Effects of TIPS on Liver Perfusion Measured by Dynamic CT

Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values. Perfusion of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 184; no. 2; pp. 505 - 510
Main Authors Weidekamm, Claudia, Cejna, Manfred, Kramer, Ludwig, Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus, Bader, Till R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Leesburg, VA Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01.02.2005
American Roentgen Ray Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0361-803X
1546-3141
DOI10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840505

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values. Perfusion of the liver parenchyma was measured in 24 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with liver cirrhosis using dynamic single-section CT. Seventeen patients underwent TIPS placement, and CT measurements were repeated within 7 days. CT scans were obtained at a single level comprising the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over a period of 88 sec (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 sec and eight scans every 7 sec) beginning with the injection of a contrast agent bolus (40 mL at 10 mL/sec). Parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement was measured with regions of interest, and time-density curves were obtained. These data were processed with a pharmaco-dynamic fitting program (TopFit), and the arterial and portal venous component and the total perfusion of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated (milliliters of perfusion per minute per 100 mL of tissue). Mean normal values for hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion were 20, 102, and 122 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis before TIPS, mean hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion was 28, 63, and 91 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for all values (p <0.05). After TIPS, hepatic perfusion increased to a mean value of 48, 65, 113 mL/min per 100 mL for arterial (p <0.01), portal venous, and total (p=0.011) perfusion, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic arterial perfusion increased, whereas portal venous and total perfusion decreased compared with that of healthy volunteers. TIPS placement caused a statistically significant increase of the hepatic arterial and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous parenchymal perfusion remained unchanged.
AbstractList Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values. Perfusion of the liver parenchyma was measured in 24 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with liver cirrhosis using dynamic single-section CT. Seventeen patients underwent TIPS placement, and CT measurements were repeated within 7 days. CT scans were obtained at a single level comprising the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over a period of 88 sec (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 sec and eight scans every 7 sec) beginning with the injection of a contrast agent bolus (40 mL at 10 mL/sec). Parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement was measured with regions of interest, and time-density curves were obtained. These data were processed with a pharmaco-dynamic fitting program (TopFit), and the arterial and portal venous component and the total perfusion of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated (milliliters of perfusion per minute per 100 mL of tissue). Mean normal values for hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion were 20, 102, and 122 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis before TIPS, mean hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion was 28, 63, and 91 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for all values (p <0.05). After TIPS, hepatic perfusion increased to a mean value of 48, 65, 113 mL/min per 100 mL for arterial (p <0.01), portal venous, and total (p=0.011) perfusion, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic arterial perfusion increased, whereas portal venous and total perfusion decreased compared with that of healthy volunteers. TIPS placement caused a statistically significant increase of the hepatic arterial and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous parenchymal perfusion remained unchanged.
Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values.OBJECTIVEOur aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values.Perfusion of the liver parenchyma was measured in 24 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with liver cirrhosis using dynamic single-section CT. Seventeen patients underwent TIPS placement, and CT measurements were repeated within 7 days. CT scans were obtained at a single level comprising the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over a period of 88 sec (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 sec and eight scans every 7 sec) beginning with the injection of a contrast agent bolus (40 mL at 10 mL/sec). Parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement was measured with regions of interest, and time-density curves were obtained. These data were processed with a pharmaco-dynamic fitting program (TopFit), and the arterial and portal venous component and the total perfusion of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated (milliliters of perfusion per minute per 100 mL of tissue).SUBJECTS AND METHODSPerfusion of the liver parenchyma was measured in 24 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with liver cirrhosis using dynamic single-section CT. Seventeen patients underwent TIPS placement, and CT measurements were repeated within 7 days. CT scans were obtained at a single level comprising the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over a period of 88 sec (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 sec and eight scans every 7 sec) beginning with the injection of a contrast agent bolus (40 mL at 10 mL/sec). Parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement was measured with regions of interest, and time-density curves were obtained. These data were processed with a pharmaco-dynamic fitting program (TopFit), and the arterial and portal venous component and the total perfusion of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated (milliliters of perfusion per minute per 100 mL of tissue).Mean normal values for hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion were 20, 102, and 122 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis before TIPS, mean hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion was 28, 63, and 91 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for all values (p <0.05). After TIPS, hepatic perfusion increased to a mean value of 48, 65, 113 mL/min per 100 mL for arterial (p <0.01), portal venous, and total (p=0.011) perfusion, respectively.RESULTSMean normal values for hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion were 20, 102, and 122 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis before TIPS, mean hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion was 28, 63, and 91 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for all values (p <0.05). After TIPS, hepatic perfusion increased to a mean value of 48, 65, 113 mL/min per 100 mL for arterial (p <0.01), portal venous, and total (p=0.011) perfusion, respectively.In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic arterial perfusion increased, whereas portal venous and total perfusion decreased compared with that of healthy volunteers. TIPS placement caused a statistically significant increase of the hepatic arterial and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous parenchymal perfusion remained unchanged.CONCLUSIONIn patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic arterial perfusion increased, whereas portal venous and total perfusion decreased compared with that of healthy volunteers. TIPS placement caused a statistically significant increase of the hepatic arterial and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous parenchymal perfusion remained unchanged.
