Classification of Metastatic versus Non-Metastatic Axillary Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients: Value of Cortex-Hilum Area Ratio with Ultrasound
To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients. From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nod...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of breast cancer Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 65 - 70 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
Korean Breast Cancer Society
01.03.2012
한국유방암학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1738-6756 2092-9900 2092-9900 |
DOI | 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65 |
Cover
Abstract | To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients.
From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging).
The sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027).
We recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose: To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients. Methods: From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging). Results: The sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027). Conclusion: We recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern. KCI Citation Count: 5 To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients. From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging). The sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027). We recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern. To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients.PURPOSETo investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients.From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging).METHODSFrom October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging).The sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027).RESULTSThe sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027).We recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern.CONCLUSIONWe recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern. |
Author | Lee, Seung Hwa Kim, Baek Hyun Yie, Ann Woo, Ok Hee Cha, Sang Hoon Song, Sung Eun Seo, Bo Kyoung Lee, Ki Yeol Cho, Kyu Ran |
AuthorAffiliation | 2 Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea 3 Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – name: 1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – name: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea – name: 3 Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sung Eun surname: Song fullname: Song, Sung Eun organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Bo Kyoung surname: Seo fullname: Seo, Bo Kyoung organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Seung Hwa surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Seung Hwa organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Ann surname: Yie fullname: Yie, Ann organization: Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Ki Yeol surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Ki Yeol organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea – sequence: 6 givenname: Kyu Ran surname: Cho fullname: Cho, Kyu Ran organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 7 givenname: Ok Hee surname: Woo fullname: Woo, Ok Hee organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 8 givenname: Sang Hoon surname: Cha fullname: Cha, Sang Hoon organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea – sequence: 9 givenname: Baek Hyun surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Baek Hyun organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22493630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001647645$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp1kk1v1DAQhi1URLeFOyfkG1yy2PFXwgFpiSitVD5UtVwtrzOhbrN2azul_RH8Z7y7pSpInEaeed537PHsoR0fPCD0kpI5J7x5e7G085rQek7FnM6leIJmNWnrqm0J2UEzqlhTSSXkLtpL6YIQyZlSz9BuXfOWSUZm6Fc3mpTc4KzJLngcBvwZskm5HC2-gZimhL8EXz3KLm7dOJp4V_I9JOw8_hChFHFnvIWIvxUKfE7v8HczTrD27ELMcFsdunFa4UWh8cm6H_7p8jk-G3M0KUy-f46eDmZM8OI-7qOzg4-n3WF1_PXTUbc4riyvm1xRwhQAF3Vbq6UYBsGkEFwNfJDCGtGXvGg5EYz2QihgIEFRAgOjrDcClmwfvdn6-jjoS-t0MG4TfwR9GfXi5PRI81Y2ShX0_Ra9mpYr6G15WDSjvopuVUawEf5d8e682NxoxmhDlSwGr-8NYrieIGW9cslCmaCHMCXdtqwlDZe0kK8et3ro8ee3CkC2gI0hpQjDA0KJXi-ELguh1wuhqdBUS1Ek8h-JdXnz1eWybvy_8Dc73rys |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_013_0036_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejr_2012_09_002 crossref_primary_10_3166_onco_2019_0031 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12282_015_0598_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2017_09_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_femme_2017_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrid_2016_06_002 crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2017_5817 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jidi_2024_05_005 crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_15_03039 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_023_01090_7 crossref_primary_10_25259_AJS_3_2020 |
Cites_doi | 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1720 10.1080/028418600750013014 10.1023/A:1008377910967 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.141 10.2214/AJR.09.3122 10.2214/AJR.05.0936 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO;2-H 10.1002/cncy.20152 10.1056/NEJM199810013391410 10.1007/s00330-004-2605-9 10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393544 10.1148/radiol.2252011605 10.1245/s10434-009-0421-9 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01243.x 10.1148/rg.27si075502 10.1148/radiol.2203001545 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601290 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.010 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2012 Korean Breast Cancer Society. All rights reserved. 2012 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 Korean Breast Cancer Society. All rights reserved. 2012 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2092-9900 |
