Effects of different management strategies on long‐term trends of Australian threatened and near‐threatened mammals
Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are lacking. We compiled 1808 time series from 71 threatened and near‐threatened terrestrial and volant mammal species and subspecies in Australia (...
Saved in:
| Published in | Conservation biology Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. e14032 - n/a |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2023
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are lacking. We compiled 1808 time series from 71 threatened and near‐threatened terrestrial and volant mammal species and subspecies in Australia (48% of all threatened mammal taxa) to compare relative trends of populations subject to different management strategies. We adapted the Living Planet Index to develop the Threatened Species Index for Australian Mammals and track aggregate trends for all sampled threatened mammal populations and for small (<35 g), medium (35–5500 g), and large mammals (>5500 g) from 2000 to 2017. Unmanaged populations (42 taxa) declined by 63% on average; unmanaged small mammals exhibited the greatest declines (96%). Populations of 17 taxa in havens (islands and fenced areas that excluded or eliminated introduced red foxes [Vulpes vulpes] and domestic cats [Felis catus]) increased by 680%. Outside havens, populations undergoing sustained predator baiting initially declined by 75% but subsequently increased to 47% of their abundance in 2000. At sites where predators were not excluded or baited but other actions (e.g., fire management, introduced herbivore control) occurred, populations of small and medium mammals declined faster, but large mammals declined more slowly, than unmanaged populations. Only 13% of taxa had data for both unmanaged and managed populations; index comparisons for this subset showed that taxa with populations increasing inside havens declined outside havens but taxa with populations subject to predator baiting outside havens declined more slowly than populations with no management and then increased, whereas unmanaged populations continued to decline. More comprehensive and improved monitoring (particularly encompassing poorly represented management actions and taxonomic groups like bats and small mammals) is required to understand whether and where management has worked. Improved implementation of management for threats other than predation is critical to recover Australia's threatened mammals.
Efectos de diferentes estrategias de manejo sobre las tendencias a largo plazo de los mamíferos amenazados y casi amenazados de Australia
Resumen
El monitoreo es fundamental para evaluar la efectividad del manejo, aunque faltan evaluaciones sistemáticas y a gran escala de este monitoreo para evaluar y mejorar los esfuerzos de recuperación. Compilamos 1,808 series temporales de 71 especies y subespecies de mamíferos terrestres y voladores amenazadas y casi amenazadas en Australia (48% de todos los taxones de mamíferos amenazados) para comparar las tendencias relativas de las poblaciones sujetas a diferentes estrategias de manejo. Adaptamos el Índice Planeta Vivo para desarrollar el Índice de Especies Amenazadas para los Mamíferos Australianos y así rastrear las tendencias agregadas de todas las poblaciones muestreadas de mamíferos amenazados y de los mamíferos pequeños (<35 g), medianos (35–5,500 g) y grandes (>5,500 g) entre 2000 y 2017. Las poblaciones sin manejo (42 taxones) declinaron en un 63% en promedio; los mamíferos pequeños sin manejo exhibieron las declinaciones más marcadas (96%). Las poblaciones de 17 taxones incrementaron 680% en los refugios (islas o áreas encercadas que excluían o eliminaban al zorro rojo [Vulpes vulpes] y al gato doméstico [Felis catus], especies introducidas) Afuera de los refugios, las poblaciones sometidas al cebado constante de los depredadores en un inicio declinaron en un 75% pero después incrementaron al 47% de su abundancia para el 2000. En los sitios en donde los depredadores no fueron excluidos o cebados sino sometidos a otras acciones (manejo del fuego, control de herbívoros introducidos), las poblaciones de los mamíferos pequeños y medianos declinaron más rápido, pero los mamíferos grandes declinaron de manera más lenta que las poblaciones sin manejo. Sólo el 13% de los taxones contaron con datos para sus poblaciones con y sin manejo; las comparaciones entre índices para este subconjunto mostraron que los taxones con poblaciones en incremento dentro de los refugios declinaron afuera de éstos, pero los taxones con poblaciones sujetas al cebado de depredadores afuera de los refugios declinaron más lentamente que las poblaciones sin manejo y después incrementaron, mientras que las poblaciones sin manejo continuaron su declinación. Se requiere un monitoreo más completo y mejorado (particularmente el que engloba las acciones de manejo mal representadas y los grupos taxonómicos como los murciélagos y los mamíferos pequeños) para entender si ha funcionado el manejo y en dónde. La implementación mejorada del manejo para las amenazas distintas a la depredación es fundamental para recuperar a los mamíferos amenazados de Australia.
【摘要】
监测对于评估保护管理有效性至关重要, 但目前仍缺乏对监测的大尺度系统评估, 以评价和提高恢复工作。本研究整理了澳大利亚71种受威胁或近危的陆生及飞行野生哺乳动物物种和亚种(占所有受威胁哺乳动物的48%)的1808个时间序列, 以比较受到不同管理策略影响的种群的相对趋势。我们基于“地球生命力指数(Living Planet Index)”开发了“澳大利亚哺乳动物受威胁物种指数”, 并追踪了2000‐2017年所有采样的受威胁哺乳动物种群以及小型(<35克)、中型(35‐5500克)和大型哺乳动物(>5500克)的总体趋势。结果表明, 未受到管理的种群(42个类群)数量平均减少了63%;未受到管理的小型哺乳动物种群数量下降幅度最大(96%)。17个在避难所(驱除或消灭了外来赤狐[Vulpes vulpe]及家猫[Felis catus]的岛屿和围栏区)中生活的类群种群数量增加了680%。在避难所外, 受到持续捕食者诱捕管理的种群最初数量下降了75%, 但随后增加到2000年种群数量的47%。在没有驱除或诱捕捕食者, 但采取了其它行动(如火灾管理、引入食草动物控制)的位点, 小型和中型哺乳动物种群比没有受到管理的种群下降得更快, 但大型哺乳动物相比下降得更慢。只有13%的类群同时有未受到管理种群和受到管理种群的数据, 这部分数据的指数比较显示, 在避难所内种群增加的类群在避难所外种群有所下降, 但在避难所外受到捕食者诱捕的种群比没有管理的种群下降更慢且随后种群数量增加, 而未受到管理的种群则持续下降。未来还需要更全面和更好的监测工作(特别是纳入没有得到充分代表的管理行动及类群, 如蝙蝠和小型哺乳动物), 以了解管理的有效性以及有效的区域。进一步落实对捕食以外威胁的管理措施, 对于澳大利亚受威胁哺乳动物恢复至关重要。