Risk Factors of Microscopic Invasion in Early Gastric Cancer

• Published in: Journal of gastric cancer Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 331 - 341
• Main Authors: Choi, Jong-Ho, Suh, Yun-Suhk, Park, Shin-Hoo, Kong, Seong-Ho, Lee, Hyuk-Joon, Kim, Woo Ho, Yang, Han-Kwang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 01.12.2017; 대한위암학회
• Subjects: Original; 일반외과학; Stomach neoplasm; Risk factors
• ISSN: 2093-582X; 2093-5641
• DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e37

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of microscopic invasion to determine the adequate resection margin in early gastric cancer (EGC). A retrospective review was performed that included patients who underwent gastrectomy for clinical early gastric cancer (cEGC) at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2007 and December 2010. After subtracting the microscopic resection margin from the gross resection margin for each proximal or distal resection margin, microscopic invasion was represented by the larger value. Microscopic invasion and its risk factors were analyzed according to the clinicopathologic characteristics. In total, 861 patients were enrolled in the study. Microscopic invasion of cEGC was 6.0±12.8 mm, and the proportion of patients with microscopic invasion ≥0 mm was 78.4%. In the risk group, tumor location, pT stage, and differentiation did not significantly discriminate the presence of microscopic invasion. The microscopic invasion of EGC-IIb was 13.9±16.8 mm, which was significantly greater than that of EGC-I. No linear correlation was observed between the overall tumor size and microscopic invasion (R=0.030). The independent risk factors for microscopic invasion ≥20 mm were EGC-IIb vs. EGC-I/IIa/IIc/III (odds ratio [OR], 3.103; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.533-6.282; P=0.002) and male vs. female sex (OR, 1.655; 95% CI, 1.012-2.705; P=0.045). Male sex and EGC-IIb were independent risk factors for microscopic invasion ≥20 mm. Examination of intraoperative frozen sections is highly recommended to avoid resection margin involvement, especially in cases of EGC-IIb.