Implications of equipment failure occurring during surgery

• Published in: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Vol. 104; no. 9; pp. 678 - 684
• Main Authors: Efthymiou, CA, Cale, AR
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.11.2022; Royal College of Surgeons
• Subjects: Computer terminals; Failure; Infrastructure; Medical equipment; Patient safety; Surgery; Surgical apparatus & instruments; Technology; Ventilation; Instrument accountability; Instrument maintenance; Cardiac equipment malfunction; Risk management; Quality control
• ISSN: 0035-8843; 1478-7083; 1478-7083
• DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0345

Few formal studies have been performed investigating the frequency of equipment failure during surgery. Surgeons are unable to operate without the plethora of instruments and equipment surrounding them in the operating theatre. As with any mechanical component, instruments and equipment are subject to time- and use-dependent degradation in their performance. Yet no formal requirements exist for the routine inspection or maintenance of instruments. Owing to this lack of information regarding equipment failure we undertook the first investigation of intraoperative equipment malfunction occurring during cardiac surgical procedures. Over a 12-month period cardiac surgeons were required to report equipment malfunction during each procedure. Operating theatre equipment was divided into three categories broadly based on equipment portability and function: group 1, theatre infrastructure and components; group 2, large medical equipment; and group 3, surgical instruments. In a highly significant proportion of operations performed (92%) there was an issue with equipment. The most common issues occurred in group 3 with fine surgical instrument malfunctions; most commonly worn-out needle holders and blunt scissors. Theatre infrastructure and large medical equipment failures (groups 1 and 2) resulted in the cancellation of four cases. Some intraoperative instrument failures were potentially catastrophic. The incidence of equipment failure during cardiac surgery is unacceptably high. In some instances, cases were cancelled and revenue lost owing to equipment malfunction. A balance between the safety and quality of equipment and cost effectiveness is required. These findings suggest that surgical instruments warrant an annual compulsory inspection.