【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】 |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are lacking. We compiled 1808 time series from 71 threatened and near-threatened terrestrial and volant mammal species and subspecies in Australia (48% of all threatened mammal taxa) to compare relative trends of populations subject to different management strategies. We adapted the Living Planet Index to develop the Threatened Species Index for Australian Mammals and track aggregate trends for all sampled threatened mammal populations and for small (<35 g), medium (35-5500 g), and large mammals (>5500 g) from 2000 to 2017. Unmanaged populations (42 taxa) declined by 63% on average; unmanaged small mammals exhibited the greatest declines (96%). Populations of 17 taxa in havens (islands and fenced areas that excluded or eliminated introduced red foxes [Vulpes vulpes] and domestic cats [Felis catus]) increased by 680%. Outside havens, populations undergoing sustained predator baiting initially declined by 75% but subsequently increased to 47% of their abundance in 2000. At sites where predators were not excluded or baited but other actions (e.g., fire management, introduced herbivore control) occurred, populations of small and medium mammals declined faster, but large mammals declined more slowly, than unmanaged populations. Only 13% of taxa had data for both unmanaged and managed populations; index comparisons for this subset showed that taxa with populations increasing inside havens declined outside havens but taxa with populations subject to predator baiting outside havens declined more slowly than populations with no management and then increased, whereas unmanaged populations continued to decline. More comprehensive and improved monitoring (particularly encompassing poorly represented management actions and taxonomic groups like bats and small mammals) is required to understand whether and where management has worked. Improved implementation of management for threats other than predation is critical to recover Australia's threatened mammals. Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are lacking. We compiled 1808 time series from 71 threatened and near‐threatened terrestrial and volant mammal species and subspecies in Australia (48% of all threatened mammal taxa) to compare relative trends of populations subject to different management strategies. We adapted the Living Planet Index to develop the Threatened Species Index for Australian Mammals and track aggregate trends for all sampled threatened mammal populations and for small (<35 g), medium (35–5500 g), and large mammals (>5500 g) from 2000 to 2017. Unmanaged populations (42 taxa) declined by 63% on average; unmanaged small mammals exhibited the greatest declines (96%). Populations of 17 taxa in havens (islands and fenced areas that excluded or eliminated introduced red foxes [ Vulpes vulpes ] and domestic cats [ Felis catus ]) increased by 680%. Outside havens, populations undergoing sustained predator baiting initially declined by 75% but subsequently increased to 47% of their abundance in 2000. At sites where predators were not excluded or baited but other actions (e.g., fire management, introduced herbivore control) occurred, populations of small and medium mammals declined faster, but large mammals declined more slowly, than unmanaged populations. Only 13% of taxa had data for both unmanaged and managed populations; index comparisons for this subset showed that taxa with populations increasing inside havens declined outside havens but taxa with populations subject to predator baiting outside havens declined more slowly than populations with no management and then increased, whereas unmanaged populations continued to decline. More comprehensive and improved monitoring (particularly encompassing poorly represented management actions and taxonomic groups like bats and small mammals) is required to understand whether and where management has worked. Improved implementation of management for threats other than predation is critical to recover Australia's threatened mammals. 监测对于评估保护管理有效性至关重要, 但目前仍缺乏对监测的大尺度系统评估, 以评价和提高恢复工作。本研究整理了澳大利亚71种受威胁或近危的陆生及飞行野生哺乳动物物种和亚种(占所有受威胁哺乳动物的48%)的1808个时间序列, 以比较受到不同管理策略影响的种群的相对趋势。我们基于“地球生命力指数(Living Planet Index)”开发了“澳大利亚哺乳动物受威胁物种指数”, 并追踪了2000‐2017年所有采样的受威胁哺乳动物种群以及小型(<35克)、中型(35‐5500克)和大型哺乳动物(>5500克)的总体趋势。结果表明, 未受到管理的种群(42个类群)数量平均减少了63%;未受到管理的小型哺乳动物种群数量下降幅度最大(96%)。17个在避难所(驱除或消灭了外来赤狐[ Vulpes vulpe ]及家猫[ Felis catus ]的岛屿和围栏区)中生活的类群种群数量增加了680%。在避难所外, 受到持续捕食者诱捕管理的种群最初数量下降了75%, 但随后增加到2000年种群数量的47%。在没有驱除或诱捕捕食者, 但采取了其它行动(如火灾管理、引入食草动物控制)的位点, 小型和中型哺乳动物种群比没有受到管理的种群下降得更快, 但大型哺乳动物相比下降得更慢。只有13%的类群同时有未受到管理种群和受到管理种群的数据, 这部分数据的指数比较显示, 在避难所内种群增加的类群在避难所外种群有所下降, 但在避难所外受到捕食者诱捕的种群比没有管理的种群下降更慢且随后种群数量增加, 而未受到管理的种群则持续下降。未来还需要更全面和更好的监测工作(特别是纳入没有得到充分代表的管理行动及类群, 如蝙蝠和小型哺乳动物), 以了解管理的有效性以及有效的区域。进一步落实对捕食以外威胁的管理措施, 对于澳大利亚受威胁哺乳动物恢复至关重要。 【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】 Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are lacking. We compiled 1808 time series from 71 threatened and near-threatened terrestrial and volant mammal species and subspecies in Australia (48% of all threatened mammal taxa) to compare relative trends of populations subject to different management strategies. We adapted the Living Planet Index to develop the Threatened Species Index for Australian Mammals and track aggregate trends for all sampled threatened mammal populations and for small (<35 g), medium (35-5500 g), and large mammals (>5500 g) from 2000 to 2017. Unmanaged populations (42 taxa) declined by 63% on average; unmanaged small mammals exhibited the greatest declines (96%). Populations of 17 taxa in havens (islands and fenced areas that excluded or eliminated introduced red foxes [Vulpes vulpes] and domestic cats [Felis catus]) increased by 680%. Outside havens, populations undergoing sustained predator baiting initially declined by 75% but subsequently increased to 47% of their abundance in 2000. At sites where predators were not excluded or baited but other actions (e.g., fire management, introduced herbivore control) occurred, populations of small and medium mammals declined faster, but large mammals declined more slowly, than unmanaged populations. Only 13% of taxa had data for both unmanaged and managed populations; index comparisons for this subset showed that taxa with populations increasing inside havens declined outside havens but taxa with populations subject to predator baiting outside havens declined more slowly than populations with no management and then increased, whereas unmanaged populations continued to decline. More comprehensive and improved monitoring (particularly encompassing poorly represented management actions and taxonomic groups like bats and small mammals) is required to understand whether and where management has worked. Improved implementation of management for threats other than predation is critical to recover Australia's threatened mammals.Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are lacking. We compiled 1808 time series from 71 threatened and near-threatened terrestrial and volant mammal species and subspecies in Australia (48% of all threatened mammal taxa) to compare relative trends of populations subject to different management strategies. We adapted the Living Planet Index to develop the Threatened Species Index for Australian Mammals and track aggregate trends for all sampled threatened mammal populations and for small (<35 g), medium (35-5500 g), and large mammals (>5500 g) from 2000 to 2017. Unmanaged populations (42 taxa) declined by 63% on average; unmanaged small mammals exhibited the greatest declines (96%). Populations of 17 taxa in havens (islands and fenced areas that excluded or eliminated introduced red foxes [Vulpes vulpes] and domestic cats [Felis catus]) increased by 680%. Outside havens, populations undergoing sustained predator baiting initially declined by 75% but subsequently increased to 47% of their abundance in 2000. At sites where predators were not excluded or baited but other actions (e.g., fire management, introduced herbivore control) occurred, populations of small and medium mammals declined faster, but large mammals declined more slowly, than unmanaged populations. Only 13% of taxa had data for both unmanaged and managed populations; index comparisons for this subset showed that taxa with populations increasing inside havens declined outside havens but taxa with populations subject to predator baiting outside havens declined more slowly than populations with no management and then increased, whereas unmanaged populations continued to decline. More comprehensive and improved monitoring (particularly encompassing poorly represented management actions and taxonomic groups like bats and small mammals) is required to understand whether and where management has worked. Improved implementation of management for threats other than predation is critical to recover Australia's threatened mammals. Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are lacking. We compiled 1808 time series from 71 threatened and near‐threatened terrestrial and volant mammal species and subspecies in Australia (48% of all threatened mammal taxa) to compare relative trends of populations subject to different management strategies. We adapted the Living Planet Index to develop the Threatened Species Index for Australian Mammals and track aggregate trends for all sampled threatened mammal populations and for small (<35 g), medium (35–5500 g), and large mammals (>5500 g) from 2000 to 2017. Unmanaged populations (42 taxa) declined by 63% on average; unmanaged small mammals exhibited the greatest declines (96%). Populations of 17 taxa in havens (islands and fenced areas that excluded or eliminated introduced red foxes [Vulpes vulpes] and domestic cats [Felis catus]) increased by 680%. Outside havens, populations undergoing sustained predator baiting initially declined by 75% but subsequently increased to 47% of their abundance in 2000. At sites where predators were not excluded or baited but other actions (e.g., fire management, introduced herbivore control) occurred, populations of small and medium mammals declined faster, but large mammals declined more slowly, than unmanaged populations. Only 13% of taxa had data for both unmanaged and managed populations; index comparisons for this subset showed that taxa with populations increasing inside havens declined outside havens but taxa with populations subject to predator baiting outside havens declined more slowly than populations with no management and then increased, whereas unmanaged populations continued to decline. More comprehensive and improved monitoring (particularly encompassing poorly represented management actions and taxonomic groups like bats and small mammals) is required to understand whether and where management has worked. Improved implementation of management for threats other than predation is critical to recover Australia's threatened mammals. Efectos de diferentes estrategias de manejo sobre las tendencias a largo plazo de los mamíferos amenazados y casi amenazados de Australia Resumen El monitoreo es fundamental para evaluar la efectividad del manejo, aunque faltan evaluaciones sistemáticas y a gran escala de este monitoreo para evaluar y mejorar los esfuerzos de recuperación. Compilamos 1,808 series temporales de 71 especies y subespecies de mamíferos terrestres y voladores amenazadas y casi amenazadas en Australia (48% de todos los taxones de mamíferos amenazados) para comparar las tendencias relativas de las poblaciones sujetas a diferentes estrategias de manejo. Adaptamos el Índice Planeta Vivo para desarrollar el Índice de Especies Amenazadas para los Mamíferos Australianos y así rastrear las tendencias agregadas de todas las poblaciones muestreadas de mamíferos amenazados y de los mamíferos pequeños (<35 g), medianos (35–5,500 g) y grandes (>5,500 g) entre 2000 y 2017. Las poblaciones sin manejo (42 taxones) declinaron en un 63% en promedio; los mamíferos pequeños sin manejo exhibieron las declinaciones más marcadas (96%). Las poblaciones de 17 taxones incrementaron 680% en los refugios (islas o áreas encercadas que excluían o eliminaban al zorro rojo [Vulpes vulpes] y al gato doméstico [Felis catus], especies introducidas) Afuera de los refugios, las poblaciones sometidas al cebado constante de los depredadores en un inicio declinaron en un 75% pero después incrementaron al 47% de su abundancia para el 2000. En los sitios en donde los depredadores no fueron excluidos o cebados sino sometidos a otras acciones (manejo del fuego, control de herbívoros introducidos), las poblaciones de los mamíferos pequeños y medianos declinaron más rápido, pero los mamíferos grandes declinaron de manera más lenta que las poblaciones sin manejo. Sólo el 13% de los taxones contaron con datos para sus poblaciones con y sin manejo; las comparaciones entre índices para este subconjunto mostraron que los taxones con poblaciones en incremento dentro de los refugios declinaron afuera de éstos, pero los taxones con poblaciones sujetas al cebado de depredadores afuera de los refugios declinaron más lentamente que las poblaciones sin manejo y después incrementaron, mientras que las poblaciones sin manejo continuaron su declinación. Se requiere un monitoreo más completo y mejorado (particularmente el que engloba las acciones de manejo mal representadas y los grupos taxonómicos como los murciélagos y los mamíferos pequeños) para entender si ha funcionado el manejo y en dónde. La implementación mejorada del manejo para las amenazas distintas a la depredación es fundamental para recuperar a los mamíferos amenazados de Australia. 【摘要】 监测对于评估保护管理有效性至关重要, 但目前仍缺乏对监测的大尺度系统评估, 以评价和提高恢复工作。本研究整理了澳大利亚71种受威胁或近危的陆生及飞行野生哺乳动物物种和亚种(占所有受威胁哺乳动物的48%)的1808个时间序列, 以比较受到不同管理策略影响的种群的相对趋势。我们基于“地球生命力指数(Living Planet Index)”开发了“澳大利亚哺乳动物受威胁物种指数”, 并追踪了2000‐2017年所有采样的受威胁哺乳动物种群以及小型(<35克)、中型(35‐5500克)和大型哺乳动物(>5500克)的总体趋势。结果表明, 未受到管理的种群(42个类群)数量平均减少了63%;未受到管理的小型哺乳动物种群数量下降幅度最大(96%)。17个在避难所(驱除或消灭了外来赤狐[Vulpes vulpe]及家猫[Felis catus]的岛屿和围栏区)中生活的类群种群数量增加了680%。在避难所外, 受到持续捕食者诱捕管理的种群最初数量下降了75%, 但随后增加到2000年种群数量的47%。在没有驱除或诱捕捕食者, 但采取了其它行动(如火灾管理、引入食草动物控制)的位点, 小型和中型哺乳动物种群比没有受到管理的种群下降得更快, 但大型哺乳动物相比下降得更慢。只有13%的类群同时有未受到管理种群和受到管理种群的数据, 这部分数据的指数比较显示, 在避难所内种群增加的类群在避难所外种群有所下降, 但在避难所外受到捕食者诱捕的种群比没有管理的种群下降更慢且随后种群数量增加, 而未受到管理的种群则持续下降。未来还需要更全面和更好的监测工作(特别是纳入没有得到充分代表的管理行动及类群, 如蝙蝠和小型哺乳动物), 以了解管理的有效性以及有效的区域。进一步落实对捕食以外威胁的管理措施, 对于澳大利亚受威胁哺乳动物恢复至关重要。