Macular, choroidal and disc associations across women’s reproductive life stages: a scoping review from menarche to post-menopause

• Published in: Eye (London) Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 402 - 411
• Main Authors: Ribeiro Reis, Ana Paula, Ioannidou, Estelle, Stuart, Kelsey V., Wagner, Siegfried K., Foster, Paul J., Khawaja, Anthony P., Petzold, Axel, Sivaprasad, Sobha, Pontikos, Nikolas, Keane, Pearse A., Balaskas, Konstantinos, Patel, Praveen J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.02.2025; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 692/308/174; 692/698/1688/512/2613/1786; Adult; Blood flow; Body mass index; Choroid - anatomy & histology; Choroid - diagnostic imaging; Contraception; Estrogens; Female; Hormone replacement therapy; Humans; Laboratory Medicine; Macula Lutea - diagnostic imaging; Medical research; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Menarche; Menarche - physiology; Menopause; Menopause - physiology; Menstrual cycle; Menstrual Cycle - physiology; Menstruation; Middle Aged; Ophthalmology; Optic Disk - anatomy & histology; Optic Disk - diagnostic imaging; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology; Post-menopause; Postmenopause - physiology; Progesterone; Review; Review Article; Reviews; Sex differences; Surgery; Surgical Oncology; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods; Trends
• ISSN: 0950-222X; 1476-5454; 1476-5454
• DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03592-w

Oestrogen and progesterone fluctuate cyclically in women throughout their adult lives. Although these hormones cross the blood-retinal barrier and bind to intraocular receptors, their effects remain unclear. We present the first review to date on associations between posterior pole structures—specifically the macula, choroid, and optic disc—and both the menstrual cycle and post-menopausal period, utilising multimodal imaging techniques in healthy adult non-pregnant women. We excluded studies on contraception and hormonal replacement therapy, focusing solely on physiological associations. Despite the comprehensive scope of our review, limited data and inconsistent reporting among studies prevented the establishment of meaningful trends. Across menstrual cycle phases, choroidal thickness (CHT) was the most consistently reported parameter, with thinning during the luteal phase compared to the follicular phase. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in macular or disc morphology across the cycle, likely reflecting a preserved structure despite potential fluctuations in blood flow and perfusion. Studies comparing pre- and post-menopausal associations, after adjusting for age or body mass index (BMI), failed to reveal meaningful trends, highlighting the difficulty in separating the effect of age from hormonal declines in older women. Understanding how hormonal cycles impact the posterior pole in women is crucial for addressing sex differences in various ocular pathologies. Research on female-specific factors is still sparse, and interestingly, the majority of affiliations in the reviewed articles did not originate from regions with the highest biomedical research funding and publication rates. We encourage further studies focusing on female-specific variables and provide recommendations for future designs.