Myofibrillar protein synthesis and muscle hypertrophy individualized responses to systematically changing resistance training variables in trained young men
The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual’s inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hyper...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 127; no. 3; pp. 806 - 815 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.09.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual’s inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men ( n = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR ( P > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR ( P < 0.05). The 0–48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON ( P < 0.05). All participants were considered “responders” to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual's inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men (
= 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR (
> 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR (
< 0.05). The 0-48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON (
< 0.05). All participants were considered "responders" to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables.
Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response. The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual's inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men (n = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR (P > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR (P < 0.05). The 0-48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON (P < 0.05). All participants were considered "responders" to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response.The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual's inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men (n = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR (P > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR (P < 0.05). The 0-48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON (P < 0.05). All participants were considered "responders" to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response. The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual’s inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men ( n = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR ( P > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR ( P < 0.05). The 0–48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON ( P < 0.05). All participants were considered “responders” to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response. |
Author | Lixandrão, Manoel E. Phillips, Stuart M. Costa, Luiz A. R. Witard, Oliver C. Santanielo, Natalia Soligon, Samuel D. Damas, Felipe Conceição, Miguel S. Angleri, Vitor Ugrinowitsch, Carlos Libardi, Cleiton A. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Felipe surname: Damas fullname: Damas, Felipe organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil – sequence: 2 givenname: Vitor surname: Angleri fullname: Angleri, Vitor organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil – sequence: 3 givenname: Stuart M. surname: Phillips fullname: Phillips, Stuart M. organization: Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada – sequence: 4 givenname: Oliver C. surname: Witard fullname: Witard, Oliver C. organization: Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom – sequence: 5 givenname: Carlos surname: Ugrinowitsch fullname: Ugrinowitsch, Carlos organization: School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil – sequence: 6 givenname: Natalia surname: Santanielo fullname: Santanielo, Natalia organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil – sequence: 7 givenname: Samuel D. surname: Soligon fullname: Soligon, Samuel D. organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil – sequence: 8 givenname: Luiz A. R. surname: Costa fullname: Costa, Luiz A. R. organization: School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil – sequence: 9 givenname: Manoel E. surname: Lixandrão fullname: Lixandrão, Manoel E. organization: School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil – sequence: 10 givenname: Miguel S. surname: Conceição fullname: Conceição, Miguel S. organization: School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil – sequence: 11 givenname: Cleiton A. surname: Libardi fullname: Libardi, Cleiton A. organization: MUSCULAB–Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31268828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkc1u1TAQhS1URG9bXgG8ZJOL7fw5CxaoghapVTd0bU2cSa8rxw62Uyl9Fh4Wpz8SYsNqpJnzzWjOOSFHzjsk5CNne85r8fke5tnOhzUab_eMlTXbC8a7N2SXp6LgDeNHZCfbmhVtLdtjchLjPWO8qmr-jhyXXDRSCrkjv69XP5o-GGsh0Dn4hMbRuLp0wGgiBTfQaYnaIj2sM4YUfD5LjRvMgxkWsOYRBxowzt5FjDT5DMeEEySjwdqV6gO4O-PuNpGJCZxGmgIYt_UeIBjobQbz1adu3rb6JY8mdGfk7Qg24vuXekpuv3_7eX5ZXN1c_Dj_elXoSshUcF4BNG3fSQZadqLqO-x6qEsYxrbi2Ol2BFn1rB-bDAB2JUOhh6bFqimxKk_Jp-e9-f9fC8akJhM1Zksc-iUqIbKpLZdlk6UfXqRLP-Gg5mAmCKt6dTQLvjwLdPAxBhyVNimb4d32nlWcqS1B9XeC6ilBtSWY-fYf_vXE_8g_Bw6r2w |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2024_1371839 crossref_primary_10_1298_ptr_R0031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_smhs_2023_12_003 crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpendo_00328_2021 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2019_01576 