【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】 Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are lacking. We compiled 1808 time series from 71 threatened and near‐threatened terrestrial and volant mammal species and subspecies in Australia (48% of all threatened mammal taxa) to compare relative trends of populations subject to different management strategies. We adapted the Living Planet Index to develop the Threatened Species Index for Australian Mammals and track aggregate trends for all sampled threatened mammal populations and for small (<35 g), medium (35–5500 g), and large mammals (>5500 g) from 2000 to 2017. Unmanaged populations (42 taxa) declined by 63% on average; unmanaged small mammals exhibited the greatest declines (96%). Populations of 17 taxa in havens (islands and fenced areas that excluded or eliminated introduced red foxes [Vulpes vulpes] and domestic cats [Felis catus]) increased by 680%. Outside havens, populations undergoing sustained predator baiting initially declined by 75% but subsequently increased to 47% of their abundance in 2000. At sites where predators were not excluded or baited but other actions (e.g., fire management, introduced herbivore control) occurred, populations of small and medium mammals declined faster, but large mammals declined more slowly, than unmanaged populations. Only 13% of taxa had data for both unmanaged and managed populations; index comparisons for this subset showed that taxa with populations increasing inside havens declined outside havens but taxa with populations subject to predator baiting outside havens declined more slowly than populations with no management and then increased, whereas unmanaged populations continued to decline. More comprehensive and improved monitoring (particularly encompassing poorly represented management actions and taxonomic groups like bats and small mammals) is required to understand whether and where management has worked. Improved implementation of management for threats other than predation is critical to recover Australia's threatened mammals. |
| Author | Joseph, Liana Hardie, Mel Carey, Alexander R. Tulloch, Ayesha I. T. Stuart, Stephanie Gynther, Ian C. Correa‐Gomez, Diego F. Suarez‐Castro, Andrés Felipe Possingham, Hugh P. Woinarski, John C. Z. Preece, Harriet Moseby, Katherine Bayraktarov, Elisa Driessen, Michael Jackson, Micha V. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ayesha I. T. surname: Tulloch fullname: Tulloch, Ayesha I. T. organization: The University of Queensland – sequence: 2 givenname: Micha V. orcidid: 0000-0002-5150-2962 surname: Jackson fullname: Jackson, Micha V. email: micha.jackson@uq.edu.au organization: The University of Queensland – sequence: 3 givenname: Elisa surname: Bayraktarov fullname: Bayraktarov, Elisa organization: Griffith University – sequence: 4 givenname: Alexander R. surname: Carey fullname: Carey, Alexander R. organization: Charles Darwin University – sequence: 5 givenname: Diego F. surname: Correa‐Gomez fullname: Correa‐Gomez, Diego F. organization: The University of Queensland – sequence: 6 givenname: Michael surname: Driessen fullname: Driessen, Michael organization: Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania – sequence: 7 givenname: Ian C. surname: Gynther fullname: Gynther, Ian C. organization: Queensland Museum – sequence: 8 givenname: Mel orcidid: 0000-0002-7732-9061 surname: Hardie fullname: Hardie, Mel organization: Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning – sequence: 9 givenname: Katherine orcidid: 0000-0003-0691-1625 surname: Moseby fullname: Moseby, Katherine organization: University of New South Wales – sequence: 10 givenname: Liana surname: Joseph fullname: Joseph, Liana organization: Australian Wildlife Conservancy – sequence: 11 givenname: Harriet surname: Preece fullname: Preece, Harriet organization: Department of Environment and Science – sequence: 12 givenname: Andrés Felipe surname: Suarez‐Castro fullname: Suarez‐Castro, Andrés Felipe organization: Griffith University – sequence: 13 givenname: Stephanie surname: Stuart fullname: Stuart, Stephanie organization: Department of the Environment – sequence: 14 givenname: John C. Z. surname: Woinarski fullname: Woinarski, John C. Z. organization: Charles Darwin University – sequence: 15 givenname: Hugh P. surname: Possingham fullname: Possingham, Hugh P. organization: The Nature Conservancy |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36349543$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqF0c1KHTEUB_BQLPWq3fQBykA3pTCar5lklvZiW0Fw4z7kZk5uI5PEJhnEnY_QZ-yTNONVCiI2mxPC738g5xygvRADIPSB4GNSz4mJG3dMOGb0DVqRjrKWCDbsoRWWUrZSDnQfHeR8jTEeOsLfoX3WMz50nK3Q7Zm1YEpuom1GV-8JQmm8DnoLfrnmknSBrYNKQjPFsP1z_7tA8k2pdHwIns6LmpwOTfmZoPoAY6PD2ATQafH_Xr32Xk_5CL21tcD7x3qIrr6dXa1_tBeX38_Xpxet4bSnLR0xWMI3HDQVrAcQm1EQygy3dqCyt8T0WHcj9AIY49AJYTQWlnZcMy3ZIfq8a3uT4q8ZclHeZQPTpAPEOSsqGaeEdpj_nwrGe9Jzhiv99IxexzmF-o-qBiIlZr2o6uOjmjceRnWTnNfpTj0NvwK8AybFnBNYZVzRxcVQp-kmRbBa9quW_aqH_dbIl2eRp64vYrLDt26Cu1ekWl9-Pd9l_gIJvLfg |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_023_02750_4 crossref_primary_10_1071_AM23014 crossref_primary_10_1126_science_adg7870 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecog_07035 crossref_primary_10_1071_WR24163 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2023_110337 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2023_109946 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2024_112978 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_13000 crossref_primary_10_1080_01584197_2023_2291144 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_animal_111523_102004 crossref_primary_10_3390_d15090963 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/aec.13091 10.1111/csp2.322 10.1111/conl.12762 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.285 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108261 10.1007/s10530-020-02226-4 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.029 10.1071/9781486307722 10.1007/s10531-020-02010-9 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.002 10.1073/pnas.1417301112 10.1071/WR19217 10.1111/csp2.52 10.1098/rstb.2004.1584 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146137 10.1038/s41559-017-0456-4 10.1111/cobi.12413 10.1111/gcb.15272 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105 10.1071/WR14151 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.023 10.1890/140022 10.1071/ZO08027 10.1071/WR17172 10.1071/WR16178 10.1016/0006-3207(89)90009-8 10.1007/s10530-013-0511-2 10.1093/jmammal/gyy105 10.1038/s41586-020-2920-6 10.1371/journal.pone.0203694 10.1038/s41586-021-04165-z 10.1098/rstb.2004.1599 10.1111/rec.13105 10.1111/1365-2664.13427 10.1111/cobi.13371 10.1111/conl.12682 10.1098/rsos.170384 10.1038/nature24158 10.1073/pnas.1602480113 10.1371/journal.pone.0169156 10.1038/s41559-020-1251-1 10.1071/WR10235 10.1111/acv.12476 10.1017/S003060531100161X 10.1111/mam.12208 10.1071/WR09046 10.5751/ES-02957-140207 10.1071/9781486308644 10.1111/cobi.13220 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.006 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.024 10.1098/rspb.2003.2447 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01117.x 10.1126/science.1069349 10.1071/WR08098 10.1038/536143a 10.1038/s41586-021-03750-6 10.1071/WR18008 10.1073/pnas.1804906115 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. – notice: 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. – notice: 2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U6 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H95 L.G P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.14032 |
| DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access (Activated by CARLI) CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Technology Research Database Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional AGRICOLA |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology Ecology |
| EISSN | 1523-1739 |
| EndPage | n/a |
| ExternalDocumentID | 36349543 10_1111_cobi_14032 COBI14032 |
| Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Australia |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Australia |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Australian Research Council funderid: DE170100599 – fundername: Australian Government National Environment Science Program funderid: Threatened Species Recovery Hub |
| GroupedDBID | --- -DZ .-4 .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 24P 29F 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 42X 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHHS AAHKG AAHQN AAISJ AAKGQ AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAUTI AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEFU ABEML ABJNI ABLJU ABPLY ABPPZ ABPVW ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACHIC ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACPVT ACRPL ACSCC ACSTJ ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADUKH ADULT ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUPB AEUQT AEUYR AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHXOZ AI. AIAGR AILXY AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ANHSF AQVQM ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG CBGCD COF CS3 CUYZI D-E D-F D0L DCZOG DEVKO DOOOF DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBS ECGQY EJD ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE G-S G.N GODZA GTFYD H.T H.X HF~ HGD HGLYW HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IPSME IX1 J0M JAAYA JBMMH JBS JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JSODD JST LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LMP LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MVM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NEJ NF~ O66 O9- OES OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QN7 R.K ROL RSU RX1 SA0 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI TN5 UB1 UKR UQL V8K VH1 VOH W8V W99 WBKPD WHG WIH WIK WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XIH XSW YFH YUY YV5 YZZ ZCA ZCG ZO4 ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT AAYXX ABSQW ADXHL AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGUYK AGYGG CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U6 8FD AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY C1K F1W FR3 H95 L.G P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-2d0ef14b4ea2736ee7bd7123c4ff9286f1c60a5de67e334e577ca07f254a3a83 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 18:30:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:36:46 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:37:02 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:06:54 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:14 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:25:35 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:23:57 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Keywords | 入侵捕食者控制 生物多样性保护 Índice Planeta Vivo 无捕食者避难所 种群趋势 Living Planet Index management effectiveness efectividad de manejo 受威胁物种 control de depredadores invasores refugios libres de depredadores especie amenazada conservación de la biodiversidad long-term ecological monitoring population trends 长期生态监测 predator-free havens tendencias poblacionales threatened species 管理有效性 biodiversity conservation monitoreo ecológico a largo plazo 地球生命力指数(Living Planet Index) invasive predator control |
| Language | English |
| License | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4262-2d0ef14b4ea2736ee7bd7123c4ff9286f1c60a5de67e334e577ca07f254a3a83 |
| Notes | Article impact statement Australia's unmanaged threatened mammal populations declined by 63% since 2000. Managing introduced predators has slowed or reversed trends. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0691-1625 0000-0002-7732-9061 0000-0002-5150-2962 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcobi.14032 |
| PMID | 36349543 |
| PQID | 2791880367 |
| PQPubID | 36794 |
| PageCount | 15 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2834212504 proquest_miscellaneous_2734616430 proquest_journals_2791880367 pubmed_primary_36349543 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cobi_14032 crossref_primary_10_1111_cobi_14032 wiley_primary_10_1111_cobi_14032_COBI14032 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | April 2023 2023-04-00 20230401 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2023 text: April 2023 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Washington |
| PublicationTitle | Conservation biology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Conserv Biol |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| References | 2017; 4 2017; 44 2019; 56 2019; 12 2003; 270 2018; 45 2017; 551 2009; 14 2020; 4 2018; 2 2012; 134 2019; 22 2020; 50 2011; 70 2015; 41 2016; 113 2014; 16 2020; 47 2019; 235 2018; 219 2019; 239 2022; 601 2009; 23 2015; 13 2021; 46 2010; 37 2013; 47 2021; 3 2002; 296 2019; 33 2019; 1 2018; 222 2020; 588 2008; 56 2006; 4 2011; 38 2017; 213 2021; 14 2009; 36 1989; 50 2005; 360 2015; 29 2018; 634 2016; 536 2020 2021; 777 2015; 112 2018; 115 2017; 12 2020; 28 2019 2018 2020; 26 2020; 22 2018; 99 2018; 13 2020; 29 e_1_2_6_51_1 e_1_2_6_53_1 e_1_2_6_32_1 e_1_2_6_30_1 e_1_2_6_19_1 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_36_1 e_1_2_6_59_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 e_1_2_6_34_1 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_55_1 e_1_2_6_15_1 e_1_2_6_38_1 e_1_2_6_57_1 e_1_2_6_62_1 e_1_2_6_64_1 e_1_2_6_43_1 e_1_2_6_20_1 e_1_2_6_41_1 e_1_2_6_60_1 e_1_2_6_9_1 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 R Core Team (e_1_2_6_45_1) 2020 e_1_2_6_49_1 e_1_2_6_3_1 e_1_2_6_22_1 e_1_2_6_28_1 e_1_2_6_47_1 e_1_2_6_52_1 e_1_2_6_54_1 e_1_2_6_10_1 e_1_2_6_31_1 e_1_2_6_50_1 e_1_2_6_14_1 e_1_2_6_35_1 e_1_2_6_12_1 e_1_2_6_33_1 e_1_2_6_18_1 e_1_2_6_39_1 e_1_2_6_56_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 e_1_2_6_37_1 e_1_2_6_58_1 e_1_2_6_63_1 e_1_2_6_42_1 e_1_2_6_65_1 e_1_2_6_21_1 e_1_2_6_40_1 e_1_2_6_61_1 Kanowski J. (e_1_2_6_26_1) 2018 e_1_2_6_8_1 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_6_1 e_1_2_6_25_1 e_1_2_6_48_1 e_1_2_6_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 e_1_2_6_29_1 e_1_2_6_44_1 Hayward M. W. (e_1_2_6_24_1) 2012; 134 e_1_2_6_27_1 e_1_2_6_46_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 26 start-page: 5816 year: 2020 end-page: 5828 article-title: Ecological forecasts to inform near‐term management of threats to biodiversity publication-title: Global Change Biology – volume: 777 year: 2021 article-title: Synergistic effects of a severe drought and fire on platypuses publication-title: Science of the Total Environment – volume: 134 start-page: A27 year: 2012 end-page: A37 article-title: Reintroduction of bridled nailtail wallabies beyond fences at Scotia Sanctuary‐Phase 1 publication-title: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales – volume: 22 start-page: 1967 year: 2020 end-page: 1982 article-title: Invasive anuran driven trophic cascade: An alternative hypothesis for recent critical weight range mammal collapses across northern Australia publication-title: Biological Invasions – volume: 634 start-page: 382 year: 2018 end-page: 393 article-title: Biodiversity responds to increasing climatic extremes in a biome‐specific manner publication-title: Science of The Total Environment – volume: 22 start-page: 386 year: 2019 end-page: 395 article-title: Forecasting wildlife die‐offs from extreme heat events publication-title: Animal Conservation – volume: 588 start-page: 267 year: 2020 end-page: 271 article-title: Clustered versus catastrophic global vertebrate declines publication-title: Nature – volume: 12 start-page: 20 year: 2017 article-title: The diversity‐weighted Living Planet Index: Controlling for taxonomic bias in a global biodiversity indicator publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 536 start-page: 143 year: 2016 end-page: 145 article-title: Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers publication-title: Nature – volume: 38 start-page: 338 year: 2011 end-page: 349 article-title: The use of poison baits to control feral cats and red foxes in arid South Australia I. Aerial baiting trials publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 99 start-page: 1137 year: 2018 end-page: 1148 article-title: Synchronous boom–bust cycles in central Australian rodents and marsupials in response to rainfall and fire publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 44 start-page: 114 year: 2017 end-page: 126 article-title: Falling apart? Insights and lessons from three recent studies documenting rapid and severe decline in terrestrial mammal assemblages of northern, south‐eastern and south‐western Australia publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 37 start-page: 57 year: 2010 end-page: 67 article-title: Predator‐baiting experiments for the conservation of rock‐wallabies in Western Australia: A 25‐year review with recent advances publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 56 start-page: 1992 year: 2019 end-page: 1997 article-title: Threat webs: Reframing the co‐occurrence and interactions of threats to biodiversity publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – year: 2018 – volume: 222 start-page: 172 year: 2018 end-page: 179 article-title: The threats endangering Australia's at‐risk fauna publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 47 start-page: 762 year: 2020 end-page: 778 article-title: Integrating feral cat ( ) control into landscape‐scale introduced predator management to improve conservation prospects for threatened fauna: A case study from the south coast of Western Australia publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 28 start-page: 468 year: 2020 end-page: 474 article-title: The impact of a fox‐ and cat‐free safe haven on the bird fauna of remnant vegetation in southwestern Australia publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 235 start-page: 273 year: 2019 end-page: 278 article-title: Continental‐scale assessment reveals inadequate monitoring for threatened vertebrates in a megadiverse country publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 23 start-page: 317 year: 2009 end-page: 327 article-title: Monitoring change in vertebrate abundance: The living planet index publication-title: Conservation Biology – volume: 213 start-page: 341 year: 2017 end-page: 350 article-title: Assessing the suitability of diversity metrics to detect biodiversity change publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 45 start-page: 645 year: 2018 end-page: 657 article-title: Degrees of population‐level susceptibility of Australian terrestrial non‐volant mammal species to predation by the introduced red fox ( ) and feral cat ( ) publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 29 start-page: 525 year: 2015 end-page: 536 article-title: Benefits of integrating complementarity into priority threat management publication-title: Conservation Biology – volume: 16 start-page: 167 year: 2014 end-page: 175 article-title: Correlated recovery of five lizard populations following eradication of invasive mammals publication-title: Biological Invasions – volume: 33 start-page: 1370 year: 2019 end-page: 1379 article-title: Site‐selection bias and apparent population declines in long‐term studies publication-title: Conservation Biology – year: 2019 – volume: 13 start-page: 91 year: 2015 end-page: 99 article-title: Why do we map threats? Linking threat mapping with actions to make better conservation decisions publication-title: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment – volume: 50 start-page: 143 year: 1989 end-page: 198 article-title: Patterns in the modern decline of Western Australia's vertebrate fauna: Causes and conservation implications publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 4 year: 2006 article-title: Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments publication-title: PLoS Biology – volume: 36 start-page: 422 year: 2009 end-page: 435 article-title: Movement patterns of feral predators in an arid environment ‐ Implications for control through poison baiting publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 219 start-page: 78 year: 2018 end-page: 88 article-title: Too much of a good thing; successful reintroduction leads to overpopulation in a threatened mammal publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 70 start-page: 1789 year: 2011 end-page: 1796 article-title: Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of biodiversity conservation spending publication-title: