Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Elective Neck Dissection: Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in Clinically Node-Negative Tongue Cancer

Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in clinically node-negative (cN0) tongue cancer.Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cN0 tongue cancer from a single...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 107 - 114
Main Authors Park, Woori, Jin, Hokyung, Heo, Yujin, Jeong, Han-Sin, Son, Young-Ik, Chung, Man Ki, Baek, Chung-Hwan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 01.02.2022
대한이비인후과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1976-8710
2005-0720
DOI10.21053/ceo.2020.02411

Cover

Abstract Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in clinically node-negative (cN0) tongue cancer.Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cN0 tongue cancer from a single institution, including 91 patients in the SLNB group and 120 patients in the END group.Results. The overall recurrence rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The regional control rate was also comparable between the two groups (P=0.490). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was slightly better in the SLNB group than in the END group (P=0.427). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89.9% in the SLNB group versus 91.9% in the END group (P=0.737). In a propensity-matched subgroup analysis, the type of neck management did not affect RFS or OS.Conclusion. SLNB showed non-inferior oncologic outcomes compared to END in patients with cN0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
AbstractList The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in clinically node-negative (cN0) tongue cancer.OBJECTIVESThe aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in clinically node-negative (cN0) tongue cancer.This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cN0 tongue cancer from a single institution, including 91 patients in the SLNB group and 120 patients in the END group.METHODSThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cN0 tongue cancer from a single institution, including 91 patients in the SLNB group and 120 patients in the END group.The overall recurrence rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The regional control rate was also comparable between the two groups (P=0.490). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was slightly better in the SLNB group than in the END group (P=0.427). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89.9% in the SLNB group versus 91.9% in the END group (P=0.737). In a propensity-matched subgroup analysis, the type of neck management did not affect RFS or OS.RESULTSThe overall recurrence rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The regional control rate was also comparable between the two groups (P=0.490). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was slightly better in the SLNB group than in the END group (P=0.427). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89.9% in the SLNB group versus 91.9% in the END group (P=0.737). In a propensity-matched subgroup analysis, the type of neck management did not affect RFS or OS.SLNB showed non-inferior oncologic outcomes compared to END in patients with cN0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma.CONCLUSIONSLNB showed non-inferior oncologic outcomes compared to END in patients with cN0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in clinically node-negative (cN0) tongue cancer. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cN0 tongue cancer from a single institution, including 91 patients in the SLNB group and 120 patients in the END group. Results The overall recurrence rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The regional control rate was also comparable between the two groups (P=0.490). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was slightly better in the SLNB group than in the END group (P=0.427). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89.9% in the SLNB group versus 91.9% in the END group (P=0.737). In a propensity-matched subgroup analysis, the type of neck management did not affect RFS or OS. Conclusion SLNB showed non-inferior oncologic outcomes compared to END in patients with cN0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in clinically node-negative (cN0) tongue cancer. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cN0 tongue cancer from a single institution, including 91 patients in the SLNB group and 120 patients in the END group. Results. The overall recurrence rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The regional control rate was also comparable between the two groups (P=0.490). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was slightly better in the SLNB group than in the END group (P=0.427). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89.9% in the SLNB group versus 91.9% in the END group (P=0.737). In a propensity-matched subgroup analysis, the type of neck management did not affect RFS or OS. Conclusion. SLNB showed non-inferior oncologic outcomes compared to END in patients with cN0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma. KCI Citation Count: 0
The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in clinically node-negative (cN0) tongue cancer. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cN0 tongue cancer from a single institution, including 91 patients in the SLNB group and 120 patients in the END group. The overall recurrence rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The regional control rate was also comparable between the two groups (P=0.490). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was slightly better in the SLNB group than in the END group (P=0.427). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89.9% in the SLNB group versus 91.9% in the END group (P=0.737). In a propensity-matched subgroup analysis, the type of neck management did not affect RFS or OS. SLNB showed non-inferior oncologic outcomes compared to END in patients with cN0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Author Jin, Hokyung
Baek, Chung-Hwan
Jeong, Han-Sin
Heo, Yujin
Son, Young-Ik
Chung, Man Ki
Park, Woori
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Woori
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9032-6685
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Woori
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hokyung
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7278-0320
  surname: Jin
  fullname: Jin, Hokyung
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yujin
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9577-6802
  surname: Heo
  fullname: Heo, Yujin
