Classification of Metastatic versus Non-Metastatic Axillary Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients: Value of Cortex-Hilum Area Ratio with Ultrasound

To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients. From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of breast cancer Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 65 - 70
Main Authors Song, Sung Eun, Seo, Bo Kyoung, Lee, Seung Hwa, Yie, Ann, Lee, Ki Yeol, Cho, Kyu Ran, Woo, Ok Hee, Cha, Sang Hoon, Kim, Baek Hyun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Breast Cancer Society 01.03.2012
한국유방암학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1738-6756
2092-9900
2092-9900
DOI10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65

Cover

Abstract To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients. From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging). The sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027). We recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern.
AbstractList Purpose: To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients. Methods: From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging). Results: The sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027). Conclusion: We recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern. KCI Citation Count: 5
To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients. From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging). The sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027). We recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern.
To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients.PURPOSETo investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound in breast cancer patients.From October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging).METHODSFrom October 2005 to July 2006, we prospectively evaluated axillary nodes with ultrasound in 205 consecutive patients who had category 4B, 4C or 5 breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System-Ultrasound (BI-RADS-Ultrasound®). Among the 205, there were 24 patients who had pathologic verification of breast cancer and axillary lymph node status. For a total of 80 axillary nodes we measured the areas of the cortex and hilum of lymph nodes and calculated the area ratio. We also measured the length of the longitudinal and transverse axis of the lymph nodes and calculated the length ratio. We evaluated the blood flow pattern on power Doppler imaging and classified each lymph node into a central or peripheral pattern. Diagnostic performance was analyzed according to positive criteria for lymph node metastasis (CH area ratio >2, LT axis ratio <2, peripheral type on power Doppler imaging).The sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027).RESULTSThe sensitivity of the CH area ratio was superior to that of the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 82.3%, p=0.031) and to that of the blood flow pattern (94.1% vs. 29.4%, p=0.009). For specificity, all three evaluating parameters had high values (89.1-95.6%) and no significant differences were found (p=0.121). The CH area ratio had a better positive predictive value than the LT axis ratio (94.1% vs. 80.0%, p=0.030) and power Doppler imaging (94.1% vs. 66.6%, p=0.028). For the negative predictive value, the CH area ratio was superior to the LT axis ratio (95.6% vs. 86.6%, p=0.035) and the blood flow pattern (95.6% vs. 63.0%, p=0.027).We recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern.CONCLUSIONWe recommend the CH area ratio of an axillary lymph node on ultrasound as a quantitative indicator for the classification of lymph nodes. The CH area ratio can improve diagnostic performance when compared with the LT axis ratio or blood flow pattern.
Author Lee, Seung Hwa
Kim, Baek Hyun
Yie, Ann
Woo, Ok Hee
Cha, Sang Hoon
Song, Sung Eun
Seo, Bo Kyoung
Lee, Ki Yeol
Cho, Kyu Ran
AuthorAffiliation 2 Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
3 Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– name: 1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– name: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
– name: 3 Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sung Eun
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Sung Eun
  organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Bo Kyoung
  surname: Seo
  fullname: Seo, Bo Kyoung
  organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Seung Hwa
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Seung Hwa
  organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ann
  surname: Yie
  fullname: Yie, Ann
  organization: Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ki Yeol
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Ki Yeol
  organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kyu Ran
  surname: Cho
  fullname: Cho, Kyu Ran
  organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Ok Hee
  surname: Woo
  fullname: Woo, Ok Hee
  organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Sang Hoon
  surname: Cha
  fullname: Cha, Sang Hoon
  organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Baek Hyun
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Baek Hyun
  organization: Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22493630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001647645$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1kk1v1DAQhi1URLeFOyfkG1yy2PFXwgFpiSitVD5UtVwtrzOhbrN2azul_RH8Z7y7pSpInEaeed537PHsoR0fPCD0kpI5J7x5e7G085rQek7FnM6leIJmNWnrqm0J2UEzqlhTSSXkLtpL6YIQyZlSz9BuXfOWSUZm6Fc3mpTc4KzJLngcBvwZskm5HC2-gZimhL8EXz3KLm7dOJp4V_I9JOw8_hChFHFnvIWIvxUKfE7v8HczTrD27ELMcFsdunFa4UWh8cm6H_7p8jk-G3M0KUy-f46eDmZM8OI-7qOzg4-n3WF1_PXTUbc4riyvm1xRwhQAF3Vbq6UYBsGkEFwNfJDCGtGXvGg5EYz2QihgIEFRAgOjrDcClmwfvdn6-jjoS-t0MG4TfwR9GfXi5PRI81Y2ShX0_Ra9mpYr6G15WDSjvopuVUawEf5d8e682NxoxmhDlSwGr-8NYrieIGW9cslCmaCHMCXdtqwlDZe0kK8et3ro8ee3CkC2gI0hpQjDA0KJXi-ELguh1wuhqdBUS1Ek8h-JdXnz1eWybvy_8Dc73rys
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_013_0036_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejr_2012_09_002
crossref_primary_10_3166_onco_2019_0031
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12282_015_0598_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2017_09_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_femme_2017_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrid_2016_06_002
crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2017_5817
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jidi_2024_05_005
crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_15_03039
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_023_01090_7
crossref_primary_10_25259_AJS_3_2020
Cites_doi 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1720
10.1080/028418600750013014
10.1023/A:1008377910967
10.1200/JCO.2004.11.141
10.2214/AJR.09.3122
10.2214/AJR.05.0936
10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO;2-H
10.1002/cncy.20152
10.1056/NEJM199810013391410
10.1007/s00330-004-2605-9
10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393544
10.1148/radiol.2252011605
10.1245/s10434-009-0421-9
10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01243.x
10.1148/rg.27si075502
10.1148/radiol.2203001545
10.1038/sj.bjc.6601290
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.010
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2012 Korean Breast Cancer Society. All rights reserved. 2012
Copyright_xml – notice: 2012 Korean Breast Cancer Society. All rights reserved. 2012
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2092-9900
EndPage 70
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_496877
PMC3318176
22493630
10_4048_jbc_2012_15_1_65
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
5-W
5GY
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
DIK
DU5
EF.
