3e9386ff80f5054b3f2dfa3f0d3cb1428a770f5c576e1f6ff645dd626fc987e03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1347-841X
0000-0002-3334-4286
0000-0002-3987-8836
0000-0002-3016-7165
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/45326cf8a21c4a35b575a24b30ffde6e
PMID 34698535
PQID 2630527928
PQPubID 37269
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_45326cf8a21c4a35b575a24b30ffde6e
proquest_miscellaneous_2636719305
proquest_miscellaneous_2586452163
proquest_journals_2630527928
pubmed_primary_34698535
crossref_citationtrail_10_1094_MPMI_09_21_0234_R
crossref_primary_10_1094_MPMI_09_21_0234_R
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-01-00
2022-Jan
20220101
2022-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-01-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: St. Paul
PublicationSubtitle MPMI
PublicationTitle Molecular plant-microbe interactions
PublicationTitleAlternate Mol Plant Microbe Interact
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher American Phytopathological Society
The American Phytopathological Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Phytopathological Society
– name: The American Phytopathological Society
References b10
b54
b53
b12
b56
b11
b55
b14
b58
b13
b57
b16
b15
b59
b18
b17
b19
b1
b2
b4
b5
b6
b7
b8
b48a
b9
b61
b60
b63
b62
b21
b65
b20
b64
b23
b67
b22
b66
b25
b69
b24
b68
b27
b26
b29
b28
b70
b72
b71
b30
b73
b32
b31
b34
b33
b36
b35
b38
b37
b39
b41
b40
b43
b42
b45
b44
b47
b46
b49
b48
b50
b52
Balsanelli E. (b3) 2010; 12
b51
References_xml – ident: b23
  doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2009.11.014
– ident: b38
  doi: 10.1128/JB.00566-07
– ident: b26
  doi: 10.1205/096030802321154835
– ident: b41
  doi: 10.1128/JB.00673-06
– ident: b58
  doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7937-7940.2001
– ident: b18
  doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.10.5690-5695.2000
– ident: b68
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.03943-13
– ident: b73
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.02744-17
– ident: b13
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.12.022
– ident: b52
  doi: 10.1128/JB.183.22.6579-6589.2001
– ident: b17
  doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.019
– ident: b12
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.038
– ident: b2
  doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.3.1000-1007.1998
– ident: b24
  doi: 10.1038/7545
– ident: b36
  doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.06.023
– ident: b43
  doi: 10.1128/iai.50.1.152-159.1985
– ident: b47
  doi: 10.1007/s00374-013-0835-1
– ident: b54
  doi: 10.1128/jb.171.7.4054-4062.1989
– ident: b27
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01228
– ident: b8
  doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-9-2261
– ident: b16
  doi: 10.1007/s002030050732
– ident: b34
  doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.05.002
– ident: b50
  doi: 10.1080/08927014.2019.1575960
– ident: b25
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.01600-14
– ident: b28
  doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28875-0
– ident: b30
  doi: 10.1128/JB.186.19.6617-6625.2004
– ident: b32
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.02872-10
– ident: b67
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.02645-12
– ident: b72
  doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7906-9
– ident: b57
  doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1707
– ident: b71
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117414
– ident: b45
  doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-12-3413
– ident: b62
  doi: 10.1007/s00203-010-0651-z
– ident: b48
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023626
– ident: b35
  doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-2-299
– ident: b33
  doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2018.01.004
– ident: b60
  doi: 10.1128/JB.01315-09
– ident: b19
  doi: 10.1128/aem.63.10.4111-4115.1997
– ident: b49
  doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.07.028
– ident: b10
  doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00748-0
– ident: b66
  doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.061
– ident: b48a
  doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.014
– ident: b22
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03615.x
– ident: b63
  doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2960
– ident: b20
  doi: 10.1111/mmi.12103
– ident: b21
  doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821
– ident: b53
  doi: 10.1128/jb.168.2.821-827.1986
– ident: b64
  doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.023
– ident: b9
  doi: 10.1007/s00284-004-4447-8
– ident: b5
  doi: 10.1002/bit.10321
– ident: b11
  doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.076
– ident: b31
  doi: 10.1099/00221287-138-9-1949
– ident: b4
  doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00265-4
– ident: b14
  doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-18-0003-R
– ident: b37
  doi: 10.1128/jb.178.17.5302-5308.1996
– ident: b59
  doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01791.x
– ident: b29
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05057.x
– ident: b39
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa913
– ident: b70
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02039
– ident: b42
  doi: 10.1128/JB.01654-12
– ident: b69
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01025
– ident: b1
  doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.006
– ident: b6
  doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0556-2
– volume: 12
  start-page: 2233
  year: 2010
  ident: b3
  publication-title: Environ. Microbiol.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02187.x
– ident: b55
  doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1838
– ident: b46
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01061.x
– ident: b44
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01323.x
– ident: b51
  doi: 10.1099/mic.0.025288-0
– ident: b65
  doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4572-4
– ident: b7
  doi: 10.1128/JB.01620-09
– ident: b61
  doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-9-2599
– ident: b15
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01238.x
– ident: b40
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140310
– ident: b56
  doi: 10.1038/nsb1097-833
SSID ssj0019655
Score 2.5025067
Snippet Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm...
