Identification of Adhesins in Plant Beneficial Rhizobacteria Bacillus velezensis SQR9 and Their Effect on Root Colonization
Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied proc...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecular plant-microbe interactions Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 64 - 72 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Phytopathological Society
01.01.2022
The American Phytopathological Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.
[Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . |
---|---|
AbstractList | Probiotic
colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain
SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations Δ
, Δ
, Δ
, Δ
, and Δ
reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only Δ
had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition,
SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.[Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.[Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.[Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production.[Graphic: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are the four steps of root colonization by plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Compared with the other three well-studied processes, adhesion of PGPRs is less known. In this study, using mutant strains deleted for potential adhesin genes in PGPR strain Bacillus velezensis SQR9, adherence to both cucumber root surface and abiotic surface by those strains was evaluated. Results showed that deletion mutations ΔlytB, ΔV529_10500, ΔfliD, ΔyhaN, and ΔsacB reduced the adhesion to root surfaces, while, among them, only ΔfliD had significant defects in adhesion to abiotic surfaces (glass and polystyrene). In addition, B. velevzensis SQR9 mutants defective in adhesion to root surfaces showed a deficiency in rhizosphere colonization. Among the encoded proteins, FliD and YhaN played vital roles in root adhesion. This research systematically explored the potential adhesins in a well-studied PGPR strain and also indicated that adhesion progress was required for root colonization, which will help to enhance rhizosphere colonization and beneficial function of PGPRs in agricultural production. |
Author | Liu, Yunpeng Shen, Qirong Huang, Rong Zhang, Nan Feng, Haichao Shao, Jiahui Xu, Zhihui Zhang, Ruifu |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rong orcidid: 0000-0003-1347-841X surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Rong organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China – sequence: 2 givenname: Haichao surname: Feng fullname: Feng, Haichao organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China – sequence: 3 givenname: Zhihui orcidid: 0000-0002-3987-8836 surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Zhihui organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China – sequence: 4 givenname: Nan surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Nan organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China – sequence: 5 givenname: Yunpeng orcidid: 0000-0002-3016-7165 surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Yunpeng organization: Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources Collection and Preservation, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R. China – sequence: 6 givenname: Jiahui surname: Shao fullname: Shao, Jiahui organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China – sequence: 7 givenname: Qirong surname: Shen fullname: Shen, Qirong organization: Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, P.R. China – sequence: 8 givenname: Ruifu orcidid: 0000-0002-3334-4286 surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Ruifu organization: Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources Collection and Preservation, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R. China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34698535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkktvEzEUhS1URNPCD2CDLLHpZoofY8942UaFRmpFCWVtOZ5r4mhiF9tBIvx5nKRlUQmxsmR_59yHzwk6CjEAQm8pOadEtR9u725nDVENow1hvG3mL9CEqpY3XUfkEZqQXrX1pWfH6CTnFSFUSSFeoWPeStULLibo92yAULzz1hQfA44OXwxLyD5k7AO-G00o-BICVMKbEc-XfhsXxhZI3uBLY_04bjL-CSNsIWSf8dcvc4VNGPD9EnzCV86BLbhaz2MseBrHGPx2X-w1eunMmOHN43mKvn28up9eNzefP82mFzeNbVlfGg6K99K5njhBRLvgjg3OcEcGbhe0IqaO64QVnQTqKihbMQySSWdV3wHhp2h28B2iWemH5Ncm_dLReL2_iOm7Nql4O4JuBWfSut4walvDxUJ0wrBakzg3gITqdXbwekjxxwZy0WufLYx1TxA3WTPJZUcVJ-L_qOhrp4xKXtH3z9BV3KRQl7IzJIJ1ivWVevdIbRZrGP5O8vSbFegOgE0x5wROW1_2qy7J-FFTone50bvcaKI0o3qXGz2vSvpM-WT-b80fBEjE4g |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_03572_22 crossref_primary_10_3390_biology13020095 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11061486 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_994716 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms241310980 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42729_022_00958_x crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24108527 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00284_023_03206_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms10030575 