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40279_023_01825_0 crossref_primary_10_1113_JP284867 crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000004225 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2020_00859 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2316_7885 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_8697 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmet_2023_12_025 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_638936 crossref_primary_10_1152_physrev_00039_2022 crossref_primary_10_1111_sms_14134 crossref_primary_10_1123_jsr_2021_0101 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_655955 crossref_primary_10_1519_SSC_0000000000000866 crossref_primary_10_3390_sports11010011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40279_019_01247_x crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00354_2024 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2256_5857 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2053_8426 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00670_2023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_celrep_2020_107980 crossref_primary_10_1249_MSS_0000000000002171 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1493_3121 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_773995 crossref_primary_10_1249_MSS_0000000000002632 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_020_04446_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s40279_023_01932_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_exger_2020_111011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tice_2021_101725 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_665044 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0022_4707_21_12118_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_789403 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12041061 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6579_ad7348 crossref_primary_10_1249_MSS_0000000000002878 |
Cites_doi | 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001787 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002864 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958 10.1007/s00421-003-0833-3 10.1007/s00421-016-3529-1 10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2007 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000532 10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012 10.1519/15604.1 10.1111/apha.12225 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197 10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1 10.1007/s00421-009-1016-7 10.1016/1044-0305(94)85054-2 10.1152/japplphysiol.01215.2007 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb 10.1055/s-0035-1569369 10.1101/cshperspect.a029751 10.1113/JP272472 10.1002/mus.24077 10.3945/jn.110.135038 10.3945/ajcn.112.055517 10.1007/s00421-011-2078-x 10.1017/S0007114512002516 10.1097/00005768-200505001-00881 10.1007/s00421-017-3792-9 10.1152/japplphysiol.00154.2016 10.1007/s00421-015-3243-4 10.1080/17461391.2018.1476590 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559 10.1371/journal.pone.0012033 10.1139/y00-036 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.1.E99 10.3389/fphys.2018.00834 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000480 10.1007/s40279-015-0320-0 10.1152/ajpregu.00636.2007 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.475 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.192856 10.3389/fphys.2019.00297 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.071 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00350.2019 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1522-1601 |
EndPage | 815 |
ExternalDocumentID | 31268828 10_1152_japplphysiol_00350_2019 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .55 18M 29J 2WC 4.4 53G 5VS 85S AAFWJ AAYXX ABCQX ABDNZ ABHWK ABJNI ABKWE ABOCM ACBEA ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ADBBV ADFNX AEILP AENEX AFOSN AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BKKCC BTFSW CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EMOBN F5P FRP GX1 H13 H~9 ITBOX KQ8 L7B OK1 P2P P6G PQQKQ RAP RHI RPL RPRKH SJN TR2 UHB UKR UPT W8F WH7 WOQ X7M XSW YBH YQT YWH ~02 NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-114aa67b980ac8924b9e9ba53adf741e9c7fa84b0bf6428ae930e2cd67e463e43 |
ISSN | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 06:29:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:02:08 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:16:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:24 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | muscle protein synthesis individual responses biological predisposition resistance exercise training protocol |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c428t-114aa67b980ac8924b9e9ba53adf741e9c7fa84b0bf6428ae930e2cd67e463e43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/japplphysiol.00350.2019 |
PMID | 31268828 |
PQID | 2252271836 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2252271836 pubmed_primary_31268828 crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_japplphysiol_00350_2019 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00350_2019 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2019 text: 2019-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of applied physiology (1985) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Appl Physiol (1985) |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