EndPage | 70 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_496877 PMC3318176 22493630 10_4048_jbc_2012_15_1_65 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 5-W 5GY 8JR 8XY 9ZL AAYXX ADBBV ADRAZ AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL CITATION DIK DU5 EF. GROUPED_DOAJ HYE KQ8 M48 O5R O5S PGMZT RPM NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-1037ee452927b5ff5365547f4f65ca5d2925940531d557e3e6e710ef313da5eb3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1738-6756 2092-9900 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:30:10 EST 2023 Thu Aug 21 18:42:44 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 23:25:19 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:10:41 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:56:40 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:50 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Breast Lymphatic metastasis Lymph nodes Ultrasonography |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c428t-1037ee452927b5ff5365547f4f65ca5d2925940531d557e3e6e710ef313da5eb3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 G704-SER000010237.2012.15.1.003 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65 |
PMID | 22493630 |
PQID | 993908461 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_496877 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3318176 proquest_miscellaneous_993908461 pubmed_primary_22493630 crossref_primary_10_4048_jbc_2012_15_1_65 crossref_citationtrail_10_4048_jbc_2012_15_1_65 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012-03-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2012 text: 2012-03-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Journal of breast cancer |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Breast Cancer |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
Publisher | Korean Breast Cancer Society 한국유방암학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Korean Breast Cancer Society – name: 한국유방암학회 |
References | Chang (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref21) 2011; 119 Specht (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref16) 2005; 200 Tate (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref9) 1989; 15 Feu (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref18) 1997; 205 Reynolds (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref3) 1999; 17 Kumar (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref7) 2003; 44 Fraile (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref6) 2000; 11 de Kanter (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref5) 1999; 86 Yang (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref12) 2001; 220 Esen (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref19) 2005; 15 Carter (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref2) 1989; 63 Rao (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref22) 2009; 16 Sacre (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref15) 1986; 12 Cho (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref20) 2009; 193 McMasters (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref4) 1998; 339 Abe (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref13) 2007; 27 Banerjee (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref1) 2004; 22 Michel (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref8) 2002; 225 Damera (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref10) 2003; 89 Lernevall (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref11) 2000; 39 Alvarez (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref17) 2006; 186 American College of Radiology, BI-RADS Committee (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref14) 2003 21433002 - Cancer Cytopathol. 2011 Oct 25;119(5):328-34 15690206 - Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1215-23 14520465 - Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 6;89(7):1310-3 9393544 - Radiology. 1997 Dec;205(3):831-5 3709822 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 1986 Jun;12(2):169-73 10987221 - Acta Oncol. 2000;39(3):277-81 19933672 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1731-7 11526284 - Radiology. 2001 Sep;220(3):795-802 9753717 - N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 1 ;339(14 ):990-5 10583296 - Br J Surg. 1999 Nov;86(11):1459-62 15226324 - J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2567-75 2910416 - Cancer. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):181-7 19263171 - Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1170-5 16632729 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 May;186(5):1342-8 15631914 - J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jan;200(1):10-4 2649395 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 1989 Apr;15(2):139-41 18180238 - Radiographics. 2007 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S91-9 10561208 - J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1720-6 12515869 - J Nucl Med. 2003 Jan;44(1):7-10 12409591 - Radiology. 2002 Nov;225(2):527-36 10942059 - Ann Oncol. 2000 Jun;11(6):701-5 |
References_xml | – volume: 17 start-page: 1720 year: 1999 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref3 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1720 – volume: 39 start-page: 277 year: 2000 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref11 publication-title: Acta Oncol doi: 10.1080/028418600750013014 – volume: 11 start-page: 701 year: 2000 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref6 publication-title: Ann Oncol doi: 10.1023/A:1008377910967 – volume: 22 start-page: 2567 year: 2004 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref1 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.141 – volume: 193 start-page: 1731 year: 2009 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref20 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3122 – volume: 12 start-page: 169 year: 1986 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref15 publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol – volume: 186 start-page: 1342 year: 2006 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref17 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0936 – volume: 63 start-page: 181 year: 1989 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref2 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO;2-H – volume: 119 start-page: 328 year: 2011 