Bottom-up or top-down? The origins of the Industrial Revolution

• Published in: Journal of institutional economics Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 1003 - 1024
• Main Author: MOKYR, JOEL
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.12.2018
• Subjects: Artisans; British history; Capital distributions; Economic growth; Economic theory; Education; Elites; Enlightenment; Human capital; Incentives; Industrial Revolution; Inventions; Inventors; Modernity; Philosophers; Political power; Political systems; Scientific technological revolution; Scientists; Tacit knowledge; Technological change; Technological progress
• DOI: 10.1017/S174413741700042X
• ISSN: 1744-1374

Was technological progress during and after the Industrial Revolution top-down or bottom-up? The technology that created the great inventions was driven by a combination of pathbreaking ideas and the dexterity and skills of trained artisans. While those forms of human capital were quite different, they both came out of small elites of intellectuals and craftsmen, what are rapidly becoming known as “upper-tail human capital.” I analyze the institutions that drove the incentives for both, and show that they came together to produce the Great Enrichment. These incentives were both material and social: between 1500 and 1700, the search for financial security and reputation cooperated in producing a unique institutional environment in which the elites in Western Europe produced the three legged-stool of European modernity: the Reformation, the Scientific Revolution, and the Enlightenment. Once these three movements had succeeded, the foundation for modern economic growth had been laid.