Author Bader, Till R
Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus
Weidekamm, Claudia
Cejna, Manfred
Kramer, Ludwig
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Weidekamm, Claudia
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Cejna, Manfred
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Kramer, Ludwig
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Bader, Till R
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16538179$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15671371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgFW3VP-BCZqO7qblJZpJZSq0PqChYwV1IM4lG5lGTGUv_vSmtCC5cXQLfCZwzQoOmbQxCp4DHhAC7VB9-DIKNyRjHgzOc7aEhZCxPKTAYoCGmOaQC09dDNArhA2PMRcEP0CFkOQfKYYiKqbVGdyFpbTK_f3pO2iaZuS_jkyfjbR9cfD8YFXpvymSxTq7XjaqdTibzY7RvVRXMye4eoZeb6Xxyl84eb-8nV7NUMyK6FMpSgS0KEEJrbHVB6YIXBlhJLIAWQHMsCGFGRWCtzTPGNMNcL4RmrMjoEbrY_rv07WdvQidrF7SpKtWYtg8y55QLzliEZzvYL2pTyqV3tfJr-VM2gvMdUEGrynrVaBd-XZ5RAbyIjmyd9m0I3thfguVmeRmXl3FySeTP8jEk_oS061QX9-u8ctX_0V3Dd_f2vnLeyFCrqoo1QK5Wq63ewG8W5ZLl
CODEN AAJRDX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2015_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1117_1_2812704
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2011_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2012_09_015
crossref_primary_10_1109_TRPMS_2018_2812360
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_15_907
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_014_3524_z
crossref_primary_10_1177_2050640617732886
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_021_03214_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2007_06_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_009_9563_2
crossref_primary_10_1177_0284185116685922
crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_4671590
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_016_4277_7
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20130228
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2011_10_009
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_7476477
crossref_primary_10_1137_10079690X
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_25070
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_89764_6
crossref_primary_10_4254_wjh_v2_i4_167
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_008_9435_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11604_010_0497_y
crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0b013e32832e09ce
crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v15_i4_664
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2012_04_024
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_185_3_01850813
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_009_1693_y
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v28_i42_6068
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_006_0405_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_13320
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpgi_00399_2015
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1751_2980_2011_00490_x
Cites_doi 10.1053/jhep.2002.31432
10.1152/ajpgi.1985.249.5.G549
10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70436-6
10.1097/00004424-199602000-00006
10.1023/A:1026679430553
10.1097/00004424-200008000-00005
10.1007/BF00841401
10.1016/0016-5085(91)90596-D
10.1007/PL00014078
10.1093/cvr/21.11.830
10.1097/00006231-198304060-00003
10.1097/00004424-200009000-00004
10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00454-5
10.1002/hep.510290302
10.1097/00004728-199505000-00016
10.1148/radiology.137.3.7003648
10.1055/s-2001-17551
10.1097/00004424-199311001-00023
10.1111/j.1600-0676.1998.tb00132.x
10.1097/00004728-200211000-00021
10.1002/hep.510280307
10.1002/hep.1840170125
10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769823
10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61552-8
10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327686
10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61811-9
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840505
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1546-3141
EndPage 510
ExternalDocumentID 15671371
16538179
10_2214_ajr_184_2_01840505
www184_2_505
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID -
1KJ
23M
2WC
34G
39C
3O-
53G
55
5GY
5RE
AAWTL
ABFLS
ABOCM
ADACO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AJYGW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GJ
GX1
H13
L7B
LSO
O0-
P2P
SJN
TRR
UDS
VH1
W2D
WH7
WOQ
X7M
ZA5
ZXP
---
-DD
.55
.GJ
1CY
AAEJM
AAYXX
AI.