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Han-Sin
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4652-0573
  surname: Jeong
  fullname: Jeong, Han-Sin
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Young-Ik
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0570-6953
  surname: Son
  fullname: Son, Young-Ik
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Man Ki
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1435-7786
  surname: Chung
  fullname: Chung, Man Ki
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Chung-Hwan
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4430-5546
  surname: Baek
  fullname: Baek, Chung-Hwan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002812993$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1ksFv0zAUxiM0xLrBmRvyEQ7pbCdOYg5Io2xQqWolKFwtx3npvDp2ZyeTeuUvn5uOiSFxerL9fb_39PydJSfWWUiStwRPKcEsu1DgphRTPMU0J-RFMqEYsxSXFJ8kE8LLIq1Kgk-TsxBuMS4Yw_mr5DTLyirai0ny-wfYXlswaLHvdjdo6RpAn7XbhT36BT4MAV0ZUL2-B7QEtUVfdAiHs7Mf0cLZTboG36GVVc64jVZoNfTKdRCQtmhmtNVKGrMfuekSNnIkraNxADSTVoF_nbxspQnw5rGeJz-vr9azb-li9XU-u1ykKqdZn1LVUMqLsq7zvK5aWhetlEoWrG7KooVCsho3PGegMqlUhpUCjqumjTuQnPI8O08-HLnWt2KrtHBSj3XjxNaLy-_rueA8i7uhUTs_ahsnb8XO6076_WgYL5zfCOl7rQwIVklZUFXRsiE5pySOxluApsyYlKSFyPp0ZO2GuoNGxYV7aZ5Bn79YfRNnuhcVx4SzLALePwK8uxsg9KLTQYEx0oIbgqAMlySvKD9I3_3d66nJnw-PgoujQHkXgof2SUKwGCMlYqTEIVJijFR0sH8cSvfyEIA4rDb_9T0AErHR6g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_28550_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16061153
crossref_primary_10_3390_biotech11010005
crossref_primary_10_1111_jop_13291
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40336_023_00552_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcms_2023_12_012
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022215122002043
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.008
10.1002/hed.23288
10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.07.007
10.1002/lary.27323
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.05.021
10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80082-0
10.1056/nejmoa1506007
10.1007/s00405-009-0955-2
10.1002/jso.25493
10.1016/j.ijom.2014.07.016
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.07.020
10.1200/jco.2008.20.8777
10.1002/hed.2890070105
10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_213_17
10.1002/hed.23632
10.1016/j.anorl.2016.10.004
10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.05.008
10.1016/s1368-8375(98)00113-4
10.1016/j.oooo.2013.09.012
10.3346/jkms.2006.21.5.865
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.07.007
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
ACYCR
DOI 10.21053/ceo.2020.02411
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic


PubMed
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2005-0720
EndPage 114
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9933372
oai_doaj_org_article_58aa62c827d149218f29feed735aa1fe
PMC8901953
33781056
10_21053_ceo_2020_02411
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 29B
2WC
5-W
53G
5GY
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ACYCR
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EF.
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
KQ8
M48
O5R
O5S
OK1
PGMZT
RNS
RPM
TR2
ADRAZ
C1A
M~E
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-2cd22967bb44b8f2b6faaca65bd76fe6a5b0d945ec3acc30cce908df976a92943
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1976-8710
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:44:31 EST 2023
Wed Aug 27 01:31:00 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:34:37 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:52:48 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:55:34 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:03:23 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:59 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Sentinel Lymph Node
Recurrence
Neck Dissection
Language English
License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c423t-2cd22967bb44b8f2b6faaca65bd76fe6a5b0d945ec3acc30cce908df976a92943
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2020.02411
ORCID 0000-0001-9577-6802
0000-0002-1435-7786
0000-0001-9032-6685
0000-0003-4430-5546
0000-0002-7278-0320
0000-0003-4652-0573
0000-0003-0570-6953
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.21053/ceo.2020.02411
PMID 33781056
PQID 2507148293
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9933372
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_58aa62c827d149218f29feed735aa1fe
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8901953
proquest_miscellaneous_2507148293
pubmed_primary_33781056
crossref_primary_10_21053_ceo_2020_02411
crossref_citationtrail_10_21053_ceo_2020_02411
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
대한이비인후과학회
Publisher_xml – name: Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
– name: 대한이비인후과학회
References ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref20
ref11
ref22
ref10
ref21
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref5
Schilling (ref6) 2015
References_xml – ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.008
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1002/hed.23288
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.07.007
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1002/lary.27323
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.05.021
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80082-0
– start-page: 2777
  volume-title: Sentinel European Node Trial (SENT): 3-year results of sentinel node biopsy in oral cancer
  year: 2015
  ident: ref6
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1506007
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-0955-2
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1002/jso.25493
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.07.016
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.07.020
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1200/jco.2008.20.8777
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1002/hed.2890070105
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_213_17
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1002/hed.23632
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.10.004
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.05.008
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(98)00113-4
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.09.012
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.5.865
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.07.007
SSID ssj0065504
Score 2.269757
Snippet Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in...
The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in clinically...
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in...
