Myofibrillar protein synthesis and muscle hypertrophy individualized responses to systematically changing resistance training variables in trained young men

The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual’s inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hyper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 127; no. 3; pp. 806 - 815
Main Authors Damas, Felipe, Angleri, Vitor, Phillips, Stuart M., Witard, Oliver C., Ugrinowitsch, Carlos, Santanielo, Natalia, Soligon, Samuel D., Costa, Luiz A. R., Lixandrão, Manoel E., Conceição, Miguel S., Libardi, Cleiton A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.09.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual’s inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men ( n = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR ( P > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR ( P < 0.05). The 0–48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON ( P < 0.05). All participants were considered “responders” to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response.
AbstractList The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual's inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men ( = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR ( > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR ( < 0.05). The 0-48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON ( < 0.05). All participants were considered "responders" to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables. Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response.
The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual's inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men (n = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR (P > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR (P < 0.05). The 0-48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON (P < 0.05). All participants were considered "responders" to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response.The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual's inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men (n = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR (P > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR (P < 0.05). The 0-48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON (P < 0.05). All participants were considered "responders" to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response.
The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual’s inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men ( n = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR ( P > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR ( P < 0.05). The 0–48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON ( P < 0.05). All participants were considered “responders” to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response.
Author Lixandrão, Manoel E.
Phillips, Stuart M.
Costa, Luiz A. R.
Witard, Oliver C.
Santanielo, Natalia
Soligon, Samuel D.
Damas, Felipe
Conceição, Miguel S.
Angleri, Vitor
Ugrinowitsch, Carlos
Libardi, Cleiton A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Felipe
  surname: Damas
  fullname: Damas, Felipe
  organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Vitor
  surname: Angleri
  fullname: Angleri, Vitor
  organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Stuart M.
  surname: Phillips
  fullname: Phillips, Stuart M.
  organization: Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Oliver C.
  surname: Witard
  fullname: Witard, Oliver C.
  organization: Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Carlos
  surname: Ugrinowitsch
  fullname: Ugrinowitsch, Carlos
  organization: School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Natalia
  surname: Santanielo
  fullname: Santanielo, Natalia
  organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Samuel D.
  surname: Soligon
  fullname: Soligon, Samuel D.
  organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Luiz A. R.
  surname: Costa
  fullname: Costa, Luiz A. R.
  organization: School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Manoel E.
  surname: Lixandrão
  fullname: Lixandrão, Manoel E.
  organization: School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Miguel S.
  surname: Conceição
  fullname: Conceição, Miguel S.
  organization: School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Cleiton A.
  surname: Libardi
  fullname: Libardi, Cleiton A.
  organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31268828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkc1u1TAQhS1URG9bXgG8ZJOL7fw5CxaoghapVTd0bU2cSa8rxw62Uyl9Fh4Wpz8SYsNqpJnzzWjOOSFHzjsk5CNne85r8fke5tnOhzUab_eMlTXbC8a7N2SXp6LgDeNHZCfbmhVtLdtjchLjPWO8qmr-jhyXXDRSCrkjv69XP5o-GGsh0Dn4hMbRuLp0wGgiBTfQaYnaIj2sM4YUfD5LjRvMgxkWsOYRBxowzt5FjDT5DMeEEySjwdqV6gO4O-PuNpGJCZxGmgIYt_UeIBjobQbz1adu3rb6JY8mdGfk7Qg24vuXekpuv3_7eX5ZXN1c_Dj_elXoSshUcF4BNG3fSQZadqLqO-x6qEsYxrbi2Ol2BFn1rB-bDAB2JUOhh6bFqimxKk_Jp-e9-f9fC8akJhM1Zksc-iUqIbKpLZdlk6UfXqRLP-Gg5mAmCKt6dTQLvjwLdPAxBhyVNimb4d32nlWcqS1B9XeC6ilBtSWY-fYf_vXE_8g_Bw6r2w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2024_1371839
crossref_primary_10_1298_ptr_R0031
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_smhs_2023_12_003
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpendo_00328_2021
