Long-Term Distributed Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Tinnitus: A Feasibility Study

Objectives To assess feasibility and tolerability of long‐term distributed therapeutic rTMS for refractory tinnitus, distributed over seven months. Materials and Methods Eight subjects with refractory tinnitus underwent five weekly sessions of 1800 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS targeted toward the temporopari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuromodulation (Malden, Mass.) Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 249 - 253
Main Authors Labar, Douglas, Labar, Amy S., Edwards, Dylan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2016
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1094-7159
1525-1403
DOI10.1111/ner.12390

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives To assess feasibility and tolerability of long‐term distributed therapeutic rTMS for refractory tinnitus, distributed over seven months. Materials and Methods Eight subjects with refractory tinnitus underwent five weekly sessions of 1800 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS targeted toward the temporoparietal junction. Five weeks later (study week 10), subjects meeting predefined responder criteria entered a monthly rTMS treatment phase, for the next five months. Outcome measures were subject satisfaction and compliance, tinnitus severity daily diaries, standardized tinnitus self‐rating scales, and adverse events. Results Subject satisfaction was high, and compliance was virtually 100%. The tinnitus handicap inventory and mini‐tinnitus questionnaire scores improved significantly at study week 5 compared with baseline. There were four responders at study week 5; three responders at study week 10; and one responder at study week 30. There were no serious adverse events. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that rTMS can be delivered in a distributed schedule that is well‐tolerated, feasible and may prove to be clinically beneficial. A long‐term distributed rTMS schedule for tinnitus may warrant investigation as an alternative to the short‐term aggregated treatment schedules more frequently used previously. For the many varied therapeutic uses of rTMS (established and investigational), treatment schedules are relatively unexplored, and deserve further attention.
Bibliography:ArticleID:NER12390
istex:359C64BF7CD3CC29C326C6512C0132C9EF8258B1
ark:/67375/WNG-J43J5TP5-5
For more information on author guidelines, an explanation of our peer review process, and conflict of interest informed consent policies, please go to
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-301854.html
Financial support: None.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1094-7159
1525-1403
DOI:10.1111/ner.12390