References | B20 B42 B21 B43 B22 B23 B24 B26 B27 B28 B29 B30 B31 B10 B32 B11 B33 B12 B34 B13 B35 B14 B36 B15 B37 B16 B38 B17 B39 B18 B19 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 Hubal MJ (B25) 2005; 37 B40 B41 |
References_xml | – ident: B32 doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001787 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002864 – ident: B39 doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958 – ident: B2 doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0833-3 – ident: B5 doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3529-1 – ident: B6 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2007 – ident: B27 doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000532 – ident: B29 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012 – ident: B3 doi: 10.1519/15604.1 – ident: B19 doi: 10.1111/apha.12225 – ident: B38 doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197 – ident: B4 doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1016-7 – ident: B28 doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(94)85054-2 – ident: B33 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01215.2007 – ident: B20 doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb – ident: B37 doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569369 – ident: B7 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029751 – ident: B17 doi: 10.1113/JP272472 – ident: B26 doi: 10.1002/mus.24077 – ident: B10 doi: 10.3945/jn.110.135038 – ident: B42 doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.055517 – ident: B30 doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2078-x – ident: B34 doi: 10.1017/S0007114512002516 – volume: 37 start-page: 964 year: 2005 ident: B25 publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc doi: 10.1097/00005768-200505001-00881 – ident: B15 doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3792-9 – ident: B31 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00154.2016 – ident: B18 doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3243-4 – ident: B8 doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1476590 – ident: B22 doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559 – ident: B11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012033 – ident: B21 doi: 10.1139/y00-036 – ident: B35 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.1.E99 – ident: B36 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00834 – ident: B40 doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000480 – ident: B16 doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0320-0 – ident: B41 doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00636.2007 – ident: B24 doi: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 – ident: B43 doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.475 – ident: B1 doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670 – ident: B9 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.192856 – ident: B23 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00297 – ident: B13 doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.071 |
SSID | ssj0014451 |
Score | 2.4850056 |
Snippet | The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 806 |
Title | Myofibrillar protein synthesis and muscle hypertrophy individualized responses to systematically changing resistance training variables in trained young men |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31268828 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2252271836 |
Volume | 127 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFBZZB6UvY2t3yW5oMPZi0tmyrViPZVspG9mFtaNvRnLkLuA4wXUG6W_Zj9lP2zmSfAlt2OXFBBkpcb7P0jlH53wi5KVmKuAi5yMdZBi6iRm8Uno6SqYSVgTtj3WCxcmTj_zkLHp_Hp8PBr96WUurWh1mVzfWlfwPqtAGuGKV7D8g2w4KDfAZ8IUrIAzXv8J4sobuqsKDgyrPKC7MStQgAKMOdUYwJj5fXUIn7zu4m1VdLeBP9WZtDdbsSmPxismStVIPnbCzLIq1LQvGYEKFA9amvKA5VML7AW42Fl6ZjFrTCqOtcfbw5q7A7LrVK53VayIqVv8JpaJEEvdiEm_l3NaZHetituxIWV4UrjL-28yqJF_b0fhaY5aq14sn1dJm738qMAXFRYVdnCPoErlgmXJzM_jNAXdtzeRtlQUcS8PeVJwYJYMbloiYmaMJ4HHdox6a7VVM8xP9HoD1cm6YEwaMgyeSdGtmm8nY3LpFbjNwVHCm_fCl28dC-TeXVQjf-3rLt-6R3WacTfNoi89jbJ_Tu-SOg48eWQbeIwNd7pODo1LWi_mavqKfWzD3ye7EZWsckJ99flLHT9rykwI_qeUn7fGTbvKTtvyk9YJu8pM2_KQdP2nDT9ryE0akjp_U8JMCP--Ts-N3p29ORu40kFEGLnI9AsddSj5WIvFllggWKaGFknEopzmYxVpk41wmkfJVjj611CL0NcumfKwjHuoofEB2ykWpHxE65UzHQR6O4zyMuPJFBJZikKsokiLPRTIkvAEhzZxUPv7MIjUuc8zSPpCpATJFIIfEbzsurVrMn7u8aFBOYWbH7TpZ6sXqMoWVljEwHUM-JA8t_O2gDV0eb73zhOx1b9FTslNXK_0M7OdaPTcU_Q0cAtRo |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myofibrillar+protein+synthesis+and+muscle+hypertrophy+individualized+responses+to+systematically+changing+resistance+training+variables+in+trained+young+men&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+physiology+%281985%29&rft.au=Damas%2C+Felipe&rft.au=Angleri%2C+Vitor&rft.au=Phillips%2C+Stuart+M&rft.au=Witard%2C+Oliver+C&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.eissn=1522-1601&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=806&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjapplphysiol.00350.2019&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31268828&rft.externalDocID=31268828 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |