Pavlovian-instrumental interactions in active avoidance: The bark of neutral trials

•Computational model of behaviour and dopamine in the approach-avoidance task of Gentry et al. (2016).•Good avoidance of shock is accounted for by purely instrumental factors.•Poor avoidance can be explained by Pavlovian misbehaviour. In active avoidance tasks, subjects have to learn to execute part...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain research Vol. 1713; pp. 52 - 61
Main Authors Lloyd, Kevin, Dayan, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.06.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0006-8993
1872-6240
1872-6240
DOI10.1016/j.brainres.2018.10.011

Cover

More Information
Summary:•Computational model of behaviour and dopamine in the approach-avoidance task of Gentry et al. (2016).•Good avoidance of shock is accounted for by purely instrumental factors.•Poor avoidance can be explained by Pavlovian misbehaviour. In active avoidance tasks, subjects have to learn to execute particular actions in order to avoid an aversive stimulus, such as a shock. Such paradigms pose a number of psychological and neural enigmas, and so have attracted substantial computational interest. However, the ratio of conjecture to confirmation remains high. Here, we perform a theoretical inquiry into a recent experiment by Gentry, Lee, and Roesch (’Phasic dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens predicts approach and avoidance performance’, Nat. Commun., 7:13154) who measured phasic dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens core of rats whilst they avoided shocks, acquired food, or acted to gain no programmed outcome. These last, neutral, trials turned out to be a perfect probe for the workings of avoidance, partly because of the substantial differences between subjects and sessions revealed in the experiment. We suggest a way to interpret this probe, gaining support for opponency-, safety-, and Pavlovian-influenced treatments of avoidance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0006-8993
1872-6240
1872-6240
DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2018.10.011