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
KQ8
M48
O5R
O5S
PGMZT
RPM
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-1037ee452927b5ff5365547f4f65ca5d2925940531d557e3e6e710ef313da5eb3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1738-6756
2092-9900
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:30:10 EST 2023
Thu Aug 21 18:42:44 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 23:25:19 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:10:41 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:56:40 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:50 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Breast
Lymphatic metastasis
Lymph nodes
Ultrasonography
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c428t-1037ee452927b5ff5365547f4f65ca5d2925940531d557e3e6e710ef313da5eb3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
G704-SER000010237.2012.15.1.003
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65
PMID 22493630
PQID 993908461
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_496877
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3318176
proquest_miscellaneous_993908461
pubmed_primary_22493630
crossref_primary_10_4048_jbc_2012_15_1_65
crossref_citationtrail_10_4048_jbc_2012_15_1_65
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Journal of breast cancer
PublicationTitleAlternate J Breast Cancer
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
한국유방암학회
Publisher_xml – name: Korean Breast Cancer Society
– name: 한국유방암학회
References Chang (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref21) 2011; 119
Specht (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref16) 2005; 200
Tate (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref9) 1989; 15
Feu (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref18) 1997; 205
Reynolds (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref3) 1999; 17
Kumar (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref7) 2003; 44
Fraile (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref6) 2000; 11
de Kanter (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref5) 1999; 86
Yang (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref12) 2001; 220
Esen (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref19) 2005; 15
Carter (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref2) 1989; 63
Rao (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref22) 2009; 16
Sacre (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref15) 1986; 12
Cho (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref20) 2009; 193
McMasters (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref4) 1998; 339
Abe (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref13) 2007; 27
Banerjee (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref1) 2004; 22
Michel (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref8) 2002; 225
Damera (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref10) 2003; 89
Lernevall (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref11) 2000; 39
Alvarez (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref17) 2006; 186
American College of Radiology, BI-RADS Committee (10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref14) 2003
21433002 - Cancer Cytopathol. 2011 Oct 25;119(5):328-34
15690206 - Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1215-23
14520465 - Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 6;89(7):1310-3
9393544 - Radiology. 1997 Dec;205(3):831-5
3709822 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 1986 Jun;12(2):169-73
10987221 - Acta Oncol. 2000;39(3):277-81
19933672 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1731-7
11526284 - Radiology. 2001 Sep;220(3):795-802
9753717 - N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 1 ;339(14 ):990-5
10583296 - Br J Surg. 1999 Nov;86(11):1459-62
15226324 - J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2567-75
2910416 - Cancer. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):181-7
19263171 - Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1170-5
16632729 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 May;186(5):1342-8
15631914 - J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jan;200(1):10-4
2649395 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 1989 Apr;15(2):139-41
18180238 - Radiographics. 2007 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S91-9
10561208 - J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1720-6
12515869 - J Nucl Med. 2003 Jan;44(1):7-10
12409591 - Radiology. 2002 Nov;225(2):527-36
10942059 - Ann Oncol. 2000 Jun;11(6):701-5
References_xml – volume: 17
  start-page: 1720
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref3
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1720
– volume: 39
  start-page: 277
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref11
  publication-title: Acta Oncol
  doi: 10.1080/028418600750013014
– volume: 11
  start-page: 701
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref6
  publication-title: Ann Oncol
  doi: 10.1023/A:1008377910967
– volume: 22
  start-page: 2567
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref1
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.141
– volume: 193
  start-page: 1731
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref20
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3122
– volume: 12
  start-page: 169
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref15
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
– volume: 186
  start-page: 1342
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref17
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0936
– volume: 63
  start-page: 181
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref2
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO;2-H
– volume: 119
  start-page: 328
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref21
  publication-title: Cancer Cytopathol
  doi: 10.1002/cncy.20152
– volume: 339
  start-page: 990
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref4
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810013391410
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1215
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref19
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2605-9
– volume-title: ACR BI-RADS Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System: Breast Imaging Atlas
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref14
– volume: 205
  start-page: 831
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref18
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393544
– volume: 225
  start-page: 527
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref8
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2252011605
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1170
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref22
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0421-9
– volume: 86
  start-page: 1459
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref5
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01243.x
– volume: 27
  start-page: S91
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref13
  publication-title: Radiographics
  doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075502
– volume: 44
  start-page: 7
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref7
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
– volume: 15
  start-page: 139
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref9
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
– volume: 220
  start-page: 795
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref12
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2203001545
– volume: 89
  start-page: 1310
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref10
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601290
– volume: 200
  start-page: 10
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.1.65_ref16
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.010
– reference: 10583296 - Br J Surg. 1999 Nov;86(11):1459-62
– reference: 15226324 - J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2567-75
– reference: 15631914 - J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jan;200(1):10-4
– reference: 3709822 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 1986 Jun;12(2):169-73
– reference: 19263171 - Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1170-5
– reference: 10561208 - J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1720-6
– reference: 12409591 - Radiology. 2002 Nov;225(2):527-36
– reference: 2649395 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 1989 Apr;15(2):139-41
– reference: 12515869 - J Nucl Med. 2003 Jan;44(1):7-10
– reference: 9393544 - Radiology. 1997 Dec;205(3):831-5
– reference: 21433002 - Cancer Cytopathol. 2011 Oct 25;119(5):328-34
– reference: 15690206 - Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1215-23
– reference: 10987221 - Acta Oncol. 2000;39(3):277-81
– reference: 14520465 - Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 6;89(7):1310-3
– reference: 2910416 - Cancer. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):181-7
– reference: 10942059 - Ann Oncol. 2000 Jun;11(6):701-5
– reference: 18180238 - Radiographics. 2007 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S91-9
– reference: 16632729 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 May;186(5):1342-8
– reference: 11526284 - Radiology. 2001 Sep;220(3):795-802
– reference: 19933672 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1731-7
– reference: 9753717 - N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 1 ;339(14 ):990-5
SSID ssj0064377
Score 1.920973
Snippet To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for diagnosis of...
Purpose: To investigate the significance of the cortex-hilum (CH) area ratio and longitudinal-transverse (LT) axis ratio and the blood flow pattern for...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 65
SubjectTerms Original
일반외과학
Title Classification of Metastatic versus Non-Metastatic Axillary Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients: Value of Cortex-Hilum Area Ratio with Ultrasound
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22493630
https://www.proquest.com/docview/993908461
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3318176
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001647645
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Journal of Breast Cancer, 2012, 15(1), 58, pp.65-70
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1fi9QwEA_eCeKL-N-eukTwxYfUS9MkF1_kXDxWYQ8RV-4ttEmq9ZbWa7uw9yH8zs60vfVWFsGn0jRt0swk85vMZIaQl86A4OCJZzkoByxNvGRGC8NU7pQX3IXE9dE-T9VskX48k2d_jkePA9juVO0wn9SiWcbri8u3MOEBv8Yphp39kWMsQp7EXMY8VnKP3AS5pFAVm6cbmwJaqPpUKxqmOMDk0Wi58wtbQmqvaopd-PNvN8prcunkLrkzAkp6PHDAPXIjVPfJrfloMn9AfvVpL9EhqKcBrQs6D12GB4lKR9EpY9XS07pi10qP15iLqLmEch9aWlb0Hfqud3SKPNLQT0Mw1vYN_ZotVwG_OUWn3TWblbDYQWdCRj9jexT3eeliCT1vMYHTQ7I4ef9lOmNjDgbmQDHpGB4jDAGts4nOZVFIoQCA6CItlHSZ9FAuTYoz2UupgwgqAGYJheDCZxI09Udkv6qr8ITQTBtAO7njR06k0uc5oBvjAJ9AfYAlPiKvrwbdujFAOebJWFpQVJBMFshkkUyWS8utkhF5tXnj5xCc4x91XwAd7bkrLUbUxuu32p43FvSGDzY16kjriNArKluYZWg6yapQr1oLKM4cAlTjEXk8EH3TIGAgI5Q4jIjeYodNBWxu-0lVfu8DeQtYULlWB__xG0_JbbwdvOCekf2uWYXnAIu6fNJvJ0x6np_0u1a_AewAC-M
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification+of+Metastatic+versus+Non-Metastatic+Axillary+Nodes+in+Breast+Cancer+Patients%3A+Value+of+Cortex-Hilum+Area+Ratio+with+Ultrasound&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+breast+cancer&rft.au=Song%2C+Sung+Eun&rft.au=Seo%2C+Bo+Kyoung&rft.au=Lee%2C+Seung+Hwa&rft.au=Yie%2C+Ann&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.issn=1738-6756&rft.eissn=2092-9900&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft_id=info:doi/10.4048%2Fjbc.2012.15.1.65&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_4048_jbc_2012_15_1_65
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1738-6756&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1738-6756&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1738-6756&client=summon