SourceID nrf
doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 107
SubjectTerms neck dissection
Original
recurrence
sentinel lymph node
이비인후과학
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQDxUXBOUVoMggDlzSJo4fSW-0tCqo3R7YSr1ZtuNsVxs51e7msNf-8o7t7KqLQFw4RUoyyWRmPPM5tj8j9IXltWVGs5Tkqk5pRSm0OW1SwWxFS86IDWQ6lyN-fk1_3rCbR1t9-TlhkR44Gu6QlUpxYkoiagDzUJAaUjWQ2EXBlMob67NvVmXrzlTMwRxwdxxPFhzenWeR1Ae6N6w4NGHRH8kOoDzl-VY9CrT9UGXcvPkT4vx94uSjSnT2HD0bICT-FlV_gZ5Yt4d2L4dB8pfo_pefAeRsiy9W4Cs86mqLj6fd3WKF_e-xfoFP25jn8MiaGf7ux-TD-oYjfNG5STqGdI2vnImJEV_1S4hLu8BThwce0bZdheemIzsJ1OF4DIK9xSc-iuav0PXZ6fjkPB22WkgN4KllSkxNSMWF1pRqMLHmjVJGcaZrwRvLFdNZXVFmTaGMKTJjbJWVdQP2VQCwaPEa7bjO2bcIQ1GsqPY8YlxQSgslckJ0ZmjTZNpwlaCDtcGlGXjI_XYYrYT-SPCQBA9J7yEZPJSgrxuBu0jB8fdbj70HN7d57uxwAiJKDhEl_xVRCfoM_pczMw3y_jjp5GwuoYfxQwKeKwpBEvRpHR4SGqQfZVHOdv1CEo-waQkwKkFvYrhs9AHJEtTmCRJbgbSl8PYVN70NpN9l5Zd2Fu_-xxe-R0-JX8URJp9_QDvLeW_3AVst9cfQjB4AF_EhBA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Elective Neck Dissection: Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in Clinically Node-Negative Tongue Cancer
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781056
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2507148293
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8901953
https://doaj.org/article/58aa62c827d149218f29feed735aa1fe
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002812993
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 2022, 15(1), , pp.107-114
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3di9QwEA9ygvgifls_jig--NK1m-ajFUS8845Tbvce3IV7C0marMuW9my34L76lztJe6srK_hUaJsyZGYyv-lkfkHoNRsXlhnNYjJWRUxzSsHntIkFsznNOCM2kOlMpvxsTr9cssvfxwENE9juTe38eVLzphz9-L75AA7_3m9jBniQvjWhjY8kIwg4vs_3Jly4z8QmdFtS4ADF-xKz4CDOOOl5fvZ9YCdEBSZ_CDxV4_aB0L_3Uv4RnE7vojsDqsQfezO4h27Y6j66NRnq5g_Qz69-U1BlS3y-AfXhaV1YfLSsr9oN9n_MuhaflP3Sh6fWrPAnX6YPLQ_v8HldLeIZrOD4ojL9WokvujWYqm3xssIDtWhZbsJ346ldBDZxPIOBncXH3rCah2h-ejI7PouH0xdiAxBrHRNTEJJzoTWlOnNEc6eUUZzpQnBnuWI6KXLKrEmVMWlijM2TrHAwvwowF00foYOqruwThCFO5lR7ajEuKKWpEmNCdGKoc4k2XEVodD3h0gzU5P6EjFJCihI0JEFD0mtIBg1F6M12wFXPyvHvV4-8BreveTrtcKNuFnLwTskypTgxGREFZIyAehzJHaAHkTKlxs5G6BXoX67MMoz310UtV42EpOOzBIiXpoJE6OW1eUjwUV94UZWtu1YSD7ppBsgqQo97c9nKAyMzEJtHSOwY0o7Au0-q5bfAA57lvtszffo_wj1Dt4lv3Aj7zZ-jg3XT2RcAp9b6MPyGOAzO8gu1IB37
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sentinel+Lymph+Node+Biopsy+Versus+Elective+Neck+Dissection%3A+Long-Term+Oncologic+Outcomes+in+Clinically+Node-Negative+Tongue+Cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical+and+experimental+otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=%EB%B0%95%EC%9A%B0%EB%A6%AC&rft.au=%EC%A7%84%ED%98%B8%EA%B2%BD&rft.au=%ED%97%88%EC%9C%A0%EC%A7%84&rft.au=%EC%A0%95%ED%95%9C%EC%8B%A0&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%9D%B4%EB%B9%84%EC%9D%B8%ED%9B%84%EA%B3%BC%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=1976-8710&rft.eissn=2005-0720&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=114&rft_id=info:doi/10.21053%2Fceo.2020.02411&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9933372
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1976-8710&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1976-8710&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1976-8710&client=summon