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref21 publication-title: Cancer Cytopathol doi: 10.1002/cncy.20152 – volume: 339 start-page: 990 year: 1998 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref4 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810013391410 – volume: 15 start-page: 1215 year: 2005 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref19 publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2605-9 – volume-title: ACR BI-RADS Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System: Breast Imaging Atlas year: 2003 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref14 – volume: 205 start-page: 831 year: 1997 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref18 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393544 – volume: 225 start-page: 527 year: 2002 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref8 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2252011605 – volume: 16 start-page: 1170 year: 2009 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref22 publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0421-9 – volume: 86 start-page: 1459 year: 1999 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref5 publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01243.x – volume: 27 start-page: S91 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2007 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref13 publication-title: Radiographics doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075502 – volume: 44 start-page: 7 year: 2003 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref7 publication-title: J Nucl Med – volume: 15 start-page: 139 year: 1989 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref9 publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol – volume: 220 start-page: 795 year: 2001 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref12 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2203001545 – volume: 89 start-page: 1310 year: 2003 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref10 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601290 – volume: 200 start-page: 10 year: 2005 ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref16 publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.010 – reference: 10583296 - Br J Surg. 1999 Nov;86(11):1459-62 – reference: 15226324 - J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2567-75 – reference: 15631914 - J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jan;200(1):10-4 – reference: 3709822 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 1986 Jun;12(2):169-73 – reference: 19263171 - Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1170-5 – reference: 10561208 - J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1720-6 – reference: 12409591 - Radiology. 2002 Nov;225(2):527-36 – reference: 2649395 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 1989 Apr;15(2):139-41 – reference: 12515869 - J Nucl Med. 2003 Jan;44(1):7-10 – reference: 9393544 - Radiology. 1997 Dec;205(3):831-5 – reference: 21433002 - Cancer Cytopathol. 2011 Oct 25;119(5):328-34 – reference: 15690206 - Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1215-23 – reference: 10987221 - Acta Oncol. 2000;39(3):277-81 – reference: 14520465 - Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 6;89(7):1310-3 – reference: 2910416 - Cancer. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):181-7 – reference: 10942059 - Ann Oncol. 2000 Jun;11(6):701-5 – reference: 18180238 - Radiographics. 2007 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S91-9 – reference: 16632729 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 May;186(5):1342-8 – reference: 11526284 - Radiology. 2001 Sep;220(3):795-802 – reference: 19933672 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1731-7 – reference: 9753717 - N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 1 ;339(14 ):990-5 |
SSID | ssj0064377 |
Score | 1.920973 |
Snippet | To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of... Purpose: To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 65 |
SubjectTerms | Original 일반외과학 |
Title | Classification of Metastatic versus Non-Metastatic Axillary Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients: Value of Cortex-Hilum Area Ratio with Ultrasound |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22493630 https://www.proquest.com/docview/993908461 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3318176 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001647645 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Journal of Breast Cancer, 2012, 15(1), 58, pp.65-70 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1fi9QwEA_eCeKL-N-eukTwxYfUS9MkF1_kXDxWYQ8RV-4ttEmq9ZbWa7uw9yH8zs60vfVWFsGn0jRt0swk85vMZIaQl86A4OCJZzkoByxNvGRGC8NU7pQX3IXE9dE-T9VskX48k2d_jkePA9juVO0wn9SiWcbri8u3MOEBv8Yphp39kWMsQp7EXMY8VnKP3AS5pFAVm6cbmwJaqPpUKxqmOMDk0Wi58wtbQmqvaopd-PNvN8prcunkLrkzAkp6PHDAPXIjVPfJrfloMn9AfvVpL9EhqKcBrQs6D12GB4lKR9EpY9XS07pi10qP15iLqLmEch9aWlb0Hfqud3SKPNLQT0Mw1vYN_ZotVwG_OUWn3TWblbDYQWdCRj9jexT3eeliCT1vMYHTQ7I4ef9lOmNjDgbmQDHpGB4jDAGts4nOZVFIoQCA6CItlHSZ9FAuTYoz2UupgwgqAGYJheDCZxI09Udkv6qr8ITQTBtAO7njR06k0uc5oBvjAJ9AfYAlPiKvrwbdujFAOebJWFpQVJBMFshkkUyWS8utkhF5tXnj5xCc4x91XwAd7bkrLUbUxuu32p43FvSGDzY16kjriNArKluYZWg6yapQr1oLKM4cAlTjEXk8EH3TIGAgI5Q4jIjeYodNBWxu-0lVfu8DeQtYULlWB__xG0_JbbwdvOCekf2uWYXnAIu6fNJvJ0x6np_0u1a_AewAC-M |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification+of+Metastatic+versus+Non-Metastatic+Axillary+Nodes+in+Breast+Cancer+Patients%3A+Value+of+Cortex-Hilum+Area+Ratio+with+Ultrasound&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+breast+cancer&rft.au=Song%2C+Sung+Eun&rft.au=Seo%2C+Bo+Kyoung&rft.au=Lee%2C+Seung+Hwa&rft.au=Yie%2C+Ann&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.issn=1738-6756&rft.eissn=2092-9900&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft_id=info:doi/10.4048%2Fjbc.2012.15.1.65&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_4048_jbc_2012_15_1_65 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1738-6756&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1738-6756&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1738-6756&client=summon |