AJJEV
CITATION
J5H
MJL
TR2
TWZ
W8F
YJK
YQI
YQJ
ZGI
ZVN
IQODW
ACRZS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PKN
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-1dda1f99188cc0fc933b79e14d2f11c813608224ea88cfff6544c407cb8c44953
ISSN 0361-803X
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 03:26:25 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:42:48 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:13:55 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:45:06 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:12 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 10 19:20:16 EST 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Nuclear medicine
Intravenous administration
Liver
Parenchyma
Hepatic disease
Intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
Density
Interest
Tissue
Aorta
Human
Spleen
Program
Radiodiagnosis
Healthy subject
Method
Normal
Biological activity
Cirrhosis
Perfusion
Radiology
Value
Digestive diseases
Medical imagery
Computerized axial tomography
Portal vein
Comparative study
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c428t-1dda1f99188cc0fc933b79e14d2f11c813608224ea88cfff6544c407cb8c44953
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 15671371
PQID 67378744
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67378744
pubmed_primary_15671371
pascalfrancis_primary_16538179
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_184_2_01840505
crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_ajr_184_2_01840505
highwire_smallpub1_www184_2_505
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Leesburg, VA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Leesburg, VA
– name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of roentgenology (1976)
PublicationTitleAlternate AJR Am J Roentgenol
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Am Roentgen Ray Soc
American Roentgen Ray Society
Publisher_xml – name: Am Roentgen Ray Soc
– name: American Roentgen Ray Society
References REF9
REF7
REF8
REF5
REF6
REF3
REF4
REF22
REF21
REF20
REF25
REF24
REF29
REF28
REF27
REF11
REF10
REF31
REF30
REF15
REF14
REF13
REF12
REF1
atypb1
REF19
REF18
atypb3
REF16
atypb2
atypb4
16120940 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Sep;185(3):813; author reply 813
References_xml – ident: REF25
  doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.31432
– ident: REF30
  doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1985.249.5.G549
– ident: REF31
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70436-6
– ident: REF13
  doi: 10.1097/00004424-199602000-00006
– ident: REF11
  doi: 10.1023/A:1026679430553
– ident: REF21
– ident: REF14
  doi: 10.1097/00004424-200008000-00005
– ident: atypb2
– ident: REF16
  doi: 10.1007/BF00841401
– ident: REF12
– ident: REF4
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90596-D
– ident: REF24
  doi: 10.1007/PL00014078
– ident: REF18
  doi: 10.1093/cvr/21.11.830
– ident: REF20
  doi: 10.1097/00006231-198304060-00003
– ident: REF22
– ident: REF10
  doi: 10.1097/00004424-200009000-00004
– ident: REF7
  doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00454-5
– ident: REF27
  doi: 10.1002/hep.510290302
– ident: REF6
  doi: 10.1097/00004728-199505000-00016
– ident: REF19
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.137.3.7003648
– ident: atypb1
– ident: REF28
  doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17551
– ident: REF15
  doi: 10.1097/00004424-199311001-00023
– ident: REF3
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1998.tb00132.x
– ident: REF9
  doi: 10.1097/00004728-200211000-00021
– ident: atypb4
  doi: 10.1002/hep.510280307
– ident: REF1
  doi: 10.1002/hep.1840170125
– ident: REF8
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769823
– ident: atypb3
  doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61552-8
– ident: REF5
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327686
– ident: REF29
  doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61811-9
– reference: 16120940 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Sep;185(3):813; author reply 813
SSID ssj0007897
Score 1.9544739
Snippet Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 505
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Contrast Media
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Linear Models
Liver Circulation - physiology
Liver Cirrhosis - diagnostic imaging
Liver Cirrhosis - surgery
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Semiology
Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic
Radiography, Interventional
Reference Values
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Title Effects of TIPS on Liver Perfusion Measured by Dynamic CT
URI http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/184/2/505
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15671371
https://www.proquest.com/docview/67378744
Volume 184
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9NAEF6FIiFeEDfhKH7gLXLI2uvrEYWiFghCkIq-Wes9qqaOXSUxEfx6ZnZ9NaUIeLEie72OZj7Pzreeg5BXfgaLGI-EC-RHuoxS6WZUJS5PmBfpRHlSI1GcfQoPj9n7k-BkMNC9qKVqk43Fz9_mlfyPVuEc6BWzZP9Bs-2kcAJ-g37hCBqG41_p-KALxpgfff6KG_85xllgMWJd4T7YaGn3AI2bKW33-dF03ndJ2282vSISqxLWIizfago0YS0n8Cd6mwbfsDrWOV8aME1zXsmzLuJHLWye2YwXumkEiiYdw8AMPj5Wcnt22hllce5-4bJc8-_5AtZp0eQQ7exJBE0Ys-5ysSisfabTb8_Osh6gvJ7VDEzm9RVr7nmU4VK1WI3h3rE3niAd3RkMGrlYGv0CEwXGbRu67NTQbi7dIDc9oBPY6eLt0Yd2xY5i04Sn_dc2uQof__rqw00jJzvdZV-mqS-N4bV8DW-Ytq1RrucuxoeZ3yV3avLhvLFIukcGqrhPbs3q8IoHJKkB5ZTaQUA5ZeEYQDktoJwGUE72w6kB5UznD8nxu4P59NCte2u4AgjnxqVScqqBHMSxEBMtEt_PokRRJj1NqYipH2IvAKY4DNBahwFjAsi_yGLBMCb5EdkrykI9IQ5XWiVRpn2pYsZgXmAcchLw0PcF5dlkSGgjpVTUheex_0meAgFFIacg5BSkm3ppI-QhGbX3XNiyK38c_bIRfrpe8jwHIdN0u93aYWbE_iWddJOGAdaoTGCKRkkpGFj8asYLVVZrDHyMsEfEkDy2uuvurWHw9Norz8jt7vV4TvY2q0q9ACd2k-0bBP4ClHuVrg
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+of+TIPS+on+liver+perfusion+measured+by+dynamic+CT&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Weidekamm%2C+Claudia&rft.au=Cejna%2C+Manfred&rft.au=Kramer%2C+Ludwig&rft.au=Peck-Radosavljevic%2C+Markus&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.volume=184&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=505&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2Fajr.184.2.01840505&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F15671371&rft.externalDocID=15671371
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon