Neuromodulation Treatments of Pathological Anxiety in Anxiety Disorders, Stressor-Related Disorders, and Major Depressive Disorder: A Dimensional Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Frontiers in psychiatry Vol. 13; p. 910897
• Main Authors: Gay, Florian, Singier, Allison, Aouizerate, Bruno, Salvo, Francesco, Bienvenu, Thomas C. M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers 01.07.2022; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: anxiety; DBS (deep brain stimulation); Human health and pathology; Life Sciences; meta-analysis; Psychiatrics and mental health; Psychiatry; rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation); Santé publique et épidémiologie; tDCS – transcranial direct current stimulation; RTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation); DBS (deep brain stimulation); Anxiety; TDCS – transcranial direct current stimulation; Meta-analysis
• ISSN: 1664-0640; 1664-0640
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.910897

Background Pathological anxiety is responsible for major functional impairments and resistance to conventional treatments in anxiety disorders (ADs), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Focal neuromodulation therapies such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are being developed to treat those disorders. Methods We performed a dimensional systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence of the efficacy of TMS, tDCS and DBS in reducing anxiety symptoms across ADs, PTSD and MDD. Reports were identified through systematic searches in PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Cochrane library (inception to November 2020), followed by review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Controlled clinical trials examining the effectiveness of brain stimulation techniques on generic anxiety symptoms in patients with ADs, PTSD or MDD were selected. Results Nineteen studies (RCTs) met inclusion criteria, which included 589 participants. Overall, focal brain activity modulation interventions were associated with greater reduction of anxiety levels than controls [SMD: −0.56 (95% CI, −0.93 to−0.20, I 2 = 77%]. Subgroup analyses revealed positive effects for TMS across disorders, and of focal neuromodulation in generalized anxiety disorder and PTSD. Rates of clinical responses and remission were higher in the active conditions. However, the risk of bias was high in most studies. Conclusions There is moderate quality evidence for the efficacy of neuromodulation in treating pathological anxiety. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=233084 , identifier: PROSPERO CRD42021233084. It was submitted on January 29th, 2021, and registered on March 1st, 2021. No amendment was made to the recorded protocol. A change was applied for the subgroup analyses based on target brain regions, we added the putative nature (excitatory/inhibitory) of brain activity modulation.