Effects of TIPS on Liver Perfusion Measured by Dynamic CT
Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values. Perfusion of...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 184; no. 2; pp. 505 - 510 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Leesburg, VA
Am Roentgen Ray Soc
01.02.2005
American Roentgen Ray Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
DOI | 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840505 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values.
Perfusion of the liver parenchyma was measured in 24 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with liver cirrhosis using dynamic single-section CT. Seventeen patients underwent TIPS placement, and CT measurements were repeated within 7 days. CT scans were obtained at a single level comprising the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over a period of 88 sec (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 sec and eight scans every 7 sec) beginning with the injection of a contrast agent bolus (40 mL at 10 mL/sec). Parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement was measured with regions of interest, and time-density curves were obtained. These data were processed with a pharmaco-dynamic fitting program (TopFit), and the arterial and portal venous component and the total perfusion of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated (milliliters of perfusion per minute per 100 mL of tissue).
Mean normal values for hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion were 20, 102, and 122 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis before TIPS, mean hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion was 28, 63, and 91 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for all values (p <0.05). After TIPS, hepatic perfusion increased to a mean value of 48, 65, 113 mL/min per 100 mL for arterial (p <0.01), portal venous, and total (p=0.011) perfusion, respectively.
In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic arterial perfusion increased, whereas portal venous and total perfusion decreased compared with that of healthy volunteers. TIPS placement caused a statistically significant increase of the hepatic arterial and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous parenchymal perfusion remained unchanged. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values.
Perfusion of the liver parenchyma was measured in 24 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with liver cirrhosis using dynamic single-section CT. Seventeen patients underwent TIPS placement, and CT measurements were repeated within 7 days. CT scans were obtained at a single level comprising the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over a period of 88 sec (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 sec and eight scans every 7 sec) beginning with the injection of a contrast agent bolus (40 mL at 10 mL/sec). Parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement was measured with regions of interest, and time-density curves were obtained. These data were processed with a pharmaco-dynamic fitting program (TopFit), and the arterial and portal venous component and the total perfusion of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated (milliliters of perfusion per minute per 100 mL of tissue).
Mean normal values for hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion were 20, 102, and 122 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis before TIPS, mean hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion was 28, 63, and 91 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for all values (p <0.05). After TIPS, hepatic perfusion increased to a mean value of 48, 65, 113 mL/min per 100 mL for arterial (p <0.01), portal venous, and total (p=0.011) perfusion, respectively.
In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic arterial perfusion increased, whereas portal venous and total perfusion decreased compared with that of healthy volunteers. TIPS placement caused a statistically significant increase of the hepatic arterial and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous parenchymal perfusion remained unchanged. Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values.OBJECTIVEOur aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values.Perfusion of the liver parenchyma was measured in 24 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with liver cirrhosis using dynamic single-section CT. Seventeen patients underwent TIPS placement, and CT measurements were repeated within 7 days. CT scans were obtained at a single level comprising the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over a period of 88 sec (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 sec and eight scans every 7 sec) beginning with the injection of a contrast agent bolus (40 mL at 10 mL/sec). Parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement was measured with regions of interest, and time-density curves were obtained. These data were processed with a pharmaco-dynamic fitting program (TopFit), and the arterial and portal venous component and the total perfusion of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated (milliliters of perfusion per minute per 100 mL of tissue).SUBJECTS AND METHODSPerfusion of the liver parenchyma was measured in 24 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with liver cirrhosis using dynamic single-section CT. Seventeen patients underwent TIPS placement, and CT measurements were repeated within 7 days. CT scans were obtained at a single level comprising the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over a period of 88 sec (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 sec and eight scans every 7 sec) beginning with the injection of a contrast agent bolus (40 mL at 10 mL/sec). Parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement was measured with regions of interest, and time-density curves were obtained. These data were processed with a pharmaco-dynamic fitting program (TopFit), and the arterial and portal venous component and the total perfusion of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated (milliliters of perfusion per minute per 100 mL of tissue).Mean normal values for hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion were 20, 102, and 122 