Ecological Economics – volume: 29 start-page: 2985 year: 2020 end-page: 3007 article-title: Prescribed burning benefits threatened mammals in northern Australia publication-title: Biodiversity and Conservation – volume: 13 year: 2018 article-title: Popular interest in vertebrates does not reflect extinction risk and is associated with bias in conservation investment publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 56 start-page: 411 year: 2008 end-page: 422 article-title: Conservation status and biogeography of Australia's terrestrial mammals publication-title: Australian Journal of Zoology – volume: 33 start-page: 456 year: 2019 end-page: 468 article-title: Metrics of progress in the understanding and management of threats to Australian birds publication-title: Conservation Biology – volume: 601 start-page: E17 year: 2022 end-page: E18 article-title: Shifting baselines and biodiversity success stories publication-title: Nature – volume: 14 year: 2021 article-title: How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented? publication-title: Conservation Letters – volume: 41 start-page: 560 year: 2015 end-page: 570 article-title: Population recovery of the yellow‐footed rock‐wallaby following fox control in New South Wales and South Australia publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 50 start-page: 382 year: 2020 end-page: 398 article-title: Translocations of digging mammals and their potential for ecosystem restoration: A review of goals and monitoring programmes publication-title: Mammal Review – volume: 115 year: 2018 article-title: Mammal diversity will take millions of years to recover from the current biodiversity crisis publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America – volume: 296 start-page: 904 year: 2002 end-page: 904 article-title: Mammal population losses and the extinction crisis publication-title: Science – volume: 1 year: 2019 article-title: Interactions among threats affect conservation management outcomes: Livestock grazing removes the benefits of fire management for small mammals in Australian tropical savannas publication-title: Conservation Science and Practice – volume: 601 start-page: E20 year: 2022 end-page: E24 article-title: Emphasizing declining populations in the Living Planet Report publication-title: Nature – volume: 239 year: 2019 article-title: Reading the black book: The number, timing, distribution and causes of listed extinctions in Australia publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 4 year: 2017 article-title: Desert mammal populations are limited by introduced predators rather than future climate change publication-title: Royal Society Open Science – volume: 360 start-page: 289 year: 2005 end-page: 295 article-title: The Living Planet Index: Using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences – volume: 2 start-page: 410 year: 2018 end-page: 411 article-title: Australia's mammal fauna requires a strategic and enhanced network of predator‐free havens publication-title: Nature Ecology & Evolution – start-page: 269 year: 2018 end-page: 280 – volume: 47 start-page: 134 year: 2013 end-page: 143 article-title: Trends and biases in the listing and recovery planning for threatened species: An Australian case study publication-title: Oryx – volume: 45 start-page: 627 year: 2018 end-page: 644 article-title: Havens for threatened Australian mammals: The contributions of fenced areas and offshore islands to the protection of mammal species susceptible to introduced predators publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 14 start-page: 7 year: 2009 article-title: Wildlife tunnel enhances population viability publication-title: Ecology and Society – volume: 112 start-page: 4531 year: 2015 end-page: 4540 article-title: Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: Decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America – volume: 270 start-page: 1801 year: 2003 end-page: 1808 article-title: Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the decline and extinction of Australian marsupials publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences – volume: 12 year: 2019 article-title: Spending to save: What will it cost to halt Australia's extinction crisis? publication-title: Conservation Letters – year: 2020 – volume: 46 start-page: 1366 year: 2021 end-page: 1382 article-title: The ecological costs and benefits of a feral cat poison‐baiting programme for protection of reintroduced populations of the western quoll and brushtail possum publication-title: Austral Ecology – volume: 113 year: 2016 article-title: Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America – volume: 4 start-page: 1321 year: 2020 end-page: 1326 article-title: Impact of 2019–2020 mega‐fires on Australian fauna habitat publication-title: Nature Ecology & Evolution – volume: 3 year: 2021 article-title: A threatened species index for Australian birds publication-title: Conservation Science and Practice – volume: 551 start-page: 309 year: 2017 end-page: 310 article-title: The effect of conservation spending publication-title: Nature – volume: 360 start-page: 221 year: 2005 end-page: 228 article-title: The 2010 challenge: Data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences – ident: e_1_2_6_38_1 doi: 10.1111/aec.13091 – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.1111/csp2.322 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.1111/conl.12762 – ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.285 – ident: e_1_2_6_64_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108261 – ident: e_1_2_6_47_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02226-4 – start-page: 269 volume-title: Recovering Australian threatened species: A book of hope year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.029 – ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 doi: 10.1071/9781486307722 – ident: e_1_2_6_46_1 doi: 10.1007/s10531-020-02010-9 – ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.002 – ident: e_1_2_6_65_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417301112 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.1071/WR19217 – volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing: Reference index version 3.8.3 year: 2020 ident: e_1_2_6_45_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_55_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 doi: 10.1111/csp2.52 – ident: e_1_2_6_33_1 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1584 – ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146137 – ident: e_1_2_6_50_1 doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0456-4 – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.1111/cobi.12413 – ident: e_1_2_6_56_1 doi: 10.1111/gcb.15272 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105 – ident: e_1_2_6_53_1 doi: 