Probiotic colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are...
SourceID doaj
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 64
SubjectTerms abiotic surface
adhesin
Adhesins
Adhesion
Agricultural production
Bacillus - genetics
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis SQR9
Bacterial Proteins - genetics
biofilm
Biofilms
Chemotaxis
Colonization
cucumbers
Cucumis sativus
Gene deletion
glass
Mutants
Mutation
Plant growth
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
Plant Roots
Polystyrene
Polystyrene resins
polystyrenes
Probiotics
Rhizosphere
rhizosphere bacteria
root surface
roots
Title Identification of Adhesins in Plant Beneficial Rhizobacteria Bacillus velezensis SQR9 and Their Effect on Root Colonization
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34698535
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2630527928
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2586452163
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2636719305
https://doaj.org/article/45326cf8a21c4a35b575a24b30ffde6e
Volume 35
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQJSQ4oFJeoQUZiRNS1CR-JDnuVlQFaRGEVurN8hNWWiWoyR7a_vnOxMkKDpQL13jiOJ7xeMbj-YaQ98yE3NtSpDVzLuW6zlIDG1NaaR5MYGVpxry11Rd5dsE_X4rL30p94Z2wCA8cJ-6YCzAwbKh0kVuumTBgX-iCG5aF4Lz0qH1hz5udqSl-UMux3mlWIfAteBVzPLPmx6uvq08Y8C_AjS4YT5s_dqQRuP_v1ua465zukyeTuUgXcZhPyQPfHpDHix9XE2SGPyAPYznJ62fkNmbdhukYjnaBLtxP36_bnq5bivWJBroE5RZRI2iD9-1MhGvWdKnterPZ9hRLUdzgvfaefv_W1FS3jp5jPIFGqGMKXTddN9AT-O6cx_mcXJx-PD85S6fiCqkFj2NIma9ZJUOosgBGEMxnKFzQLGSOWTwYqnRZQpMFf8TnAQglF86B-xNsXZU-Yy_IXtu1_hWhjGkha0Q685p7yQ2oEQtdgCeT26IsE5LNE6zshDyOBTA2KkbAuUKeqKxWRa6QJ6pJyIfdK78i7MZ9xEvk2o4QEbPHByBHapIj9S85SsjRzHM1LeNeFRLUIUIsVgl5t2uGBYhRFd36bgs0osLgMNi199BIJkswlTORkJdRnnajZVjDUzDx-n_8xSF5VGB-xnhGdET2hqutfwNW02DejgvkDga_EXE
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification+of+Adhesins+in+Plant+Beneficial+Rhizobacteria+Bacillus+velezensis+SQR9+and+Their+Effect+on+Root+Colonization&rft.jtitle=Molecular+plant-microbe+interactions&rft.au=Huang%2C+Rong&rft.au=Feng%2C+Haichao&rft.au=Xu%2C+Zhihui&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Nan&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.issn=0894-0282&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094%2FMPMI-09-21-0234-R&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34698535&rft.externalDocID=34698535
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0894-0282&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0894-0282&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0894-0282&client=summon