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis before TIPS, mean hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion was 28, 63, and 91 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for all values (p <0.05). After TIPS, hepatic perfusion increased to a mean value of 48, 65, 113 mL/min per 100 mL for arterial (p <0.01), portal venous, and total (p=0.011) perfusion, respectively.RESULTSMean normal values for hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion were 20, 102, and 122 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis before TIPS, mean hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion was 28, 63, and 91 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for all values (p <0.05). After TIPS, hepatic perfusion increased to a mean value of 48, 65, 113 mL/min per 100 mL for arterial (p <0.01), portal venous, and total (p=0.011) perfusion, respectively.In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic arterial perfusion increased, whereas portal venous and total perfusion decreased compared with that of healthy volunteers. TIPS placement caused a statistically significant increase of the hepatic arterial and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous parenchymal perfusion remained unchanged.CONCLUSIONIn patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic arterial perfusion increased, whereas portal venous and total perfusion decreased compared with that of healthy volunteers. TIPS placement caused a statistically significant increase of the hepatic arterial and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous parenchymal perfusion remained unchanged. |
Author | Bader, Till R Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus Weidekamm, Claudia Cejna, Manfred Kramer, Ludwig |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Weidekamm, Claudia – sequence: 2 fullname: Cejna, Manfred – sequence: 3 fullname: Kramer, Ludwig – sequence: 4 fullname: Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus – sequence: 5 fullname: Bader, Till R |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16538179$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15671371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgFW3VP-BCZqO7qblJZpJZSq0PqChYwV1IM4lG5lGTGUv_vSmtCC5cXQLfCZwzQoOmbQxCp4DHhAC7VB9-DIKNyRjHgzOc7aEhZCxPKTAYoCGmOaQC09dDNArhA2PMRcEP0CFkOQfKYYiKqbVGdyFpbTK_f3pO2iaZuS_jkyfjbR9cfD8YFXpvymSxTq7XjaqdTibzY7RvVRXMye4eoZeb6Xxyl84eb-8nV7NUMyK6FMpSgS0KEEJrbHVB6YIXBlhJLIAWQHMsCGFGRWCtzTPGNMNcL4RmrMjoEbrY_rv07WdvQidrF7SpKtWYtg8y55QLzliEZzvYL2pTyqV3tfJr-VM2gvMdUEGrynrVaBd-XZ5RAbyIjmyd9m0I3thfguVmeRmXl3FySeTP8jEk_oS061QX9-u8ctX_0V3Dd_f2vnLeyFCrqoo1QK5Wq63ewG8W5ZLl |
CODEN | AAJRDX |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2015_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_2812704 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2011_07_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2012_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1109_TRPMS_2018_2812360 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_15_907 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_014_3524_z crossref_primary_10_1177_2050640617732886 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_021_03214_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2007_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_009_9563_2 crossref_primary_10_1177_0284185116685922 crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_4671590 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_016_4277_7 crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20130228 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2011_10_009 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_7476477 crossref_primary_10_1137_10079690X crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_25070 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_89764_6 crossref_primary_10_4254_wjh_v2_i4_167 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_008_9435_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11604_010_0497_y crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0b013e32832e09ce crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v15_i4_664 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2012_04_024 crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_185_3_01850813 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_009_1693_y crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v28_i42_6068 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_006_0405_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_13320 crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpgi_00399_2015 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1751_2980_2011_00490_x |
Cites_doi | 10.1053/jhep.2002.31432 10.1152/ajpgi.1985.249.5.G549 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70436-6 10.1097/00004424-199602000-00006 10.1023/A:1026679430553 10.1097/00004424-200008000-00005 10.1007/BF00841401 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90596-D 10.1007/PL00014078 10.1093/cvr/21.11.830 10.1097/00006231-198304060-00003 10.1097/00004424-200009000-00004 10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00454-5 10.1002/hep.510290302 10.1097/00004728-199505000-00016 10.1148/radiology.137.3.7003648 10.1055/s-2001-17551 10.1097/00004424-199311001-00023 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1998.tb00132.x 10.1097/00004728-200211000-00021 10.1002/hep.510280307 10.1002/hep.1840170125 10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769823 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61552-8 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327686 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61811-9 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2005 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840505 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1546-3141 |
EndPage | 510 |
ExternalDocumentID | 15671371 16538179 10_2214_ajr_184_2_01840505 www184_2_505 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - 1KJ 23M 2WC 34G 39C 3O- 53G 55 5GY 5RE AAWTL ABFLS ABOCM ADACO ADBBV AENEX AFFNX AJYGW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CS3 DIK E3Z EBS EJD F5P GJ GX1 H13 L7B LSO O0- P2P SJN TRR UDS VH1 W2D WH7 WOQ X7M ZA5 ZXP --- -DD .55 .GJ 1CY AAEJM AAYXX AI. AJJEV CITATION J5H MJL TR2 TWZ W8F YJK YQI YQJ ZGI ZVN IQODW ACRZS CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PKN 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-1dda1f99188cc0fc933b79e14d2f11c813608224ea88cfff6544c407cb8c44953 |