crossref_primary_10_1128_msystems_00778_22 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocontrol_2024_105510 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pestbp_2022_105272 crossref_primary_10_1093_jambio_lxae248 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1199024 crossref_primary_10_1094_MPMI_02_24_0020_R crossref_primary_10_1094_MPMI_01_22_0021_A crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2022_105294 crossref_primary_10_1093_femsre_fuad066 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micres_2025_128072 crossref_primary_10_1111_1758_2229_13250 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jafc_2c01745 crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_01147_24 crossref_primary_10_3390_horticulturae8090779 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micres_2024_127726 crossref_primary_10_1093_jambio_lxad009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mib_2023_102269 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pbi_2023_102483 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plaphy_2023_108245 crossref_primary_10_1094_MPMI_09_22_0193_A |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.bej.2009.11.014 10.1128/JB.00566-07 10.1205/096030802321154835 10.1128/JB.00673-06 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7937-7940.2001 10.1128/IAI.68.10.5690-5695.2000 10.1128/AEM.03943-13 10.1128/AEM.02744-17 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.12.022 10.1128/JB.183.22.6579-6589.2001 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.019 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.038 10.1128/IAI.66.3.1000-1007.1998 10.1038/7545 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.06.023 10.1128/iai.50.1.152-159.1985 10.1007/s00374-013-0835-1 10.1128/jb.171.7.4054-4062.1989 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01228 10.1099/00221287-139-9-2261 10.1007/s002030050732 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.05.002 10.1080/08927014.2019.1575960 10.1128/AEM.01600-14 10.1099/mic.0.28875-0 10.1128/JB.186.19.6617-6625.2004 10.1128/AEM.02872-10 10.1128/AEM.02645-12 10.1007/s00253-016-7906-9 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1707 10.1371/journal.pone.0117414 10.1099/00221287-147-12-3413 10.1007/s00203-010-0651-z 10.1371/journal.pone.0023626 10.1099/13500872-142-2-299 10.1016/j.resmic.2018.01.004 10.1128/JB.01315-09 10.1128/aem.63.10.4111-4115.1997 10.1016/j.carres.2004.07.028 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00748-0 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.061 10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.014 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03615.x 10.1038/nrmicro2960 10.1111/mmi.12103 10.1038/nrmicro821 10.1128/jb.168.2.821-827.1986 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.023 10.1007/s00284-004-4447-8 10.1002/bit.10321 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.076 10.1099/00221287-138-9-1949 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00265-4 10.1094/MPMI-01-18-0003-R 10.1128/jb.178.17.5302-5308.1996 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01791.x 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05057.x 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02039 10.1128/JB.01654-12 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01025 10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.006 10.1007/s00374-011-0556-2 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02187.x 10.1038/nrmicro1838 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01061.x 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01323.x 10.1099/mic.0.025288-0 10.1007/s00253-012-4572-4 10.1128/JB.01620-09 10.1099/00221287-144-9-2599 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01238.x 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140310 10.1038/nsb1097-833 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright American Phytopathological Society Jan 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright American Phytopathological Society Jan 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. 7X8 7S9 L.6 DOA |
DOI | 10.1094/MPMI-09-21-0234-R |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef AGRICOLA ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture Biology |
EISSN | 1943-7706 |
