Grading of tarsal conjunctiva of young adults in Malaysia

• Published in: Clinical and experimental optometry Vol. 94; no. 5; pp. 458 - 463
• Main Authors: Ishak, Bashirah, Mohd-ali, Bariah, Mohidin, Norhani
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Melbourne, Australia Taylor & Francis 01.09.2011; Blackwell Publishing Asia
• Subjects: Asian Continental Ancestry Group; conjunctiva; Conjunctiva - anatomy & histology; Conjunctiva - pathology; Conjunctival Diseases - ethnology; Conjunctival Diseases - pathology; contact lenses; Contact Lenses - adverse effects; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological - standards; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological - statistics & numerical data; Female; Humans; Malaysia; Male; Observer Variation; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results; Young Adult; Malaysia
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00621.x
• ISSN: 0816-4622

Background:  The monitoring and assessment of the upper tarsal conjunctiva can be enhanced by the use of a grading scale. The aim of this study was to categorise the appearance of normal tarsal conjunctiva among young adults in Malaysia using the Institute for Eye Research grading scale and to investigate inter- and intra-observer agreement. Methods:  The appearance of the upper tarsal conjunctiva of 416 non-contact lens wearing subjects aged between 19 to 24-years was assessed by two separate observers for roughness and redness in three separate zones using the Institute for Eye Research grading scale. The average grade for each zone and overall grade for roughness and redness were calculated. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were analysed. Results:  Subjects were categorised for ethnicity and the roughness and redness were calculated. No significant differences were found between Malay and Chinese eyes (p > 0.05). The average grades for the upper tarsal conjunctiva redness and roughness were 0.90 ± 0.25 and 0.86 ± 0.43, respectively. Significantly higher roughness scores were found in zone 1 compared to the other two zones (p = 0.03). Significant association was also found between tarsal conjunctiva redness and roughness (Spearman ρ= 0.45, p < 0.001). Correlation between redness and roughness with age (p = 0.48, p = 0.65) and gender (p = 0.30, p = 0.79) were not significant. Only 2.2 per cent of subjects had scores higher than 2.0 for roughness or redness. Inter- and intra-observer analysis showed good agreement between two observers during the study. Conclusion:  The roughness and redness of normal tarsal conjunctiva among young adults in Malaysia were found to be less than two units. Results of this study might be beneficial in clinical trials using contact lenses where changes in the tarsal conjunctiva are commonly used as an outcome measure.