ISSN | 0361-803X |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 03:26:25 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:42:48 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:55 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:45:06 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:12 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 10 19:20:16 EST 2020 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Nuclear medicine Intravenous administration Liver Parenchyma Hepatic disease Intrahepatic portosystemic shunt Density Interest Tissue Aorta Human Spleen Program Radiodiagnosis Healthy subject Method Normal Biological activity Cirrhosis Perfusion Radiology Value Digestive diseases Medical imagery Computerized axial tomography Portal vein Comparative study |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c428t-1dda1f99188cc0fc933b79e14d2f11c813608224ea88cfff6544c407cb8c44953 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 15671371 |
PQID | 67378744 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67378744 pubmed_primary_15671371 pascalfrancis_primary_16538179 crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_184_2_01840505 crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_ajr_184_2_01840505 highwire_smallpub1_www184_2_505 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2005-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2005 text: 2005-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Leesburg, VA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Leesburg, VA – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | AJR Am J Roentgenol |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | Am Roentgen Ray Soc American Roentgen Ray Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: Am Roentgen Ray Soc – name: American Roentgen Ray Society |
References | REF9 REF7 REF8 REF5 REF6 REF3 REF4 REF22 REF21 REF20 REF25 REF24 REF29 REF28 REF27 REF11 REF10 REF31 REF30 REF15 REF14 REF13 REF12 REF1 atypb1 REF19 REF18 atypb3 REF16 atypb2 atypb4 16120940 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Sep;185(3):813; author reply 813 |
References_xml | – ident: REF25 doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.31432 – ident: REF30 doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1985.249.5.G549 – ident: REF31 doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70436-6 – ident: REF13 doi: 10.1097/00004424-199602000-00006 – ident: REF11 doi: 10.1023/A:1026679430553 – ident: REF21 – ident: REF14 doi: 10.1097/00004424-200008000-00005 – ident: atypb2 – ident: REF16 doi: 10.1007/BF00841401 – ident: REF12 – ident: REF4 doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90596-D – ident: REF24 doi: 10.1007/PL00014078 – ident: REF18 doi: 10.1093/cvr/21.11.830 – ident: REF20 doi: 10.1097/00006231-198304060-00003 – ident: REF22 – ident: REF10 doi: 10.1097/00004424-200009000-00004 – ident: REF7 doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00454-5 – ident: REF27 doi: 10.1002/hep.510290302 – ident: REF6 doi: 10.1097/00004728-199505000-00016 – ident: REF19 doi: 10.1148/radiology.137.3.7003648 – ident: atypb1 – ident: REF28 doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17551 – ident: REF15 doi: 10.1097/00004424-199311001-00023 – ident: REF3 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1998.tb00132.x – ident: REF9 doi: 10.1097/00004728-200211000-00021 – ident: atypb4 doi: 10.1002/hep.510280307 – ident: REF1 doi: 10.1002/hep.1840170125 – ident: REF8 doi: 10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769823 – ident: atypb3 doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61552-8 – ident: REF5 doi: 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327686 – ident: REF29 doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61811-9 – reference: 16120940 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Sep;185(3):813; author reply 813 |
SSID | ssj0007897 |
Score | 1.9544739 |
Snippet | Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 505 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Contrast Media Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Linear Models Liver Circulation - physiology Liver Cirrhosis - diagnostic imaging Liver Cirrhosis - surgery Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Other diseases. Semiology Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic Radiography, Interventional Reference Values Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
Title | Effects of TIPS on Liver Perfusion Measured by Dynamic CT |
URI | http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/184/2/505 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15671371 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67378744 |
Volume | 184 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9NAEF6FIiFeEDfhKH7gLXLI2uvrEYWiFghCkIq-Wes9qqaOXSUxEfx6ZnZ9NaUIeLEie72OZj7Pzreeg5BXfgaLGI-EC-RHuoxS6WZUJS5PmBfpRHlSI1GcfQoPj9n7k-BkMNC9qKVqk43Fz9_mlfyPVuEc6BWzZP9Bs-2kcAJ-g37hCBqG41_p-KALxpgfff6KG_85xllgMWJd4T7YaGn3AI2bKW33-dF03ndJ2282vSISqxLWIizfago0YS0n8Cd6mwbfsDrWOV8aME1zXsmzLuJHLWye2YwXumkEiiYdw8AMPj5Wcnt22hllce5-4bJc8-_5AtZp0eQQ7exJBE0Ys-5ysSisfabTb8_Osh6gvJ7VDEzm9RVr7nmU4VK1WI3h3rE3niAd3RkMGrlYGv0CEwXGbRu67NTQbi7dIDc9oBPY6eLt0Yd2xY5i04Sn_dc2uQof__rqw00jJzvdZV-mqS-N4bV8DW-Ytq1RrucuxoeZ3yV3avLhvLFIukcGqrhPbs3q8IoHJKkB5ZTaQUA5ZeEYQDktoJwGUE72w6kB5UznD8nxu4P59NCte2u4AgjnxqVScqqBHMSxEBMtEt_PokRRJj1NqYipH2IvAKY4DNBahwFjAsi_yGLBMCb5EdkrykI9IQ5XWiVRpn2pYsZgXmAcchLw0PcF5dlkSGgjpVTUheex_0meAgFFIacg5BSkm3ppI-QhGbX3XNiyK38c_bIRfrpe8jwHIdN0u93aYWbE_iWddJOGAdaoTGCKRkkpGFj8asYLVVZrDHyMsEfEkDy2uuvurWHw9Norz8jt7vV4TvY2q0q9ACd2k-0bBP4ClHuVrg |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+of+TIPS+on+liver+perfusion+measured+by+dynamic+CT&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Weidekamm%2C+Claudia&rft.au=Cejna%2C+Manfred&rft.au=Kramer%2C+Ludwig&rft.au=Peck-Radosavljevic%2C+Markus&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.volume=184&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=505&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2Fajr.184.2.01840505&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F15671371&rft.externalDocID=15671371 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |