Comparative outcomes of trans-arterial radioembolization in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-induced HCC: a retrospective analysis

Purpose Tumorigenesis in NAFLD/NASH-induced HCC is unique and may affect the effectiveness of trans-arterial radioembolization in this population. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of trans-arterial radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAbdominal imaging Vol. 49; no. 8; pp. 2714 - 2725
Main Authors Brunson, Christopher, Struycken, Lucas, Schaub, David, Ref, Jacob, Goldberg, Daniel, Hannallah, Jack, Woodhead, Gregory, Young, Shamar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.08.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose Tumorigenesis in NAFLD/NASH-induced HCC is unique and may affect the effectiveness of trans-arterial radioembolization in this population. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of trans-arterial radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-NASH/NAFLD liver disease. Materials and methods Consecutive patients with HCC who underwent TARE at a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measures including overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (PFS), and hepatic PFS as assessed by modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) were recorded. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were utilized to compare progression-free survival and overall survival. Results 138 separate HCCs in patients treated with TARE between July 2013 and July 2022 were retrospectively identified. Etiologies of HCC included NASH/NAFLD (30/122, 22%), HCV (52/122, 43%), alcoholic liver disease (25/122, 21%), and combined ALD/HCV (14/122, 11%). NASH/NAFLD patients demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus ( p  < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in overall survival ( p  = 0.928), local progression-free survival ( p  = 0.339), or hepatic progression-free survival between the cohorts ( p  = 0.946) by log-rank analysis. When NASH/NAFLD patients were compared to all combined non-NASH/NAFLD patients, there was no significant difference in OS (HR 1.1, 95% C.I. 0.32–3.79, p  = 0.886), local PFS (HR 1.2, 95% C.I. 0.58–2.44, p  = 0.639), or hepatic PFS (HR 1.3, 95% C.I. 0.52–3.16, p  = 0.595) by log-rank analysis. Conclusion TARE appears to be an equally effective treatment for NASH/NAFLD-induced HCC when compared to other causes of HCC. Further studies in a larger cohort with additional subgroup analyses are warranted. Graphical abstract
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2366-0058
2366-004X
2366-0058
DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04295-8