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2019_01576
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40279_023_01825_0
crossref_primary_10_1113_JP284867
crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000004225
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2020_00859
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2316_7885
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_8697
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmet_2023_12_025
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_638936
crossref_primary_10_1152_physrev_00039_2022
crossref_primary_10_1111_sms_14134
crossref_primary_10_1123_jsr_2021_0101
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_655955
crossref_primary_10_1519_SSC_0000000000000866
crossref_primary_10_3390_sports11010011
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40279_019_01247_x
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00354_2024
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2256_5857
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2053_8426
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00670_2023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_celrep_2020_107980
crossref_primary_10_1249_MSS_0000000000002171
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1493_3121
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_773995
crossref_primary_10_1249_MSS_0000000000002632
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_020_04446_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40279_023_01932_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_exger_2020_111011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tice_2021_101725
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_665044
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0022_4707_21_12118_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_789403
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12041061
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6579_ad7348
crossref_primary_10_1249_MSS_0000000000002878
Cites_doi 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001787
10.1519/JSC.0000000000002864
10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958
10.1007/s00421-003-0833-3
10.1007/s00421-016-3529-1
10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2007
10.1519/JSC.0000000000000532
10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012
10.1519/15604.1
10.1111/apha.12225
10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197
10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1
10.1007/s00421-009-1016-7
10.1016/1044-0305(94)85054-2
10.1152/japplphysiol.01215.2007
10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb
10.1055/s-0035-1569369
10.1101/cshperspect.a029751
10.1113/JP272472
10.1002/mus.24077
10.3945/jn.110.135038
10.3945/ajcn.112.055517
10.1007/s00421-011-2078-x
10.1017/S0007114512002516
10.1097/00005768-200505001-00881
10.1007/s00421-017-3792-9
10.1152/japplphysiol.00154.2016
10.1007/s00421-015-3243-4
10.1080/17461391.2018.1476590
10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559
10.1371/journal.pone.0012033
10.1139/y00-036
10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.1.E99
10.3389/fphys.2018.00834
10.1519/JSC.0000000000000480
10.1007/s40279-015-0320-0
10.1152/ajpregu.00636.2007
10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001
10.1093/ajcn/84.3.475
10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670
10.1113/jphysiol.2010.192856
10.3389/fphys.2019.00297
10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.071
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00350.2019
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1601
EndPage 815
ExternalDocumentID 31268828
10_1152_japplphysiol_00350_2019
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.55
18M
29J
2WC
4.4
53G
5VS
85S
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABDNZ
ABHWK
ABJNI
ABKWE
ABOCM
ACBEA
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADFNX
AEILP
AENEX
AFOSN
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BKKCC
BTFSW
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
FRP
GX1
H13
H~9
ITBOX
KQ8
L7B
OK1
P2P
P6G
PQQKQ
RAP
RHI
RPL
RPRKH
SJN
TR2
UHB
UKR
UPT
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
XSW
YBH
YQT
YWH
~02
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-114aa67b980ac8924b9e9ba53adf741e9c7fa84b0bf6428ae930e2cd67e463e43
ISSN 8750-7587
1522-1601
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 06:29:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:02:08 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:16:56 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:24 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords muscle protein synthesis
individual responses
biological predisposition
resistance exercise
training protocol
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c428t-114aa67b980ac8924b9e9ba53adf741e9c7fa84b0bf6428ae930e2cd67e463e43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/japplphysiol.00350.2019
PMID 31268828
PQID 2252271836
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2252271836
pubmed_primary_31268828
crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_japplphysiol_00350_2019
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00350_2019