EndPage | 72 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_45326cf8a21c4a35b575a24b30ffde6e 34698535 10_1094_MPMI_09_21_0234_R |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 123 29M 2WC 53G 7X2 7X7 88E 8AO 8CJ 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FW 8R4 8R5 AAHBH AAYJJ AAYXX ABDNZ ABRJW ABUWG ACGFO ACPRK ACYGS ADBBV AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFRAH ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ATCPS BAWUL BBNVY BENPR BES BHPHI BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1J DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P FRP FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ HMCUK HYO LK8 M0K M1P M7P MVM OK1 P2P PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X RPS S0X TR2 UKHRP ~KM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM YCJ K9. 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-3e9386ff80f5054b3f2dfa3f0d3cb1428a770f5c576e1f6ff645dd626fc987e03 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 0894-0282 1943-7706 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:18 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 18:20:14 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:23:35 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 08:43:34 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:05:11 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:38:54 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:05 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | root surface abiotic surface Bacillus velezensis SQR9 adhesin colonization |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c428t-3e9386ff80f5054b3f2dfa3f0d3cb1428a770f5c576e1f6ff645dd626fc987e03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-1347-841X 0000-0002-3334-4286 0000-0002-3987-8836 0000-0002-3016-7165 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/45326cf8a21c4a35b575a24b30ffde6e |
PMID | 34698535 |
PQID | 2630527928 |
PQPubID | 37269 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_45326cf8a21c4a35b575a24b30ffde6e proquest_miscellaneous_2636719305 proquest_miscellaneous_2586452163 proquest_journals_2630527928 pubmed_primary_34698535 crossref_citationtrail_10_1094_MPMI_09_21_0234_R crossref_primary_10_1094_MPMI_09_21_0234_R |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-01-00 2022-Jan 20220101 2022-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2022 text: 2022-01-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: St. Paul |
PublicationSubtitle | MPMI |
PublicationTitle | Molecular plant-microbe interactions |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Mol Plant Microbe Interact |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | American Phytopathological Society The American Phytopathological Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Phytopathological Society – name: The American Phytopathological Society |
References | b10 b54 b53 b12 b56 b11 b55 b14 b58 b13 b57 b16 b15 b59 b18 b17 b19 b1 b2 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 b48a b9 b61 b60 b63 b62 b21 b65 b20 b64 b23 b67 b22 b66 b25 b69 b24 b68 b27 b26 b29 b28 b70 b72 b71 b30 b73 b32 b31 b34 b33 b36 b35 b38 b37 b39 b41 b40 b43 b42 b45 b44 b47 b46 b49 b48 b50 b52 Balsanelli E. (b3) 2010; 12 b51 |
References_xml | – ident: b23 doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2009.11.014 – ident: b38 doi: 10.1128/JB.00566-07 – ident: b26 doi: 10.1205/096030802321154835 – ident: b41 doi: 10.1128/JB.00673-06 – ident: b58 doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7937-7940.2001 – ident: b18 doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.10.5690-5695.2000 – ident: b68 doi: 10.1128/AEM.03943-13 – ident: b73 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02744-17 – ident: b13 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.12.022 – ident: b52 doi: 10.1128/JB.183.22.6579-6589.2001 – ident: b17 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.019 – ident: b12 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.038 – ident: b2 doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.3.1000-1007.1998 – ident: b24 doi: 10.1038/7545 – ident: b36 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.06.023 – ident: b43 doi: 10.1128/iai.50.1.152-159.1985 – ident: b47 doi: 10.1007/s00374-013-0835-1 – ident: b54 doi: 10.1128/jb.171.7.4054-4062.1989 – ident: b27 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01228 – ident: b8 doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-9-2261 – ident: b16 doi: 10.1007/s002030050732 – ident: b34 doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.05.002 – ident: b50 doi: 10.1080/08927014.2019.1575960 – ident: b25 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01600-14 – ident: b28 doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28875-0 – ident: b30 doi: 10.1128/JB.186.19.6617-6625.2004 – ident: b32 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02872-10 – ident: b67 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02645-12 – ident: b72 doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7906-9 – ident: b57 doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1707 – ident: b71 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117414 – ident: b45 doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-12-3413 – ident: b62 doi: 10.1007/s00203-010-0651-z – ident: b48 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023626 – ident: b35 doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-2-299 – ident: b33 doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2018.01.004 – ident: b60 doi: 10.1128/JB.01315-09 – ident: b19 doi: 10.1128/aem.63.10.4111-4115.1997 – ident: b49 doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.07.028 – ident: b10 doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00748-0 – ident: b66 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.061 – ident: b48a doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.014 – ident: b22 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03615.x – ident: b63 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2960 – ident: b20 doi: 10.1111/mmi.12103 – ident: b21 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821 – ident: b53 doi: 10.1128/jb.168.2.821-827.1986 – ident: b64 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.023 – ident: b9 doi: 10.1007/s00284-004-4447-8 – ident: b5 doi: 10.1002/bit.10321 – ident: b11 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.076 – ident: b31 doi: 10.1099/00221287-138-9-1949 – ident: b4 doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00265-4 – ident: b14 doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-18-0003-R – ident: b37 doi: 10.1128/jb.178.17.5302-5308.1996 – ident: b59 doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01791.x – ident: b29 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05057.x – ident: b39 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 – ident: b70 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02039 – ident: b42 doi: 10.1128/JB.01654-12 – ident: b69 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01025 – ident: b1 doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.006 – ident: b6 doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0556-2 – volume: 12 start-page: 2233 year: 2010 ident: b3 publication-title: Environ. Microbiol. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02187.x – ident: b55 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1838 – ident: b46 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01061.x – ident: b44 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01323.x – ident: b51 doi: 10.1099/mic.0.025288-0 – ident: b65 doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4572-4 – ident: b7 doi: 10.1128/JB.01620-09 – ident: b61 doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-9-2599 – ident: b15 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01238.x – ident: b40 doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140310 – ident: b56 doi: 10.1038/nsb1097-833 |
SSID | ssj0019655 |
Score | 2.5025067 |
Snippet | Probiotic Bacillus colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm... Probiotic colonization of plant root surfaces has been reported to improve its beneficial effect. Chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, and biofilm formation are... |
SourceID | doaj proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 64 |
SubjectTerms | abiotic surface adhesin Adhesins Adhesion Agricultural production Bacillus - genetics Bacillus velezensis Bacillus velezensis SQR9 Bacterial Proteins - genetics biofilm Biofilms Chemotaxis Colonization cucumbers Cucumis sativus Gene deletion glass Mutants Mutation Plant growth plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Plant Roots Polystyrene Polystyrene resins polystyrenes Probiotics Rhizosphere rhizosphere bacteria root surface roots |
Title | Identification of Adhesins in Plant Beneficial Rhizobacteria Bacillus velezensis SQR9 and Their Effect on Root Colonization |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34698535 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2630527928 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2586452163 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2636719305 https://doaj.org/article/45326cf8a21c4a35b575a24b30ffde6e |
Volume | 35 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQJSQ4oFJeoQUZiRNS1CR-JDnuVlQFaRGEVurN8hNWWiWoyR7a_vnOxMkKDpQL13jiOJ7xeMbj-YaQ98yE3NtSpDVzLuW6zlIDG1NaaR5MYGVpxry11Rd5dsE_X4rL30p94Z2wCA8cJ-6YCzAwbKh0kVuumTBgX-iCG5aF4Lz0qH1hz5udqSl-UMux3mlWIfAteBVzPLPmx6uvq08Y8C_AjS4YT5s_dqQRuP_v1ua465zukyeTuUgXcZhPyQPfHpDHix9XE2SGPyAPYznJ62fkNmbdhukYjnaBLtxP36_bnq5bivWJBroE5RZRI2iD9-1MhGvWdKnterPZ9hRLUdzgvfaefv_W1FS3jp5jPIFGqGMKXTddN9AT-O6cx_mcXJx-PD85S6fiCqkFj2NIma9ZJUOosgBGEMxnKFzQLGSOWTwYqnRZQpMFf8TnAQglF86B-xNsXZU-Yy_IXtu1_hWhjGkha0Q685p7yQ2oEQtdgCeT26IsE5LNE6zshDyOBTA2KkbAuUKeqKxWRa6QJ6pJyIfdK78i7MZ9xEvk2o4QEbPHByBHapIj9S85SsjRzHM1LeNeFRLUIUIsVgl5t2uGBYhRFd36bgs0osLgMNi199BIJkswlTORkJdRnnajZVjDUzDx-n_8xSF5VGB-xnhGdET2hqutfwNW02DejgvkDga_EXE |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification+of+Adhesins+in+Plant+Beneficial+Rhizobacteria+Bacillus+velezensis+SQR9+and+Their+Effect+on+Root+Colonization&rft.jtitle=Molecular+plant-microbe+interactions&rft.au=Huang%2C+Rong&rft.au=Feng%2C+Haichao&rft.au=Xu%2C+Zhihui&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Nan&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.issn=0894-0282&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094%2FMPMI-09-21-0234-R&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34698535&rft.externalDocID=34698535 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0894-0282&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0894-0282&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0894-0282&client=summon |