10.1071/WR14151 – ident: e_1_2_6_52_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.023 – ident: e_1_2_6_57_1 doi: 10.1890/140022 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1071/ZO08027 – ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 doi: 10.1071/WR17172 – ident: e_1_2_6_61_1 doi: 10.1071/WR16178 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(89)90009-8 – ident: e_1_2_6_37_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0511-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyy105 – ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2920-6 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203694 – ident: e_1_2_6_42_1 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04165-z – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1599 – ident: e_1_2_6_54_1 doi: 10.1111/rec.13105 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13427 – volume: 134 start-page: A27 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 article-title: Reintroduction of bridled nailtail wallabies beyond fences at Scotia Sanctuary‐Phase 1 publication-title: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 doi: 10.1111/cobi.13371 – ident: e_1_2_6_62_1 doi: 10.1111/conl.12682 – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.1098/rsos.170384 – ident: e_1_2_6_44_1 doi: 10.1038/nature24158 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602480113 – ident: e_1_2_6_35_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169156 – ident: e_1_2_6_60_1 doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1251-1 – ident: e_1_2_6_39_1 doi: 10.1071/WR10235 – ident: e_1_2_6_49_1 doi: 10.1111/acv.12476 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_59_1 doi: 10.1017/S003060531100161X – ident: e_1_2_6_43_1 doi: 10.1111/mam.12208 – ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 doi: 10.1071/WR09046 – ident: e_1_2_6_58_1 doi: 10.5751/ES-02957-140207 – ident: e_1_2_6_63_1 doi: 10.1071/9781486308644 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 doi: 10.1111/cobi.13220 – ident: e_1_2_6_40_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.006 – ident: e_1_2_6_51_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.024 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2447 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01117.x – ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1069349 – ident: e_1_2_6_41_1 doi: 10.1071/WR08098 – ident: e_1_2_6_34_1 doi: 10.1038/536143a – ident: e_1_2_6_36_1 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03750-6 – ident: e_1_2_6_48_1 doi: 10.1071/WR18008 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804906115 |
| SSID | ssj0009514 |
| Score | 2.4937165 |
| Snippet | Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | e14032 |
| SubjectTerms | Animal population Animals Australia Baiting Biodiversity biodiversity conservation Cats Chiroptera conservación de la biodiversidad Conservation of Natural Resources control de depredadores invasores Domestic animals efectividad de manejo Endangered Species especie amenazada Felis catus fire science and management Foxes Herbivores Interspecific relationships invasive predator control Living Planet Index long‐term ecological monitoring Mammals Management management effectiveness monitoreo ecológico a largo plazo Monitoring population trends Populations Predation Predators predator‐free havens refugios libres de depredadores Small mammals Taxa tendencias poblacionales Threatened species time series analysis Trends Vulpes vulpes Índice Planeta Vivo 入侵捕食者控制 受威胁物种 地球生命力指数(Living Planet Index) 无捕食者避难所 生物多样性保护 种群趋势 管理有效性 长期生态监测 |
| Title | Effects of different management strategies on long‐term trends of Australian threatened and near‐threatened mammals |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcobi.14032 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36349543 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2791880367 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2734616430 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2834212504 |
| Volume | 37 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9UwFD_MgeCLzu_r5ojoi0IvvUmatODLNjam4AcyYS9SkjRVcbcVby8yn_wT_Bv9SzwnaXs3lYG-hfYE8nE-k5PfAXjkcq8c2sHEGF0l0ugiMZa7REovfFZ5nYdHYS9eqsO38vlxdrwGT4e3MBEfYjxwI8kI-poE3NjFGSF3rf04JbQ5UsCUrEUe0Rt-BnE3AntjiJfkecF7bFJK41l1PW-N_nAxz3usweQcXIN3w2Bjpsmn6bKzU_ftNxzH_53NBlztfVG2E5nnOqz55gZcjtUpT7G1HxCtT2_C14hxvGBtzYaKKh2bj5kzbNENiBOsbdhJ27z_-f0HKX3WhZxb6rg6VWHdB3JVUctWzDQVa1DaiH71dW7mc5SLW3B0sH-0d5j0FRsSR8j2Ca9SX8-kld6gW6S817bSaBudrOuC56qeOZUaZAGlvRDSZ1o7k-oao1QjTC5uw3rTNv4uMMtrLZzn0rlcClsXhZllxmA8U7lq5sUEHg8bV7oezZyKapyUQ1RDK1qGFZ3Aw5H2c8Tw-CvV1rD_ZS_Hi5LrggDrhNITeDD-RgmkaxXT-HZJNEIqjDpFegFNLujqPUvlBO5E3hqHIpTAKFXilJ4EDrlgjOXeq91noXXvX4g34QpH3ywmHG3Bevdl6e-jL9XZbbjE5evtIDm_AC_lHlY |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwELZQK0QvQEsLC9viCi5FyiprO3ZypKtWW_qDhBapt8hxnILoJojNqmpPfQSekSdhxk6yLaBK9BYlY8l25hvP2ONvCHlrYisNrIOB1ioPhFZJoDNmAiEst1FuVewuhR2fyPFn8eE0Om1yc_AujOeH6DbcEBnOXiPAcUP6BspNlX0dIN0cWOBlLOntIqpP7Abnrqf2hiAviOOENeykmMizaHt7PfrLybzts7pFZ_-Jr6w6c1yFmGvybTCvs4G5-oPJ8d7jeUoeN-4ofe_1Z5U8sOUaeegLVF7C054jtb58Ri48zfGMVgVti6rUdNolz9BZ3ZJO0Kqk51V59uv6J9p9Wru0W2y42Fih9Rf0VsHQ5lSXOS0BcCi_eDvV0ylAY51M9vcmo3HQFG0IDJLbBywPbTEUmbAaPCNprcpyBcujEUWRsFgWQyNDDVogleVc2Egpo0NVQKCquY75Blkqq9K-IDRjheLGMmFMLHhWJIkeRlpDSJObfGh5j-y0fy41DaE51tU4T9vABmc0dTPaI2862e-exuOfUv1WAdIGyrOUqQQ567hUPbLdfQYQ4smKLm01RxkuJASePLxDJuZ4-h6Fokeee-XqusIlh0BVwJDeORW5o4_p6OPugXt6-T_Cr8mj8eT4KD06ODl8RVYYuGo-_6hPluofc7sJrlWdbTkA_QYy1yGa |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFH6qikBc2JeBAkZwASmjTOzYjsQF2o5aloJQkXpBkeOFVnSSiskIlRM_gd_IL-HZTjItoEpws5Jnyctb7efvATzW0nKNdjBRSpiEKVEkqsp0wpilNjdWyPAo7M0O3_rAXu7leyvwrH8LE_EhhgM3LxlBX3sBPzLuhJDrpjoYe7Q5VMDnGE-l5-mN99kJyN2I7I0xXiJlkXXgpD6PZ9n3tDn6w8c87bIGmzO9DB_70cZUk8_jRVuN9bffgBz_dzpX4FLnjJLnkXuuwoqtr8H5WJ7yGFubAdL6-Dp8jSDHc9I40pdUaclsSJ0h87aHnCBNTQ6b-tPP7z-81idtSLr1HZfHKqTd974qqllDVG1IjeLm6ZdfZ2o2Q8G4AbvTzd31raQr2ZBoD22fZCa1bsIqZhX6RdxaURmBxlEz54pMcjfRPFXIA1xYSpnNhdAqFQ7DVEWVpDdhtW5qextIlTlBtc2Y1pLRyhWFmuRKYUBjtJlYOoIn_caVuoMz91U1Dss-rPErWoYVHcGjgfYognj8lWqt3_-yE-R5mYnCI9ZRLkbwcPiNIujvVVRtm4WnoYxj2EnTM2gk9XfvecpGcCvy1jAUyimGqQyn9DRwyBljLNffvtgOrTv_QvwALrzbmJavt3de3YWLGfppMfloDVbbLwt7D_2qtrofxOcX3NcgUg |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+of+different+management+strategies+on+long%E2%80%90term+trends+of+Australian+threatened+and+near%E2%80%90threatened+mammals&rft.jtitle=Conservation+biology&rft.au=Tulloch%2C+Ayesha+I+T&rft.au=Jackson%2C+Micha+V&rft.au=Bayraktarov%2C+Elisa&rft.au=Carey%2C+Alexander+R&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcobi.14032&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0888-8892&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0888-8892&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0888-8892&client=summon |