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of applied physiology (1985)
PublicationTitleAlternate J Appl Physiol (1985)
PublicationYear 2019
References B20
B42
B21
B43
B22
B23
B24
B26
B27
B28
B29
B30
B31
B10
B32
B11
B33
B12
B34
B13
B35
B14
B36
B15
B37
B16
B38
B17
B39
B18
B19
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
Hubal MJ (B25) 2005; 37
B40
B41
References_xml – ident: B32
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001787
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002864
– ident: B39
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958
– ident: B2
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0833-3
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3529-1
– ident: B6
  doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2007
– ident: B27
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000532
– ident: B29
  doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012
– ident: B3
  doi: 10.1519/15604.1
– ident: B19
  doi: 10.1111/apha.12225
– ident: B38
  doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197
– ident: B4
  doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1016-7
– ident: B28
  doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(94)85054-2
– ident: B33
  doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01215.2007
– ident: B20
  doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb
– ident: B37
  doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569369
– ident: B7
  doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029751
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.1113/JP272472
– ident: B26
  doi: 10.1002/mus.24077
– ident: B10
  doi: 10.3945/jn.110.135038
– ident: B42
  doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.055517
– ident: B30
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2078-x
– ident: B34
  doi: 10.1017/S0007114512002516
– volume: 37
  start-page: 964
  year: 2005
  ident: B25
  publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc
  doi: 10.1097/00005768-200505001-00881
– ident: B15
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3792-9
– ident: B31
  doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00154.2016
– ident: B18
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3243-4
– ident: B8
  doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1476590
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559
– ident: B11
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012033
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1139/y00-036
– ident: B35
  doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.1.E99
– ident: B36
  doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00834
– ident: B40
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000480
– ident: B16
  doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0320-0
– ident: B41
  doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00636.2007
– ident: B24
  doi: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001
– ident: B43
  doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.475
– ident: B1
  doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.192856
– ident: B23
  doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00297
– ident: B13
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.071
SSID ssj0014451
Score 2.4850056
Snippet The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 806
Title Myofibrillar protein synthesis and muscle hypertrophy individualized responses to systematically changing resistance training variables in trained young men
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31268828
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2252271836
Volume 127
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFBZZB6UvY2t3yW5oMPZi0tmyrViPZVspG9mFtaNvRnLkLuA4wXUG6W_Zj9lP2zmSfAlt2OXFBBkpcb7P0jlH53wi5KVmKuAi5yMdZBi6iRm8Uno6SqYSVgTtj3WCxcmTj_zkLHp_Hp8PBr96WUurWh1mVzfWlfwPqtAGuGKV7D8g2w4KDfAZ8IUrIAzXv8J4sobuqsKDgyrPKC7MStQgAKMOdUYwJj5fXUIn7zu4m1VdLeBP9WZtDdbsSmPxismStVIPnbCzLIq1LQvGYEKFA9amvKA5VML7AW42Fl6ZjFrTCqOtcfbw5q7A7LrVK53VayIqVv8JpaJEEvdiEm_l3NaZHetituxIWV4UrjL-28yqJF_b0fhaY5aq14sn1dJm738qMAXFRYVdnCPoErlgmXJzM_jNAXdtzeRtlQUcS8PeVJwYJYMbloiYmaMJ4HHdox6a7VVM8xP9HoD1cm6YEwaMgyeSdGtmm8nY3LpFbjNwVHCm_fCl28dC-TeXVQjf-3rLt-6R3WacTfNoi89jbJ_Tu-SOg48eWQbeIwNd7pODo1LWi_mavqKfWzD3ye7EZWsckJ99flLHT9rykwI_qeUn7fGTbvKTtvyk9YJu8pM2_KQdP2nDT9ryE0akjp_U8JMCP--Ts-N3p29ORu40kFEGLnI9AsddSj5WIvFllggWKaGFknEopzmYxVpk41wmkfJVjj611CL0NcumfKwjHuoofEB2ykWpHxE65UzHQR6O4zyMuPJFBJZikKsokiLPRTIkvAEhzZxUPv7MIjUuc8zSPpCpATJFIIfEbzsurVrMn7u8aFBOYWbH7TpZ6sXqMoWVljEwHUM-JA8t_O2gDV0eb73zhOx1b9FTslNXK_0M7OdaPTcU_Q0cAtRo
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myofibrillar+protein+synthesis+and+muscle+hypertrophy+individualized+responses+to+systematically+changing+resistance+training+variables+in+trained+young+men&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+physiology+%281985%29&rft.au=Damas%2C+Felipe&rft.au=Angleri%2C+Vitor&rft.au=Phillips%2C+Stuart+M&rft.au=Witard%2C+Oliver+C&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.eissn=1522-1601&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=806&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjapplphysiol.00350.2019&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31268828&rft.externalDocID=31268828
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon